RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) represents an important diagnostic tool for the workup of salivary gland (SG) lesions. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a six-tiered system for standardizing diagnoses and improvement of communication between pathologists and clinicians, providing risk of malignancy (ROM) rates for every category. The aims of the present study were (i) to validate the use of MSRSGC in a large series of SG FNAC in a tertiary center in Switzerland, (ii) to determine ROM for each category and compare them with data from MSRSGC and similar studies, and (iii) to investigate whether there were relevant differences of non-diagnostic results between fine-needle aspirations (FNA) performed by cytopathologists compared to non-cytopathologists. METHODS: The files of the department of Pathology in the University Hospital Zurich (UHZ) were searched for SG FNAC between 2010 and 2019. The MSRSGC guidelines were applied retrospectively. Furthermore, ROM, risk of neoplasia (RON), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated based on the cases with histopathological follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 2156 SG FNAC including 753 cases with histopathological follow-up were evaluated. Generally, ROM was within the range of values provided by MSRSGC, with some minor deviations. Sensitivity was 94.6%, and specificity was 99.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the usefulness of MSRSGC. In addition, it provides a detailed insight into the wide spectrum of SG FNAC. Finally, we showed that the rate of non-diagnostic FNA was significantly lower in FNAs performed by cytopathologists compared to non-cytopathologists.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales , Humanos , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Salivales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glándulas Salivales/patología , Citodiagnóstico/métodos , PatólogosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The expression of amino acid transporters is known to vary during acute pancreatitis (AP) except for LAT1 (slc7a5), the expression of which remains stable. LAT1 supports cell growth by importing leucine and thereby stimulates mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity, a phenomenon often observed in cancer cells. The mechanisms by which LAT1 influences physiological and pathophysiological processes and affects disease progression in the pancreas are not yet known. AIM: To evaluate the role of LAT1 in the development of and recovery from AP. METHODS: AP was induced with caerulein (cae) injections in female and male mice expressing LAT1 or after its knockout (LAT1 Cre/LoxP). The development of the initial AP injury and its recovery were followed for seven days after cae injections by daily measuring body weight, assessing microscopical tissue architecture, mRNA and protein expression, protein synthesis, and enzyme activity levels, as well as by testing the recruitment of immune cells by FACS and ELISA. RESULTS: The initial injury, evaluated by measurements of plasma amylase, lipase, and trypsin activity, as well as the gene expression of dedifferentiation markers, did not differ between the groups. However, early metabolic adaptations that support regeneration at later stages were blunted in LAT1 knockout mice. Especially in females, we observed less mTOR reactivation and dysfunctional autophagy. The later regeneration phase was clearly delayed in female LAT1 knockout mice, which did not regain normal expression of the pancreas-specific differentiation markers recombining binding protein suppressor of hairless-like protein (rbpjl) and basic helix-loop-helix family member A15 (mist1). Amylase mRNA and protein levels remained lower, and, strikingly, female LAT1 knockout mice presented signs of fibrosis lasting until day seven. In contrast, pancreas morphology had returned to normal in wild-type littermates. CONCLUSION: LAT1 supports the regeneration of acinar cells after AP. Female mice lacking LAT1 exhibited more pronounced alterations than male mice, indicating a sexual dimorphism of amino acid metabolism.
Asunto(s)
Ceruletida , Pancreatitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Amilasas , Animales , Ceruletida/toxicidad , Femenino , Transportador de Aminoácidos Neutros Grandes 1/genética , Masculino , Mamíferos/genética , Ratones , Ratones Noqueados , Páncreas/metabolismo , Pancreatitis/inducido químicamente , Pancreatitis/genética , Pancreatitis/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TORRESUMEN
AIMS: With ongoing intensive vaccination programme against COVID-19, numerous cases of adverse reactions occur, some of which represent rare events. Enlargement of the injection site’s draining lymph nodes is increasingly reported, but is not yet widely recognised as being possibly associated with recent vaccination. As patients at risk of a severe course of COVID-19, indicated by their medical history such as a previous diagnosis of malignancy, receive priority vaccination, newly palpable lymph nodes raise concerns of disease progression. In this case series, we report on five patients who presented with enlarged lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: Sonography guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) was performed in five patients presenting with PET-positive and/or enlarged lymph nodes after COVID-19 vaccination with either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine. RESULTS: COVID-19 vaccination had been carried out in all cases, with an interval of between 3 and 33 days prior to FNA. Three of five patients had a history of neoplasms. The vaccine was administered into the deltoid muscle, with subsequent enlargement of either the cervical, supra-, infra- or retroclavicular, or axillary lymph nodes, in four out of five cases ipsilaterally. In all cases, cytology and additional analyses showed a reactive lymphadenopathy without any sign of malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of newly enlarged lymph nodes after recent COVID-19 vaccination should be considered reactive in the first instance, occurring owing to stimulation of the immune system. A clinical follow-up according to the patient’s risk profile without further diagnostic measures is justified. In the case of preexisting unilateral cancer, vaccination should be given contralaterally whenever possible. Persistently enlarged lymph nodes should be re-evaluated (2 to) 6 weeks after the second dose, with additional diagnostic tests tailored to the clinical context. Fine needle aspiration is a well established, safe, rapid and cost-effective method to investigate an underlying malignancy, especially metastasis. Recording vaccination history, including date of injection, site and vaccine type, as well as communicating this information to treating physicians of different specialties is paramount for properly handling COVID-19 vaccine-associated lymphadenopathy.