RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) often results in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The cause for increased THA revision rates among patients with AVN is not yet fully understood. PURPOSE: To perform a comparative radiological analysis of implant integration between patients with AVN and osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: After a matched pair analysis of 58 patients, 30 received THA due to OA, 28 due to AVN. X-ray images were evaluated after one week ("baseline") and on average 37.58 months postoperatively ("endline"). The prosthesis was grouped into 10 regions of interest (ROI): seven femoral and three acetabular. Incidence, width, and extent of "radiolucent lines" were measured within each zone. RESULTS: Between baseline and endline, width and extent progressed more noticeably in all femoral and acetabular zones among patients with AVN. In femoral ROI 1, the width increased in 40% of AVN cases compared to 6.7% of OA cases. For acetabular ROI 3, the width increased in 26.7% of AVN cases compared to no perceived changes in the OA group. No signs of prosthetic loosening were found in the AVN group. CONCLUSION: The increase of width and extent of radiolucent lines over time in patients with AVN could be a sign of lack of osteointegration. However, prosthetic loosening in absence of clinical symptoms cannot be deduced from radiological findings after medium-term postoperative follow-up. Further long-term studies are required to monitor how radiolucent lines develop in respect to long-term implant loosening. Dependent on bone quality, individually adapted reaming and broaching of the implant site are recommended.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral , Prótesis de Cadera , Osteoartritis , Humanos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Cabeza Femoral , Resultado del Tratamiento , Falla de Prótesis , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a prevalent condition in frail older adults that requires hip or knee replacement in many patients. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of hip and knee arthroplasty on frailty. METHODS: In this prospective short-term study, we used data from 101 participants of the ongoing Special Orthopaedic Geriatrics (SOG) trial, funded by the German Federal Joint Committee (GBA). Frailty, measured by Fried's Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP), was assessed preoperatively, 7 days postoperatively, 4-6 weeks and 3 months after hip and knee arthroplasty. ANOVA with repeated measures and post-hoc tests for the subgroups were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the 101 participants, 50 were pre-frail (1-2 PFP criteria) and 51 were frail (≥ 3 PFP criteria) preoperatively. In the pre-frail group, the PFP score decreased from 1.56 ± 0.50 (median 2) preoperatively to 0.53 ± 0.73 (median 0) 3 months after surgery (p < 0.001). The PFP score in the frail cohort decreased from 3.39 ± 1.45 (median 3) preoperatively to 1.27 ± 1.14 (median 1) 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). While the PFP score of the pre-frail participants increased 7 days after surgery, the PFP score of the frail group decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: Pre-frail individuals often regain robustness and patients with frailty are no longer assessed as frail after surgery. Joint replacement is an effective intervention to improve frailty in hip and knee osteoarthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is part of the Special Orthopaedic Geriatrics (SOG) trial, German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00024102. Registered on 19 January 2021.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Fragilidad , Anciano , Humanos , Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although osteoporosis is common in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), its impact on postoperative outcomes has been inadequately studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of bone mineral density (BMD) on adverse events and patient-reported outcomes in THA and TKA. METHODS: A series of 1,306 THA and 1,046 TKA patients who had received osteodensitometry were analyzed retrospectively. Rates of readmission, complication, transfusion, and patient-reported outcome were correlated with BMD. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between osteoporosis and adverse events. RESULTS: Osteoporosis patients showed higher rates of 90-day readmission (THA: 8.5% versus 4.0%, P = .02; TKA: 8.9% versus 4.4%, P = .04) and transfusion (THA: 6.8% versus 1.2%, P < .001; TKA: 5.4% versus 1.5%, P = .005). After THA, rates of complications requiring intensive care management (5.1% versus 0.7%, P < .001) and rates of medical complications (3.5% versus 0.6%, P = .001) were increased. After TKA, rates of surgical complications (2.8% versus 0.8%, P = .04) were increased. Postoperatively, osteoporosis patients improved to comparable patient-reported outcomes as patients who had normal BMD. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed osteoporosis as an independent risk factor for readmissions, complications, and transfusions. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is a risk factor for adverse events after THA and TKA. Affected patients show similar improvement of patient-reported outcome compared to patients who have normal BMD. As osteoporosis is modifiable, a systematic screening of patients scheduled for THA or TKA should be discussed.