Foreign body in a Zenker's diverticulum.

Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is an uncommon disorder that can cause dysphagia with risk of aspiration. While surgical treatment has been the mainstay for many years, endoscopic diverticulotomy has emerged as a first-line option with favorable outcomes. We present the case of a 93-year-old woman with no significant past medical history who was diagnosed with a 6 cm ZD. Due to dysphagia, she experienced significant weight loss and was at risk of malnutrition. She developed aspiration pneumonia and required admission to our center. Given her condition and inability to swallow, a nasogastric tube was placed under radiological guidance for nutritional support pending definitive treatment. On radiographic localization of the ZD, a radiopaque metallic density image was observed that had not been identified in previous imaging. Suspecting a possible retained foreign body in the large diverticulum, a gastroscopy was performed. During the procedure, the ZD was accessed and a 10 mm metallic object was identified. The object was extracted using a Roth net, confirming the suspicion of a foreign body lodged in the ZD. The metallic piece was later identified as a patient's dental prosthesis. After resolution of the aspiration pneumonia, endoscopic-assisted diverticulotomy was performed. The procedure was carried out under deep sedation with cricopharyngeal myotomy without immediate complications. After 48 hours of hospitalization, the patient was discharged without requiring a nasogastric tube for feeding.

Impact of the endoscopist's experience on the negative predictive value of capsule endoscopy. / Influencia de la experiencia acumulada del explorador en el valor predictivo negativo de la cápsula endoscópica.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of the accumulated experience of the capsule endoscopy (CE) reader on the accuracy of this test is discussed. AIM: To determine whether the negative predictive value of CE findings changes along the learning curve. METHODS: We reviewed the first 900 CE read by 3 gastroenterologists experienced in endoscopy over 8 years. These 900 CE were divided into 3 groups (300 CE each): group 1 consisted of the sum of the first 100 CE read by each of the 3 endoscopists; group 2, the sum of the second 100 and groups 3, the sum of the third 100. Patients with normal CE were monitored for at least 28 months to estimate the negative predictive value. RESULTS: A total of 54 (18%) CE in group 1, 58 (19.3%) in group 2 and 47 (15.6%) in group 3 were normal, although only 34 patients in group 1, 38 in group 2 and 36 in group 3 with normal CE completed follow up and were eventually studied. The negative predictive value was 88.2% in group 1, 89.5% in group 2 and 97% in group 3 (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The negative predictive value tended to increase, but remained high and did not change significantly after the first 100 when readers are experienced in conventional endoscopy and have preliminary specific training.

Frequency, predictors, and consequences of maintenance infliximab therapy intensification in ulcerative colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab (IFX) therapy intensification in ulcerative colitis (UC) is more common than established in pivotal studies. OBJECTIVES: To establish the frequency and form of intensification for UC in clinical practice, as well as predictors, and to compare outcomes between intensified and non-intensified treatment. METHODS: A retrospective study of 10 hospitals and 144 patients with response to infliximab (IFX) induction. Predictive variables for intensification were analyzed using a Cox regression analysis. Outcome, loss of response to IFX, and colectomy were compared between intensified and non-intensified therapy. RESULTS: Follow-up time from induction to data collection: 38 months [interquartile range (IQR), 20-62]. Time on IFX therapy: 24 months (IQR, 10-44). In all, 37% of patients required intensification. Interval was shortened for 36 patients, dose was increased for 7, and 10 subjects received both. Concurrent thiopurine immunosuppressants (IMM) and IFX initiation was an independent predictor of intensification [Hazard ratio, 0.034; p, 0.006; CI, 0.003-0.371]. In patients on intensified therapy IFX discontinuation for loss of response (30.4% vs. 10.2%; p, 0.002), steroid reintroduction (35% vs. 18%; p, 0.018), and colectomy (22% vs. 6.4%; p, 0.011) were more common. Of patients on intensification, 17% returned to receiving 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Intensification is common and occasionally reversible. IMM initiation at the time of induction with IFX predictsnon-intensification. Intensification, while effective, is associated with poorer outcome.