Clinical experience with the European Ankylosing Spondylitis Infliximab Cohort (EASIC): long-term extension over 7 years with focus on clinical efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge on the long-term effects of anti-TNF therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is still limited. Our objective was to study the long-term efficacy and safety of anti-TNF therapy in AS. METHODS: After having completed the first part of the EASIC trial a total of 71 patients were enrolled into this 96-week extension study. Patients were treated with the same dosages and dosing intervals of infliximab as in the EASIC core study. Efficacy was assessed by using standardised assessment tools such as BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, patient global assessment, CRP levels and the proportion of patients without any sign of enthesitis or arthritis. Long-term safety was assessed by documenting adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE) and reasons for dropping out. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients included, 64 (90.1%) completed the trial , and 7 discontinued: one was lost to follow-up, 3 withdrew informed consent and in 3 patients therapy was stopped for different reasons: secondary loss of response, recurrent infections and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. The completers showed rather stable low scores of BASDAI (mean 2.4, median 2.52), BASFI (mean 3.1, median 2.76) and BASMI (mean 3.2, median 3) as well as patients global assessment and CRP. The vast majority of patients did not have enthesitis or arthritis. A total of 476 AE were observed, 13 of which were SAE. The majority of these were infections and most of them affected the respiratory tract. Two malignancies occurred: one basal cell carcinoma and one malignant melanoma. These were the only SAE judged to be possibly related to the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF treatment with infliximab is efficacious over long periods of time in patients with AS. The observation of two skin related malignancies, including one melanoma, during the whole study period of 7 years is in line with reports from previous large AS data sets.

Patient global assessment in psoriatic arthritis: a multicenter GRAPPA and OMERACT study.

OBJECTIVE: During OMERACT 8, delegates selected patient global assessment (PGA) of disease as a domain to be evaluated in randomized controlled trials in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study assessed the reliability of the PGA, measured by means of 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), and the additional utility of separate VAS scales for joints (PJA) and skin (PSA). METHODS: In total, 319 consecutive patients with PsA (186 men, 133 women, mean age 51 ± 13 yrs) were enrolled. PGA, PJA, and PSA were administered at enrolment (W0) and after 1 week (W1). Detailed clinical data, including ACR joint count, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, were recorded. RESULTS: Comparison of W0 and W1 scores showed no significant variations (intraclass correlation coefficients for PGA 0.87, PJA 0.86, PSA 0.78), demonstrating the reliability of the instrument. PGA scores were not influenced by patient anxiety or depression, but were dependent on PJA and PSA (p = 0.00001). PJA was dependent on the number of swollen and tender joints (p < 0.00001). PSA scores were influenced by the extent of skin psoriasis and by hand skin involvement (p = 0.00001). Joint and skin disease were found not to correlate in terms of disease activity as evidenced by the swollen joint count compared to PASI (r = 0.11) and by the PJA compared to PSA (r = 0.38). CONCLUSION: PGA assessed by means of VAS is a reliable tool related to joint and skin disease activity. Because joint and skin disease often diverge it is suggested that in some circumstances both PJA and PSA are also assessed.