Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 78(12): 2156-2159, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780995

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at an increased risk for perioperative and postoperative complications after receiving intravenous (IV) sedation or postoperative analgesia. We previously showed that most oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) providers do not screen for OSA using a quantifiable method. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of OSA risk in the OMS office-based anesthesia patient population using the snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high blood pressure, body mass index, age, neck circumference, and gender (STOP-BANG) questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After deeming patients (n = 153) suitable for outpatient IV sedation using our existing institutional ambulatory preanesthesia protocol, 2 OMS providers administered the STOP-BANG questionnaire to classify patient risk for OSA. The questionnaire is a concise, validated predictor for OSA risk and consists of 8 yes or no questions. RESULTS: Of the 153 patients, 141 (92.16%) were at a low risk for moderate to severe OSA, 11 (7.19%) were at a moderate risk, and 1 (0.65%) was at a high risk. Overall, 12 (7.84%) patients were shown to be at risk for OSA. We estimate with 95% confidence that between 5.7 and 10% of all OMS office-based anesthesia patients are at risk for OSA. The IV sedation plans for 4 (2.61%) patients were changed after including OSA risk with the existing preanesthesia protocol. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant proportion (95% confidence interval, 0.0567 to 0.100) of the OMS office-based anesthesia patient population is at an increased risk for moderate to severe OSA. These results outline the importance of screening for OSA before office-based anesthesia administration. OMS providers can easily use the STOP-BANG questionnaire to assess OSA risk, modify anesthesia management, and improve patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Cirugía Bucal , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Orales/efectos adversos , Pacientes , Polisomnografía , Prevalencia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 77(6): 1135-1142, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738058

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Oral and maxillofacial surgeons often treat patients with both diagnosed and undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Patients with OSA are at substantial risk of perioperative and postoperative complications after receiving intravenous sedation, general anesthesia, or postoperative opiate analgesia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) providers are screening patients for perioperative and postoperative risks related to OSA before office-based ambulatory anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SurveyMonkey software (SurveyMonkey, San Mateo, CA) was used to distribute a survey to 1,658 community- and hospital-based OMS providers in the United States. A response rate of 17.4% (n = 288) was achieved. The 27-question survey was created to obtain demographic information and to assess the preoperative anesthesia routine of the OMS providers. The questions were developed based on American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines and the STOP-Bang questionnaire to determine the quality and rate of screening for OSA before office-based ambulatory anesthesia procedures. RESULTS: All incomplete survey responses were excluded from analysis. Demographic analysis showed that 73.61% of the 288 respondents were in private practice only, with no hospital affiliation. Of the respondents, 81.88% reported performing fewer than 50 hospital operating room procedures per year, 81.60% reported performing more than 200 office-based ambulatory anesthesia cases per year, and 96.19% reported performing their own office-based ambulatory anesthesia. In this cohort, only 34.7% of OMS providers stated that they asked patients OSA-specific screening questions, whereas 74.3% reported asking other preoperative anesthesia questions (χ2 = 91.0, df = 1, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the surveyed OMS providers are not screening pre-anesthesia patients for OSA with a quantifiable method such as the STOP-Bang questionnaire. These findings identify a need to investigate the rate of undiagnosed OSA syndrome in the OMS office-based ambulatory anesthesia patient population. The STOP-Bang questionnaire may be a useful tool to better assess for anesthesia risk and modify management accordingly.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Dental , Anestesiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Cirugía Bucal , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA