Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Radiographics ; 40(4): 1061-1070, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32559149

RESUMEN

CT scanning of a pregnant patient is often a source of distress for both patient and staff. Despite having expertise in image interpretation, a radiologist may not feel equipped to discuss the radiation-related safety issues during CT scanning of the fetus. In addition, patients are frequently concerned about the risk of adverse effects on the fetus from exposure to ionizing radiation. Recognizing the possibility of adverse effects from fetal exposure and the impossibility of direct in vivo measurement, medical physicists have developed several methods to estimate the amount of radiation reaching the fetus. A physician should know the potential biologic effects of fetal irradiation and at what radiation dose thresholds they occur. Physicians should also have an understanding of these methods and how the numbers they produce relate to potential fetal bioeffects. Furthermore, radiologists should have some understanding of how a qualified medical physicist calculates the fetal dose, how much they should trust those numbers, and the relevant variables that can affect the outcomes. Finally, the radiologist should know the magnitude of doses for CT scans commonly used in pregnant patients. Armed with this knowledge, a radiologist should be confident when discussing fetal dose and determining the best course of action for the pregnant patient. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico por imagen , Feto/efectos de la radiación , Radiometría , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Dosis de Radiación
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 28(12): 1727-1731, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29042170

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that computed tomography (CT)-guided bone marrow biopsy in patients with a platelet count between 20,000/uL and 50,000/uL is safe and that preprocedure platelet transfusion is unnecessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included bone marrow biopsies performed between May 2009 and May 2016. The study population included 981 patients-age range, 15-93 years; average age, 57 years; 505 (51.5%) men; and 476 (48.5%) women. One hundred eighty-seven biopsies were performed in patients with a platelet count of 20,000-50,000/µL; 33 were performed in patients with a platelet count of < 20,000/µL. The primary endpoint was hemorrhagic complications, Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) complication class C or above. The complication rates in thrombocytopenic patients were compared to patients with a platelet count of ≥ 50,000/uL. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) for the complication rate in each group were also calculated. RESULTS: There were no SIR class C or above postprocedure bleeding-related complications, including interventions or transfusions. For patients with a platelet count of < 20,000/µL and of 20,000-50,000/µL, hemorrhagic complications rates were 0% (95% CI: 0-9.1%) and 0% (95% CI: 0-1.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided bone marrow biopsy is safe in thrombocytopenic patients, with a hemorrhagic complication rate below 1.6% for patients with a platelet count of 20,000-50,000/µL. Routine preprocedure platelet transfusion may not be necessary for patients with a platelet count of 20,000-50,000/µL.


Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea/patología , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Radiografía Intervencional , Trombocitopenia/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Recuento de Plaquetas , Transfusión de Plaquetas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Cureus ; 14(9): e29165, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36259004

RESUMEN

We report the case of a patient with a previous history of obstructive renal calculus disease who initially presented with a symptomatic calculus in her right mid-ureter, requiring ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy and ureteral stent placement. Shortly after the removal of the stent, the patient was found to have a peri-ureteral abscess, necessitating percutaneous drainage by interventional radiology, and placement of an additional ureteral stent. Adverse reactions to these procedures are rare and, to our knowledge, this is the only documented case of peri-ureteral abscess as a complication of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy or of ureteral stenting. In addition to developing a peri-ureteral abscess, this patient also experienced deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and subsegmental pulmonary embolism (PE), which also have not been found to be a common complication of laser lithotripsy or ureteral stent placement in any of the studies that we reviewed for this article. The complications that were previously rare are unfortunately on the rise, possibly in the setting of both increased access to invasive therapies as well as the increased rates of diabetes and obesity. Survivability hinges on prompt recognition and treatment of these complications. In the event that a peri-ureteral abscess is discovered, prompt treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics is recommended in addition to interventional radiology and urology consultation. Antibiotics should cover conventional intra-abdominal and urologic abscess regimens.

4.
Phys Med Biol ; 65(20): 205008, 2020 10 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33063693

RESUMEN

Studies investigating the effects of computed tomography (CT) image acquisition and reconstruction parameters have mostly been limited to non-human phantoms to limit exposure to patients. This study investigates these variations using a cadaveric liver and determines harmonization methods to mitigate these variations. A reference CT scan of a cadaveric liver was acquired along with 16 modified scans. Modified scans were obtained with altered image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. In each slice, the liver was segmented and used to calculate 142 features. Student's t-tests assessed differences between reference and modified scans for each feature after correcting for multiple comparisons. Features were harmonized between reference and modified scans using histogram normalization, pixel resampling, Butterworth filtering, resampling and filtering combined, and ComBat harmonization. The number of features reflecting significant differences before and after harmonization were compared across imaging parameters. Reducing the field-of-view (FOV) and using coronal instead of axial scans resulted in the greatest number of features reflecting significant differences (67.6%, and 35.9%, respectively) and resulted in the greatest median relative change in feature values (25.4% and 18.2%, respectively). Changes in tube voltage, pitch, and slice interval resulted in the smallest number of features reflecting significance (0.7%) with median relative changes in feature <2%. Histogram normalization reduced or maintained the number of significantly different features for all scans, while ComBat reduced the number of significantly different features to zero for all scans. The remaining harmonization methods had mixed effects: resampling reduced the number of features reflecting significant differences for half of the imaging parameters, while filtering alone and filtering combined with resampling both reduced the number of features reflecting significance for 10 of the 16 parameters. The dependence of radiomic features on image acquisition and reconstruction parameters varies in a cadaveric liver; however, various harmonization methods have shown promise in mitigating these dependencies, particularly ComBat.


Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Cadáver , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/normas , Masculino , Fantasmas de Imagen , Estándares de Referencia
5.
Cureus ; 9(8): e1634, 2017 Aug 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29104842

RESUMEN

Multiple myeloma (MM) and osteosarcoma (OS) are two common bone malignancies, however, the simultaneous occurrence of both primary bone tumors in the same patient has not been reported in the United States to date. We present a unique case in which both malignancies present concurrently in a 72-year-old man. Results of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiographic skeletal survey, and hematological workup established the initial diagnosis of MM. Approximately three months later, the patient was admitted with severe right hip pain and shortness of breath and was evaluated with computed tomography (CT) of the right hip, abdomen, pelvis, and chest, revealing an osseous mass with a "sunburst" pattern in the right hip, and several calcified nodules in the lungs. Subsequent wedge resection and histological evaluation of the lung nodules confirmed the diagnosis of metastatic OS to the lungs, with a presumptive diagnosis of primary OS of the right hip. The clinical findings and imaging characteristics in this case are presented. Two similar cases found in the literature are also briefly discussed. The findings of this case report suggest that, in rare instances, MM patients with sclerotic bone findings may have a concurrent diagnosis of OS.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA