Can the learning of laparoscopic skills be quantified by the measurements of skill parameters performed in a virtual reality simulator?

PURPOSE: To ensure patient safety and surgical efficiency, much emphasis has been placed on the training of laparoscopic skills using virtual reality simulators. The purpose of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic skills can be objectively quantified by measuring specific skill parameters during training in a virtual reality surgical simulator (VRSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten medical students (with no laparoscopic experience) and ten urology residents (PGY3-5 with limited laparoscopic experience) were recruited to participate in a ten-week training course in basic laparoscopic skills (camera, cutting, peg transfer and clipping skills) on a VRSS. Data were collected from the training sessions. The time that individuals took to complete each task and the errors that they made were analyzed independently. RESULTS: The mean time that individuals took to complete tasks was significantly different between the groups (p < 0.05), with the residents being faster than the medical students. The residents' group also completed the tasks with fewer errors. The majority of the subjects in both groups exhibited a significant improvement in their task completion time and error rate. CONCLUSION: The findings in this study demonstrate that laparoscopic skills can be objectively measured in a VRSS based on quantified skill parameters, including the time spent to complete skill tasks and the associated error rate. We conclude that a VRSS is a feasible tool for training and assessing basic laparoscopic skills.

Surgical performance during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is improved with training in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Becoming proficient in laparoscopic surgery is dependent on the acquisition of specialized skills that can only be obtained from specific training. This training could be achieved in various ways using inanimate models, animal models, or live patient surgery--each with its own pros and cons. Currently, there are substantial data that support the benefits of animal model training in the initial learning of laparoscopy. Nevertheless, whether these benefits extent themselves to moderately experienced surgeons is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine if training using a porcine model results in a quantifiable gain in laparoscopic skills for moderately experienced laparoscopic surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six urologists with some laparoscopic experience were asked to perform a radical nephrectomy weekly for 10 weeks in a porcine model. The procedures were recorded, and surgical performance was assessed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons using a previously published surgical performance assessment tool. The obtained data were then submitted to statistical analysis. RESULTS: With training, blood loss was reduced approximately 45% when comparing the averages of the first and last surgical procedures (P=0.006). Depth perception showed an improvement close to 35% (P=0.041), and dexterity showed an improvement close to 25% (P=0.011). Total operative time showed trends of improvement, although it was not significant (P=0.158). Autonomy, efficiency, and tissue handling were the only aspects that did not show any noteworthy change (P=0.202, P=0.677, and P=0.456, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that there are quantifiable gains in laparoscopic skills obtained from training in an animal model. Our results suggest that these benefits also extend to more advanced stages of the learning curve, but it is unclear how far along the learning curve training with animal models provides a clear benefit for the performance of laparoscopic procedures. Future studies are necessary to confirm these findings and better understand the impact of this learning tool on surgical practice.

Can the learning of laparoscopic skills be quantified by the measurements of skill parameters performed in a virtual reality simulator?

Purpose To ensure patient safety and surgical efficiency, much emphasis has been placed on the training of laparoscopic skills using virtual reality simulators. The purpose of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic skills can be objectively quantified by measuring specific skill parameters during training in a virtual reality surgical simulator (VRSS). Materials and Methods Ten medical students (with no laparoscopic experience) and ten urology residents (PGY3-5 with limited laparoscopic experience) were recruited to participate in a ten-week training course in basic laparoscopic skills (camera, cutting, peg transfer and clipping skills) on a VRSS. Data were collected from the training sessions. The time that individuals took to complete each task and the errors that they made were analyzed independently. Results The mean time that individuals took to complete tasks was significantly different between the groups (p < 0.05), with the residents being faster than the medical students. The residents' group also completed the tasks with fewer errors. The majority of the subjects in both groups exhibited a significant improvement in their task completion time and error rate. Conclusion The findings in this study demonstrate that laparoscopic skills can be objectively measured in a VRSS based on quantified skill parameters, including the time spent to complete skill tasks and the associated error rate. We conclude that a VRSS is a feasible tool for training and assessing basic laparoscopic skills. .

Fatores determinantes para a escolha da especialidade médica no Brasil / Defining factors for choosing medical specialty in Brazil

Fundamento. A escolha da especialidade médica é complexa e multifatorial. A importância dos diferentes fatores varia mundialmente e está associada a diferentes valores e sistemas de educação. O objetivo do estudo é identificar os fatores que determinam essa escolha no Brasil. Métodos. Um questionário foi enviado, via internet (eletronic mail), para graduandos dos seis anos do curso de medicina, solicitando informações demográficas e a avaliação de fatores que influenciam na escolha da especialidade médica. Resultados. A idade média foi de 22 anos. Quanto à influência de familiares, 42,5% dos alunos têm pelo menos um médico como parente próximo, sendo as especialidades mais comuns desse parente: Pediatria, Ginecologia e Obstetrícia e Oftalmologia. A quantidade de respondentes que declararam certeza da carreira a ser seguida ao entrar na faculdade foi 19%, enquanto essa certeza foi de 22,2% na ocasião da pesquisa. Afinidade pela especialidade e estilo de vida foram fatores avaliados como importantes ou muito importantes por mais de 95% dos respondentes. Urgência em ganhar dinheiro rápido, tempo curto de residência, alto rendimento inicial e influência familiar foram os fatores avaliados como menos importantes pelos respondentes na escolha de sua especialidade. Quase metade dos respondentes (49,7%) descartaram uma especialidade que cogitaram fortemente, as principais razões para isso foram ter descoberto não ter afinidade pela especialidade pela qualidade de vida. Conclusões. Afinidade e estilo de vida são os fatores determinantes da escolha e da rejeição de especialidade médica em nosso meio.

Background. Choosing medical specialty is complex and depends on multiple factors. The importance of the different factors varies across the world, according to different values and systems of education. The purpose of this study is to identify the determining factors involved in this choice among medical students in Brazil. Methods. A questionnaire was sent by email to medical students from first to sixth year of a selected institution, asking demographic information and the evaluation of factors that may influence the choice of the medical specialty. Results. The mean age was 22 years. Regarding the influence of relatives, 42.5% of the students has at least one physician as a close relative, the most common specialties of this relative were: Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Ophthalmology. 19% of the respondents declared being sure of the career when they entered University, while 22.2% of them were sure about the choice at the occasion of the study. Affinity for the specialty and lifestyle were evaluated as important or very important by more than 95% of respondents. Urge to earn money fast, short time of medical residency, high initial profit and family influence were the factors evaluated as less important by the respondents. Almost half of the respondents (49.7%) rejected a specialty they had strongly cogitated once. The main reasons for this were the lifestyle and the fact that they discovered not having affinity for the specialty. Conclusions. Affinity and medical lifestyle are the defining factors in choosing and rejecting a medical specialty in Brazil.