Hospital pharmacy acquisition of nonstocked antimicrobials-current processes and areas for improvement.

BACKGROUND: The delivery of prompt and appropriate antimicrobial therapy for life-threatening infections is an important antimicrobial stewardship measure and a priority for hospitals. OBJECTIVES: To better understand U.S. hospital pharmacy stocking processes and acquisition of nonstocked antimicrobials and to identify strategies for improving this process. METHODS: This mixed-methods study recruited infectious diseases and antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists. Semistructured interviews with pharmacists in Minnesota were conducted via video conferencing software from January 21, 2021, to March 17, 2021. Audio recordings of the interviews guided survey development and were also transcribed, coded, and qualitatively analyzed. Surveys were distributed throughout the United States via an e-mail listserv, and responses were collected between August 5, 2021, and September 15, 2021. RESULTS: Ten interviews and 78 surveys were included in the analysis. Formulary and stocking practices varied based on institution. Stocking decisions were most frequently based on the frequency of use, clinical utility, and cost of antimicrobials. Nonstocked antimicrobials were often ordered from the wholesale distributor but, if needed urgently, acquired from another local institution. Antibacterial agents were the most frequently needed nonstocked antimicrobials, especially those targeting multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. When acquiring nonstocked antimicrobials, barriers include process inefficiencies, cost, availability, and safety concerns. Improved information sharing between local institutions may help improve this process. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, antimicrobial stocking practices varied within U.S. hospitals. Acquisition of nonstocked, urgently needed antimicrobials from neighboring hospitals may be common; however, this process lacks guidance and is often inefficient. Establishing better mechanisms for information sharing may improve this process and should be explored.

Impact of Virtual Care on Outpatient Urinary Tract Infection Management.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of virtual care on urine testing, antibiotic prescription patterns, and outcomes of care in urinary tract infection (UTI) management. METHODS: We conducted retrospective analysis of adults treated for UTI in an ambulatory setting across a large health system from March 2020-2021. Outcomes included urine testing, antibiotic prescription, and retreatment or hospitalization, stratified by in-person vs virtual visit. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine factors contributing to outcomes. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients seen virtually had urine testing as compared to those seen in-person (19% vs 69%, P <.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, virtual visit was the most significant predictor of urine testing, associated with an 86% reduction in the odds of urine testing (odds ratio (OR) 0.14, P <.001). Having a complicated UTI did not affect the likelihood of urine testing (OR 1.0, P = .95). Patients seen virtually were more likely to have a subsequent repeat ambulatory UTI visit (OR 1.16) or repeat antibiotic prescription (1.06) more than 2 weeks after the index encounter, though no more likely to be hospitalized for UTI (OR 1.00). CONCLUSION: Virtual care for UTI is associated with a significant reduction in urine testing and an increase in repeat UTI encounters and additional antibiotics among patients with complicated and uncomplicated UTIs.