Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach for treating thoracic disc herniation. METHODS: We searched three databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase for eligible studies until Dec 2022. The quality of studies and their risk of bias were assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies. We evaluated the heterogeneity between studies using the I2 statistic and the P-value for the heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients described in 11 included articles were published from 2009 to 2022. Pain outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS score) were reported in four studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.749 (CI 95% 0.555-0.943). The obtained result showed the positive effect of the procedure and the improvement of patients' pain after the surgery. Myelopathy outcomes using the Nurick score were reported in five studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.775 (CI 95% 0.479-1.071). The result showed the positive effect of the procedure. Eight studies assessed postoperative complications and neurological deterioration. The pooled overall complication was 12.4% (32/258) and 3.5% (9/258) neurological worsening. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated a positive effect of the transfacet pedicle-sparing approach on the clinical outcomes of patients with thoracic disc herniation surgery. The technique has been shown to be safe and effective for the right patient. The technique is associated with lower rates of complications and a shorter hospital stay compared to other surgical approaches. This information can assist clinicians in making informed decisions when selecting the most appropriate surgical technique for their patients with thoracic disc herniation.

Predictors of poor clinical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing cervical laminectomy and fusion.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common degenerative disease that arises from spinal cord compression and injury. Laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion (LPSF) is one of the most common approaches used to treat patients with CSM. The present study aimed to evaluate predictors of poor clinical outcome in patients with CSM undergoing LPSF. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 157 patients with CSM who underwent LPSF at our center between April 2014 and June 2019. The neurological outcome was assessed using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale before the surgery and at the last follow-up visit. Based on the clinical outcomes, all patients were divided into two groups [the good group (recovery rates ≥ 75%) and the poor group (recovery rates < 75%)]. The following suggested variables as potential predictors for the poor clinical outcome were compared between the two groups:age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, number of laminectomy levels, presence of signal changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), duration of symptoms, preoperative JOA scale, preoperative Pavlov ratio, preoperative cervical curvature, and preoperative cervical range of motion (ROM). RESULTS: There were 86 males (54.8%) and 71 females (45.2%) with the mean follow-up time of 24.96 ± 1.67 months. Overall, 114 patients (72.6%) had a good clinical outcome. However, 43 subjects (27.4%) failed to achieve a good outcome. According to the binary logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.87-2.63; P = 0.014) and preoperative JOA scale (OR, 3.73; 95% CI 2.96-4.87; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study showed that age and preoperative JOA scale were predictors of poor clinical outcome in patients with CSM undergoing LPSF. These findings will be of great value in preoperative counseling and management of postoperative expectations.