Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 116
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transplant ; 35(2): e14171, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33247459

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rituximab has been proposed as induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) or a positive flow cross-match. We here evaluated whether adding rituximab was associated with a higher incidence of post-transplant malignancies (PTM) due to greater immunosuppression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight HLA-sensitized KTRs received induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and rituximab because of preformed DSA or a positive flow cross-match (RTX group). They were compared with a control group of 154 patients receiving ATG alone. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 202 (19.3%) patients developed PTM; the rate was similar in the RTX and no-RTX groups (14.6% vs. 20.8%, respectively, P = .3). The distributions of the types of cancer were similar between the two groups, with the majority being non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC, n = 24). The risk factors for PTM were male gender, age, history of cancer, and azathioprine. CONCLUSION: Our data do not indicate a higher rate of post-transplantation de novo malignancies after kidney transplantation in high-immunological risk patients who received induction therapy based on ATG and rituximab.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Neoplasias , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Antígenos HLA , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
J Clin Apher ; 36(3): 291-298, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In organ transplantation, apheresis is frequently used for removal of anti-HLA antibodies. However, it is unclear whether plasmapheresis (PP) or semi-selective immunoadsorption (IA) should be employed, and the optimal number of apheresis sessions required to reach post-treatment objectives is also unknown. METHODS: We enrolled 43 patients from Bordeaux University Hospital who were treated with PP (n = 29) or IA (n = 14) for antibody-mediated rejection or pre-transplant desensitization. Using Luminex single-antigen flow beads, we assessed the initial mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 1416 positive beads with MFIs obtained after 7 to 8 apheresis sessions (extended protocol) and, if a serum was available, after the first four sessions (short protocol). RESULTS: MFI reduction after extended apheresis protocol was stronger with IA [87% (61%-100%)] than with PP [73% (22%-100%)] (P < .001). Indeed, 59% of the beads had a final MFI < 2000 with IA, whereas only 38% with PP (P < .001). The efficacy of removal depended on initial MFI but not on HLA specificity. A short protocol of apheresis showed excellent results without superiority of IA over PP for antibodies with an initial MFI < 3000. For antibodies showing MFI ≥2000 after four sessions, the residual MFI predicted the effectiveness of four additional sessions. CONCLUSION: Monitoring the MFI of anti-HLA antibodies before and during apheresis protocol can guide physicians in the selection of apheresis technique and the number of sessions to be performed.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Técnicas de Inmunoadsorción , Isoanticuerpos/aislamiento & purificación , Plasmaféresis/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Fluorescencia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Transplant ; 20(5): 1365-1374, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883413

RESUMEN

Anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are highly prevalent, whereas anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies seem to lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results. We aimed to reassess crossmatch prediction for anti-HLA-Cw using 2 types of single antigen flow beads (classical beads and beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA), and to compare the pathogenicity of preformed anti-denatured and anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. We performed 135 crossmatches with sera reacting against donor HLA-Cw (classical beads fluorescence ≥500); only 20.6% were positive. Forty-three (31.6%) were anti-denatured HLA antibodies (beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA fluorescence <300); all were crossmatch negative. The correlation between classical beads fluorescence and the crossmatch ratio was low (ρ = 0.178), and slightly higher with beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA (ρ = 0.289). We studied 52 kidney recipients with preformed anti-HLA-Cw donor-specific antibodies. Those with anti-native HLA antibodies experienced more acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejections (P = .006 and .03, respectively), and displayed a lower graft survival (P = .04). Patients with anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies more frequently had previous sensitizing events (P < .000001) or plausibility of their antibody profile according to known anti-native HLA-Cw eplets (P = .0001). Anti-native but not anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are deleterious, which underscores the need for reagents with diminished expression of denatured HLA.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Citometría de Flujo , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Antígenos HLA , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Isoanticuerpos , Donantes de Tejidos
4.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 33(10): 1853-1863, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29672702

RESUMEN

Background: Pathogenicity of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) can be assessed using the single-antigen flow beads (SAFB) assays through mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) with or without serum ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) treatment, measurement of C1q or C3d binding and/or their intragraft detection [graft-bound donor-specific antibody (gDSA)]. We aimed to investigate which of these markers best associates with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and kidney allograft loss at the time of a for-cause biopsy. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre study included 77 kidney transplant recipients who underwent a for-cause biopsy between December 2004 and July 2013. All displayed serum DSAs were identified on the same day as the biopsy. Sera were tested in parallel with the classical SAFB assay with or without serum EDTA treatment, C1q- and C3d-binding assays. gDSAs were eluted from biopsy fragments and identified with SAFB. Results: The median time between transplantation and biopsy was 25 months (range 0.5-251). The median follow-up was 36 months (range 0-140). ABMR was histologically proven in 40% of recipients. The sensitivity and specificity of C1q, C3d and gDSA assays for predicting ABMR were 68% and 61%, 52% and 70% and 64.5% and 56.5%, respectively. At the time of biopsy, only the DSA MFI after EDTA treatment and C3d positivity were associated with graft loss. In multivariate analyses, glomerular filtration rate, transplant glomerulopathy and C4d positivity were the only factors associated with graft loss. Conclusions: Our findings weaken the rationale for systematically implementing C1q, C3d or gDSA assays in this situation, because they do not independently predict ABMR and graft loss.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos , Aloinjertos , Complemento C1q/análisis , Complemento C1q/inmunología , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes
5.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 27(2): 615-25, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26047793

RESUMEN

C1q-binding ability may indicate the clinical relevance of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). This study investigated the incidence and risk factors for the appearance of C1q-binding de novo DSA and their long-term impact. Using Luminex Single Antigen Flow Bead assays, 346 pretransplant nonsensitized kidney recipients were screened at 2 and 5 years after transplantation for de novo DSA, which was followed when positive by a C1q Luminex assay. At 2 and 5 years, 12 (3.5%) and eight (2.5%) patients, respectively, had C1q-binding de novo DSA. De novo DSA mean fluorescence intensity >6237 and >10,000 at 2 and 5 years, respectively, predicted C1q binding. HLA mismatches and cyclosporine A were independently associated with increased risk of C1q-binding de novo DSA. When de novo DSA were analyzed at 2 years, the 5-year death-censored graft survival was similar between patients with C1q-nonbinding de novo DSA and those without de novo DSA, but was lower for patients with C1q-binding de novo DSA (P=0.003). When de novo DSA were analyzed at 2 and 5 years, the 10-year death-censored graft survival was lower for patients with C1q-nonbinding de novo DSA detected at both 2 and 5 years (P<0.001) and for patients with C1q-binding de novo DSA (P=0.002) than for patients without de novo DSA. These results were partially confirmed in two validation cohorts. In conclusion, C1q-binding de novo DSA are associated with graft loss occurring quickly after their appearance. However, the long-term persistence of C1q-nonbinding de novo DSA could lead to lower graft survival.


Asunto(s)
Aloinjertos/inmunología , Anticuerpos/inmunología , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Unión Proteica/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos
6.
Eur J Immunol ; 45(7): 2111-21, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25824860

RESUMEN

Anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies are deleterious for organ transplant survival. Class I HLA donor-specific antibodies are identified by using the Luminex single antigen beads (LSAB) assay, which also detects anti-denatured HLA antibodies (anti-dHLAs). Anti-dHLAs are thought to be unable to recognize native HLA (nHLA) on the cell surface and therefore to be clinically irrelevant. Acid denaturation of nHLA on LSAB allows anti-dHLAs to be discriminated from anti-nHLAs. We previously defined a threshold for the ratio between mean fluorescence intensity against acid-treated (D for denaturation) and nontreated (N) LSAB, D ≥ 1.2 N identifying the anti-dHLAs. However, some anti-dHLAs remained able to bind nHLA on lymphocytes in flow cytometry crossmatches, and some anti-nHLAs conserved significant reactivity toward acid-treated LSAB. After depleting serum anti-nHLA reactivity with HLA-typed cells, we analyzed the residual LSAB reactivity toward nontreated and acid-treated LSABs, and then evaluated the ability of antibodies to recognize nHLA alleles individually. We observed that sera can contain mixtures of anti-nHLAs and anti-dHLAs, or anti-nHLAs recognizing acid-resistant epitopes, all possibly targeting the same allele(s). Therefore, the anti-HLA antibody response can be highly complex and subtle, as is the accurate identification of pathogenic anti-HLA antibodies in human serum.


