Continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute on chronic liver failure and acute kidney injury: A retrospective cohort study
.

BACKGROUND: Incident acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with poor prognosis. The role of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is not well established for patients with ACLF and AKI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine clinical outcomes in 66 patients with ACLF and AKI requiring CRRT. RESULTS: All-cause hospital mortality was 89.4%. Five (7.6%) patients were listed for liver transplantation, of whom 1 (1.5%) was eventually subjected to transplantation. Etiology of AKI included type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) with or without some degree of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) in 20 (30.3%) patients, and primarily ATN in 46 (69.7%) patients. When evaluated at the time of CRRT initiation, Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) 0.67 for both) had fair performance for prediction of mortality, whereas Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Chronic Liver Failure (CLIF)-SOFA performed better for the prediction of mortality (AUROC 0.87 for both). SOFA and CLIF-SOFA also performed well when determined at the time of ICU admission (AUROC 0.86 and 0.85, respectively). Etiology of liver disease or AKI did not influence prognosis. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients with ACLF and AKI requiring CRRT have poor hospital survival, even with provision of extracorporeal support therapy. SOFA and CLIF-SOFA are good prognostic tools of mortality in this susceptible population.

Racial Differences in the Prevalence of Celiac Disease in the US Population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2012.

AIM: To provide an estimate of the prevalence of celiac disease by race/ethnic origin in large sample of US population. METHODS: Data from the 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 NHANES were combined and analyzed. The NHANES is a nationally representative survey with oversampling of certain minorities. Sample-based frequencies were reported and weighted frequencies were used to estimate prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 14,701 participants were checked for tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and endomysial (EMA) IgA antibodies. Seventy-four participants had positive tTG and/or EMA corresponding to prevalence of 0.79 % (95 % CI 0.54-1.04 %). Non-Hispanic white were more likely to be positive for both compared with other races (72.0 vs 31.7 %; p = 0.010) and less likely to be weakly positive for tTG but positive for EMA (3.6 vs 26.4 %; p = 0.03). The prevalence of positive serology according to race was as follows: 1.08 % (95 % CI 0.70-1.45 %) in non-Hispanic white, 0.23 % (95 % CI 0.03-0.43 %) in Mexican, 0.22 % (95 % CI 0.01-0.44 %) in non-Hispanic black, 0.38 % (95 % CI 0.00-0.89 %) in "other Hispanic," and 0.15 % (95 % CI 0.00-0.34 %) in other races including multiracial and undeterminable in non-Hispanic Asian due to the presence of only one positive EMA test. 0.9 % of the NHANES sample participants followed gluten-free diet. Of this group of participants, 85 % were never diagnosed with celiac disease and 99 % of them had negative celiac disease serology. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially 0.79 % of the general US population demonstrate serologic evidence of celiac disease autoimmunity. The prevalence is 4-8 times higher among non-Hispanic white compared with other races. Close to 1 % of the population is electively following gluten-free diet despite having little evidence of the disease.

Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is becoming increasingly common among patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and is associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Management of such patients is complicated by LC related complications. Literature is scarce on the safety of antithrombotic regimens and invasive strategies for ACS in patients with LC, especially those undergoing liver transplant evaluation. Recently there has been evidence that cirrhosis is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in ACS. As patients with LC are generally excluded from large randomized trials, definitive guidelines for the management of ACS in this particular cohort are lacking. Many antithrombotic drugs require either hepatic activation or clearance; hence, an accurate assessment of hepatic function is required prior to initiation and dose adjustment. Despite a demonstrated survival benefit of optimal medical therapy and invasive revascularization techniques in LC patients with ACS, both strategies are currently underutilized in this population. This review aims to present currently available data and provide a practical, clinically oriented approach for the management of ACS in LC. Randomized clinical trials in LC patients with ACS are the need of the hour to further refine their management for favorable outcomes.

Hepatic encephalopathy for the hospitalist.

