An inflection point in global public health.

Population health needs to pivot toward the primordial prevention of global chronic diseases, most specifically the disease cascade that runs from marketing to obesity to diabetes to its known complications. Medical sciences can now manage these diseases and prolong meaningful life, but can only do so at an enormous cost, a cost that will threaten societal stability everywhere. The fall in global fertility and the explosion in elderly populations will facilitate this fiscal pandemic attributable to good health. Risk factor mitigation, not effective for obesity, enhanced longevity but did not prevent chronic illness, only forestalled it. For public health, but not health practitioners, the risk factor era needs to be supplanted by a focus on public policy to alter public behavior via primordial prevention of the emergence of risk factors. And public health needs to lead that effort. The historical pathway to this present dilemma that linked science to economic development can be illuminated by the efforts of four scientists, Francis Bacon at the dawn of the seventeenth century, James Lind in the 18th and Vannevar Bush and Abdel Omran in the 20th. This perspective introduces a near inevitability to the emergence of the current critical pivot point but also teaches that there is a powerful rationale to assume that dramatic and expensive changes will be coming and need be anticipated and planned for.

Death with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: a MADIT-II substudy.

AIMS: There are limited data regarding factors that identify implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients who will experience either ventricular tachyarrhythmic (VTA) or non-arrhythmic (NA) mortality, and the commonly used clinical classification of sudden cardiac death (SCD) vs. non-sudden cardiac death (NSCD) may not be accurate enough. We aimed to correlate clinical adjudication of mortality events to device interrogation data and to identify risk factors for VTA mortality in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 746 patients who received an ICD in MADIT-II, 44 died from cardiac causes and had available interrogation data at the time of death. Sudden cardiac death vs. NSCD was defined by an adjudication committee. Ventricular tachyarrhythmic and NA arrhythmic deaths were categorized by the presence or absence of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) during the terminal event. Mode of death was found to be inaccurate when validated by device interrogation for VTA events: 50% patients adjudicated as SCD did not have a VTA event at the time of death; and 25% of adjudicated NSCD were found to have VT/VF during the mortality event. Multivariate analysis showed that factors independently associated with VTA mortality included: VT/VF >72 h prior to the mortality event [hazard ratio (HR) 8.0; P < 0.001], hospitalization for heart failure (HR 6.7; P = 0.001), and a history of hypertension (HR 4; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Current classification of SCD vs. NSCD fails to identify VTA events at the time of death in a significant proportion of patients, and simple clinical parameters can be used to identify ICD recipients with increased risk for VTA mortality.

Survival with cardiac-resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) showed that early intervention with cardiac-resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) in patients with an electrocardiographic pattern showing left bundle-branch block was associated with a significant reduction in heart-failure events over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, as compared with defibrillator therapy alone. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of CRT-D on long-term survival in the MADIT-CRT population. Post-trial follow-up over a median period of 5.6 years was assessed among all 1691 surviving patients (phase 1) and subsequently among 854 patients who were enrolled in post-trial registries (phase 2). All reported analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: At 7 years of follow-up after initial enrollment, the cumulative rate of death from any cause among patients with left bundle-branch block was 18% among patients randomly assigned to CRT-D, as compared with 29% among those randomly assigned to defibrillator therapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio in the CRT-D group, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.80; P<0.001). The long-term survival benefit of CRT-D in patients with left bundle-branch block did not differ significantly according to sex, cause of cardiomyopathy, or QRS duration. In contrast, CRT-D was not associated with any clinical benefit and possibly with harm in patients without left bundle-branch block (adjusted hazard ratio for death from any cause, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.39; P=0.04; P<0.001 for interaction of treatment with QRS morphologic findings). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that in patients with mild heart-failure symptoms, left ventricular dysfunction, and left bundle-branch block, early intervention with CRT-D was associated with a significant long-term survival benefit. (Funded by Boston Scientific; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00180271, NCT01294449, and NCT02060110.).

Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (MADIT S-ICD): Design and clinical protocol.

Patients with diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, older age, and a relatively preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remain at risk for sudden cardiac death that is potentially amenable by the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator with a good risk-benefit profile. The launched MADIT S-ICD study is designed to test the hypothesis that post-myocardial infarction diabetes patients with relatively preserved ejection fraction of 36%-50% will have a survival benefit from a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

The lack of a non-communicable disease curriculum threatens the relevance of global public health education.

BACKGROUND: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cancer, lung disease and diabetes are major public health challenges for emerging economies. However, Masters of Public Health (MPH) curricula in the USA do not provide germane coursework. METHODS: To assess the availability of global NCD courses in MPH curricula, we searched the websites of the 50 schools accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health as of 1 July 2013. Our questionnaire queried availability of a global or international health department or track, availability of an NCD track, and the presence of courses on NCD, NCD risk factors, CVD or global NCDs as well as global health infrastructure. RESULTS: All schools had online course coursework available. Thirty-one schools (62%) offered a global/international health track or certificate; 38 (76%) offered an NCD course but only 4 (8%) offered a global NCD course. Of the schools with a global health program, none required an NCD course but all offered courses on global health economics or infrastructure. CONCLUSION: For public health schools to be aligned with global realities and to retain a leadership role, curricular initiatives that highlight the NCD epidemic and its societal complexities will need new emphasis.

Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming.

BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is highly effective in reducing mortality among patients at risk for fatal arrhythmias, but inappropriate ICD activations are frequent, with potential adverse effects. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1500 patients with a primary-prevention indication to receive an ICD with one of three programming configurations. The primary objective was to determine whether programmed high-rate therapy (with a 2.5-second delay before the initiation of therapy at a heart rate of ≥200 beats per minute) or delayed therapy (with a 60-second delay at 170 to 199 beats per minute, a 12-second delay at 200 to 249 beats per minute, and a 2.5-second delay at ≥250 beats per minute) was associated with a decrease in the number of patients with a first occurrence of inappropriate antitachycardia pacing or shocks, as compared with conventional programming (with a 2.5-second delay at 170 to 199 beats per minute and a 1.0-second delay at ≥200 beats per minute). RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 1.4 years, high-rate therapy and delayed ICD therapy, as compared with conventional device programming, were associated with reductions in a first occurrence of inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio with high-rate therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.34; P<0.001; hazard ratio with delayed therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.40; P<0.001) and reductions in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio with high-rate therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.85; P=0.01; hazard ratio with delayed therapy vs. conventional therapy, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.02; P=0.06). There were no significant differences in procedure-related adverse events among the three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Programming of ICD therapies for tachyarrhythmias of 200 beats per minute or higher or with a prolonged delay in therapy at 170 beats per minute or higher, as compared with conventional programming, was associated with reductions in inappropriate therapy and all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. (Funded by Boston Scientific; MADIT-RIT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00947310.).

The vulnerability of being ill informed: the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and Global Public Health.

The Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) is a regional trade agreement currently being negotiated by 11 Pacific Rim countries, excluding China. While the negotiations are being conducted under a veil of secrecy, substantive leaks over the past 4 years have revealed a broad view of the proposed contents. As it stands the TPPA poses serious risks to global public health, particularly chronic, non-communicable diseases. At greatest risk are national tobacco regulations, regulations governing the emergence of generic drugs and controls over food imports by transnational corporations. Aside from a small group of public health professionals from Australia, the academic public health community has missed these threats to the global community, although many other health-related entities, international lawyers and health-conscious politicians have voiced serious concerns. As of mid-2014 there has been no comment in the leading public health journals. This large lacuna in interest or recognition reflects the larger problem that the public health education community has all but ignored global non-communicable diseases. Without such a focus, the risks are unseen and the threats not perceived. This cautionary tale of the TPPA reflects the vulnerability of being ill informed of contemporary realities.

Anti-obesity Medications: Ethical, Policy, and Public Health Concerns.

New anti-obesity medications (AOMs) have received widespread acclaim in medical journals and the media, but they also raise critical ethical, public health, and public policy concerns that have largely been ignored. AOMs are very costly, need to be taken by a patient in perpetuity (since significant rebound weight gain otherwise occurs), and threaten to shift resources and focus away from other crucial efforts at obesity treatment and prevention. Many people may feel less motivated to exercise or reduce their caloric consumption, if they assume that obesity is now medically treatable. Policy-makers may similarly come to feel that the solution to the obesity pandemic is simply to prescribe medications and that prevention efforts are far less necessary. These drugs raise concerns about justice (since AOMs will disproportionately benefit the wealthy), medicalization, and marketing. Policy-makers, clinicians, and others need to engage in multipronged educational and policy efforts to address these challenges.

Differences in mode of death between men and women receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy in the MADIT trials.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported sex differences in outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. However, little is known about sex differences with regard to mode of death or device efficacy following ICD or CRT-D implantation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sex influenced mode of death or device efficacy in ICD and CRT-D subjects enrolled in the MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial) studies (MADIT-II, MADIT-CRT, and MADIT-RIT). METHODS: The combined MADIT cohort consisted of 3038 men and 1000 women with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30%; New York Heart Association functional class I-III heart failure who received ICD or CRT-D. Mode of death was divided into cardiac and noncardiac causes, reviewed by independent adjudication committees. RESULTS: A total of 295 men and 66 women died (9.7% vs 6.6%; P =.003) during 26 months. The most common cause of death was nonarrhythmic cardiac death in men (n = 121 [41%]) and noncardiac death in women (n = 22 [33%]). All-cause mortality and cardiac deaths were 1.5- to 2.0-fold higher in men vs women with ICM but similar for those with NICM after adjustment for covariates. ICD efficacy was similar in men and women, resulting in a 50% reduction in all-cause mortality. CRT-D was more effective at reducing all-cause and cardiac death in women than men. CONCLUSION: Mode of death differs between sex and is dependent on the underlying cardiac substrate. Compared to women, cardiac death is higher in men with ICM but similar in those with NICM. ICDs are equally effective at reducing mortality in both men and women. However, CRT-D may be more effective at reducing mortality in women.

Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events.

BACKGROUND: This trial was designed to determine whether cardiac-resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing would reduce the risk of death or heart-failure events in patients with mild cardiac symptoms, a reduced ejection fraction, and a wide QRS complex. METHODS: During a 4.5-year period, we enrolled and followed 1820 patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, an ejection fraction of 30% or less, a QRS duration of 130 msec or more, and New York Heart Association class I or II symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned in a 3:2 ratio to receive CRT plus an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (1089 patients) or an ICD alone (731 patients). The primary end point was death from any cause or a nonfatal heart-failure event (whichever came first). Heart-failure events were diagnosed by physicians who were aware of the treatment assignments, but they were adjudicated by a committee that was unaware of assignments. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 2.4 years, the primary end point occurred in 187 of 1089 patients in the CRT-ICD group (17.2%) and 185 of 731 patients in the ICD-only group (25.3%) (hazard ratio in the CRT-ICD group, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.84; P=0.001). The benefit did not differ significantly between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The superiority of CRT was driven by a 41% reduction in the risk of heart-failure events, a finding that was evident primarily in a prespecified subgroup of patients with a QRS duration of 150 msec or more. CRT was associated with a significant reduction in left ventricular volumes and improvement in the ejection fraction. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the overall risk of death, with a 3% annual mortality rate in each treatment group. Serious adverse events were infrequent in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: CRT combined with ICD decreased the risk of heart-failure events in relatively asymptomatic patients with a low ejection fraction and wide QRS complex. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00180271.)

