Acute primary angle closure attack does not cause an increased cup-to-disc ratio.

PURPOSE: To determine if an increased cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss occur after acute primary angle closure (APAC). DESIGN: Prospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty participants with unilateral APAC provided 20 affected eyes and 20 fellow eyes (controls) for analysis. METHODS: After initial presentation, participants attended 3 further assessments over a 12-month period (visit 2, within 2 weeks; visit 3, 2-3 months; and visit 4, 6-12 months), in which they underwent the following investigations: Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany), optical coherence tomography of the RNFL and macula, and automated perimetry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cup-to-disc ratio, optic cup area, neuroretinal rim area, RNFL thickness, macular thickness, and volume. RESULTS: There was no change from visits 2 to 4 in CDR (0.46 ± 0.17 vs. 0.47 ± 0.20; P = 0.94), neuroretinal rim area (1.64 ± 0.55 vs. 1.64 ± 0.57; P = 0.96), or other optic nerve head parameters analyzed in eyes with APAC. The mean overall RNFL thickness decreased from 106.6 ± 17.9 µm to 92.9 ± 18.3 µm between visits 2 and 3 (P<0.01) in affected eyes. The superior quadrant RNFL thickness decreased from 134.8 ± 25.9 µm to 113 ± 25.7 µm (P<0.01), and the inferior quadrant RNFL thickness decreased from 139.1 ± 28.4 µm to 115.6 ± 24.9 µm (P<0.01). There was no significant change in macular thickness or volume. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that an increase in CDR does not occur after APAC that is treated promptly, although RNFL loss does occur.

Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation project: a standardized internet system for assessing skills in optic disc examination.

BACKGROUND: Development of a standardized internet-based system to self-assess skills in optic disc examination for glaucoma risk assessment. DESIGN: Prospective internet-based observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 197 participants (glaucoma subspecialists, general ophthalmologists and trainees) from 22 countries. METHODS: Forty-two optic disc images demonstrating a range of features were selected from 2500 monoscopic disc photographs of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Images were presented to clinicians via website (http://www.gone-project.com). Participants were asked to assess nine topographic features and make a subjective assessment of glaucoma likelihood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-observer agreement using kappa (κ) or weighted kappa (κ(w) ). RESULTS: There was substantial level of inter-observer agreement between glaucoma subspecialists for assessment of glaucoma likelihood (κ(w) = 0.63). Inter-observer agreement was high for haemorrhage (κ= 0.83) and substantial for disc size, disc shape, cup:disc ratio, peripapillary atrophy and cup shape (κ(w) = 0.59-0.68). Subspecialists had stronger inter-observer agreement for glaucoma likelihood and for most disc characteristics than did trainees: the greatest difference being the assessment for retinal nerve fibre layer loss. Analysis of individual disc answers from ophthalmology trainees showed that discs leading to lower agreement of glaucoma likelihood tend to produce lower agreement for the assessment of cup:disc ratio, cup shape, cup depth and retinal nerve fibre layer. Discs with features of moderate to deep cup or cup:disc ratio between 0.6 and 0.8 also lead to lower agreement in glaucoma likelihood. CONCLUSIONS: This internet-based system is a readily accessible and standardized tool, for clinicians globally, that permits self-assessment and benchmarking of skills in optic disc examination.

Glaucoma Mini-Shunt Implantation After Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of patients who underwent miniature glaucoma shunt implantation after secondary glaucoma due to keratoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study of consecutive clinical cases who underwent mini-glaucoma shunt implantation following keratoplasty. In brief, a fornix-based conjunctival flap was performed, approximately 50% thickness scleral flap. Mitomycin C 0.025% placed under Tenon's capsule. A 25-G needle created entry for mini-shunt. Ex-PRESS model P-50 was inserted. Scleral flap and conjunctiva were closed with 10-0 Nylon. STATA 8.0 and SPSS software were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen eyes of 17 patients with a mean age of 39.70 years (SD=18.33, range: 18 to 76). A total of 64.70% were male and 35.30% female. Eleven cases after penetrating keratoplasty, 3 cases after triple procedure, 2 after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and 1 following endothelial keratoplasty. Most of the indications for keratoplasty were keratoconus in 9 cases (52.94%), 4 due to endothelial failure (23.52%), 3 cases of herpetic keratitis (17.64%), and 1 case of post-LASIK ectasia (5.88%). Mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 35.94 mm Hg with maximal medical therapy (SD=9.65, range: 18 to 55). Decreasing intraocular pressure to 12.76 mm Hg postoperatively (SD=2.51, range 10 to 18) (P=0.001). Mean follow-up after mini-glaucoma shunt implantation was 23.76 months (SD=8.73, range: 10 to 35 mo). Preoperative mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 1.31±0.63 (20/408 Snellen) and postoperative mean UDVA was 0.85±0.40 (20/141 Snellen) (P=0.001). Preoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.83±0.76 (20/135 Snellen) and postoperative mean CDVA was 0.56±0.44 (20/72 Snellen) (P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma shunt could be an alternative treatment in postkeratoplasty glaucoma resistant to medical treatment. This technique may be helpful, in trying to avoid corneal damage produced by conventional glaucoma procedures.

Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation project: factors associated with underestimation of glaucoma likelihood.

IMPORTANCE: Glaucoma is a significant health problem for which diagnosis remains suboptimal. Optic disc evaluation, which is fundamental to the diagnosis, is a difficult skill to acquire. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optic disc characteristics that most influence decision making in the assessment of glaucoma likelihood and to ascertain the optic disc features associated with overestimation and underestimation of glaucoma likelihood. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective, observational, Internet-based study with multinational participation included 197 ophthalmic clinicians (37 glaucoma subspecialists, 51 comprehensive ophthalmologists, and 109 ophthalmology trainees) from 22 countries who self-registered for the Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Evaluation (GONE) Project from December 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010. INTERVENTIONS: A series of 42 monoscopic optic disc photographs of healthy and glaucomatous eyes were presented to clinicians using the GONE Project Program. Participants were asked to assess each disc according to 9 conventional topographic features and assign a presumptive grade for glaucoma likelihood. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Agreement (κ and weighted κ) among participants for disc signs and glaucoma likelihood and contributions of disc-related factors to overestimation and underestimation of glaucoma likelihood. RESULTS: Ophthalmology trainees and comprehensive ophthalmologists underestimated glaucoma likelihood in a mean (SD) of 22.1% (1.6%) and 23.8% (1.8%) of discs, respectively. Underestimation of vertical cup-disc ratio and failure to identify retinal nerve fiber layer loss, disc hemorrhage, or rim loss were most likely to lead to underestimation of glaucoma. When all 4 features were inaccurately assessed, underestimation of glaucoma likelihood increased to 43.0%. Ophthalmology trainees and comprehensive ophthalmologists overestimated glaucoma likelihood in a mean (SD) of 13.0% (1.2%) and 8.9% (1.3%) of discs, respectively. Overestimation of glaucoma likelihood was associated with overestimation of retinal nerve fiber layer loss, rim loss, vertical cup-disc ratio, disc hemorrhage, and incorrect assessment of disc tilt and was more likely in large discs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Ophthalmology trainees and comprehensive ophthalmologists underestimated glaucoma likelihood in approximately 1 in 5 disc photographs and were twice as likely to underestimate as overestimate glaucoma likelihood. Underestimating the vertical cup-disc ratio and cup shape and missing retinal nerve fiber layer defects and disc hemorrhage were the key errors that led to underestimation. When all 4 parameters were incorrectly assessed, underestimation increased to almost 1 in 2.