Examining the Relationship Between Multiple Tests of Receptive Vocabulary.

PURPOSE: Numerous tasks have been developed to measure receptive vocabulary, many of which were designed to be administered in person with a trained researcher or clinician. The purpose of the current study is to compare a common, in-person test of vocabulary with other vocabulary assessments that can be self-administered. METHOD: Fifty-three participants completed the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) via online video call to mimic in-person administration, as well as four additional fully automated, self-administered measures of receptive vocabulary. Participants also completed three control tasks that do not measure receptive vocabulary. RESULTS: Pearson correlations indicated moderate correlations among most of the receptive vocabulary measures (approximately r = .50-.70). As expected, the control tasks revealed only weak correlations to the vocabulary measures. However, subsets of items of the four self-administered measures of receptive vocabulary achieved high correlations with the PPVT (r > .80). These subsets were found through a repeated resampling approach. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of receptive vocabulary differ in which items are included and in the assessment task (e.g., lexical decision, picture matching, synonym matching). The results of the current study suggest that several self-administered tasks are able to achieve high correlations with the PPVT when a subset of items are scored, rather than the full set of items. These data provide evidence that subsets of items on one behavioral assessment can more highly correlate to another measure. In practical terms, these data demonstrate that self-administered, automated measures of receptive vocabulary can be used as reasonable substitutes of at least one test (PPVT) that requires human interaction. That several of the fully automated measures resulted in high correlations with the PPVT suggests that different tasks could be selected depending on the needs of the researcher. It is important to note the aim was not to establish clinical relevance of these measures, but establish whether researchers could use an experimental task of receptive vocabulary that probes a similar construct to what is captured by the PPVT, and use these measures of individual differences.

Rapid Implementation of Teletherapy for Voice Disorders: Challenges and Opportunities for Speech-Language Pathologists.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid restructuring of the clinical management of voice and upper airway disorders by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). As in-person therapy sessions were suspended, voice-specialized SLPs across healthcare settings shifted to online teletherapy. In this survey study, we queried voice therapists on their experiences with and opinions regarding the adoption of teletherapy into routine clinical practice. METHODS: Voice-specialized SLPs were recruited nationwide to complete an online survey which included questions about the usability of software and hardware, patient management, the effectiveness of therapy, overall satisfaction, and suggestions for improvement. RESULTS: 48 participants completed the survey. The majority of respondents reported frequent technical difficulties and poor access to or understanding of appropriate equipment. Overall, participants endorsed better patient access, attendance, and compliance, as well as increased scheduling flexibility. While 95% of the respondents stated they would recommend teletherapy to another SLP, only 20% supported a shift to exclusively virtual sessions. Forty percent of respondents endorsed a hybrid model consisting of initial in-person sessions followed by virtual ones. DISCUSSION: Incorporating teletherapy into clinical voice practice has, for the most part, followed Carl May's normalization process theory framework, in that clinicians have invested understanding, training, time and effort, and appraisal into its implementation. However, the unusually rapid pace of change necessitated by the pandemic has presented its own set of challenges. Given the inherent conveniences of virtual therapy, the online modality is likely here to stay. It is critical that we understand the facilitators and barriers to its successful adoption.

Effects of Participation in a Structured Choral Program on the Voice of Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of short-term and long-term engagement with structured choral singing on vocal function and quality of life outcomes in older adults. METHODS: Two groups of older adult singers over 55 years, one with fewer than 4 semesters and one with 4 or more semesters singing in a chorale, were assessed at 3 time points: baseline, after 1 semester of singing, and either after 1 semester of rest or after 1 semester of rest and 1 semester more of singing. Acoustic and aerodynamic measures, voice-related quality of life ratings, and measures of singing accuracy were obtained. Percent change between time points were calculated to determine three outcomes: improvement, lack of change, or worsening of measures across time. RESULTS: Long-term average spectrum (LTAS), difference in first and second harmonics and estimated subglottic pressure were significantly more likely to improve after a semester of singing with less experience singers, and LTAS continued to improve after a semester of rest. Flow was significantly more likely to improve with more singing experience after a semester of singing. Aerodynamic variables consistently changed in more experienced singers and improvement was maintained over the three visits. No significant changes occurred over time for singing accuracy for any singer type. Self-perception of singing voice continued to improve with more singing experience. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that for older adults in good health, regular singing provided a mechanism for maintaining speaking voice over time.

Effect of Anchor Term on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Feminine and Masculine Speakers.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating auditory perception of gender expression vary greatly in the specific terms applied to gender expression in rating scales. PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of different anchor terms on listeners' auditory perceptions of gender expression in phonated and whispered speech. Additionally, token and speaker cues were examined to identify predictors of the auditory-perceptual ratings. METHOD: Inexperienced listeners (n = 105) completed an online rating study in which they were asked to use one of five visual analog scales (VASs) to rate cis men, cis women, and transfeminine speakers in both phonated and whispered speech. The VASs varied by anchor term (very female/very male, feminine/masculine, feminine female/masculine male, very feminine/not at all feminine, and not at all masculine/very masculine). RESULTS: Linear mixed-effects models revealed significant two-way interactions of gender expression by anchor term and gender expression by condition. In general, the feminine female/masculine male scale resulted in the most extreme ratings (closest to the end points), and the feminine/masculine scale resulted in the most central ratings. As expected, for all speakers, whispered speech was rated more centrally than phonated speech. Additionally, ratings of phonated speech were predicted by mean fundamental frequency (f o) within each speaker group and by smoothed cepstral peak prominence in cisgender speakers. In contrast, ratings of whispered speech, which lacks an f o, were predicted by indicators of vocal tract resonance (second formant and speaker height). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate that differences in the terms applied to rating scales limit generalization of results across studies. Identifying the patterns across listener ratings of gender expression provide a rationale for researchers and clinicians when making choices about terms. Additionally, beyond f o and vocal tract resonance, predictors of listener ratings vary based on the anchor terms used to describe gender expression. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19617564.