Metabolic and Renal Effects of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors Treatment After Liver Transplantation: Real-Life Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors following liver transplantation (LT) are used to minimize calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity. Data about metabolic effects of mTOR inhibitors are still limited. AIM: This study aims to determine the renal and metabolic effects of different mTOR inhibitor-based protocols in real-life LT patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with mTOR inhibitors after LT. Demographics, treatment protocols, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and metabolic parameters were collected over a period of 4 years. Initiation of blood pressure (BP), diabetes mellitus, and lipid medications was also noted. RESULTS: Fifty-two LT recipients received mTOR inhibitors. GFR improved significantly (by 1.96 mL/min/year), with greater improvement in patients with baseline renal dysfunction (+13.3 mL/min vs +4.5 mL/min at 3 years). Conversion to an mTOR inhibitor during the first post-transplant year resulted in a more durable improvement in GFR (for 4 years vs only 1 year for later conversion).No significant weight gain or new-onset diabetes mellitus was observed. However, there was some increase in total cholesterol (+7 mg/dL) and blood pressure (+2 mm Hg during the third year and +8 mm Hg in the fourth years), followed by initiation of lipid-lowering and BP medications in 25% and 13% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with an mTOR inhibitor following LT resulted in improved kidney functions without significant negative metabolic effects such as weight gain or new-onset diabetes mellitus. This makes mTOR inhibitors a valuable immunosuppressive option in the face of the growing incidence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis as a leading cause for LT.

Long-Term Effects of Pregnancy on Renal Graft Function in Women After Kidney Transplantation Compared With Matched Controls.

BACKGROUND: An important benefit associated with kidney transplantation in women of child-bearing age is increased fertility. We retrospectively evaluated the maternal and fetal complications and evolution of graft function associated with 22 pregnancies post-kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation, compared with controls without pregnancy post-transplantation, who were matched for gender, year of transplantation, type of donor, age at transplantation, number of transplants, type of transplant (kidney vs kidney-pancreas), and cause of native kidney failure, as well as for renal parameters including serum creatinine and urine protein excretion 1 year before delivery. RESULTS: The mean age at time of transplantation was 22.32 (range, 19.45-33.1) years. The mean interval between transplantation and delivery was 75.7 (range, 34-147.8) months. Main maternal complications were pre-eclampsia in 27.3%. The main fetal complications included delayed intrauterine growth (18.2%), preterm deliveries (89.4%), and one death at 3 days postdelivery. The mean serum creatinine level pre-pregnancy was 1.17 (range, 0.7-3.1) mg/dL. Graft failure was higher in the pregnancy group (6 vs 3) but did not differ statistically from the control group, and was associated with creatinine pre-pregnancy (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-3.45; P = .04), age at transplantation (1.13 [1.03-1.21]; P = .032), and time of follow-up (2.14 [1.27-2.98]; P = .026). Delta serum creatinine was not different in both groups: 1.05 ± 0.51 versus 0.99 ± 0.92 mg/dL, study versus control group, respectively (P = .17). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy after kidney transplantation is associated with serious maternal and fetal complications. We did not observe a significantly increased risk of graft loss or reduced graft function in comparison with recipients with similar clinical characteristics.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: Management and long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of pancreas is a rare pancreatic neoplasm with a low metastatic potential. Our aim was to study the clinical-pathological characteristics, and long-term outcome of this tumor. MATERIALS: Rretrospective single center study of patients operated for SPN of pancreas. Clinical and pathological data were collected. RESULTS: From 1995 to 2016, 1320 patients underwent pancreatic resection. SPN was confirmed in 32 cases (2.46%), including 29 (90.6%) female and three (9.4%) male, with a mean age of 28.4 ± 12.2 years. SPN was the most common pathology among female patients under age of 40 (72.4%). Abdominal pain was the most frequent presenting symptom (48%), whereas none of the patients presented with jaundice. Mean tumor diameter was 5.9 cm (range, 0.9-14 cm). All patients underwent margin-negative surgical resection. Two patients demonstrated gross malignant features, including liver metastases at presentation (n = 1), and adjacent organ and vascular invasion (n = 1). Microscopic malignant features were present in thirteen patients (40.6%). Recurrence occurred in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 1, 7 years post resection) and in the liver (n = 2, 1 and 5 years post resection). Mean follow-up was 49.2 months (range, 1-228 months). Five and 10-year disease-free survival was 96.5% and 89.6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SPNs are low-grade tumors with a good prognosis. Margin-negative surgical resection is curative in most patients. However, almost 15% of patients demonstrate malignant features including invasion of adjacent organs or metastatic disease. Patients with malignant disease are still expected to have long survival, and aggressive surgical approach is advocated.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Application of minimally invasive surgery for oncologic liver resection is still limited to expert centers. We describe our experience in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2010 and February 2015, 174 patients underwent resection of CLM. LLR was chosen according to surgeon's preferences. Data was retrieved from the institutes' electronic charts and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: LLR was performed in 42 patients (24.5%) and OLR in 132. Increased number of metastases were found in OLR (2.82 ± 2.81 versus 1.78 ± 1.16, P = 0.02), with no difference in maximal lesion size (33.1 ± 22 versus 34.9 ± 27.5 cm, P = 0.7). Altogether 55 patients underwent major hepatectomy, and 50 of the OLR group (37.8%, 37 right hepatectomy and 7 left hepatectomy) (P = 0.02). In 5 patients (11.6%) a conversion to open surgery was indicated. Operative time was longer in LLR. Estimated blood loss was decreased in laparoscopic minor resections. One OLR patient died during the postoperative period (0.7%). Eight patients in the OLR group had major complications, versus 1 in the LLR group (P = 0.0016). Reoperation within 30 days was performed in 4 OLR patients and none in the LLR group. Patients in the LLR group had shorter length of stay (LOS) (6.78 ± 2.75 versus 8.39 ± 5.64 days, P = 0.038). R0 resection was 88% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with CLM, LLR is feasible, safe and may achieve shorter LOS without inferior oncologic outcome.