Postpartum urinary retention: a systematic review of adverse effects and management.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a well-known condition after childbirth. Often clinicians assume that this condition is transient, either through belief or by not being aware that its occurrence as measurement of post-void residual volume (PVRV) is often not routine. However, long lasting urinary retention is a serious condition that needs management in order to prevent urogenital tract morbidity. By performing a systematic review of the adverse effects of PUR and management of this condition, we aimed to identify the necessity of diagnosing this condition in the puerperium and to evaluate whether treatment is required. METHODS: We searched for all studies on PUR in OVID MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE, and ongoing Trial registers. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. RESULTS: Twenty-four papers were included in this review. Limited data on adverse effects demonstrate potential morbidities, like micturition symptoms and sporadically spontaneous bladder ruptures, related to PUR. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current literature, evidence stating that PUR is harmless is lacking. Future research should focus on management strategies for overt PUR and the long-term consequences of covert PUR. Until these results are available, clinicians should be aware of the potential consequences and therefore keep trying to identify patients at risk of PUR and patients with the actual condition.

Risk factors for postpartum urinary retention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a common condition with varying prevalence. Measurement of the post-void residual volume (PVRV) is not regularly performed. Various studies have been published on overt (the inability to void after giving birth, requiring catheterisation) and covert (an increased PVRV after spontaneous micturition) PUR. To evaluate which clinical prognostic factors are related to PUR, the identification of independent risk factors for covert and overt PUR is needed. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting on risk factors for PUR. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to September 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles that reported on women diagnosed with PUR or with an abnormal PVRV. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The included articles were selected by two authors. We constructed two-by-two tables for potential risk factors of overt and covert PUR and calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three observational studies with original data were eligible for data extraction, of which 13 could be used for meta-analysis. Statistically significant risk factors for overt PUR were epidural analgesia (OR 7.7), instrumental delivery (OR 4.5), episiotomy (OR 4.8) and primiparity (OR 2.4). For covert PUR, variety in the definitions used resulted in heterogeneity; no significant prognostic factors were found. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumental delivery, epidural analgesia, episiotomy and nulliparity are statistically significantly associated with a higher incidence of overt PUR. The same factors were identified for covert PUR, but without statistical significance. Uniformity in definitions in future research is essential to create a prognostic model.

Anterior colporrhaphy does not induce bladder outlet obstruction.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to evaluate if anterior colporrhaphy causes incomplete voiding due to bladder outlet obstruction. METHODS: Women scheduled for anterior colporrhaphy were asked to undergo multichannel urodynamic investigation before surgery and the first postoperative day. Bladder outlet obstruction was assessed using the Blaivas­Groutz voiding nomogram. Maximum flow rate, detrusor pressure and residual volume were compared between pre- and postoperative measurements and between women with and without an abnormal post-void residual volume (PVR; volume exceeding 150 ml). RESULTS: Seventeen women participated. One woman who was unobstructed before surgery was obstructed after surgery. Overall, detrusor pressure and maximum flow rate before and after surgery did not differ. After surgery, six women had an abnormal PVR, one was unable to void, four were mildly obstructed and one moderately obstructed. CONCLUSION: Urodynamic investigation the first day after anterior colporrhaphy did not show that anterior colporrhaphy induces bladder outlet obstruction. The explanation for postoperative urinary retention can therefore also lie in nonanatomical causes such as postoperative pain and psychological factors.

Patient preferences for clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for treatment of abnormal post-void residual bladder volume after vaginal prolapse surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient preferences for clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) relative to transurethral indwelling catheterisation (TIC) as the treatment of abnormal post-void residual bladder volume (PVR) following vaginal prolapse surgery. DESIGN: Scenario-based preference assessment during face-to-face interview. SETTING: Teaching hospital. POPULATION: A sample of consecutive patients scheduled for vaginal prolapse surgery. METHODS: Preference for CIC relative to TIC was assessed using written treatment scenarios. Initially, treatment duration was set at 3 days and the risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) was 30% for both interventions. Both treatment duration and UTI risk related to TIC were kept constant. Treatment duration and UTI risk after CIC were varied until patients altered their preference. In this way, the duration of catheterisation and level of UTI risk related to CIC at which patients would prefer CIC to TIC could be determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' preference for CIC relative to TIC. RESULTS: When both duration of treatment and UTI risk were identical for both interventions, 64% of patients prefer CIC. Ninety-two percent of patients prefer CIC when CIC lasts 3 days but results in a 15% lower risk of UTI. Assuming that CIC results in a 15% risk of UTI, a total of 98 and 99% of patients prefer CIC to TIC when catheterisation with CIC last 2 and 1 day, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with abnormal PVR prefer CIC to TIC. The results of a recent randomised controlled trial showed that CIC resulted in a 2 days shorter catheterisation and more than 20% reduced risk of UTI. These conditions correspond to a preference of 99% of patients for CIC.

Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicentre randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clean intermittent catheterisation with transurethral indwelling catheterisation for the treatment of abnormal post-void residual bladder volume (PVR) following vaginal prolapse surgery. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Five teaching hospitals and one non-teaching hospital in the Netherlands. POPULATION: All patients older than 18 years experiencing abnormal PVR following vaginal prolapse surgery, with or without the use of mesh. Exclusion criteria were: any neurological or anxiety disorder, or the need for combined anti-incontinence surgery. METHODS: All patients were given an indwelling catheter directly after surgery, which was removed on the first postoperative day. Patients with a PVR of more than 150 ml after their first void were randomised for clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC), performed by nursing staff, or for transurethral indwelling catheterisation (TIC) for 3 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Bacteriuria rate at end of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were included in the study. Compared with the TIC group (n = 42), there was a lower risk of developing bacteriuria (14 versus 38%; P = 0.02) or urinary tract infection (UTI; 12 versus 33%; P = 0.03) in the CIC group (n = 45); moreover, a shorter period of catheterisation was required (18 hours CIC versus 72 hours TIC; P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was similar in the two groups, and no adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Clean intermittent catheterisation is preferable over indwelling catheterisation for 3 days in the treatment of abnormal PVR following vaginal prolapse surgery.

[Two adult patients with pneumococcal peritonitis]. / Twee volwassen patiënten met pneumokokkenperitonitis.

Two women, aged 31 and 37 years, had abdominal pain and fever several months after giving birth and a few weeks after receiving an intrauterine device. Both patients were admitted and treated under the working diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). They appeared to have pneumococcal adnexitis and pneumococcal peritonitis. Both patients recovered after initiating directed antibiotic treatment. Peritonitis in previously healthy adults is seldom caused by pneumococci. Standard antibiotics that are effective when given empirically for PID may be a suboptimal treatment for pneumococcal peritonitis.

A nationwide survey to measure practice variation of catheterisation management in patients undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary catheterisation following vaginal prolapse surgery causes inconvenience for patients, risk of urinary tract infections and potentially longer hospitalisation. Possibly, practice variation exists concerning diagnosis and management of abnormal postvoid residual (PVR) volume implying suboptimal treatment for certain subgroups. METHODS: Nationwide questionnaire-based survey. RESULTS: Post-operatively, 77% performed transurethral indwelling catheterisation, 12% suprapubic catheterisation and 11% intermittent catheterisation. Catheterisation was applied 3 days (1-7 days) following anterior repair and 1 day (1-3 days) following all other procedures. The median cut-off point for abnormal PVR was 150 mL (range 50-250 mL). Treatment of abnormal PVR consisted mostly of prolonging transurethral indwelling catheterisation for 2 days (range 1-5 days; 57%), 29% by intermittent and 12% by suprapubic catheterisation. Antibiotics were administered by 21% either routinely or based on symptoms only. CONCLUSIONS: Due to insufficient evidence and suboptimal implementation of available evidence, practice variation in catheterisation regimens is high.

Histological classification of chorionic villous vascularization in early pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to assess the reproducibility of a new classification for early pregnancy chorionic villous vascularization (Grade: I, normal; IIA, mild hypoplasia; IIB, severe hypoplasia and III, avascular) for routine microscopic examination in daily clinical practice. METHODS: In this observational study, four observers scored first trimester chorionic villous vascularization. Scoring was performed in microscopic slides of chorionic tissue obtained by D&C in 30 patients with early pregnancy loss due to empty sac (n = 10), fetal death (n = 10) and termination of pregnancy (n = 10) using the new classification. Ultrasonographic measurement of trophoblastic thickness (TT) at the implantation site was available in all patients and in a reference group of 100 ongoing singleton pregnancies. The vascularization score could therefore be related to the TT. RESULTS: The new classification resulted in a good-to-excellent agreement in histological scoring (0.73-0.90) between investigators (kappa 0.64-0.86). TT was not related to either vascularization or pregnancy outcome and only partly to hydropic degeneration. CONCLUSION: The vascularization scoring system is a simple, valid and effective method for assessment of chorionic villous vascularization. It is helpful in understanding the underlying cause of pregnancy loss, as the classification can distinguish between normal and abnormal embryonic development. We did not find either a relation between TT and pregnancy outcome or between TT and vascularization.

How long should urinary bladder catheterisation be continued after vaginal prolapse surgery? A randomised controlled trial comparing short term versus long term catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prolonged urinary bladder catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery is advantageous. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A large training hospital in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Patients undergoing anterior colporrhaphy. METHODS: One hundred patients were included. Patients were randomised into two groups. In one group (n= 50), a transurethral catheter was in place for four days post-operatively and removed on the fifth post-operative day. In the other group (n= 50), catheterisation was not prolonged and the catheter was removed the morning after surgery. Residual volumes after removal of the catheter were measured by ultrasound scanning. Where residual volumes of >200 mL were found the patient was recatheterised for three more days. Urinary cultures were taken before removal of the catheter. Six patients were excluded: four in the standard prolonged catheterisation group and two in the not prolonged catheterisation group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Need for recatheterisation, urinary tract infection, mean duration of catheterisation and hospital stay. RESULTS: Residual volumes exceeding 200 mL and need for recatheterisation occurred in 9% in the standard prolonged catheterisation group versus 40% of patients in the not prolonged catheterisation group (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.045-0.47). Positive urine cultures were found in 40% of cases in the standard prolonged catheterisation group compared with 4% in the not prolonged catheterisation group (OR 15, 95% CI 3.2-68.6). Mean duration of catheterisation was 5.3 days in the standard prolonged catheterisation group and 2.3 days in the not prolonged catheterisation group (P < 0.001). Mean duration of hospitalisation was 7 days in the standard prolonged catheterisation group and 5.7 days in the not prolonged group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The disadvantages of prolonged catheterisation outweigh the advantages, therefore, removal of the catheter on the morning after surgery may be preferable and longer term catheterisation should only be undertaken where there are specific indications.