RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to aggregate data for the first genomewide association study meta-analysis of cluster headache, to identify genetic risk variants, and gain biological insights. METHODS: A total of 4,777 cases (3,348 men and 1,429 women) with clinically diagnosed cluster headache were recruited from 10 European and 1 East Asian cohorts. We first performed an inverse-variance genomewide association meta-analysis of 4,043 cases and 21,729 controls of European ancestry. In a secondary trans-ancestry meta-analysis, we included 734 cases and 9,846 controls of East Asian ancestry. Candidate causal genes were prioritized by 5 complementary methods: expression quantitative trait loci, transcriptome-wide association, fine-mapping of causal gene sets, genetically driven DNA methylation, and effects on protein structure. Gene set and tissue enrichment analyses, genetic correlation, genetic risk score analysis, and Mendelian randomization were part of the downstream analyses. RESULTS: The estimated single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based heritability of cluster headache was 14.5%. We identified 9 independent signals in 7 genomewide significant loci in the primary meta-analysis, and one additional locus in the trans-ethnic meta-analysis. Five of the loci were previously known. The 20 genes prioritized as potentially causal for cluster headache showed enrichment to artery and brain tissue. Cluster headache was genetically correlated with cigarette smoking, risk-taking behavior, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, and musculoskeletal pain. Mendelian randomization analysis indicated a causal effect of cigarette smoking intensity on cluster headache. Three of the identified loci were shared with migraine. INTERPRETATION: This first genomewide association study meta-analysis gives clues to the biological basis of cluster headache and indicates that smoking is a causal risk factor. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:713-726.
Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica , Trastornos Migrañosos , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Cefalalgia Histamínica/epidemiología , Cefalalgia Histamínica/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although there is extensive evidence about the safety of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAbs) in combination with traditional drugs, scarce data are available on the safety of their combination with other mAbs. This study aimed to evaluate the 6-month effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs in combination with other mAbs for different diseases. METHODS: Patients included in the Italian Headache Registry and treated concomitantly with an anti-CGRP mAb and another mAb were included. Effectiveness outcomes for migraine included reduction from baseline of monthly headache days (MHDs), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, and Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included. In 27 patients (71.1%), the anti-CGRP mAb was added to a previously ongoing mAb. Nine patients (23.7%) discontinued one of the two mAbs before the end of treatment (seven discontinued the anti-CGRP mAb and two the other mAb). One patient discontinued for AEs. Anti-CGRP mAbs were discontinued due to ineffectiveness (n = 5, 55.5%) and one each (11.1%) for clinical remission and lost to follow-up. MHDs significantly decreased from baseline to 3 months (p < 0.0001) and 6 months (p < 0.001), as did the MIDAS and the HIT-6 scores at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.001). For anti-CGRP mAbs, 27.4% of patients reported PGIC ≥ 5 at 3 months and 48.3% at 6 months. Mild AEs associated with introduction of a second mAb were detected in six patients (15.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, anti-CGRP mAbs showed safety and effectiveness when administered concomitantly with other mAbs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the rate of hypertension incoming in patients treated with monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide. BACKGROUND: The monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide are unquestionable effective in the prevention of migraine. Despite this, the development of hypertension has been detected in some patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at the University Hospital of Modena. Patients were visited quarterly up to 1 year. RESULTS: Globally, no significant increase in the blood pressure was detected. The 5.7% of the patients developed a significant increase in their blood pressure. In particular, patients with a pre-existing hypertension were more likely to have a significant increase in the blood pressure. CONCLUSION: The risk of developing hypertension during a treatment with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies seems low. Anyway, patients with a pre-existing hypertension should be cautiously monitored because they are more likely to develop hypertension.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Hipertensión , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP pathway have revolutionized migraine management due to their improved tolerance and adherence, concerns remain about their potential impact on blood pressure (BP), especially in older patients, due to CGRP-mediated vasodilation blockade. Given the growing use of these therapies in older populations, assessing their cardiovascular (CV) safety is of paramount importance. METHODS: This multicentric observational prospective study focused on migraine sufferers aged ≥ 60 who began erenumab, galcanezumab, or fremanezumab for prevention. Baseline, three-month, and twelve-month BP measurements were collected. Changes in antihypertensive medication and "Newly or Worsened Hypertensive" patients (NWHP) were assessed. RESULTS: Among 155 patients receiving anti-CGRP mAbs (40 Erenumab, 47 Galcanezumab, 68 Fremanezumab), 42.5% had hypertension history and 39% were on antihypertensive treatment. No significant systolic or diastolic BP changes occurred at any time point compared to baseline (all p > 0.05), with no differences between the three groups. After one year, 20/155 (12.9%) patients were considered NWHP; 11/20 had prior hypertension, and 5/11 adjusted antihypertensive therapy. Among 9/20 newly hypertensive patients, 5/9 had a single measurement above the normal threshold with no requirement for new pharmacological therapy. A higher baseline BP value was associated with increased BP (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs over one year does not significantly affect BP in patients aged ≥ 60, nor does it increase the incidence of hypertension compared to general population trends. Nonetheless, continuous monitoring and further long-term studies are necessary to fullya scertain the cardiovascular safety of these medications in the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Presión Sanguínea , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/inmunología , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While migraine is markedly prevalent in women, gender-related phenotype differences were rarely assessed. For this reason, we investigated, through a multicenter observational cross-sectional study, based on an online questionnaire, gender-related differences in stress factors, emotions, and pain perception in migraine patients and controls and their impact on migraine severity. METHODS: The study was designed as an online questionnaire. The link was emailed to healthy subjects (C) and migraine patients (MIG) (age 18-75, education ≥ 13 years) recruited during the first visit in 8 Italian Headache Centers adhering to Italian Society for Headache Study (SISC). The questionnaire included personal/social/work information, the Perceived Stress Scale, the Romance Quality Scale, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Body Perception Questionnaire, the pain perception, and a self-assessment of migraine severity in the last 3 months. RESULTS: 202 MIG and 202 C completed the survey. Independently from gender, migraine was characterized by higher pain sensitivity and more severe partner relationships. The female gender, in MIG, exhibited higher anxiety scores, body awareness, and reduced emotional suppression. Body awareness and emotional suppression were discriminating factors between genders in control and migraine groups without relevant influence on disease features. Perceived perception of migraine severity was similar between genders. CONCLUSION: Gender-related emotional and stress factors did not contribute to delineate a distinct phenotype in migraine men and women. The possible impact of emotional and stress factors characterizing genders could be considered for a single case-tailored therapeutic approach.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Pruebas Psicológicas , Autoinforme , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Estudios Transversales , Emociones , Cefalea , Trastornos Migrañosos/psicología , Percepción del Dolor , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Cluster Headache Impact Questionnaire (CHIQ) is a specific and easy-to-use questionnaire to assess the current impact of cluster headache (CH). The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the CHIQ. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with episodic CH (eCH) or chronic CH (cCH) according to the ICHD-3 criteria and included in the "Italian Headache Registry" (RICe). The questionnaire was administered to patients through an electronic form in two sessions: at first visit for validation, and after 7 days for test-retest reliability. For internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was calculated. Convergent validity of the CHIQ with CH features and the results of questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, stress, and quality of life was evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: We included 181 patients subdivided in 96 patients with active eCH, 14 with cCH, and 71 with eCH in remission. The 110 patients with either active eCH or cCH were included in the validation cohort; only 24 patients with CH were characterized by a stable attack frequency after 7 days, and were included in the test-retest cohort. Internal consistency of the CHIQ was good with a Cronbach alpha value of 0.891. The CHIQ score showed a significant positive correlation with anxiety, depression, and stress scores, while showing a significant negative correlation with quality-of-life scale scores. CONCLUSION: Our data show the validity of the Italian version of the CHIQ, which represents a suitable tool for evaluating the social and psychological impact of CH in clinical practice and research.
Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica , Humanos , Cefalalgia Histamínica/diagnóstico , Cefalalgia Histamínica/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Italia , PsicometríaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of topical cannabidiol (CBD) in treating digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: In total, 45 patients with SSc who had digital ulcers were consecutively enrolled between January 2019 and December 2019. Of the participants, 25 were treated with CBD during surgical debridement and 20 were treated with standard local therapy. A numeric rating scale for pain and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index were administered at the baseline and at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Local treatment with CBD was significantly associated with lower pain scores, higher health assessment scores, and an increase in participants' total hours of sleep. Patients in the control group more frequently required additional analgesic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Topical CBD may be a valuable tool to treat pain related to digital ulcers in patients with SSc.
Asunto(s)
Cannabidiol , Esclerodermia Localizada , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Úlcera Cutánea , Humanos , Cannabidiol/uso terapéutico , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Úlcera Cutánea/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Localizada/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medication overuse headache significantly contributes to the chronification process and treatment refractoriness of migraine. Currently, abrupt discontinuation of the overused medication still represents the best management strategy for these patients, challenging public health system resources. METHODS: In this prospective study, chronic migraine and medication overuse headache sufferers with at least 28 days of analgesic consumption per month were included. Assessment of efficacy outcomes at three months were compared among patients who underwent in-hospital abrupt discontinuation of overused acute medication (YES-DETOX group) and patients who did not (NO-DETOX group) before starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody. RESULTS: Of 401 patients who received either erenumab or galcanezumab, 28% (n = 111) satisfied inclusion criteria (YES-DETOX n = 28; NO-DETOX n = 83). After three months of treatment, 59% (n = 65; 47/83 YES-DETOX; 18/28 NO-DETOX) patients reverted from medication overuse headache and 51% (n = 57; 42/83 YES-DETOX; 15/28 NO-DEOTX) achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly headache days; yet no statistical differences were observed between the two groups (p = 0.4788 and p = 0.8393, respectively). Monthly consumption of pain medication was the only baseline prognostic factor in multivariate analysis in the overall cohort (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Our results support the emerging evidence that anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies may be effective in medication overuse headache patients irrespective of detoxification, yet further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Secundarias , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Cefaleas Secundarias/inducido químicamente , Cefaleas Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effectiveness and safety of three oral cannabinoid preparations (FM2®, Istituto farmaceutico militare, Firenze, Italy; Bedrocan®, Bedrocan International, Vandaam, Netherlands; and Bediol®, Bedrocan International, Vandaam, Netherlands) in the treatment of chronic migraine. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. SUBJECTS: Patients with chronic migraine who received FM2, Bedrocan, or Bediol daily for the off-label treatment of their headache, for up to 6 months. METHODS: The number of migraine days per month, pain intensity, the number of acute medications taken per month, the number of days per month on which the patient took at least one acute medication, and adverse events were recorded at baseline and at 3 months and 6 months after the start of treatment with oral cannabinoid preparations. RESULTS: The number of migraine days did not change significantly after the third month or the sixth month when compared with baseline (P = 0.1182). The pain intensity (P = 0.0004), the acute medication consumption (P = 0.0006), and the number of days per month in which patients took at least one acute medication significantly decreased when compared with baseline (P = 0.0004). No significant differences were found between patients who were still taking a preventive treatment for chronic migraine and those who were not (all P > 0.05). Different oral cannabinoid preparations displayed similar levels of effectiveness (all P > 0.05). The adverse events were mostly mild and occurred in 43.75% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Oral cannabinoid preparations may have a role in reducing pain intensity and acute medication intake in patients with chronic migraine, but the magnitude of the effect seems modest; further studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Cannabinoides , Trastornos Migrañosos , Cannabinoides/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Cefalea , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Chronic migraine (CM) is a great challenge for physicians dealing with headaches. Despite the introduction of the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) acting against the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) that has revolutionized the treatment of CM, some patients still experience an incomplete relief. So, the association of two preventive treatments may be a reliable option for these patients. So, onabotulinumtoxinA (BT-A) and anti-CGRP mAbs may be used together, and some pre-clinical and clinical evidence of an additive action of the 2 drugs is emerging. In particular, since BT-A acts mainly on C-fibers and anti-CGRP mAbs on Aδ ones, their association may prevent the wearing-off phenomenon of BT-A, thus giving an additional benefit in those patients experiencing an incomplete response to BT-A alone. Despite this, the clinical studies available in the literature have a small sample size, often a retrospective design, and are heterogeneous in terms of the outcomes chosen. Considering this, the evidence of a favorable effect of the association between BT-A and anti-CGRP mAbs is still scarce. Furthermore, this association is explicitly forbidden by many National regulatory agencies, due to the high costs of both treatments. Anyway, their association could help in reducing the burden associated with the most severe cases of CM, thus relieving the direct and indirect costs of this condition. More well-designed studies with big samples are needed to unveil the real therapeutic gain of this association. Moreover, pharmacoeconomics studies should be performed, to assess the economic suitability of this association.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody acting against calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor which has been found effective even for the treatment of chronic migraine (CM) complicated with medication overuse headache (MOH). According to the present guidelines, the treatment with erenumab should continue for up to 1 year. The aim of the present study is to explore the evolution of patients affected by CM and MOH at the baseline, after erenumab discontinuation. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-five patients affected by CM and MOH were recruited and followed up after erenumab discontinuation. The number of migraine days per month, the number of painkillers taken per month, the number of days in which one medication was used for a month were collected every 30 days for the 3 months following erenumab suspension. RESULTS: At the 3rd month after suspension, patients displayed a significantly higher number of migraine days per month, a significantly higher painkiller consumption, and a significantly higher migraine-related disability. A high body mass index and the presence of aura were positively correlated with the relapse of CM and MOH. CONCLUSION: Patients affected by CM and MOH at the baseline displayed a significant worsening of their headaches after erenumab discontinuation.
Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Secundarias , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/efectos adversos , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefaleas Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether erenumab is effective and safe in refractory chronic migraine with medication overuse headache. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentric, real-life study, chronic migraine with medication overuse headache patients who received erenumab were recruited. Study inclusion was limited to patients who previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA in addition to at least three other pharmacological commonly used migraine preventive medication classes. RESULTS: Of 396 patients who received erenumab, 38% (n = 149) met inclusion criteria. After 3 months, 51% (n = 76) and 20% (n = 30) patients achieved ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% reduction in monthly headache days, respectively. Monthly pain medications intake decreased from 46.1 ± 35.3 to 16.8 ± 13.9 (p < 0.001), while monthly headache days decreased from 25.4 ± 5.4 to 14.1 ± 8.6 (p < 0.001). Increasing efficacy of erenumab over the study period was observed. Allodynia was a negative predictive factor of erenumab response (odds ratio = 0.47; p = 0.03). Clinical conversion to episodic migraine with no medication overuse was observed in 64% (n = 96) patients. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Erenumab reduced significantly migraine frequency and pain medication intake in refractory chronic migraine with MOH patients.
Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Secundarias , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina , Cefalea , Cefaleas Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor have changed migraine preventive treatment. Those treatments have led to reconsidering the outcomes of migraine prevention. Available data mostly considered benefits in terms of relative efficacy (percent or absolute decrease in monthly migraine days [MMDs] or headache days compared with baseline). However, not enough attention has been paid to residual MMDs and/or migraine-related disability in treated patients. In the present study, we aimed at comparing the relative and absolute efficacy of erenumab. METHODS: ESTEEMen was a collaborative project among 16 European headache centers which already performed real-life data collections on patients treated with erenumab for at least 12 weeks. For the present study, we performed a subgroup analysis on patients with complete data on MMDs at baseline and at weeks 9-12 of treatment. Starting from efficacy thresholds proposed by previous literature, we classified patients into 0-29%, 30-49%, 50-74%, and ≥75% responders according to MMD decrease from baseline to weeks 9-12 of treatment. For each response category, we reported the median MMDs and Headache Impact test-6 (HIT-6) scores at baseline and at weeks 9-12. We categorized the number of residual MMDs at weeks 9-12 as follows: 0-3, 4-7, 8-14, ≥15. We classified HIT-6 score into four categories: ≤49, 50-55, 56-59, and ≥60. To keep in line with the original scope of the ESTEEMen study, calculations were performed in men and women. RESULTS: Out of 1215 patients, at weeks 9-12, 381 (31.4%) had a 0-29% response, 186 (15.3%) a 30-49% response, 396 (32.6%) a 50-74% response, and 252 (20.7%) a ≥75% response; 246 patients (20.2%) had 0-3 residual MMDs, 443 (36.5%) had 4-7 MMDs, 299 (24.6%) had 8-14 MMDs, and 227 (18.7%) had ≥15 MMDs. Among patients with 50-74% response, 246 (62.1%) had 4-7 and 94 (23.7%) 8-14 residual MMDs, while among patients with ≥75% response 187 (74.2%) had 0-3 and 65 (25.8%) had 4-7 residual MMDs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that even patients with good relative response to erenumab may have a clinically non-negligible residual migraine burden. Relative measures of efficacy cannot be enough to thoroughly consider the efficacy of migraine prevention.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/farmacología , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Erenumab is a monoclonal antibody blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, which has been approved for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM). The aim of this study was to explore the safety and effectiveness of erenumab in patients suffering from CM and medication overuse headache (MOH) in a real-life setting, up to 1 year. METHODS: Data regarding 81 patients treated with erenumab were retrospectively analyzed. Every 3 months, the following variables were collected: the mean number of headache days per month (headache index (HI)), the average number of painkillers taken per month (analgesic consumption (AC)), the mean number of days with painkiller consumption (number of days on medication (NDM)), the headache intensity (numeric rating scale (NRS) score), the 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and the Self-Reported Instrument to Assess Work-Related Difficulties in Patients With Migraine (HEADWORK) scores. RESULTS: The HI, AC, and NDM and the NRS, HIT-6, and HEADWORK scores were significantly lower at every time point from the 3rd month onward compared to baseline (all P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between patients who underwent painkiller detoxification before starting erenumab and those who did not (all P > 0.05). No significant differences were found between patients taking erenumab in combination with other preventive treatments and the ones taking it alone (all P ≥ 0.05). Five patients dropped out because of adverse events, which resolved after stopping erenumab. CONCLUSION: Erenumab was safe and effective for CM complicated with MOH. Painkiller withdrawal and the association with other preventive treatment(s) seem useless.
Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Secundarias , Trastornos Migrañosos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina , Cefalea , Cefaleas Secundarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The pathophysiological mechanism of medication overuse headache is uncertain; no distinctive markers have been described right now. The aim of this study was to conduct proteomic analyses on serum samples from patients with medication overuse headache and healthy individuals. Specifically, mono- (SDS-PAGE) and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) followed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were used to evaluate changes in serum proteins. MAIN FINDINGS: By SDS-PAGE, four over-expressed bands were revealed in patients, compared to controls. 2-DE combined with LC-MS/MS analysis allowed confirmation of some proteins preliminarily detected by SDS-PAGE: Hemopexin, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1, apolipoprotein A4 and haptoglobin. Moreover, other differential proteins were isolated, mostly increased in MOH patients: Alpha-1-antitrypsin, immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1, retinol binding protein and transthyretin. Only one protein, immunoglobulin kappa constant, was decreased in the patients' group. CONCLUSIONS: The investigation of the serum proteome can offer a better understanding about biological mechanisms underlying medication overuse headache. Specifically, medication overuse headache shares some serum biochemical markers with chronic pain conditions. Further studies might uncover the relevance of these proteins in medication overuse headache.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Cefaleas Secundarias/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Cromatografía Liquida/métodos , Electroforesis en Gel Bidimensional/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteómica/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to assess the degree of awareness migraine patients had of their condition. The secondary aims were to evaluate the frequency of an incorrect diagnosis of "cervical arthrosis" in patients unaware of having migraine and to compare the clinical features, diagnostic investigation, and treatment strategies between the 2 subgroups of migraineurs, that is, those with and without the incorrect diagnosis of "cervical arthrosis." METHODS: Patients, between 18 and 65 years, were consecutively referred to 5 Headache Centers in 2 Italian regions for a first visit. They fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for migraine (with/without aura, episodic/chronic) and were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Each patient underwent a specific cranial/cervical musculoskeletal clinical examination. RESULTS: A total of 117/250 subjects (46.8%) were unaware that they suffered from migraine. In these unaware subjects, the most frequently reported diagnosis was "cervical arthrosis" in 34/117 (29.1%), followed by tension-type headache in 23/117 (19%). The cervical region was the most common site of pain onset in the so-called "cervical arthrosis" group (52.9%, P < .0001), where also more pericranial (58.8%; P = .041) and neck (70.6%; P = .009) muscle tenderness, restricted range of cervical vertical (47.1%; P < .001), and lateral (29.4%; P = .040) movements were reported. More "cervical arthrosis patients" had been referred to an Emergency Department (88.2%; P = .011) and had undergone more cervical spine radiography (23.5%; P = .003) and magnetic resonance imaging (20.6%; P = .044). While they had used fewer triptans (11.8%; P = .007) and received less pharmacological prophylaxis (2.9%; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, there were high misdiagnosis rates for migraine sufferers in Italy. The most common misdiagnosis, that is, "cervical arthrosis," led to misuse of healthcare facilities and had a negative impact on the migraine treatment.
Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/patología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disorientation, nausea, confusion, dizziness, and displacement are frequently complained by headache-suffering children. Anyhow, the cause of these symptoms is still unclear, and a dysfunction of vestibular pathways or their alteration due to central pain pathways hyper-activation, has been proposed. The aim of this study is to use posturography to explore the balance function of headache-suffering children during pain-free periods. METHODS: Posturography was performed on 19 migraineurs, 11 tension-type headache sufferers, and 20 healthy controls. Posturographic measures were performed during headache-free periods under different conditions: with eyes opened, eyes closed, and during right and left optokinetic stimulation. The last 2 conditions were used to mimic unreliable visual signals that can confound vestibular system. RESULTS: During eyes-closed conditions, headache-suffering children displayed higher displacements than healthy controls, since statokinesiogram surface was higher in tension-type headache sufferers and migraineurs compared with controls (P value = 0.0095). Romberg's index, indicating the overall stability of the subject, was lower in healthy controls than in headache sufferers (P = 0.0139), thus suggesting a vestibular impairment in the seconds. Moreover, both during right and left optokinetic stimulation, the statokinesiogram length was higher in headache-suffering children (P < 0.0001). Thereafter, statokinesiogram surface was higher in migraineurs during right optokinetic stimulation (P = 0.0388) than in tension-type headache sufferers when stimulation was directed on the opposite side (P = 0.0249). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a central alteration of vestibular pathways in headache-suffering children, that makes balance function more dependent from visual inputs than healthy subjects, even in inter-ictal phases.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Cefalea/fisiopatología , Trastornos Migrañosos/fisiopatología , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/fisiopatología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Mareo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Equilibrio Postural/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nummular headache (NH) is a rare headache disorder characterized by a small, circumscribed painful area of the scalp. The description of many cases in the last years has supported its re-classification as a primary headache from the International Headache Society, moving it from its previous placement in the Appendix of the International Criteria of Headache Disorders. METHODS: Data were collected from a retro-prospective observational study about rare headaches promoted by the RegistRare Network, a collaborative group of seven Italian Headache Centres. According to the gender-biased profile of certain primary headaches, we have looked further NH patients from a gender perspective. RESULTS: Nineteen NH patients (11 men, 8 women) have been enrolled in the study. Headache onset was at 39 years and preceded approximately 8 years the diagnosis. No clinically evident differences between men and women have been found, including treatment prescriptions and headache resolution. Of note, the mean time from the onset of NH to the first visit in a Headache Centre was longer in men, compared with women (13.5 vs. 0.9 years). NH attacks were efficaciously treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 60% of patients receiving treatment. Headache prophylaxis with pregabalin and amitriptyline has been reported as effective in 40% and 67% of the treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NH is a primary headache clinically heterogeneous in terms of temporal patterns and pain characteristics. Further research is needed to investigate the existence of male and female phenotypes, by clarifying whether it may be relevant for therapeutic purposes.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Cefaleas Primarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefaleas Primarias/epidemiología , Cefaleas Primarias/fisiopatología , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Amitriptilina/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Cefaleas Primarias/prevención & control , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pregabalina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Raras , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment with onabotulinumtoxin A (BT-A) is safe and effective for chronic migraine (CM). Several studies assessed possible predictors of response to treatment with BT-A, but there is little knowledge on the frequency and predictors of sustained response. The aim of this study was to evaluate sustained response to BT-A in patients with CM. MAIN BODY: In this prospective open-label study, 115 patients with CM and treated with BT-A were consecutively enrolled in two Italian headache centers and followed up for 15 months. Anytime responders were defined as those patients who achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in headache days during any three-month treatment cycle compared with the 3 months prior to initiation of BT-A treatment. Sustained responders were defined as those who achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in headache days within the third treatment cycle and maintained response until the end of follow-up. Non-responders were defined as those patients who never achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in headache days during the follow-up. Headache characteristics prior to BT-A treatment were assessed in order to evaluate their ability in predicting treatment response. The 115 enrolled patients (84.3% female; median age 50 years) had a median migraine duration of 30 years (interquartile range 22-38). At the end of follow-up, 66 patients (57.4%) were classified as anytime responders. Among the 51 patients who achieved a clinical response within the third month of treatment, 33 (64.7%) were sustained responders. Patients with sustained response had a lower CM duration (median 31 vs 65 months; P = 0.030) and a lower number of headache days (median 25 vs 30; P = 0.013) at baseline compared with non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: About two thirds of patients who gain ≥50% response to BT-A within the third cycle of treatment maintain this positive response over time. More recent onset of CM and more headache-free days at baseline are associated with sustained response. We suggest not to delay preventive treatment of CM with BT-A, in order to increase the likelihood to achieve sustained clinical response.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Análisis de Datos , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medication Overuse Headache (MOH) is a prevalent and disabling disorder resulting from the overuse of analgesic drugs, triptans or other acute headache medications. In previous proteomic studies, several proteins have been found at high concentrations in the urine of MOH patients and in the serum of rats with neuropathic pain. The aim of this study was to compare the serum levels of lipocalin-type Prostaglandin D2 synthase (L-PGDS), Vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), apolipoprotein E (APOE) and apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1) in MOH patients and healthy individuals, further exploring their relationship with cutaneous pain thresholds (CPTs) in the territories innervated by the trigeminal nerve. METHODS: Sixty-nine MOH patients and 42 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Von Frey-like filaments were applied to the skin territories innervated by the trigeminal nerve, to determine the CPTs. L-PGDS, VDBP, APOE and APOA1 were quantified in the serum by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Clinical and laboratory data were collected. Comparisons between MOH patients and healthy individuals were performed using independent t test or χ2 test. To correlate serum proteins with CPTs, Pearson correlation coefficient or Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used. RESULTS: CPTs were lower among MOH patients. L-PGDS, VDBP and APOE had significantly different serum concentrations between groups (p < 0.01), but no correlation was found with CPTs. APOA1 serum concentrations did not differ between patients and healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: L-PGDS, VDBP and APOE had abnormal serum levels in MOH patients, confirming their alteration in some conditions of chronic headache and neuropathic pain. However, they had no relationship with CPTs. The in-depth study of serum proteins represents a promising approach for a better understanding of MOH, as well as the detection of candidate biomarkers for chronic headache or the risks associated with overuse medications.