Asunto(s)
Aloinjertos/inmunología , Epítopos , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/genética , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/inmunología , Inmunología del Trasplante/inmunología , Anticuerpos/inmunología , Epítopos/inmunología , Citometría de Flujo , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos
7.
Clin Transplant ; 29(5): 393-402, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25683727

RESUMEN

Class I single-antigen flow beads (SAFB) carry native and denatured human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. Using a cohort of 179 class I HLA-sensitized kidney recipients, we described incidence and clinical relevance of preformed denatured HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) using two different assays: an acid-treated SAFB assay (anti-dHLA DSA) and the iBeads assays (SAFB+/iBeads- DSA). Eighty-five class I DSA were found in 67 patients (median mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] of 1729 [range 520-13 882]). Anti-dHLA and SAFB+/iBeads- DSA represented 11% and 18% of class I DSA and were mainly low MFI DSA (500-1000 MFI). Concordance between these two assays was good (90%). None of the patients with only class I anti-dHLA DSA or only SAFB+/iBeads- DSA developed acute clinical antibody-mediated rejection in the first-year post-transplantation, and their five-yr death-censored graft survival was similar to that of patients without DSA. Moreover, all these patients displayed a negative current T-cell flow cytometry cross-match. Therefore, both anti-dHLA DSA and SAFB+/iBeads- DSA appear irrelevant, which could explain the good outcome observed in some patients with preformed class I DSA.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Fallo Renal Crónico/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Desnaturalización Proteica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos
8.
Clin Transplant ; 29(5): 439-46, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25739833

RESUMEN

Outcome of patients with transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is poor. Using B-cell targeting molecules represent a rational strategy to treat TG during chronic antibody-mediated rejection. In this pilot study, 21 patients with this diagnosis received four doses of intravenous immunoglobulins and two doses of rituximab (IVIG/RTX group). They were retrospectively compared with a untreated control group of 10 patients. At 24 months post-biopsy, graft survival was similar and poor between the treated and the untreated group, 47% vs. 40%, respectively, p = 0.69. This absence of response of IVIG/RTX treatment was observed, regardless the phenotype of TG. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and decline in eGFR during the first six months after the treatment were risk factors associated with 24-month graft survival. The IVIG/RTX therapy had a modest effect on the kinetics of donor-specific alloantibodies at M24, compared to the untreated group, not associated with an improvement in graft survival. The mean number of adverse events per patient was higher in the IVIG/RTX group than in the control group (p = 0.03). Taken together, IVIG/RTX treatment for severe TG during chronic antibody-mediated rejection does not seem to change the natural history of TG and is associated with a high incidence of adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/terapia , Rechazo de Injerto/terapia , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/etiología , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/mortalidad , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
9.
Clin Transplant ; 28(9): 1054-60, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25040585

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Everolimus (EVR) is used in organ transplantation to minimize calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Some studies pointed out an increase in rejection and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) incidence in kidney transplant patients after switch to EVR and CNI withdrawal. The aims of our study were to determine the evolution of anti-HLA antibodies and the incidence of de novo DSA in transplant recipients after conversion to EVR. METHODS: Heart, lung, kidney, and liver transplant recipients were included in a retrospective, monocentric case-control study. Anti-HLA antibodies were identified at transplantation, pre-switch, and at three, six, and 12 months post-switch. RESULTS: Conversion to EVR was performed about six yr after the transplant, and low-dose CNI was maintained in 60% of patients. We found no statistical difference for rejection, evolution of preformed anti-HLA antibodies or de novo DSA, after conversion to EVR or not. Incidence of anti-class II DSA tended to increase at month 12 whatever the immunosuppressive regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Late conversion to EVR appears to be safe and to not modify the natural evolution of anti-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation. As 60% of patients received EVR and low doses of CNI, it seems that such combinations could be used with a good outcome.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Trasplante de Órganos , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Donantes de Tejidos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Everolimus , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Trasplantes
10.
HLA ; 103(1): e15292, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37942842

RESUMEN

HLA-DRB1*13:03:13 differs from HLA-DRB1*13:03:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 180 in exon 3.


Asunto(s)
Cadenas HLA-DRB1 , Humanos , Cadenas HLA-DRB1/genética , Secuencia de Bases , Alelos , Exones/genética , Codón
11.
HLA ; 103(1): e15280, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37937884

RESUMEN

HLA-DRB1*11:324 differs from HLA-DRB1*11:62:02 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 38 in exon 2.


Asunto(s)
Cadenas HLA-DRB1 , Humanos , Cadenas HLA-DRB1/genética , Secuencia de Bases , Alelos , Exones/genética , Codón
12.
HLA ; 103(1): e15279, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37947244

RESUMEN

HLA-B*08:312 differs from HLA-B*08:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 324 in exon 6.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos HLA-B , Humanos , Alelos , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Codón , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
13.
HLA ; 103(4): e15468, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575356

RESUMEN

HLA-DQB1*02:01:01:21Q differs from HLA-DQB1*02:01:01:01 by one nucleotide substitution in the splice site in the beginning of intron 3.


Asunto(s)
Secuencia de Bases , Humanos , Alelos , Cadenas beta de HLA-DQ/genética , Intrones
14.
HLA ; 103(3): e15433, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450901

RESUMEN

HLA-DQA1*01:03:11 differs from HLA-DQA1*01:03:01:02 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 59 in exon 2.


Asunto(s)
Nucleótidos , Humanos , Alelos , Cadenas alfa de HLA-DQ/genética , Exones/genética
15.
HLA ; 103(1): e15353, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38273423

RESUMEN

HLA-DRB3*02:194 differs from HLA-DRB3*02:02:01:02 by one nucleotide substitution in codon 78 in exon 2.


Asunto(s)
Secuencia de Bases , Humanos , Cadenas HLA-DRB3/genética , Alelos , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Codón , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Cadenas HLA-DRB1
16.
HLA ; 103(2): e15361, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305041

RESUMEN

HLA-DPB1*1516:01 differs from HLA-DPB1*1229:01 by seven nucleotide substitutions in exon 3.


Asunto(s)
Secuencia de Bases , Humanos , Alelos , Cadenas beta de HLA-DP/genética , Exones/genética
17.
HLA ; 103(1): e15187, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37604171

RESUMEN

T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) and ensuing antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) reduce kidney transplantation (KT) survival. The immunomodulatory effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] could be beneficial for KT outcomes. We aimed to evaluating the association between 25(OH)D levels, the development of dnDSAs, clinical TCMR and ABMR, and graft survival. This single center retrospective study included 253 KT recipients (KTRs) transplanted without preformed DSA between 2010 and 2013. We measured 25(OH)D in successive serum samples: at KT (M0) and M12 for the entire cohort, and additionally at M24 and/or M36 when sera were available. We assessed graft outcomes up to 5 years post-KT. The proportion of KTRs having sufficient 25(OH)D at KT (M0) was high (81.4%) and then dropped at M12 (71.1%). KTRs with sufficient 25(OH)D at M0 experienced less clinical TCMR (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.88 in multivariate analysis). A sufficient 25(OH)D at M12 was independently associated with a longer dnDSA-free survival (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.69). There was no association between 25(OH)D and clinical AMBR. Studying the KTRs with 25(OH)D measurements at M12, M24 and M36 (n = 203), we showed that 25(OH)D sufficiency over the 3 first-years post-KT was associated with a longer graft survival in multivariate analyses (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70). To our knowledge, this study is the first showing an association between 25(OH)D sufficiency post-KT and dnDSA occurrence in KTRs. Moreover, we reinforce previously published data showing an association between 25(OH)D, TCMR and graft survival in KT.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Antígenos HLA , Alelos , Anticuerpos , Rechazo de Injerto , Isoanticuerpos
18.
Bull Cancer ; 111(2S): S1-S13, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37690877

RESUMEN

The selection of a donor is an essential element in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the absence of an HLA-matched related donor, the selection of an unrelated donor is considered, and is currently the most common type of allogenic donor used in practice. Many criteria are considered for the selection when multiple donors are available, particularly in case of partial match. The aim of this workshop is to assist in the selection of an unrelated donor, in keeping with recent data from the literature.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Donante no Emparentado , Selección de Donante , Sociedades Médicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA