Application of ADAPT-ITT: adapting an evidence-based HIV/STI mother-daughter prevention intervention for Black male caregivers and girls.

BACKGROUND: Black girls are disproportionately impacted by HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), underscoring the urgent need for innovative strategies to enhance the adoption and maintenance of HIV/STI prevention efforts. Historically, Black male caregivers have been left out of girls' programming, and little guidance exists to inform intervention development for Black girls and their male caregivers. Engaging Black male caregivers in Black girls' sexual and reproductive health may reduce sexual risk-taking and improve the sustainability of preventative behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the formative phases, processes, and methods used to adapt an evidence-based mother-daughter sexual and reproductive health intervention for Black girls 9-18 years old and their male caregivers. METHODS: We used the ADAPT-ITT model to tailor IMARA for Black girls and their male caregivers. Diverse qualitative methods (interviews, focus groups, and theater testing) were used throughout the adaption process. RESULTS: Findings support using the ADAPT-ITT model to tailor an evidence-based HIV/STI intervention for Black girls and their Black male caregivers. Findings highlight the importance of community engagement and the use of qualitative methods to demonstrate the acceptability and feasibility of the adapted intervention. Key lessons learned are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Adapting evidence-based interventions to incorporate Black girls and their Black male caregivers should be driven by a relevant theoretical framework that aligns with the target population(s). Adapting the intervention in partnership with the community has been shown to improve acceptability and feasibility as it is responsive to community needs. Using a systematic process like the ADAPT-ITT model will ensure that the new program is ready for efficacy trials.

The missing calculation: the human cost.

The incursion of a foreign animal disease into any country produces devastating impacts on the country and on its producing industry. Although the associated financial losses to the country and its industry inevitably are calculated, the result in compensation to producers is often inadequate. Above and beyond the financial accounting calculations, however, there is a tremendously destructive and overwhelming impact that has been essentially ignored. That is the profound social impact and the real human cost to individual producers in the livestock industry and their families. Any decision to employ mass animal destruction as an animal disease control strategy must take this fundamental human element into full consideration. The author describes the consequences and depth of personal impact that the stamping-out approach has produced on affected individual livestock producers.