Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Diagnostic problems in clinical practice in Serbia.

Making diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is challenging since it can mimic a multitude of disorders, and is misdiagnosed in at least 50% of cases. We sought to determine the frequency of CIDP misdiagnosis in clinical practice in Serbia, to uncover CIDP mimics, and to identify factors that may aid in CIDP diagnosis. Our longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 86 eligible adult patients referred to the Neurology Clinic, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, with a diagnosis of CIDP. We also included 15 patients referred to us with different diagnoses that ended up having CIDP as their final diagnosis. Exactly half of patients referred as CIDP failed to meet the established diagnostic criteria (non-CIDP) and were given an alternative diagnosis at the first hospitalization. At the 1-year follow-up, the diagnosis was further revised in four subjects. Confirmed CIDP patients usually had their initial diagnosis based on the nerve conduction studies (NCS), a typical presentation with symmetrical involvement of all four limbs, as well as higher frequencies of elevated protein levels and albuminocytologic dissociation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). CIDP patients also responded better to immune therapy. We found that 52% of the patients initially referred to our Clinic as CIDP were given other diagnoses after a 1-year follow-up. Out of all CIDP cases, 27% had been unrecognized prior to referral to our Center. Utilization of clear and objective indicators - conclusive NCS, improvement on therapy, and elevated CSF proteins may provide greater certainty in diagnosing CIDP.

Retinal vascular abnormalities in myotonic dystrophy assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography - Cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to detect the changes in retinal and choroidal vasculature via optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) by comparing the quantitative OCTA parameters in patients with and without myotonic dystrophies (DM). MATERIAL: The cross-sectional study. Forty-one consecutive patients affected by DMs were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were molecular diagnosis of DM types 1 and 2. To avoid the age effect on microvascular changes and to justify a comparison between DM1 and DM2 patients, two control groups matched for sex and age were established. RESULTS: The vascular density was found to be significantly decreased in the DM groups compared to the controls in the macular, parafoveal and perifoveal zone of superficial capillary plexus (p < 0.001 for the DM1 group, and p = 0.001, p = 0.005 and p = 0.026, respectively, for the DM2 group), as well as in the macular zone in the deep capillary plexus for DM1 (p = 0.002) and deep macular and perifoveal zone for DM2 (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, respectively). The foveal avascular zone showed no significant differences between DM1 and DM2 compared to their control groups (p = 0.320 and p = 0.945, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results show that DM is associated not only with the classic pigmentary changes but also with superficial and deep retinal microvasculature abnormalities, suggesting that these changes may be related to local hypoperfusion. Optical coherence tomography angiography is a useful tool for the diagnosis and characterization of retinal changes in DM and should be part of the standard evaluation of these patients.

Cognitive assessment in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant multisystemic disorder. Previous studies conducted on small cohorts of DM2 patients indicated presence of a cognitive dysfunction. We aimed to assess cognitive functions in a larger cohort of Serbian DM2 patients using an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests. The study included 76 patients with a genetically confirmed DM2, 68 of whom had all tests for different cognitive domains performed. Patients underwent clinical and neuropsychological testing, including cognitive screening and assessment of general intellectual level, attention, executive and visuospatial abilities, memory, and language functions. Only 6% of patients achieved a below-average score on the general intellectual level test. Cognitive screening tests indicated presence of cognitive deficits in 5.5% of patients according to the Mini Mental State Examination test and 25.8% according to the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised test. Twenty-four (35.3%) patients had a cognitive impairment (being two standard deviations out of norm in at least two cognitive domains). Around one quarter of DM2 patients had a significant cognitive impairment that interfered with their everyday functioning. Patients with significant cognitive impairment were older at testing and at disease onset, less educated, and had more severe muscle weakness.