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Osteoporosis , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Densidad Ósea , Factores de Riesgo , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Lesions of the peroneal tendons are frequently overseen after ankle sprain. The symptoms consist of stress-dependent pain that extends from the inframalleolar to the proximal part along the course of the peroneal tendons as well as ankle instability and soft-tissue swelling. In case of unsuccessful conservative treatment, surgical therapy is recommended. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome after open reconstruction of the peroneus brevis tendon. METHODS: 13 patients were included in this retrospective study. All of them received a single reconstruction of the peroneus brevis tendon in open technique. Postoperative results were evaluated with the AOFAS score, a functional and perdobargraphic analysis as well as measuring postural stability with the Biodex balance system. The participants were matched with a healthy control group according to age, sex and BMI. RESULTS: The results of the AOFAS score showed significantly convincing results in all subscores postoperatively. A bilateral comparison of the postural stability showed that the affected side had become functionally similar to the healthy side. No statistical significant difference was detected concerning both one-legged and two-legged standing with the control group. Pedobarographic results revealed no difference between the affected and contralateral side, as well as between the patients and the healthy control group. CONCLUSION: Open reconstruction of the peroneus brevis tendon leads to significant better postoperative results and can be recommended after unsuccessful conservative treatment as promising option.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo , Equilibrio Postural , Traumatismos de los Tendones , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos de los Tendones/cirugía , Traumatismos de los Tendones/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de los Tendones/fisiopatología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Adulto Joven , Tendones/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Articulación del Tobillo/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Femoral stem subsidence can lead to aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for stem subsidence as it can affect the initial stability and osteointegration. We evaluated whether reduced bone mineral density is related to higher subsidence of the femoral stem after primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation. METHODS: 79 patients who had undergone primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation were analyzed retrospectively. Subsidence of the femoral stem was measured on standing pelvic anterior-posterior radiographs after 4-6 weeks and one year. Patient individual risk factors for stem subsidence (stem size, canal flare index, canal fill ratio, body mass index (BMI), demographic data) were correlated. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed of the formal neck and the lumbar spine including the calculation of T-score and Z-score. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Stem subsidence appeared regardless of BMD (overall collective 2.3 ± 1.64 mm). Measure of subsidence was even higher in patients with normal BMD (2.8 ± 1.7 mm vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.05). High BMI was correlated with increased stem subsidence (p = 0.015). Subsidence had no impact on improvement of patient-related outcome measures (WOMAC, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) after THA. Patients with low BMD reported lower quality of life 12 month postoperatively compared to patients with normal BMD (EQ-5D-5L 0.82 vs. 0.91, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Stable fixation of a cementless stem succeeds also in patients with reduced BMD. Regarding stem subsidence, enhanced recovery rehabilitation can be safely applied in patients with low BMD.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Densidad Ósea , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Absorciometría de Fotón , Diseño de PrótesisRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Numbers of total hip arthroplasty (THA) are steadily rising and patients expect faster mobility without pain postoperatively. The aim of enhanced recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programs in a multidisciplinary setup was to keep pace with the needs of quality and quantity of surgical THA-interventions and patients' expectations. METHODS: 194 patients undergoing THA procedures were investigated after single-blinded randomization to ERAS (98) or conventional setup group (96). Primary outcome variable was mobilization measured with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) in seconds. Secondary outcome variables were floor count and walking distance in meters as well as rest, mobilization and night pain on a numerous rating scale (NRS). All variables were recorded preoperatively and daily until the sixth postoperative day. To assess and compare clinical outcome and patient satisfaction, the PPP33-Score and PROMs were used. RESULTS: No complications such as thromboembolic complications, fractures or revisions were recorded within the first week postoperatively in either study group. Compared to the conventional group, the ERAS group showed significantly better TUG (p < 0.050) and walking distance results after surgery up to the sixth, and floor count up to the third postoperative day. On the first and second postoperative day, ERAS patients showed superior results (p < 0.001) in all independent activity subitems. Regarding the evaluation of pain (NRS), PPP33 and PROMS, no significant difference was shown (p > 0.050). CONCLUSION: This prospective single-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial was able to demonstrate excellent outcome with comparable pain after ERAS THA versus a conventional setup. Therefore, ERAS could be used in daily clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Dolor , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Muscular deficits as part of severe osteoarthritis of the hip may persist for up to two years following total hip arthroplasty (THA). No study has evaluated the mid-term benefit of a modified enhanced-recovery-after-surgery (ERAS) concept on muscular strength of the hip in detail thus far. We (1) investigated if a modified ERAS-concept for primary THA improves the mid-term rehabilitation of muscular strength and (2) compared the clinical outcome using validated clinical scores. METHODS: In a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial we compared patients receiving primary THA with a modified ERAS concept (n = 12, ERAS-group) and such receiving conventional THA (n = 12, non-ERAS) at three months and one year postoperatively. For assessment of isokinetic muscular strength, a Biodex-Dynamometer was used (peak-torque, total-work, power). The clinical outcome was evaluated by using clinical scores (Patient-Related-Outcome-Measures (PROMs), WOMAC-index (Western-Ontario-and-McMaster-Universities-Osteoarthritis-Index), HHS (Harris-Hip-Score) and EQ-5D-3L-score. RESULTS: Three-months postoperatively, isokinetic strength (peak-torque, total-work, power) and active range of motion was significantly better in the modified ERAS group. One year postoperatively, the total work for flexion was significantly higher than in the Non-ERAS group, whilst peak-torque and power did not show significant differences. Evaluation of clinical scores revealed excellent results at both time points in both groups. However, we could not detect any significant differences between both groups in respect of the clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: With regard to muscular strength, this study supports the implementation of an ERAS concept for primary THA. The combination with a modified ERAS concept lead to faster rehabilitation for up to one-year postoperatively, reflected by significant higher muscular strength (peak-torque, total-work, power). Possibly, because common scores are not sensitive enough, the results are not reflected in the clinical outcome. Further larger randomized controlled trials are necessary for long-term evaluation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The care of geriatric patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery is becoming increasingly more important due to demographic trends. Compared to geriatric traumatology, however, there are still no established orthogeriatric care models in Germany and therefore hardly any scientific data. The aim of this study was to describe the risk and complication profiles in older patients with elective hip and knee replacements. METHODS: In a prospective study data were collected from orthogeriatric patients with indications for elective hip and knee replacement surgery who fulfilled defined inclusion and exclusion criteria between January 2021 and August 2023 in the orthopedic department of a German university hospital for the descriptive analysis of risk and complication profiles. In addition to a preoperative and perioperative data analysis, a follow-up was conducted 4-6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The surgical risk profile of the patient population analyzed was characterized by advanced age (78.4⯱ 4.8 years), preobesity/obesity (76%), multimorbidity (7.4⯱ 3.1 comorbidities), polypharmacy (7.5⯱ 3.8 medications), immobility (short physical performance battery 7.1⯱ 2.6), prefrailty/frailty (87%), frequent anticoagulation (22%) and a high number of potentially inappropriate medications (64%). Complication events mainly occurred within the first 7 days postoperatively and 90% of the events within this recording period were minor complications. The overall complication rate significantly decreased in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Due to the high risk and complication profiles the routine use of orthogeriatric co-management models for elective orthopedic surgery should be considered in the future.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) and microfracture are established treatments for focal chondral defects in the knee, but there are little clinical data concerning these procedures over the long term. This study evaluates the outcomes of AMIC® compared to microfracture over 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Forty-seven patients were randomized and treated either with MFx (n = 13), sutured AMIC® (n = 17) or glued AMIC® (n = 17) in a prospective, randomized, controlled multicentre trial. The Modified Cincinnati Knee Score, a visual analogue scale for pain and MOCART score were used to assess outcomes over 10 years post-operatively. RESULTS: All treatment arms improved in the first 2 years, but a progressive and significant deterioration in scores was observed in the MFx group, while both AMIC® groups remained stable. MOCART scores were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: The AMIC® procedure results in improved patient outcomes in comparison with microfracture up to 10 years following surgery for the repair of focal chondral defects in the knee. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT02993510.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia Subcondral , Cartílago Articular , Condrogénesis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto , Artroplastia Subcondral/métodos , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Cartílago Articular/lesiones , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Condrocitos/trasplanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a prevalent condition in older adults that leads to reduced physical function in many patients and ultimately requires hip or knee replacement. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of hip and knee arthroplasty on the physical performance of orthogeriatric patients with osteoarthritis. METHODS: In this prospective study, we used data from 135 participants of the ongoing Special Orthopaedic Geriatrics (SOG) trial, funded by the German Federal Joint Committee (GBA). Physical function, measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), was assessed preoperatively, 3 and 7 days postoperatively, 4-6 weeks and 3 months after hip and knee arthroplasty. For the statistical analysis, the Friedman test and post-hoc tests were used. RESULTS: Of the 135 participants with a mean age of 78.5 ± 4.6 years, 81 underwent total hip arthroplasty and 54 total knee arthroplasty. In the total population, SPPB improved by a median of 2 points 3 months after joint replacement (p < 0.001). In the hip replacement group, SPPB increased by a median of 2 points 3 months after surgery (p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, the SPPB increased by a median of 1 point in the knee replacement group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Elective total hip and knee arthroplasty leads to a clinically meaningful improvement in physical performance in orthogeriatric patients with osteoarthritis after only a few weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is part of the Special Orthopaedic Geriatrics (SOG) trial, German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00024102. Registered on 19 January 2021.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Osteoartritis , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Rendimiento Físico FuncionalRESUMEN
The aim of this study is to show the concordance of an app-based decision support system and the diagnosis given by spinal surgeons in cases of back pain. 86 patients took part within 2 months. They were seen by spine surgeons in the daily routine and then completed an app-based questionnaire that also led to a diagnosis independently. The results showed a Cramer's V = .711 (p < .001), which can be taken as a strong relation between the tool and the diagnosis of the medical doctor. Besides, in 67.4% of the cases, the diagnosis was concordant. An overestimation of the severity of the diagnosis occurred more often than underestimation (15.1% vs. 7%). The app-based tool is a safe tool to support healthcare professionals in back pain diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Correlación de Datos , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico , Columna VertebralRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) leads to less morbidity, faster recovery, and, therefore, shorter hospital stays. The expected increment of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the U.S. highlights the need for sufficient pain management. The favorable use of short-lasting spinal anesthesia enables early mobilization but may lead to increased opioid consumption the first 24 h (h) postoperatively. METHODS: In a retrospective study design, we compared conventional THA with postoperative immobilization for two days (non-ERAS) and enhanced recovery THA with early mobilization (ERAS group). Data assessment took place as part of the "Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Treatment project" (QUIPS). Initially, 2161 patients were enrolled, resulting in 630 after performing a matched pair analysis for sex, age, ASA score (American-Society-of-Anesthesiology) and preoperative pain score. Patient-reported pain scores, objectified by a numerical rating scale (NRS), opioid consumption and side effects were evaluated 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The ERAS group revealed higher activity-related pain (p = 0.002), accompanied by significantly higher opioid consumption (p < 0.001). Maximum and minimum pain as well as side effects did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to analyze pain scores, opioid consumption, and side effects in a matched pair analyses at this early stage and supports the implementation of an ERAS concept for THA. Taking into consideration the early postoperative mobilization, we were not able to detect a difference regarding postoperative pain. Although opioid consumption appeared to be higher in ERAS group, occurrence of side effects ranged among comparable percentages.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Ambulación Precoz , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiempo de InternaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) is a widespread disease affecting mostly young and active people, often exacerbating in progressive stages, ending in joint replacement. The most common joint preserving operative therapy for early stages is core decompression (CD), optional with cancellous bone grafting (CBG). For success it is vital that the necrotic area is hit and the sclerotic rim is broken by drilling into the defect zone to relieve intraosseous pressure. The aim of this study was to investigate if both techniques are precise enough to hit the center of the necrosis and if there is a difference in precision between drilling with small pins (CD) and the trephine (CBG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 10 patients underwent CD, 12 patients CBG with conventional C-arm imaging. Postoperatively 3D MRI reconstructions of the necrotic area and the drilling channels were compared. The deviation of the drilling channel from the center of the necrotic area was measured. PROMs (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D, SF-36) were evaluated to compare the clinical success of these procedures. RESULTS: Neither with CD nor with CBG the defect zone was missed. The drilling precision of both procedures did not differ significantly: distance to center 3.58 mm for CD (range 0.0-14.06, SD 4.2) versus 3.91 mm for CBG (range 0.0-15.27, SD 4.7). PROMs showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Concerning the most important difference between the two procedures-the surgical higher demanding technique of CBG-we suggest applying the less invasive technique of CD alone.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral , Humanos , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Hueso Esponjoso/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodosRESUMEN
Advanced omarthritis or an irreparable lesion of the rotator cuff are indications for the implantation of a shoulder prosthesis. Several models are available and the choice of model depends on the specific pathology of the patient. Preoperative medication management must be taken into account in rheumatism patients. The correct aftercare is essential for the proper functioning of the prosthesis.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores , Articulación del Hombro , Humanos , Hombro/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoprosthesis infections represent a major challenge for doctors and patients. Due to the increase in endoprosthesis implantation because of the increasing life expectancy, an increase in endoprosthesis infections is to be expected. In addition to infection prophylaxis, methods of infection control become highly relevant, especially in the group of geriatric and multimorbid patients. The aim is to reduce the high 1year mortality from prosthesis infections through a structured algorithm. ALGORITHM FOR PROSTHESIS INFECTIONS: Prosthesis infections can basically be divided into early and late infections. According to the criteria of the International Consensus Meeting, a late infection is defined as the occurrence more than 30 days after implantation. With respect to the planned approach, the (p)TNM classification offers an orientation. In the early postoperative interval the clinical appearance is crucial as in this phase neither laboratory parameters nor an analysis of synovial fluid show a high sensitivity. It is fundamental that, apart from patients with sepsis, environment diagnostics should be initiated. If a late infection is suspected, in addition to radiological diagnostics (X-ray, skeletal scintigraphy and if necessary, computed tomography, CT), laboratory (C-reactive protein, CRP, leukocytes, blood sedimentation, and if necessary, interleukin6, procalcitonin) and microbiological diagnostics (arthrocentesis with synovial analysis and microbiology) are indicated; however, in addition to the arthrocentesis result, the clinical appearance is crucial in cases where an exclusion cannot be confirmed by laboratory parameters. If an infection is confirmed, the treatment depends on the spectrum of pathogens, the soft tissue situation and the comorbidities, including a multistage procedure with temporary explantation and, if necessary, implantation of an antibiotic-containing spacer is necessary. A prosthesis preservation using the debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) regimen is only appropriate in an acute infection situation. Basically, radical surgical debridement should be carried out to reduce the pathogen load and treatment of a possible biofilm formation for both early and late infections. The subsequent antibiotic treatment (short or long interval) should be coordinated with the infectious disease specialists. CONCLUSION: A structured approach for prosthesis infections oriented to an evidence-based algorithm provides a sufficient possibility of healing. An interdisciplinary approach involving cooperation between orthopedic and infectious disease specialists has proven to be beneficial. Surgical treatment with the aim of reducing the bacterial load by removing the biofilm with subsequent antibiotic treatment is of intrinsic importance.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Artificial joint replacement is a meaningful treatment option for patients with advanced rheumatic degenerative joint diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the underlying rheumatic diseases on postoperative complications and patient-reported outcome (PRO) after elective total joint replacement (TJR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of 9149 patients with elective total knee or total hip arthroplasty (TKR and THR), complication rates and PRO of patients with and without rheumatic diseases (RD) were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine whether the underlying rheumatic disease was an independent risk factor for various complications. RESULTS: In the univariate analyses the RD patients had an increased risk of medical complications (7.1% vs. 5.2%; pâ¯= 0.028) and Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (2.8% vs. 1.8%; pâ¯= 0.048) after TJR. This was confirmed in multivariate statistical analyses (pâ¯< 0.034). The rates for operative revisions and surgical complications were comparable (2.5% vs. 2.4%; pâ¯= 0.485). Analysis of the PRO showed a higher responder rate in patients with RD after TKR (91.9% vs. 84.5%, pâ¯= 0.039). In contrast, the responder rate in patients with RD after THR was comparable (93.4% vs. 93.2%, pâ¯= 0.584). CONCLUSION: Despite increased postoperative complication rates, patients with underlying rheumatic diseases showed a comparable outcome 1 year after TJR. After TKR the RD patients showed even higher responder rates. Although RD patients are a vulnerable patient group, they can still benefit from joint replacement.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Articulación de la Rodilla , Artritis Reumatoide/cirugía , Artritis Reumatoide/etiologíaRESUMEN
Background: Sedentary behavior is associated with an increased risk of chronic diseases, such as metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes and all-cause mortality. Occupational sitting time contributes to large amounts of daily sedentary behavior, especially in office workers. Objective: This study investigated the amount of time spent in sedentary behavior during different tasks at work and while commuting of administrative personnel of a university hospital in Germany. Material and methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of administrative employees at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany was carried out to assess work-related sedentary behavior. Descriptive and exploratory statistical analyses were performed. Results: The study population consisted of 159 participants (54.1% women, 51.6% older than 40 years), which corresponds to a response rate of 26%. The median daily sitting time in the office was 7.0â¯h (interquartile range, IQR 6.0-7.5â¯h) and mostly occurred during computer work (57.3%), telephone calls (13.2%) and meetings (11.7%). Median standing time at work was 0.8â¯h (IQR 0.3-1.4â¯h). Administrative staff spent a median of 0.7â¯h (IQR 0.3-1.0â¯h) per day sedentary while commuting, with 67.3% of respondents commuting by car, motorbike or scooter. The participants were of the opinion that sitting for long uninterrupted periods had negative (69.6%) or relatively negative (29.7%) effects on health. Conclusion: Administrative staff in hospitals spend large amounts of the daily working time with sedentary behavior. Interventions that enable working both in sitting and standing positions can lead to reduced work-related sitting time and thereby could improve occupational and, in a broader sense, public health.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The spread of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to transformative advancements in diverse sectors, including healthcare. Specifically, generative writing systems have shown potential in various applications, but their effectiveness in clinical settings has been barely investigated. In this context, we evaluated the proficiency of ChatGPT-4 in diagnosing gonarthrosis and coxarthrosis and recommending appropriate treatments compared with orthopaedic specialists. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted using anonymized medical records of 100 patients previously diagnosed with either knee or hip arthrosis. ChatGPT-4 was employed to analyse these historical records, formulating both a diagnosis and potential treatment suggestions. Subsequently, a comparative analysis was conducted to assess the concordance between the AI's conclusions and the original clinical decisions made by the physicians. RESULTS: In diagnostic evaluations, ChatGPT-4 consistently aligned with the conclusions previously drawn by physicians. In terms of treatment recommendations, there was an 83% agreement between the AI and orthopaedic specialists. The therapeutic concordance was verified by the calculation of a Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.580 (p < 0.001). This indicates a moderate-to-good level of agreement. In recommendations pertaining to surgical treatment, the AI demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 80%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that the variables reduced quality of life (OR 49.97, p < 0.001) and start-up pain (OR 12.54, p = 0.028) have an influence on ChatGPT-4's recommendation for a surgery. CONCLUSION: This study emphasises ChatGPT-4's notable potential in diagnosing conditions such as gonarthrosis and coxarthrosis and in aligning its treatment recommendations with those of orthopaedic specialists. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that AI tools such as ChatGPT-4 are not meant to replace the nuanced expertise and clinical judgment of seasoned orthopaedic surgeons, particularly in complex decision-making scenarios regarding treatment indications. Due to the exploratory nature of the study, further research with larger patient populations and more complex diagnoses is necessary to validate the findings and explore the broader potential of AI in healthcare. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III evidence.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Cadera , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Humanos , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/terapia , Inteligencia Artificial , Calidad de Vida , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Articulación de la RodillaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of coccygodynia is still a challenging entity. Clear surgical selection criteria are still lacking. The aim of the investigation was to establish a novel radiological classification for surgical decision-making in coccygodynia cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of standing and sitting X-rays of coccygodynia patients referred to a single centre from 2018 to 2020. The sacro-coccygeal angle (SCA), the intra-coccygeal angle (ICA) and the difference of the intervertebral disc height (∆IDH) were measured. All coccyges were distributed in subtypes and correlated with the patients' treatment. RESULTS: In total, 138 patients (female/male: 103/35) with a mean age of 45.6 ± 15.4 years were included in the study. In total, 49 patients underwent coccygectomy. Four different subtypes of displaced coccyges were identified: Type I with a non-segmented coccyx, anterior pivot, increased SCA and ICA from standing to sitting, ∆IDH = 1.0 ± 1.5 mm. Type II with a multisegmented coccyx, anterior pivot, increased SCA and ICA standing/sitting, ∆IDH = 1.1 ± 1.6 mm. Type III showed a posterior pivoted coccyx, negative SCA and ICA, ∆IDH = 0.6 ± 1.6 mm. Type IV is characterized by an anterior-posterior dissociation of the tail bone with a positive SCA, and the ICA shifted from a posterior to an anterior orientation. ∆IDH was - 0.6 ± 1.8 mm. CONCLUSION: The presented radiological classification could help to facilitate the surgical decision-making for patients with displaced os coccyx. In addition, lateral and sitting X-rays were easy to perform and did not need unnecessary ionizing radiation like in CT scans and were more cost-effective than MRI investigations. The subtypes III and especially IV were more likely leading to surgery.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda , Cóccix , Adulto , Cóccix/diagnóstico por imagen , Cóccix/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Región SacrococcígeaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is derived from routinely collected data and validated as a geriatric risk stratification tool. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the HFRS as a predictor for postoperative adverse events in spine surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of 2042 patients undergoing spine surgery at a university spine center between 2011 and 2019, HFRS was calculated for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between the HFRS and postoperative adverse events. Adverse events were compared between patients with high or low frailty risk. RESULTS: Patients with intermediate or high frailty risk showed a higher rate of reoperation (19.7% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.01), surgical site infection (3.4% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001), internal complications (4.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01), Clavien-Dindo IV complications (8.8% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001) and transfusion (10.9% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed a high HFRS as independent risk factor for reoperation [odds ratio (OR) = 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.2], transfusion (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.4), internal complications (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3), surgical site infections (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.5) and other complications (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.4). CONCLUSION: The HFRS can predict adverse events and is an easy instrument, fed from routine hospital data. By identifying risk patients at an early stage, the individual patient risk could be minimized, which leads to less complications and lower costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - retrospective cohort study TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the local ethics committee (20-1821-104) of the University of Regensburg in February 2020.