RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Flight attendants perform physically demanding work such as lifting baggage, pushing service carts and spending the workday on their feet. We examined if more frequent exposure to occupational physical demands could explain why previous studies have found that flight attendants have a higher reported prevalence of menstrual cycle irregularities than other workers. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 694 flight attendants and 120 teachers aged 18-44 years from three US cities. Eligible participants were married, had not had a hysterectomy or tubal ligation, were not using hormonal contraception and were not recently pregnant. Participants reported menstrual cycle characteristics (cramps, pain, irregular cycles, flow, bleed length, cycle length) and occupational physical demands (standing, lifting, pushing/pulling, bending/twisting, overall effort). We used modified Poisson regression to examine associations between occupation (flight attendant, teacher) and menstrual irregularities; among flight attendants, we further examined associations between occupational physical demands and menstrual irregularities. RESULTS: All occupational physical demands were more commonly reported by flight attendants than teachers. Flight attendants reported more frequent menstrual cramps than teachers, and most occupational physical demands were associated with more frequent or painful menstrual cramps. Lifting heavy loads was also associated with irregular cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational physical demands were associated with more frequent and worse menstrual pain among flight attendants. The physical demands experienced by these workers may contribute to the high burden of menstrual irregularities reported by flight attendants compared with other occupational groups, such as teachers.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Work-related exposures play an important role in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission, yet few studies have compared SARS-CoV-2 expsoure risk across occupations and industries. METHODS: During September 2020 to May 2021, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services collected occupation and industry data as part of routine coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case investigations. Adults aged 18-64 years with confirmed or probable COVID-19 in Wisconsin were assigned standardized occupation and industry codes. Cumulative incidence rates were weighted for non-response and calculated using full-time equivalent (FTE) workforce denominators from the 2020 American Community Survey. RESULTS: An estimated 11.6% of workers (347 013 of 2.98 million) in Wisconsin, ages 18-64 years, had COVID-19 from September 2020 to May 2021. The highest incidence by occupation (per 100 FTE) occurred among personal care and services workers (22.1), healthcare practitioners and support staff (20.7), and protective services workers (20.7). High-risk sub-groups included nursing assistants and personal care aides (28.8), childcare workers (25.8), food and beverage service workers (25.3), personal appearance workers (24.4), and law enforcement workers (24.1). By industry, incidence was highest in healthcare (18.6); the highest risk sub-sectors were nursing care facilities (30.5) and warehousing (28.5). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis represents one of the most complete examinations to date of COVID-19 incidence by occupation and industry. Our approach demonstrates the value of standardized occupational data collection by public health and may be a model for improved occupational surveillance elsewhere. Workers at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure may benefit from targeted workplace COVID-19 vaccination and mitigation efforts.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Incidencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Wisconsin/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , OcupacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced a new compensable infectious disease to workplaces. METHODS: This was a descriptive analysis of Wisconsin COVID workers' compensation (WC) claims between March 12 and December 31, 2020. The impact of the presumption law (March 12 to June 10, 2020) was also evaluated. RESULTS: Less than 1% of working-age residents with COVID-19 filed a claim. COVID-19 WC claim rates (per 100,000 FTE) were notably low for frontline industry sectors such as Retail Trade (n = 115), Manufacturing (n = 88), and Wholesale Trade (n = 31). Healthcare workers (764 claims per 100,000 FTE) comprised 73.2% of COVID-19 claims. Most claims (52.8%) were denied and the proportion of denied claims increased significantly after the presumption period for both first responders and other occupations. CONCLUSION: The presumption law made benefits accessible primarily to first responders. Further changes to WC systems are needed to offset the individual and collective costs of infectious diseases.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Indemnización para Trabajadores , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Wisconsin/epidemiología , Pandemias , IndustriasRESUMEN
