RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Children's and Infant's Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) and the German version of the Parent's Postoperative Pain Measure (PPPM-D) are used to assess postoperative pain intensity in preschool children. However, they have shown low concordance in previous prospective studies on quality improvement. AIMS: Our secondary analysis aimed to estimate the association strength between the pain score items and indication for rescue medication defined as CHIPPS ≥4 and/or PPPD-D ≥ 6. Thus, we intended to create a further developed pain instrument with fewer variables for easier routine use. METHODS: We analyzed 1067 pain intensity assessments of hospitalized children for the development of our novel tool in two steps using modern statistical and machine-learning methods: (1) Boruta variable selection to analyze the association strength between CHIPPS score, PPPM-D items, age, weight, and elapsed time after surgery, including their interactions and pattern stability, and the binary outcome (analgesics required yes/no). (2) Symbolic regression to generate a short formula with the least number of variables and highest accuracy for rescue medication indication. RESULTS: Additional analgesics were required in 19.96% of pain intensity assessments, whereby the PPPM-D showed higher variance than CHIPPS. Boruta identified PPPM-D score, CHIPPS score, 9 of the 15 PPPM-D variables, and time of assessment as associated with the indication for RM. Symbolic regression revealed that additional analgesics are required if CHIPPS is ≥4 OR PPPM-D item "less energy than usual" AND one of the items "more easily cry" or "more groan/moan" are answered with "yes." These PPPM-D items were not redundant and showed nonlinear course over time. The cross-validated accuracy for this assessment tool was 94.94%. CONCLUSIONS: The new instrument is easy to use and may improve postoperative pain intensity assessment in children. However, it requires prospective validation in a new cohort.