RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Is the drug used for final oocyte maturation a factor in determining the prevalence of empty follicle syndrome (EFS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The drug used for final oocyte maturation is not a factor in determining the prevalence of EFS among women unaffected by infertility. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Despite satisfactory follicular stimulation and adequate follicular development, cases of EFS, i.e. failure to recover any cumulus oocyte complex, have been reported both with hCG and GnRH agonist triggering. No standard management protocol has been proposed so far. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective analysis of oocyte donation cycles performed between August 2006 and April 2013 in a large private fertility centre. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The analysis included 12 483 oocyte donation cycles of which 74 were EFS cycles. All cycles were triggered with either hCG or GnRH agonists. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were no differences in the gonadotropic stimulation, pituitary suppression and triggering drug between cycles where oocytes were recovered successfully and EFS cycles. The total prevalence of EFS was 0.59%. Given the rarity of the syndrome, caution is advised when interpreting the analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main limitation of this study is its retrospective nature. Although this is the largest analysis of EFS in donors reported so far, its statistical power is limited because the syndrome has a low incidence. In some cycles of EFS from 2006 to 2007 there is a lack of hormone data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings may be generalized to oocyte donors and IVF patients younger than 35 years old, with cycles undergoing final maturation triggering with either hCG or GnRH agonists. The generalization cannot be extended to patients with an ovarian factor as the cause of their reproductive pathology. The theoretical aetiology of a temporary hypothalamic-pituitary hyposensitivity can explain the cycles where a rescue protocol with hCG has been successful. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported in part by funding from Fundaciò EUGIN. The authors have no conflicts to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NA.
Asunto(s)
Gonadotropina Coriónica/agonistas , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Donación de Oocito , Enfermedades del Ovario/epidemiología , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SíndromeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Three-dimensional (3D) sonographically based automated volume calculation (SonoAVC; GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) is being introduced in folliculometry during ovarian stimulation; however, clear training assessments in this technique are lacking. The learning curve-cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) test provides a quantitative tool to determine when a trainee has learned a procedure. The aim of this prospective study was to assess 3D SonoAVC LC-CUSUM curves in folliculometry. METHODS: Analyses were performed on 98 oocyte donors by capturing the ovarian image in 3D and applying the 3D SonoAVC software during ovarian stimulation cycles. Each patient was scanned by an expert operator and by a trainee. Independent LC-CUSUM tests for 4 follicular diameters tracked the competency of 3 trainees in 3D SonoAVC. RESULTS: We found that the numbers of sonographic examinations required by the 3 trainees to identify the correct number of follicles of 10 mm or larger were 38, 32, and 28, respectively; for follicles of 14 mm or larger, they were 29, 28, and 28; for follicles of 18 mm or larger, they were 24, 19, and 27; and for follicles of 21 mm or larger, they were 29, 19, and 24. CONCLUSIONS: A variable number of procedures are needed to reach proficiency in 3D SonoAVC, even for trained 2-dimensional sonographers. Assessment of learning curves should be implemented when incorporating 3D SonoAVC in reproduction units.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Curva de Aprendizaje , Folículo Ovárico/diagnóstico por imagen , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Infertilidad Femenina/diagnóstico por imagen , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Donación de Oocito , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Race and ethnicity are one of the newly investigated patient-related prognostic factors that might affect the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques. To our knowledge no data currently are available on the effect of race on oocyte donation outcome. MATERIALS: A retrospective, matched cohort study was performed in a private infertility centre evaluating 1012 Black, South-East Asian and Caucasian recipients undergoing their first oocyte donation cycles. RESULTS: A significantly lower ongoing pregnancy rate (24.6 versus 36.8%, OR: 0.56 95% CI: 0.40-0.77, P = 0.01) was observed among Black recipients compared with their matched Caucasian counterparts. The prevalence of uterine fibroids (49.6 versus 17.1%, P < 0.0001) and previous history of tubal infertility (53.2 versus 16.5%, P < 0.0001) was significantly higher among Black women. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for confounding variables, Black race was an independent risk factor for not achieving an ongoing pregnancy (for ongoing pregnancy, adjusted OR: 0.62 95% CI: 0.43-0.89, P = 0.009). Ongoing pregnancy rate (37.2 versus 37.2%, OR: 1.0 95% CI: 0.49-2.04, P = 1.0) was not significantly different between South-East Asian and matched Caucasian patients. CONCLUSIONS: Black race was an independent risk factor for not achieving an ongoing pregnancy after oocyte donation. Although yellow race does not seem to adversely affect oocyte donation, larger studies are still warranted to draw more solid conclusions. Race should be considered as an independent prognostic factor in oocyte donation.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Donación de Oocito , Resultado del Embarazo/etnología , Población Blanca , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedades de las Trompas Uterinas/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/etnología , Leiomioma/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Donación de Oocito/métodos , Edad Paterna , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Grupos Raciales , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Neoplasias Uterinas/etnologíaRESUMEN
AIM: To compare donor and recipient outcome after inducing the final oocyte maturation with hCG or GnRH agonist in GnRH-antagonist treated oocyte donation (OD) cycles. METHODS: Two-hundred fifty-seven oocyte donors were enrolled to participate in a clinical trial in a private fertility centre. After stimulation with 225 IU rFSH and Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day, 212 oocyte donors were randomised with sealed envelopes for triggering with recombinant hCG (Ovitrelle 250 microgr, n = 106) or a GnRH agonist (triptorelin 0.2 mg, n = 106). RESULTS: The number of retrieved COCs (12 +/- 6.3 vs 11.4 +/- 6.4), mature oocytes (8 +/- 4.6 vs 7.5 +/- 4.1), the proportion of mature oocytes (67.2 +/- 20.4% vs 67.1 +/- 20.9%) and fertilisation rates (67.8 +/- 23.5% vs 71.1 +/- 22.1%) were comparable. Clinical, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates were not statistically different in the corresponding recipient groups. Nine cases of mild and one case of severe OHSS occurred in hCG group, whereas no cases were detected in GnRH agonist group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our RCT suggest that donor and recipient outcome are comparable in OD cycles triggered with hCG or a GnRH agonist. Furthermore, the risk of OHSS seems to be reduced considerably, therefore the combination of a GnRH antagonist protocol with GnRH agonist triggering constitutes a safe treatment option for egg-donors.
Asunto(s)
Gonadotropina Coriónica/uso terapéutico , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Luteolíticos/uso terapéutico , Donación de Oocito/métodos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
A retrospective study was conducted in a private infertility centre to evaluate the rate of complications in a large oocyte donation programme. A total of 4052 oocyte retrievals were performed between January 2001 and October 2007. Altogether, 1238 cycles (30.6%) were stimulated with the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and in 2814 cycles (69.4%) the GnRH antagonist protocol was used. The GnRH antagonist treated cycles were triggered with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) or a GnRH agonist in 1295 and 1519 cycles, respectively. Complications related to oocyte retrieval occurred in 17 patients (0.42%) (intra-abdominal bleeding: n = 14, severe pain: n = 2, ovarian torsion: n = 1). Fourteen of these were hospitalized (0.35%) and six donors (0.15%) required surgical intervention. Pelvic infections, injury to pelvic structures or anaesthesiological complications were not observed in this series. Moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred in 22 donors; 11 required hospital admission and 11 were managed on an outpatient basis. All cases were related to HCG triggering (0.87%). Serious complications related to oocyte retrieval occurred at a low rate in healthy young donors. The risk of OHSS can be substantially reduced by specific stimulation protocols, which include GnRH agonist triggering. Prospective oocyte donors should be adequately counselled about the risks related to egg donation.
Asunto(s)
Recuperación del Oocito/efectos adversos , Inducción de la Ovulación/efectos adversos , Donantes de Tejidos , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/epidemiología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/farmacología , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recuperación del Oocito/métodos , Enfermedades del Ovario/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Ovario/etiología , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/inducido químicamente , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Torsión Mecánica , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to know the seroprevalence of HCV in pregnant women and to determine its vertical transmission rate as well as the viremia evolution in infected children. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Two different populations were studied: a) all pregnant women (n = 2,615) controlled in our hospital during 1999, and b) newborns (n = 228) to mothers with HCV antibodies (Ab) who were referred to our hospital from January 1995 to September 2000. Eighty of these infants were born to mothers coinfected with HIV-1. HCV Ab were determined by ELISA and RIBA techniques and viral ARN was studied by PCR. Risk factors in infected pregnant women were reviewed. RESULTS: HCV Ab were detected in 37 women using RIBA or PCR, hence meaning a seroprevalence rate of 1.4%. Usual risk factors were not identified in 35% of cases. Median viral load was 3.5 * 105 IU/ml. ARN HCV was detected in 15 infants, 9 out of them being born to mothers coinfected with HIV-1 (vertical transmission rate: 11.25%) and the remaining 6 being born to mothers without HIV-1 coinfection (vertical transmission rate: 4%). The difference in the transmission rate had statistical significance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Seroprevalence of HCV infection in our population of pregnant women was relatively high. HCV screening in pregnant women is useful in order to identify this infection not only in this population but also in newborns and, consequently, to follow-up the vertical transmission cases.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Femenino , Hepatitis C/sangre , Hepatitis C/inmunología , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis C/sangre , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios SeroepidemiológicosRESUMEN
In this prospective, follow-up study of 102 high-risk oocyte donors in their luteal phase, we found a complete absence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (no signs of hemoconcentration or ascites) after the donors were triggered with a gonadotropin releasing-hormone (GnRH) agonist. Due to its powerful preventive effect, the GnRH antagonist protocol combined with a GnRH agonist trigger should preferentially be used in egg donors; in conjunction with an effective luteal support or embryo cryopreservation, the protocol could also be applied to high-risk in vitro fertilization patients.
Asunto(s)
Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Fase Luteínica , Donación de Oocito , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/prevención & control , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Fase Luteínica/efectos de los fármacos , Fase Luteínica/fisiología , Menotropinas/administración & dosificación , Menotropinas/efectos adversos , Donación de Oocito/métodos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/etiología , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In this retrospective, matched study we evaluated the outcome of 31 oocyte donation (OD) cycles performed in 29 Turner syndrome (TS) patients involving the elective transfer of a single, fresh cleavage-stage (day 2 to 3) embryo. Due to the fact that ongoing pregnancy rate was statistically significantly lower (3.2% versus 22.5%) in TS patients when compared with matched, non-TS recipients, other strategies (such as single blastocyst transfer) should be evaluated that could enable better outcomes and at the same time avoid potential complications related to multiple pregnancies in this particularly high obstetric-risk group.
Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Donación de Oocito/métodos , Índice de Embarazo , Síndrome de Turner/complicaciones , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Embarazo Múltiple , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Turner/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy rates and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in donor stimulation cycles where final maturation of oocytes was induced with recombinant hCG or GnRH agonist. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study. SETTING: Private infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): A total of 1171 egg donors performing 2077 stimulation cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation of egg donors with GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with recombinant hCG (rhCG; 250 microg) or GnRH agonist (triptorelin 0.2 mg) based on the physician's decision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proportion of mature and fertilized oocytes per donor cycle; clinical, ongoing pregnancy and implantation rate in recipients; and incidence of moderate/severe OHSS in oocyte donors. RESULT(S): The proportion of mature oocytes was comparable, whereas the difference in the fertilization rate reached statistical significance (65% vs. 69%). No significant differences were observed in the implantation rate or clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates per ET. The incidence of moderate/severe OHSS was 1.26% (13/1031; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-2.15) and 0% (0/1046; 95% CI, 0.00-0.37) in the rhCG and GnRH agonist groups, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Recipient outcome was not significantly different when using oocytes from GnRH antagonist-treated donor cycles triggered with hCG or GnRH agonist. However, GnRH agonist triggering was associated with a lower incidence of moderate/severe OHSS in egg donors.