RESUMEN
We explored knowledge, beliefs, and acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention with reference to stigma among people who inject drugs (PWID) in two predominately rural U.S. states. We conducted interviews with 65 current or former PWID aged 18 years or older and living in Arizona or Indiana. Most (63%) of the interviewees were not aware of PrEP. They often confused PrEP with HIV treatment, and many believed that PrEP was only for sexual risk or gay sexual risk. Once they understood that PrEP was recommended for PWID, the participants held a positive view of PrEP and felt that a once-daily pill was feasible. Experiences of stigma about drug use remained a crucial barrier to accessing healthcare and PrEP. This was often linked with anticipated or expressed homophobia. PrEP interventions among PWID must focus on education and the confluence of stigmas in which PWID find themselves when considering PrEP.
RESUMEN: Exploramos el conocimiento, las creencias y la aceptabilidad de la profilaxis previa a la exposición (PrEP) para la prevención del VIH con referencia al estigma entre las personas que inyectan drogas (PWID) en dos Estados Unidos predominantemente rurales. estados. Realizamos entrevistas con 65 PWID actuales o anteriores de 18 años o más y viviendo en Arizona o Indiana. Más (63%) de los entrevistados no estaban al tanto de la PrEP. A menudo confundieron la PrEP con el tratamiento del VIH, y muchos creían que la PrEP era sólo por riesgo sexual o riesgo sexual gay. Una vez que entendieron que la PrEP se recomendaba para PWID, los participantes tenían una visión positiva de la PrEP y sentían que una vez-píldora diaria era factible. Las experiencias de estigma sobre el consumo de drogas siguieron siendo una barrera crucial para acceder a la atención médica y a la PrEP. Esto a menudo estaba relacionado con la homofobia anticipada o expresada. Las intervenciones de la PrEP entre PWID deben centrarse en la educación y la confluencia de estigmas en los que PWID se encuentra al considerar la PrEP.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
A large number of Mexican migrants are deported to Mexico and released in the North Mexican border region every year. Despite their volume and high vulnerability, little is known about the level of HIV infection and related risk behaviors among this hard-to-reach population. We conducted a cross-sectional, probability survey with deported Mexican migrants in Tijuana, Mexico (N = 693) and estimated levels of HIV infection and behavioral risk factors among this migrant flow. The sample and population estimated rates of HIV for deported males were 1.23 and 0.80 %, respectively. No positive cases were found among the female sample. We found high lifetime rates of reported sexually transmitted infections (22.3 %) and last 12-months rates of unprotected sex (63.0 %), sex with multiple sexual partners (18.1 %), casual partners (25.7 %), and sex workers (8.6 %), compared to U.S. and Mexico adults. HIV prevention, testing, and treatment programs for this large, vulnerable, and transnational population need to be implemented in both the U.S. and Mexico.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Conducta Sexual , Parejas Sexuales , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Condones/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Asunción de Riesgos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
While the US-Mexico border region has had increasing restrictions due to coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), the economically and socially integrated region continues to facilitate necessary movement between the two countries. Binational partners representing universities, government, and health delivery worked together to develop a COVID-19 Virtual Seminar for the US-Mexico Border Region, which consisted of weekly sessions in Spanish designed to better facilitate communication and collaborative systems between border states. In total 835 participants registered for the virtual seminar with attendance ranging from 394 in Session 1 to 269 in Session 6. From evaluation surveys (n = 297), organizers observed a large plurality of healthcare professionals, followed by students, researchers, and government employees. The seminar's contribution to increasing collaborative and communication systems identified major needs in the region surrounding surveillance and monitoring; increased resources for migrant shelters to control outbreaks; an increase in personal protective equipment; tracking binational cases.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comunicación , Congresos como Asunto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , México , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Northern Mexico has among the highest rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in the world. This research addresses core gaps in implementation science to develop, test and scale-up CVD risk-reduction interventions in diabetics through a national primary care health system. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Meta Salud Diabetes (MSD) research project is a parallel two-arm cluster-randomised clinical behavioural trial based in 22 (n=22) health centres in Sonora, Mexico. MSD aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the MSD intervention for the secondary prevention of CVD risk factors among a diabetic population (n=320) compared with the study control of usual care. The MSD intervention consists of 2-hour class sessions delivered over a 13-week period providing educational information to encourage sustainable behavioural change to prevent disease complications including the adoption of physical activity. MSD is delivered within the context of Mexico's national primary care health centre system by health professionals, including nurses, physicians and community health workers via existing social support groups for individuals diagnosed with chronic disease. Mixed models are used to estimate the effect of MSD by comparing cardiovascular risk, as measured by the Framingham Risk Score, between the trial arms. Secondary outcomes include hypertension, behavioural risk factors and psychosocial factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (1R01HL125996-01) and approved by the University of Arizona Research Institutional Review Board (Protocol 1508040144) and the Research Bioethics Committee at the University of Sonora. The first Internal Review Board approval date was 31 August 2015 with five subsequent approved amendments. This article refers to protocol V.0.2, dated 30 January 2017. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences and will be shared through meetings with health systems officials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT0280469; Pre-results.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/fisiopatología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/prevención & control , Prevención Primaria , Adulto , Análisis por Conglomerados , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Workforce and leadership development is imperative for the advancement of public health along the U.S./Mexico border. The Leaders across borders (LaB) program aims to train the public health and health-care workforce of the border region. The LaB is a 6-month intensive leadership development program, which offers training in various areas of public health. Program curriculum topics include: leadership, border health epidemiology, health diplomacy, border public policies, and conflict resolution. METHODS: This article describes the LaB program evaluation outcomes across four LaB cohort graduates between 2010 and 2014. LaB graduates received an invitation to participate via email in an online questionnaire. Eighty-five percent (n = 34) of evaluation participants indicated an improvement in the level of binationality since participating in the LaB program. Identified themes in the evaluation results included increased binational collaborations and partnerships across multidisciplinary organizations that work towards improving the health status of border communities. Approximately 93% (n = 37) of the LaB samples were interested in participating in future binational projects while 80% (n = 32) indicated interest in the proposal of other binational initiatives. Participants expressed feelings of gratitude from employers who supported their participation and successful completion of LaB. DISCUSSION: Programs such as LaB are important in providing professional development and education to a health-care workforce along the U.S./Mexico border that is dedicated to positively impacting the health outcomes of vulnerable populations residing in this region.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in, and factors associated with, access to health services among Mexican im/migrants to the U.S. across migration phases, including pre-departure, destination, interception, and return. METHODS: Using data from a cross-sectional survey conducted in Tijuana, Mexico (N = 1,541), we computed descriptive statistics and staged logistic regressions to estimate health care access indicators and factors associated with access to services. RESULTS: Im/migrants at post-migration phases had lower likelihood of receiving health care and having a usual source of care, and higher rates of forgone care, than their counterparts at pre-departure. These differences were partly explained by length of migration phase, health insurance status, transportation barriers, and detention or imprisonment. CONCLUSIONS: Mexican im/migrants face challenges in accessing health services across the migration continuum, especially at post-migration phases. Binational efforts to provide affordable insurance coverage and reduce transportation limitations and incarceration could contribute to improving health care access among Mexican im/migrants.
Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigración e Inmigración/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Americanos Mexicanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
HIV testing and counseling is a critical component of HIV prevention efforts and core element of current "treatment as prevention" strategies. Mobility, low education and income, and limited access to health care put Latino migrants at higher risk for HIV and represent barriers for adequate levels of HIV testing in this population. We examined correlates of, and missed opportunities to increase, HIV testing for circular Mexican migrants in the U.S. We used data from a probability-based survey of returning Mexican migrants (N=1161) conducted in the border city of Tijuana, Mexico. We estimated last 12-months rates of HIV testing and the percentage of migrants who received other health care services or were detained in an immigration center, jail, or prison for 30 or more days in the U.S., but were not tested for HIV. Twenty-two percent of migrants received HIV testing in the last 12 months. In general, utilization of other health care services or detention for 30 or more days in the U.S. was a significant predictor of last 12-months HIV testing. Despite this association, we found evidence of missed opportunities to promote testing in healthcare and/or correctional or immigration detention centers. About 27.6% of migrants received other health care and/or were detained at least 30 days but not tested for HIV. Health care systems, jails and detention centers play an important role in increasing access to HIV testing among circular migrants, but there is room for improvement. Policies to offer opt-out, confidential HIV testing and counseling to Mexican migrants in these settings on a routine and ethical manner need to be designed and pilot tested. These policies could increase knowledge of HIV status, facilitate engagement in HIV treatment among a highly mobile population, and contribute to decrease incidence of HIV in the host and receiving communities.