A dried blood spot test for diagnosis of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor autoantibodies (GMAbs) mediate the pathogenesis of autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (autoimmune PAP) and their quantification in serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) - the serum GMAb test - is the 'gold standard' for diagnosis of autoimmune PAP. Because GMAbs are high in autoimmune PAP and low or undetectable in healthy people, we hypothesized that the ELISA could be adapted for evaluation of blood obtained from the fingertip using a dried blood spot card (DBSC) for specimen collection. Here, we report development of such a method - the DBSC GMAb test - and evaluate its ability to measure GMAb concentration in blood and to diagnose autoimmune PAP. Fresh, heparinized whole blood was obtained from 60 autoimmune PAP patients and 19 healthy people and used to measure the GMAb concentration in blood (by the DBSC GMAb test). After optimization, the DBSC GMAb test was evaluated for accuracy, precision, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and ruggedness. The coefficient of variation among repeated measurements was low with regard to well-to-well, plate-to-plate, day-to-day, and inter-operator variation, and results were unaffected by exposure of prepared DBSC specimens to a wide range of temperatures (from -80 °C to 65 °C), repeated freeze-thaw cycles, or storage for up to 2.5 months before testing. The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and lower limit of quantification (LLoQ), were 0.01, 0.21, and 3.5 µg/ml of GMAb in the blood, respectively. Receiver operating curve characteristic analysis identified 2.7 µg/ml as the optimal GMAb concentration cutoff value to distinguish autoimmune PAP from healthy people. This cutoff value was less than the LLoQ and the ranges of GMAb results for autoimmune PAP patients and healthy people were widely separated (median (interquartile range): 22.6 (13.3-43.8) and 0.23 (0.20-0.30) µg/ml, respectively). Consequently, the LLoQ is recommended as the lower limit of the range indicating a positive test result (i.e., that autoimmune PAP is present); lower values indicate a negative test result (i.e., autoimmune PAP is not present). Among the 30 autoimmune PAP patients and 19 healthy people evaluated, the sensitivity and specificity of the DBSC GMAb test were both 100% for a diagnosis of autoimmune PAP. Results demonstrate the DBSC GMAb test reliably measures GMAbs in blood and performs well in the diagnosis of autoimmune PAP.

The Prevention of Global Chronic Disease: Academic Public Health's New Frontier.

A confluence of stimuli is propelling academic public health to embrace the prevention of chronic disease in developing countries as its new frontier. These stimuli are a growing recognition of the epidemic, academia's call to reestablish public health as a mover of societal tectonics rather than a handmaiden to medicine's focus on the individual, and the turmoil in the US health system that makes change permissible. To enable graduating professionals to participate in the assault on chronic diseases, schools of public health must allocate budgets and other resources to this effort. The barriers to chronic disease prevention and risk factor modulation are cultural and political; confronting them will require public health to work with a wide variety of disciplines. Chronic disease will likely become the dominant global public health issue soon. In addressing this issue, academia needs to lead, not follow.

More physicians are not the answer.

The Association of American Medical Colleges has called for an increase of 30% in matriculation in United States medical schools to treat the growing number of elderly patients with chronic illnesses. However, increasing the physician supply is unlikely to address the underlying problem, that being the growth of chronic disease, which necessitates a shift in orientation from treatment to management and prevention. This shift will in turn require a change in the makeup of health care providers. Instead of more physicians, more nonphysician professionals must be trained so as to aggressively coordinate comprehensive chronic disease care. A disease management model led by physicians, but including advanced practice nurses and other professionals, offers the opportunity to enhance efficiency, improve quality, reduce hospitalization, and meet evidence-based mandates. Such a workforce transition can become the inaugural step in converting the entire health care system from treatment based to prevention and management based. In conclusion, the position of the Association of American Medical Colleges should be a platform for discussion.

State Requirements for Automated External Defibrillators in American Schools: Framing the Debate About Legislative Action.

Installation of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in schools has been associated with increased survival after sudden cardiac arrest. An authoritative academic research database was interrogated to identify all current state statutes pertaining to AEDs in schools. As of February 2016, 17 of 50 U.S. states (34%) require AED installation in at least some of their schools; the remaining states have no legislation. However, requirements are far from comprehensive in these 17 states. Only 5 states offer unequivocal funding to schools for purchasing AEDs. A minority of U.S. states have legislation requiring AED placement in schools, and even fewer provide funding. State legislatures that have not yet enacted legislation requiring AEDs in schools may look to neighboring states for examples of child and adult lifesaving law. Placement of an AED in schools should be implemented with an emergency response plan that trains staff in the recognition and response to cardiac arrest.

Relations among renal function, risk of sudden cardiac death, and benefit of the implanted cardiac defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

Implanted cardioverter defibrillator therapy has been shown to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. However, data on the relation between renal function and SCD in this population are limited, and the effect of renal dysfunction on the implanted cardioverter defibrillator benefit has not been determined. We performed a retrospective analysis of the outcome associated with renal dysfunction, as determined by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), in patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-II. Multivariate analysis in conventionally treated patients showed that for each 10-U reduction in eGFR, the risk of all-cause mortality and SCD increased by 16% (p = 0.005) and 17% (p = 0.03), respectively. Defibrillator therapy was associated with a survival benefit in each eGFR category of > or = 35 ml/min/1.73 m2 (overall risk reduction for all-cause mortality 32%, p = 0.01 and for SCD 66%, p < 0.001). However, no implanted cardioverter defibrillator benefit was shown among patients with an eGFR < 35 ml/min/1.73 m2 (all-cause mortality hazard ratio 1.09, p = 0.84; SCD hazard ratio 0.95, p = 0.95). In conclusion, in patients with high-risk cardiac disease enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-II, a significant increase was found in the risk of SCD with declining renal function. Defibrillator therapy was associated with a significant survival benefit among the study patients with mild to moderate or no renal disease, but no benefit was shown among patients with more advanced renal dysfunction.

And Why So Great a "No?": The Donor and Academic Communities' Failure to Confront Global Chronic Disease.

Chronic diseases are the dominant issues for global public health in terms of mortality, morbidity, and cost, and they have been identified as such for >40 years. Despite their predominance, however, these diseases-cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, cancer, pulmonary disease, mental health, and dementia-attract little attention in the public health curriculum and even less from the funding community. We explore the rationales that have perpetuated this inability or unwillingness to match need with effort. We examine 3 concepts that impede changing this relationship: 1) the traditional contextual view of public health that emerged, to be sure with great success, in the post-World War II era; 2) the failure of public health to transition to economic development as the goal of health assistance; and 3) the unwillingness of public health to confront social, political, and economic policies as the foci of upstream drivers of the public's health. We conclude with a discussion of the need for public health to expand its horizon and tear down the walls of the silos that inhibit the emergence of relevant global public health.

Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) improves survival in high-risk cardiac patients. This analysis from the MADIT-II trial database examines the long-term clinical course and subsequent mortality risk of patients after termination of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias by an ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Life-table survival analysis was performed, and proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the contribution of baseline clinical factors and time-dependent defibrillator therapy to mortality during long-term follow-up. Of 720 patients with an ICD (average follow-up 21 months), 169 patients received 701 antiarrhythmic device therapies for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Few baseline characteristics distinguished patients who received appropriate ICD therapy for their first ventricular tachyarrhythmic episode. The probability of survival for at least 1 year after first therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) was 80%. The hazard ratios for the risk of death due to any cause in those who survived appropriate therapy for termination of VT and VF were 3.4 (P<0.001) and 3.3 (P=0.01), respectively, compared with those who survived without receiving ICD therapy, with a high frequency of heart failure and late nonsudden cardiac death after first successful ICD therapy for VF. CONCLUSIONS: Successful appropriate therapy by an ICD for VT or VF is associated with 80% survival at 1 year after arrhythmia termination. These patients are at increased risk for heart failure and nonsudden cardiac death after device termination of VT or VF and should receive special attention for the prevention and management of progressive left ventricular dysfunction during long-term follow-up.