The care of patients with advanced liver disease is often complicated by episodes of acute decline in alertness and cognition, termed hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Hospitalists must be familiar with HE, as it is a common reason for hospitalization in this population and is associated with significantly increased mortality. This narrative review addresses common issues related to diagnosis and classification, precipitants, inpatient management, and transitions of care for patients with HE. The initial presentation can be variable, and HE remains a clinical diagnosis. The spectrum of HE manifestations spans from mild, subclinical cognitive deficits to overt coma. The West Haven scoring system is the most widely used classification system for HE. Various metabolic insults may precipitate HE, and providers must specifically seek to rule out infection and bleeding in cirrhotic patients presenting with altered cognition. This is consistent with the 4-pronged approach of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease practice guidelines. Patients with HE are typically treated primarily with nonabsorbable disaccharide laxatives, often with adjunctive rifaximin. The evidence for these agents is discussed, and available support for other treatment options is presented. Management issues relevant to general hospitalists include those related to acute pain management, decisional capacity, and HE following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. These issues are examined individually. Successfully transitioning patients recovering from HE to outpatient care requires open communication with multiple role players including patients, caregivers, and outpatient providers. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:591-594. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Fenofibrate is effective adjunctive therapy in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fenofibrate is a potential novel therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of studies of fenofibrate in PBC. METHODS: Electronic database search was performed for relevant studies. A search of abstracts presented in the main scientific meetings in the field and articles in press was also performed. Random effect model was used to pool the effect size across studies for changes in alkaline phosphatase, GGT, bilirubin and IgM levels before and after treatment and the overall rate of complete response to fenofibrate therapy. RESULTS: Six studies with 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. All studies were case series and in all, patients who had no or incomplete response to UDCA had fenofibrate added at a dose of 100-200mg daily. Treatment duration ranged from 8-100weeks. Treatment with fenofibrate was associated with a significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase (-114IU/L, 95% CI: -152 to -76, P<0.0001); a significant decrease in GGT level (-92IU/L, 95% CI: -149 to -43; P=0.0004); significant decrease in total bilirubin (-0.11mg/dL, 95% CI: -0.18 to -0.08; P=0.0008); and a significant decrease in IgM level (-88mg/dL, 95% CI: -119 to -58; P<0.0001). The complete response rate was 69% (95% CI: 53-82%) with an odds ratio of 82.8 (95% CI: 21.6-317.2; P=0.024) while on fenofibrate. CONCLUSIONS: Fenofibrate at doses of 100-200mg daily appears to be effective adjunctive therapy in PBC patients who had no or incomplete response to UDCA. There is a critical need for larger scale randomized trials to determine its effect on liver-related morbidity and mortality (or progression towards end-stage disease).

Probiotic mix VSL#3 is effective adjunctive therapy for mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: VSL#3 is a probiotic mix preparation reported to be effective in the treatment of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of studies on its efficacy. METHODS: The searched databases included PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool the effect- ize across studies, and the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of experiencing a specific outcome were calculated. RESULTS: Five studies with 441 patients were identified. The pooled remission rate was 49.4% (95% CI, 42.7-56.1). Only 3 low risk of bias studies with 319 patients met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. A total of 162 patients received 3.6 × 10 CFU/d VSL#3, and 157 patients received placebo. A total of 95% of patients received concomitant therapies with 5-ASA and/or immunomodulators. The Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index was used to define response and remission. A >50% decrease in the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index was achieved in 44.6% of the VSL#3-treated patients versus 25.1% of the patients given placebo (P = 0008; OR, 2.793; 95% CI, 1.375-5.676; number needed to treat = 4-5). The response rate was 53.4% in VSL#3-treated patients versus 29.3% in patients given placebo (P < 0001; OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.89-4.83; number needed to treat = 3-4). The remission rate was 43.8% in VSL#3-treated patients versus 24.8% in patients given placebo (P = 0007; OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.48-3.88; number needed to treat = 4-5). No serious side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: VSL#3, when added to conventional therapy at a daily dose of 3.6 × 10 CFU/d, is safe and more effective than conventional therapy alone in achieving higher response and remission rates in mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis.