RESUMEN
Of 50 cases gastric neuroendocrine tumors, in 30 (60%) endoscopic treatment, with relapse rate of 25%, perforation 3,6% and bleeding 7,1%.
Asunto(s)
Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Endoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the technique of choice for the treatment of biliopancreatic pathology. However, fluoroscopic imaging does not always allow an adequate diagnosis. On the other hand, some large stones cannot be removed by the usual methods. In these situations, cholangioscopy has proven to be an essential tool for the diagnosis of biliary strictures and the treatment of large stones. Its role in pancreatic pathology is also increasing. The development of a single-operator, disposable cholangioscope has made it possible to expand the technique to a large number of hospitals that perform ERCP. For this reason, the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy has developed this consensus document on the use of the Spyglass-DS cholangioscope. The document has been prepared by a group of endoscopists with expertise in cholangioscopy, reviewing the scientific evidence on the main current indications for cholangiopancreatoscopy.
Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestasis , Humanos , Consenso , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , PáncreasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A lumen-apposing, self-expanding metal stent incorporated in an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system for EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) recently has become available. The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and clinical effectiveness of this newly developed device in this clinical setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with PFCs who underwent EUS-guided drainage using the study device in 13 European centers. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with PFCs (80% with complex collections) underwent drainage using the study device. Penetration of the PFC was accomplished directly with the study device in 74.2% of patients, and successful stent placement was accomplished in all but 1 patient, mostly without fluoroscopic assistance. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) was carried out in 31 of 52 cases (59.6%) of walled-off necrosis and in 2 of 4 cases (50%) of acute peripancreatic fluid collection. Complete resolution of the PFC was obtained in 86 cases (92.5%), with no recurrence during follow-up. Treatment failure occurred in 6 patients because of persistent infection requiring surgery (n = 3), perforation and massive bleeding caused by the nasocystic drainage catheter (NCDC) (n = 2), and the need for a larger opening to extract large necrotic tissue pieces (n = 1). Major adverse events occurred in 5 patients (perforation and massive bleeding caused by the NCDC in 2 patients, 1 pneumoperitoneum and 1 stent dislodgement during DEN, and 1 postdrainage infection) and were mostly not related to the drainage procedure. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided drainage with the electrocautery-enhanced delivery system is a safe, easy to perform, and a highly effective minimally invasive treatment modality for PFCs.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje/instrumentación , Electrocoagulación/instrumentación , Endosonografía , Pancreatitis/terapia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Drenaje/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Jugo Pancreático , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of bile duct calculi associated with cholelithiasis is controversial. The hospital costs could be a decisive factor in choosing between the different therapeutic options. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and costs of two options in the treatment of common bile duct calculi: 1) One-stage: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration, and 2) Two-stage: sequential endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was performed on 49 consecutive patients with bile duct calculi and gallbladder in situ, treated consecutively and simultaneously over a two year period. The post-operate complication, hospital stay, number of procedures per patient, conversion to laparotomy, efficacy of removing the calculi, and hospital costs. RESULTS: There were no differences as regards the patient clinical features or morbidity. The mean post-surgical hospital stay for the One-stage group was less than that in the Two-stage group. Three patients of the Two-stage group required conversion to laparotomy. The median costs per patient were less for the One-stage strategy, representing an overall saving of 37,173 during the period studied. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found between the two treatment options as regards efficacy or post-surgical morbidity and mortality, but there were differences in hospital stay and costs. The management of patients with gallstones in one-stage surgery represents a saving of 3 days hospital stay and 1,008 per patient.
Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/economía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/economía , Cálculos Biliares/economía , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
A review is made of the indications of ultrasonographic contrast enhancement as applied to conventional ultrasonography and endocopic ultrasonography (EUS) as opposed to the use of EUS-sonoelastography today.