Much of the literature on the healthy worker effect focuses on studies of chronic disease and mortality; however, when studying pregnancy outcomes, these effects might differ because of the short, defined risk periods of most pregnancy outcomes. Three pregnancy-specific healthy worker effects have also been described, but the structure of these effects has not yet been investigated when occupational exposure, and not employment status, is the exposure of interest. We used directed acyclic graphs to examine healthy worker effects in studies of occupational exposures and pregnancy outcomes: the healthy hire effect, the healthy worker survivor effect, the desperation/privilege effect (differential workforce reentry after pregnancy), the reproductively unhealthy worker effect (women with live births leave the workforce, while women with nonlive births do not), and the insecure pregnancy effect (women with adverse pregnancy outcomes reduce their exposures in subsequent pregnancies). Given our assumptions, we conclude that the healthy hire effect, the desperation/privilege effect, the reproductively unhealthy worker effect, and the insecure pregnancy effect result from confounding that can be addressed if data on measured confounders, such as employment status, are available. The presence of the healthy worker survivor effect, however, varies by study design. Different types of healthy worker effects can be present in studies of occupational exposure and pregnancy outcomes, and many of them are easily addressed analytically.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Estadísticos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Gráficos por Computador , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Efecto del Trabajador Sano , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiologíaRESUMEN
On May 9, 2017, Public Health Madison & Dane County contacted the Wisconsin Division of Public Health for assistance with investigation of mercury exposure among workers at a fluorescent lamp recycling facility. Public Health Madison & Dane County had been contacted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources as part of an investigation of potential environmental contamination at the facility. Fluorescent lamps are composed of a phosphor-coated glass tube containing mercury vapor and argon. During the recycling process, lamps are crushed, releasing mercury vapor and mercury-containing dusts. State and county health officials, in collaboration with Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, conducted an investigation of mercury exposure of workers and an environmental assessment of the facility, surrounding areas, and worker vehicles. All five workers who were tested had urine mercury levels exceeding the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) biologic exposure index of 20.0 µg/g creatinine, and two had tremor on physical exam. Workers wore inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE). Mercury levels in indoor air varied within the building, with a maximum of 207.4 µg/m3 at floor level on the crushing platform, approximately eightfold higher than the ACGIH threshold limit value of 25 µg/m3 (1). Mercury also was found in workers' vehicles, indicating risk for take-home exposure. Workers at risk for mercury exposure need to have access to and consistently wear National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved respiratory protection for mercury vapor, nitrile or other suitable gloves to prevent contact exposure, and disposable suits with booties and change shoes before leaving the worksite to prevent take-home exposures.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Artículos Domésticos , Mercurio/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Reciclaje , Adulto , Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluorescencia , Humanos , Masculino , Mercurio/toxicidad , Mercurio/orina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Wisconsin , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Authoritative information on occupational reproductive hazards is scarce and complex because exposure levels vary, multiple exposures may be present, and the reproductive toxicity of many agents remains unknown. For these reasons, women's health providers may find it challenging to effectively address workplace reproductive health issues with their patients who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or considering pregnancy. Reproductive epidemiologists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health answered >200 public requests for occupational reproductive health information during 2009 through 2013. The most frequent occupations represented were health care (41%) and laboratory work (18%). The most common requests for exposure information concerned solvents (14%), anesthetic gases (10%), formaldehyde (7%), infectious agents in laboratories (7%) or health care settings (7%), and physical agents (14%), including ionizing radiation (6%). Information for developing workplace policies or guidelines was sought by 12% of the requestors. Occupational exposure effects on breast-feeding were an increasing concern among working women. Based on information developed in response to these requestors, information is provided for discussing workplace exposures with patients, assessing potential workplace reproductive hazards, and helping patients determine the best options for safe work in pregnancy. Appendices provide resources to address specific occupational exposures, employee groups, personal protective equipment, breast-feeding, and workplace regulations regarding work and pregnancy. These tools can help identify those most at risk of occupational reproductive hazards and improve workers' reproductive health. The information can also be used to inform research priorities and assist the development of workplace reproductive health policies.
Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Mujeres Trabajadoras , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Consejo , Femenino , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Conducta en la Búsqueda de Información , Equipo de Protección Personal , Embarazo , Salud Reproductiva , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concern exists about the potential chronic neurological effects among aircrew of exposure to chemical contaminants from engine oil in aircraft cabin air. We evaluated mortality from neurodegenerative diseases among 11,311 former US flight attendants. METHODS: Vital status was ascertained through 2007, and life table analyses were conducted to obtain standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). RESULTS: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) mortality was over twice as high in the cohort as in the US general population, based on nine observed ALS deaths. There was no clear pattern in risk when SMRs for ALS were stratified by exposure duration. Mortality from other neurodegenerative diseases was not elevated. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are limited due to small numbers of observed deaths and reliance on mortality data, but suggest that flight attendants may have an increased risk of ALS. Additional research is needed. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:532-537, 2016. Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Aeroespacial , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/mortalidad , Aceites Combustibles/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas/mortalidad , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Anciano , Aeronaves , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cosmic radiation and circadian disruption are potential reproductive hazards for flight attendants. METHODS: Flight attendants from 3 US airlines in 3 cities were interviewed for pregnancy histories and lifestyle, medical, and occupational covariates. We assessed cosmic radiation and circadian disruption from company records of 2 million individual flights. Using Cox regression models, we compared respondents (1) by levels of flight exposures and (2) to teachers from the same cities, to evaluate whether these exposures were associated with miscarriage. RESULTS: Of 2654 women interviewed (2273 flight attendants and 381 teachers), 958 pregnancies among 764 women met study criteria. A hypothetical pregnant flight attendant with median first-trimester exposures flew 130 hours in 53 flight segments, crossed 34 time zones, and flew 15 hours during her home-base sleep hours (10 pm-8 am), incurring 0.13 mGy absorbed dose (0.36 mSv effective dose) of cosmic radiation. About 2% of flight attendant pregnancies were likely exposed to a solar particle event, but doses varied widely. Analyses suggested that cosmic radiation exposure of 0.1 mGy or more may be associated with increased risk of miscarriage in weeks 9-13 (odds ratio = 1.7 [95% confidence interval = 0.95-3.2]). Risk of a first-trimester miscarriage with 15 hours or more of flying during home-base sleep hours was increased (1.5 [1.1-2.2]), as was risk with high physical job demands (2.5 [1.5-4.2]). Miscarriage risk was not increased among flight attendants compared with teachers. CONCLUSIONS: Miscarriage was associated with flight attendant work during sleep hours and high physical job demands and may be associated with cosmic radiation exposure.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Trastornos Cronobiológicos/complicaciones , Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adulto , Medicina Aeroespacial , Trastornos Cronobiológicos/epidemiología , Docentes , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Commercial airline crew is one of the occupational groups with the highest exposures to ionising radiation. Crew members are also exposed to other physical risk factors and subject to potential disruption of circadian rhythms. METHODS: This study analyses mortality in a pooled cohort of 93 771 crew members from 10 countries. The cohort was followed for a mean of 21.7 years (2.0 million person-years), during which 5508 deaths occurred. RESULTS: The overall mortality was strongly reduced in male cockpit (SMR 0.56) and female cabin crews (SMR 0.73). The mortality from radiation-related cancers was also reduced in male cockpit crew (SMR 0.73), but not in female or male cabin crews (SMR 1.01 and 1.00, respectively). The mortality from female breast cancer (SMR 1.06), leukaemia and brain cancer was similar to that of the general population. The mortality from malignant melanoma was elevated, and significantly so in male cockpit crew (SMR 1.57). The mortality from cardiovascular diseases was strongly reduced (SMR 0.46). On the other hand, the mortality from aircraft accidents was exceedingly high (SMR 33.9), as was that from AIDS in male cabin crew (SMR 14.0). CONCLUSIONS: This large study with highly complete follow-up shows a reduced overall mortality in male cockpit and female cabin crews, an increased mortality of aircraft accidents and an increased mortality in malignant skin melanoma in cockpit crew. Further analysis after longer follow-up is recommended.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Aviación/mortalidad , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/mortalidad , Aeronaves , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Enfermedades Profesionales/mortalidad , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/etiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Causas de Muerte , Ritmo Circadiano , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia/etiología , Leucemia/mortalidad , Masculino , Melanoma/etiología , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Ocupaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Research has suggested that work as a flight attendant may be related to increased risk for reproductive health effects. Air cabin exposures that may influence reproductive health include radiation dose from galactic cosmic radiation and solar particle events. This paper describes the assessment of radiation dose accrued during solar particle events as part of a reproductive health study of flight attendants. METHODS: Solar storm data were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Space Weather Prediction Center list of solar proton events affecting the Earth environment to ascertain storms relevant to the two study periods (1992-1996 and 1999-2001). Radiation dose from exposure to solar energetic particles was estimated using the NAIRAS model in conjunction with galactic cosmic radiation dose calculated using the CARI-6P computer program. RESULTS: Seven solar particle events were determined to have potential for significant radiation exposure, two in the first study period and five in the second study period, and over-lapped with 24,807 flight segments. Absorbed (and effective) flight segment doses averaged 6.5 µGy (18 µSv) and 3.1 µGy (8.3 µSv) for the first and second study periods, respectively. Maximum doses were as high as 440 µGy (1.2 mSv) and 20 flight segments had doses greater than 190 µGy (0.5 mSv). DISCUSSION: During solar particle events, a pregnant flight attendant could potentially exceed the equivalent dose limit to the conceptus of 0.5 mSv in a month recommended by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.
Asunto(s)
Aeronaves , Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Dosis de Radiación , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Actividad SolarRESUMEN
Few studies of cancer mortality and incidence among flight crew have included a detailed assessment of both occupational exposures and lifestyle factors that may influence the risk of cancer. In this issue, Kojo et al. (Risk factors for skin cancer among Finnish airline cabin crew. Ann Occup. Hyg 2013; 57: 695-704) evaluated the relative contributions of ultraviolet and cosmic radiation to the incidence of skin cancer in Finnish flight attendants. This is a useful contribution, yet the reason flight crew members have an increased risk of skin cancer compared with the general population remains unclear. Good policy decisions for flight crew will depend on continued and emerging effective collaborations to increase study power and improve exposure assessment in future flight crew health studies. Improving the assessment of occupational exposures and non-occupational factors will cost additional time and effort, which are well spent if the role of exposures can be clarified in larger studies.
Asunto(s)
Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: National investigations are finding silicosis in young workers. We developed a silicosis case-finding process and conducted follow-up interviews to identify emerging exposure sources. METHODS: Probable cases were identified through Wisconsin hospital discharge and emergency department data and Wisconsin lung transplant programs. Interviews were attempted with case-patients under age 60. RESULTS: We identified 68 probable silicosis cases and interviewed 4 case-patients. Occupational exposures for cases under age 60 included sandblasting, quarry work, foundry work, coal mining, and stone fabrication. Two stone fabrication workers were diagnosed before age 40. DISCUSSION: Prevention is critically important to eliminate occupational silicosis. Clinicians should obtain the occupational and exposure history to identify cases of occupational lung disease and notify public health to identify and prevent workplace exposures.
Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Silicosis , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Silicosis/diagnóstico , Silicosis/epidemiología , Silicosis/prevención & control , Wisconsin/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We investigated self-reported occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs, anesthetic gases, antiviral drugs, sterilizing agents (disinfectants), and X-rays and the risk of spontaneous abortion in US nurses. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnancy outcome and occupational exposures were collected retrospectively from 8461 participants of the Nurses' Health Study II. Of these, 7482 were eligible for analysis using logistic regression. RESULTS: Participants reported 6707 live births, and 775 (10%) spontaneous abortions (<20 weeks). After adjusting for age, parity, shift work, and hours worked, antineoplastic drug exposure was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of spontaneous abortion, particularly with early spontaneous abortion before the 12th week, and 3.5-fold increased risk among nulliparous women. Exposure to sterilizing agents was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of late spontaneous abortion (12-20 weeks), but not with early spontaneous abortion. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that certain occupational exposures common to nurses are related to risks of spontaneous abortion.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adulto , Anestésicos por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Desinfectantes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Rayos X/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We evaluated mortality among 11,311 former U.S. flight attendants. The primary a priori outcomes of interest were breast cancer and melanoma. METHODS: Vital status was ascertained through 2007, and life table analyses was conducted. Cumulative exposure to cosmic radiation and circadian rhythm disruption were estimated from work history data and historical published flight schedules. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was less than expected among women but was elevated among men, primarily due to elevated HIV-related disease mortality. Mortality from breast cancer among women and melanoma was neither significantly elevated nor related to metrics of exposure. Mortality was elevated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among men; for alcoholism, drowning, and intentional self-harm among women; and for railway, water, and air transportation accidents. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of increased breast cancer or melanoma mortality. Limitations include reliance on mortality data and limited power resulting from few melanoma deaths and relatively short employment durations.
Asunto(s)
Aeronaves , Causas de Muerte , Exposición Profesional , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Ritmo Circadiano , Estudios de Cohortes , Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Tablas de Vida , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Distribución de Poisson , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: US commercial airline pilots, like all flight crew, are at increased risk for specific cancers, but the relation of these outcomes to specific air cabin exposures is unclear. Flight time or block (airborne plus taxi) time often substitutes for assessment of exposure to cosmic radiation. Our objectives were to develop methods to estimate exposures to cosmic radiation and circadian disruption for a study of chromosome aberrations in pilots and to describe workplace exposures for these pilots. METHODS: Exposures were estimated for cosmic ionizing radiation and circadian disruption between August 1963 and March 2003 for 83 male pilots from a major US airline. Estimates were based on 523 387 individual flight segments in company records and pilot logbooks as well as summary records of hours flown from other sources. Exposure was estimated by calculation or imputation for all but 0.02% of the individual flight segments' block time. Exposures were estimated from questionnaire data for a comparison group of 51 male university faculty. RESULTS: Pilots flew a median of 7126 flight segments and 14 959 block hours for 27.8 years. In the final study year, a hypothetical pilot incurred an estimated median effective dose of 1.92 mSv (absorbed dose, 0.85 mGy) from cosmic radiation and crossed 362 time zones. This study pilot was possibly exposed to a moderate or large solar particle event a median of 6 times or once every 3.7 years of work. Work at the study airline and military flying were the two highest sources of pilot exposure for all metrics. An index of work during the standard sleep interval (SSI travel) also suggested potential chronic sleep disturbance in some pilots. For study airline flights, median segment radiation doses, time zones crossed, and SSI travel increased markedly from the 1990s to 2003 (P(trend) < 0.0001). Dose metrics were moderately correlated with records-based duration metrics (Spearman's r = 0.61-0.69). CONCLUSIONS: The methods developed provided an exposure profile of this group of US airline pilots, many of whom have been exposed to increasing cosmic radiation and circadian disruption from the 1990s through 2003. This assessment is likely to decrease exposure misclassification in health studies.
Asunto(s)
Aviación , Trastornos Cronobiológicos/etiología , Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Registros , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated first-trimester exposures and the risk of preterm birth in the most recent pregnancy of participants of the Nurses' Health Study II. STUDY DESIGN: Log binomial regression was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) for preterm birth in relation to occupational risk factors, such as work schedule, physical factors, and exposures to chemicals and x-rays, adjusted for age and parity. RESULTS: Part-time work (Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros
, Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología
, Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos
, Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología
, Adulto
, Estudios de Cohortes
, Femenino
, Humanos
, Oportunidad Relativa
, Embarazo
, Primer Trimestre del Embarazo
, Factores de Riesgo
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health is conducting cohort studies of flight crew employed by the former Pan American World Airways company (Pan Am) as part of an effort to examine flight crew workplace exposures and health effects. Flight crew are exposed to elevated levels of cosmic radiation and to disruption of circadian rhythm when flying across multiple time zones. Methods exist to calculate cosmic radiation effective doses on individual flights; however, only work histories which provided an employee's domicile (home base) history rather than a record of every flight flown were available. METHODS/RESULTS: We developed a method for estimating individual cumulative domicile-based cosmic radiation effective doses and two metrics for circadian rhythm disruption for each flight attendant: cumulative times zones crossed and cumulative travel time during the standard sleep interval. CONCLUSIONS: The domicile-exposure matrix developed was used to calculate exposure estimates for a cohort mortality study of former Pan Am flight attendants.
Asunto(s)
Aeronaves/historia , Ritmo Circadiano/efectos de la radiación , Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Aviación/historia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chromosome translocations are a biomarker of cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation. We examined the relation between the frequency of translocations and cosmic radiation dose in 83 male airline pilots. METHODS: Translocations were scored using fluorescence in situ hybridization chromosome painting. Cumulative radiation doses were estimated from individual flight records. Excess rate and log-linear Poisson regression models were evaluated. RESULTS: Pilots' estimated median cumulative absorbed dose was 15 mGy (range 4.5-38). No association was observed between translocation frequency and absorbed dose from all types of flying [rate ratio (RR) = 1.01 at 1 mGy, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.04]. However, additional analyses of pilots' dose from only commercial flying suggested an association (RR = 1.04 at 1 mGy, 95% CI 0.97-1.13). DISCUSSION: Although this is the largest cytogenetic study of male commercial airline pilots to date of which the authors are aware, future studies will need additional highly exposed pilots to better assess the translocation-cosmic radiation relation.Grajewski B, Yong LC, Bertke SJ, Bhatti P, Little MP, Ramsey MJ, Tucker JD, Ward EM, Whelan EA, Sigurdson AJ, Waters MA. Chromosome translocations and cosmic radiation dose in male U.S. commercial airline pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018; 89(7):616-625.
Asunto(s)
Radiación Cósmica/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional , Pilotos/estadística & datos numéricos , Translocación Genética/genética , Adulto , Medicina Aeroespacial , Anciano , Ritmo Circadiano , ADN/sangre , ADN/genética , Humanos , Leucocitos Mononucleares/química , Leucocitos Mononucleares/citología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate potential attenuation of healthy worker biases in populations in which healthy women of reproductive age opt out of the workforce to provide childcare. METHODS: We used 2013-2015 data from 120,928 U.S. women and men aged 22-44 years participating in the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index. We used logistic regression to estimate adjusted prevalence odds ratios (PORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between health and workforce nonparticipation. RESULTS: Women and men reporting poor health were more likely to be out of the workforce than individuals reporting excellent health (POR: 3.7, 95% CI: 3.2-4.2; POR: 6.7, 95% CI: 5.7-7.8, respectively), suggesting potential for healthy worker bias. For women (P < .001) but not men (P = .30), the strength of this association was modified by number of children in the home: POR: 7.3 (95% CI: 5.8-9.1) for women with no children, decreasing to POR: 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.5) for women with four or more children. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with attenuation of healthy worker biases when healthy women opt out of the workforce to provide childcare. Accordingly, we might expect the magnitude of these biases to vary with the proportion of women with differing numbers of children in the population.
Asunto(s)
Efecto del Trabajador Sano , Salud Laboral , Sesgo de Selección , Adulto , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The initial goal of occupational reproductive health research is to effectively study the many toxicants, physical agents, and biomechanical and psychosocial stressors that may constitute reproductive hazards in the workplace. Although the main objective of occupational reproductive researchers and clinicians is to prevent recognized adverse reproductive outcomes, research has expanded to include a broader spectrum of chronic health outcomes potentially affected by reproductive toxicants. To aid in achieving these goals, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, along with its university, federal, industry, and labor colleagues, formed the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) in 1996. NORA resulted in 21 research teams, including the Reproductive Health Research Team (RHRT). In this report, we describe progress made in the last decade by the RHRT and by others in this field, including prioritizing reproductive toxicants for further study; facilitating collaboration among epidemiologists, biologists, and toxicologists; promoting quality exposure assessment in field studies and surveillance; and encouraging the design and conduct of priority occupational reproductive studies. We also describe new tools for screening reproductive toxicants and for analyzing mode of action. We recommend considering outcomes such as menopause and latent adverse effects for further study, as well as including exposures such as shift work and nanomaterials. We describe a broad domain of scholarship activities where a cohesive system of organized and aligned work activities integrates 10 years of team efforts and provides guidance for future research.