RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the independent effect of age on baseline neurocognitive performance. STUDY DESIGN: Baseline ImPACT scores from tests taken by 7454 athletes aged 12-22 from 2009 to 2019 were split into three age cohorts: 12-14 years (3244), 15-17 years (3732), and 18-22 years (477). Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of age on ImPACT composite scores while controlling for demographic differences, medication-use, and symptom burden. Significance values have been set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Linear regression analyses demonstrated that increased age does not significantly affect symptom score (ß = 0.06, p = 0.54) but does improve impulse control (ß = -0.45, p < 0.0001), verbal memory (ß = 0.23, p = 0.03), visualmotor (ß = 0.77, p < 0.0001), and reaction time (ß = -0.008, p < 0.0001) scores. However, age did not have an effect on visual memory scores (ß = -0.25, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Age was shown to be an independent modifier of impulse control, verbal memory, visual motor, and reaction time scores but not visual memory or symptom scores. This underscores the previous literature showing developmental differences as age increases among the adolescent athlete population. This data also indicates the need for repeat neurocognitive baseline testing every other year as baseline scoring is likely to change as athletes become older.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Adolescente , Humanos , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/psicología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Tiempo de Reacción , Atletas/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High altitude may affect concussion, but prior studies are limited . We tested whether high altitude affects sport-related concussion (SRC) incidence, severity, and recovery. METHODS: Twenty-five thousand eight hundred fifteen baseline and post-injury Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing results were compiled from Florida and Colorado, low (27 m or 62 m) and high (1,640 m or 1,991 m) altitude locations, respectively. Incidence, severity, and recovery of injury were compared between altitudes. RESULTS: High altitude was associated with increased suspected concussion incidence (adjusted OR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.86 to 2.24];P < .0001). However, high altitude was associated with lower concussion severity measured by Severity Index (SI) (adjusted OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.49];P < .0001). High altitude was associated with decreased recovery from post-concussive symptoms in the migraine (ß, -2.72 [95% CI, -3.31 to -2.13]; P < .0001), cognitive (ß, -1.88 [95% CI, -2.40 to -1.36]; P < .0001), and sleep symptom clusters (ß, -0.30 [95% CI, -0.52 to -0.08]; P = .007). Athletes with initial SI≥8 showed prolonged neurocognitive dysfunction at high altitude (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.81]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: High altitude was associated with increased suspected concussions and prolonged recovery but less severe initial injury.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Altitud , Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Gender differences in neurocognitive function have been reported over the past few decades. However, multiple studies that report gender differences in Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tests composite scores ignore potential confounders which may lead to inaccurate results. METHODS: A total of 4829 male and 2477 female baseline Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tests from 2009 to 2019 of subjects ages 12-18 years were used to evaluate gender differences in baseline neurocognitive scores and symptom severity ratings. Regression analyses were used to assess the effects of gender on neurocognitive performance at baseline while controlling for a number of potential confounders including symptom burden at the time of testing. RESULTS: Differences in 3 of 5 composite scores as well as severity rating scores were maintained in multivariate analysis. Females had increased Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (ß = 3.54, 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 4.16, P < .0001) along with higher verbal memory (ß = 1.82, 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 2.50, P < .0001) and visual motor (ß = 1.29, 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.72, P < .0001) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant gender differences were found in baseline neurocognitive function. This study clarifies for the first time that gender differences in these neurocognitive domains are not simply an artifact of differences in symptom burden. However, the small effect sizes call into question the clinical relevance of these differences.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Adolescente , Atletas/psicología , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/psicología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Factores Sexuales , EstudiantesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Despite the prevalence of concussions in young athletes, the impact of headaches on neurocognitive function at baseline is poorly understood. We analyze the effects of a history of headache treatment on baseline ImPACT composite scores in young athletes. METHODS: A total of 11,563 baseline ImPACT tests taken by 7,453 student-athletes ages 12-22 between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. The first baseline test was included. There were 960 subjects who reported a history of treatment for headache and/or migraine (HA) and 5,715 controls (CT). The HA cohort included all subjects who self-reported a history of treatment for migraine or other type of headache on the standardized questionnaire. Chi-squared tests were used to compare demographic differences. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to assess differences in baseline composite scores between cohorts while controlling for demographic differences and symptom burden. RESULTS: Unadjusted analyses demonstrated that HA was associated with increased symptoms (ß=2.30, 95% CI: 2.18-2.41, p<.0001), decreased visual memory (ß=-1.35, 95% CI: -2.62 to -0.43, p=.004), and increased visual motor speed (ß=0.71, 95% CI: 0.23-1.19, p=.004) composite scores. Baseline scores for verbal memory, reaction time, and impulse control were not significantly different between cohorts. Adjusted analyses demonstrated similar results with HA patients having greater symptom burden (ß=1.40, 95% CI: 1.10-1.70, p<.0001), lower visual memory (ß=-1.25, 95% CI: -2.22 to -0.27, p=.01), and enhanced visual motor speed (ß=0.60, 95% CI: 0.11-1.10, p=.02) scores. CONCLUSION: HA affected symptom, visual motor speed, and visual memory ImPACT composite scores. Visual memory scores and symptom burden were significantly worse in the HA group while visual motor speed scores were better, which may have been due to higher stimulant use in the HA group. The effects of HA on visual motor speed and visual memory scores were independent of the effects of the increased symptom burden.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adolescente , Adulto , Atletas/psicología , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Niño , Cefalea/complicaciones , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of recurrent concussions on the incidence, severity, and recovery of significant neurocognitive dysfunction (SND) in young athletes. SETTING: Various US youth sports organizations that utilize Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) for baseline and postinjury concussion testing. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 11 563 ImPACT baseline evaluations of US student-athletes aged 12 to 22 years were separated into 2 cohorts: subjects reporting 2 or more previous concussions (PC; n = 976 baseline evaluations) at baseline and a control group reporting zero previous concussions (CT; n = 7743 baseline evaluations). Subjects reporting 1 prior concussion were excluded. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. MAIN MEASURES: Differences in SND incidence, severity, and recovery between the 2 cohorts were assessed using chi-squared tests, t tests, survival analyses, and multivariate regressions. RESULTS: The PC cohort had a higher incidence of head injury leading to ImPACT (436.7 per 1000 person-years vs 194.4 per 1000 person-years, P < .0001) and a higher incidence of SND (140.4 vs 71.8, P < .0001) than controls. However, the Severity Index (SI) demonstrated that SND severity was lower in the PC group (7.55 vs 8.59, P = .04). Adjusted analyses similarly demonstrated that the PC cohort had increased SND incidence (odds ratio = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.31; P < .0001), decreased SI (ß = -1.37; 95% CI, -2.40 to -0.34; P = .009), and equivalent recovery (hazard ratio = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.72; P = .90). CONCLUSION: Participants with a history of concussion have a higher incidence of SND but present with lower severity SND, which may be a result of increased concussion education or symptom awareness. Recurrent concussion has no significant impact on acute neurocognitive recovery. Together, these results provide evidence against the supposition that a history of concussion increases the severity of future SND.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Adolescente , Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , EstudiantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite comprising half of medical students, women represent only 29.6% of neurosurgery applicants and 17% of residents, suggesting a "leak" in the career pipeline for women neurosurgeons. Surveys persistently show that neurosurgery programs identify United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®) Step 1 score and letters of recommendation (LORs) as the most important factors in selecting applicants to interview. A previous study in neurosurgery found no differences in LORs. However, multiple studies in other specialties have demonstrated implicit gender bias in LORs, which may influence resident selection. Our objective is to evaluate neurosurgery residency LORs for evidence of implicit gender bias. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of LORs for interviewed neurosurgery applicants at a single institution during the 2014 to 2020 National Residency Matching Program (NRMP®) match cycles. Letters were evaluated using Linguistic Inquiry & Word Count (LIWC) software (Pennebaker Conglomerates), and additional applicant data were obtained from candidate applications. LIWC (Pennebaker Conglomerates) output data included custom dictionary categories and terms that were analyzed using Prism 10 and Rstudio. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen applications were reviewed for a total of 827 letters. LIWC (Pennebaker Conglomerates) analysis showed significant differences in word count (331 vs 297, difference = 34, 95% CI: 9-61, P = .008). LORs for applicants who were men were more likely to mention Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society (1.17 vs 0.778, difference = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.13-0.67, P = .023). USMLE® Step 1 scores were significantly lower for women (241 vs 247, difference = 6, 95% CI: 2-10, P = .004). There was no significant difference between letters for men and women for all categories evaluated in the linguistic evaluation. CONCLUSION: LORs are vital to the neurosurgical residency application process. The data exhibit some differences between the men and women applicants but few differences in their LORs, consistent with the results of the previous neurosurgical study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has potential to identify cervical pathology not detectable on conventional static MRI. Our study evaluated standard quantitative and novel subjective grading scales for assessing the severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in dynamic sagittal MRI as well as in static axial and sagittal images. METHODS: Forty-five patients underwent both conventional and flexion-extension MRI prior to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion from C4 through C7. In addition to measuring Cobb angles and cervical canal diameter, grading scales were developed for assessment of vertebral body translation, loss of disc height, change in disc contour, deformation of cord contour, and cord edema. Data were collected at all levels from C2-C3 through C7-T1. Variations in measurements between cervical levels and from flexion through neutral to extension were assessed using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and two-way ANOVA tests. RESULTS: Cervical canal diameter, vertebral translation, and posterior disc opening changed significantly from flexion to neutral to extension positions (P < 0.01). When comparing operative versus nonoperative cervical levels, significant differences were found when measuring sagittal cervical canal dimensions, vertebral translation, and posterior disc opening (P < 0.01). Degenerative loss of disc height, disc dehydration, deformation of ventral cord contour, and cord edema were all significantly increased at operative levels versus nonoperative levels (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Flexion-extension MRI demonstrated significant changes not available from conventional MRI. Subjective scales for assessing degenerative changes were significantly more severe at levels with operative cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The utility of these scales for planning surgical intervention at specific and adjacent levels is currently under investigation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Vértebras Cervicales/patología , Cuello/cirugía , DiscectomíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Bibliometrics assessing academic productivity plays a significant role in neurosurgeons' career advancement. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of multiple author profiles on Scopus on neurosurgeon author-level metrics (h-index, document number, citation number). METHODS: A list of 1671 academic neurosurgeons was compiled through public searches of hospital and faculty websites for 115 neurosurgical residency training programs. The h-index, document number, and citation number for each neurosurgeon were collected using the Scopus algorithm. For surgeons with multiple profiles, total document number and citation number were calculated by summing results of each profile. Cumulative h-indices were calculated manually. Comparisons were made between surgeons with a single Scopus profile and surgeons with multiple profiles. RESULTS: A total of 124 neurosurgeons with multiple profiles were identified. Gender distribution (P = 0.47), years in practice (P = 0.06), subspecialty (P = 0.32), and academic rank (P = 0.16) between neurosurgeons with a single profile versus multiple profiles were similar. Primary profile h-index median was 16 (interquartile range [IQR]: 8-34), combined profiles median was 20 (IQR: 11-36), and percent loss median was 17.3% (IQR: 3%-33%) (P < 0.001). For document number, primary profile median was 46 (IQR: 16-127), combined profiles median was 55 (IQR: 22-148), and percent loss median was 16.2% (IQR: 7%-36%) (P < 0.001). For citation number, primary profile median was 1030 (IQR: 333-4082), combined profiles median was 1319 (IQR: 546-4439), and percent loss median was 14.1% (IQR: 4%-32%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: U.S. academic neurosurgeons with multiple existing profiles on Scopus experience a 17.3% loss in h-index, a 16.2% loss in document number, and a 14.1% loss in citations, heavily undercounting their perceived academic productivity.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirugia , Cirujanos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Neurocirujanos , Neurocirugia/educación , Bibliometría , EficienciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) comprise â¼25% of physicians in the United States. Differences in promotion rates from assistant to associate to full professorship based on medical school location have been understudied. We aim to stratify odds of professional advancement by 3 categories: IMG with U.S. residency, IMG with international residency, and U.S. medical with U.S. residency training. METHODS: We created and queried a database after exclusions of 1334 neurosurgeons including multiple demographic factors: academic productivity and promotion rates. Stratified logistic regression modeled odds of promotion including the variables: decades out of training, Scopus h-index, gender, and training location. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each variable were calculated. RESULTS: Significant predictors of increased associate versus assistant professorship included decades out of training (OR = 2.519 [95% CI: 2.07-3.093], P < 0.0001) and Scopus h-index (OR = 1.085 [95% CI: 1.064-1.108], P < 0.0001) while international medical school with U.S. residency (OR = 0.471 [95% CI: 0.231-0.914], P = 0.0352) was associated with decreased promotion. Significant predictors of associate versus full professorship were decades out of training (OR = 2.781 [95% CI: 2.268-3.444], P < 0.0001) and Scopus h-index (OR = 1.064 [95% CI: 1.049-1.080], P < 0.0001). Attending medical school or residency internationally was not associated with odds of full professorship. CONCLUSIONS: Time out of residency and Scopus h-index were associated with higher academic rank regardless of career level. Attending medical school internationally with U.S. residency was associated with lower odds of associate professorship promotion over 10 years. There was no relationship between IMG and full professorship promotion. IMGs who attended residency internationally did not have lower promotion rates. These findings suggest it may be harder for IMGs to earn promotion from assistant to associate professor in neurosurgery.
RESUMEN
Surgical expertise does not have a clear definition and is often culturally associated with power, authority, prestige, and case number rather than more objective proxies of excellence. Multiple models of expertise progression have been proposed including the Dreyfus model, however, they all currently require subjective evaluation of skill. Recently, efforts have been made to improve the ways in which surgical excellence is measured and expertise is defined using artificial intelligence, video recordings, and accelerometers. However, these aforementioned methods of assessment are still subjective or indirect proxies of expertise, thus uncovering the neural mechanisms that differentiate expert surgeons from trainees may enhance the objectivity of surgical expertise validation. In fact, some researchers have already suggested that their neural imaging-based expertise classification methods outperform currently used methods of surgical skill certification such as the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) scores. Such imaging biomarkers would not only help better identify the highest performing surgeons, but could also improve residency programs by providing more objective, evidence-based feedback and developmental milestones for those in training and perhaps act as a marker of surgical potential in medical students. Despite the potential advantages of using neural imaging in the assessment of surgical expertise, this field of research remains in its infancy. This systematic review identifies studies that have applied neuromonitoring in assessing surgical skill across levels of expertise. The goals of this review are to identify (1) the strongest neural indicators of surgical expertise, (2) the limitations of the current literature on this subject, (3) the most sensible future directions for further study. We found substantial evidence that surgical expertise can be delineated by differential activation and connectivity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) across multiple task and neuroimaging modalities. Specifically, novices tend to have greater PFC activation than experts under standard conditions in bimanual and decision-making tasks. However, under high temporal demand tasks, experts had increased PFC activation whereas novices had decreased PFC activation. Common limitations uncovered in this review were that task difficulty was often insufficient to delineate between residents and attending. Moreover, attending level involvement was also low in multiple studies which may also have contributed to this issue. Most studies did not analyze the ability of their neuromonitoring findings to accurately classify subjects by level of expertise. Finally, the predominance of fNIRS as the neuromonitoring modality limits our ability to uncover the neural correlates of surgical expertise in non-cortical brain regions. Future studies should first strive to address these limitations. In the longer term, longitudinal within-subjects design over the course of a residency or even a career will also advance the field. Although logistically arduous, such studies would likely be most beneficial in demonstrating effects of increasing surgical expertise on regional brain activation and inter-region connectivity.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Concussion incidence is known to be highest in children and adolescents; however, there is conflicting evidence about the effect of age on concussion risk and recovery within the adolescent age range. The heterogeneity of results may be partially due to the use of age groupings based on convenience, making comparisons across studies difficult. This study evaluated the independent effect of age on concussion incidence, severity, and recovery in student-athletes aged 12-18 years using cluster analysis to define groupings. METHODS: Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) scores of 11,403 baseline tests and 4922 postinjury tests were used to calculate the incidence rates for adolescent student-athletes grouped into 3 age bands (12-13, 14-15, and 16-18 years of age) on the basis of clustering analysis. The recently created Severity Index was used to compare concussion severity between groups. Follow-up tests for subjects who sustained a concussion were used to evaluate recovery time. The chi-square test and 1-way ANOVA were used to compare differences in demographic characteristics and concussion incidence, severity, and recovery. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used to evaluate the independent effects of age on concussion incidence and severity, respectively. Multivariable Cox hazard regression was used to evaluate differences in recovery time. Further analyses were conducted to directly compare findings across studies on the basis of the age groupings used in prior studies. RESULTS: Multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that the 14- to 15-year-old age group had a significantly higher concussion incidence than both the 12- to 13-year-old (14- to 15-year-old group vs 12- to 13-year-old group, OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.16-2.17, p = 0.005) and 16- to 18-year-old (16- to 18-year-old group vs 14- to 15-year-old group, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91, p = 0.0008) age groups. There was no difference in incidence between the 12- to 13-year-old and 16- to 18-year-old groups (16- to 18-year group vs 12- to 13-year group, OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.93-1.72, p = 0.15). There were also no differences in concussion severity or recovery between any groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that concussion incidence was higher during mid-adolescence than early and late adolescence, suggesting a U-shaped relationship between age and concussion risk over the course of adolescence. Age had no independent effect on concussion severity or recovery in the 12- to 13-, 14- to 15-, and 16- to 18-year-old groups. Further analysis of the various age groups revealed that results may vary significantly with minor changes to groupings, which may explain the divergent results in the current literature on this topic. Thus, caution should be taken when interpreting the results of this and all similar studies, especially when groupings are based on convenience.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Academic neurosurgeons with international medical training play a large role in the U.S. neurosurgical workforce. We aimed to compare U.S.-trained neurosurgeons with internationally trained neurosurgeons to reveal differences in subspecialty preferences and training opportunities abroad. METHODS: We identified 1671 neurosurgeons from 115 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited neurosurgical residency programs. Data on demographics, institution characteristics, and chosen subspecialty were collected, and faculty were divided based on location of training. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression compared faculty characteristics between training locations. RESULTS: Compared with the U.S. medical school + U.S. residency group, the international medical graduate + U.S. residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base and vascular neurosurgery and complete a fellowship in the United States or internationally (P < 0.05). The international medical graduate + international residency group was more likely to subspecialize in oncology/skull base neurosurgery, more likely to complete an international fellowship, and less likely to practice general neurosurgery (P < 0.05). Neurosurgeons in pediatrics, radiosurgery, and vascular subspecialties were more likely to receive fellowship training in any location (P < 0.05). Additionally, functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete fellowships internationally, spinal neurosurgeons were less likely to pursue international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons were more likely to have dual fellowship training in both the United States and abroad (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: International medical training affected subspecialty choice and fellowship training. Internationally trained neurosurgeons more often specialized in oncology and vascular neurosurgery. Functional neurosurgeons were more likely to complete international fellowships, spine neurosurgeons were less likely to complete international fellowships, and peripheral nerve neurosurgeons more often had both U.S. and international fellowships.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Neurocirugia , Acreditación , Niño , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Docentes , Becas , Humanos , Neurocirugia/educación , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Neurocognitive tests are an integral component of sport-related concussion (SRC) workup. A history of psychiatric illness (HPI) is common among young athletes. Investigations of factors that influence athletes' baseline neurocognitive function are crucial for an accurate assessment of SRC. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to elucidate the effect of HPI and selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication use on baseline neurocognitive performance in young athletes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing assessments. A total of 268 athletes with HPI and a control group of 6,364 athletes were included. The outcomes were total symptom score based on post-concussion symptom scale, verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor, reaction time, and impulse control scores with self-reported HPI status and SSRI use. RESULTS: Athletes with HPI had an elevated symptom score in both univariate analysis (p < .0001) and multivariate analysis (p < .0001). HPI influence on visual memory score was not robust to multivariate analysis (p = .24). Athletes with HPI who reported SSRI medication use had the same baseline neurocognitive performance as other athletes with HPI. HPI influences athletes' baseline neurocognitive performance by elevating symptom scores. HPI does not alter any of the objective neurocognitive composite scores in contrast to previous work. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider the impact of HPI on baseline neurocognitive performance during the assessment of a suspected SRC. Additional research is required to bolster our findings on SSRI use and ascertain the effects of other drug classes on baseline neurocognitive performance.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Trastornos Mentales , Atletas/psicología , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Academic productivity, a key feature of academic neurosurgery, has been linked to academic rank, subspecialty, and institutional rank. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) has emerged as a new metric of scholarly output that can make field-normalized comparisons between researchers, a feature unavailable in prior metrics such as h-index. Here we evaluate the influence of academic rank and neurosurgical subspecialties on RCR scores. METHODS: We identified 1640 academic neurosurgeons from 115 ACGME-accredited programs in the United States, along with their neurosurgical specialty and demographic information, using publicly available data. Mean RCR (m-RCR) and weighted RCR (w-RCR) for each neurosurgeon were queried from the iCite database, which included publications from 2002-2020. m-RCR and w-RCR scores were compared across subspecialties and academic rank using multivariable regression while controlling for demographic factors. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis indicated that academic neurosurgeons in general neurosurgery (P = 0.039) and pediatric neurosurgery (P = 0.003) had lower m-RCR scores than their peers in other subspecialties. w-RCR did not differ significantly among subspecialties. Higher academic rank was associated with increased m-RCR (P < 0.05) and w-RCR scores (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Professors have a higher m-RCR score relative to assistant professors, while general and pediatric neurosurgery were linked to lower m-RCR values. Although neurosurgical subspecialty choice did not influence w-RCR, a higher w-RCR score corresponded to a higher academic rank. Overall, the RCR metric can be utilized for field-normalized comparisons of faculty who differ in academic rank and subspecialty.
Asunto(s)
Neurocirugia , Bibliometría , Niño , Eficiencia , Docentes , Humanos , Neurocirujanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Contact level affects the incidence of sports-related concussion. However, the effects of contact level on injury severity and recovery are less clear and are the focus of this study. METHOD: Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) for athletes aged 12-22 was performed at baseline (n = 10,907 for 7,058 athletes), after suspected concussion determined by physicians or athletic trainers (n = 5,062 for 4,419 athletes), and during follow-up visits (n = 3,264 for 2,098 athletes). Athletes played contact/collision (CC), limited contact (LC), and noncontact (NC) sports. Injury incidence, severity, and recovery were measured using raw and change from baseline neurocognitive test scores. Comparisons between groups used univariate analysis and multivariable regression controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: Compared to CC athletes, LC and NC athletes showed decreased suspected concussion incidence. At initial post-injury testing, all neurocognitive test scores were similar between groups except changes from baseline for processing speed were improved for LC compared to CC athletes. Upon follow-up testing, raw neurocognitive scores were better for NC compared to the contact collision athletes in verbal memory, processing speed, total symptom score, migraine cluster, cognitive cluster, and neuropsychiatric cluster scores. For change from baseline scores, LC athletes exhibited better performance on verbal memory, processing speed, and reaction time but also showed higher neuropsychiatric scores than CC athletes. CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive scores between contact levels were similar at the first post-injury test. However, follow up showed many improved scores and symptoms for limited and NC sports compared to CC sports, which may indicate faster recovery.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Deportes , Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Humanos , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies investigating seasonality as a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery show mixed results. This study used national data to analyze seasonal effects on spine surgery SSIs. METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2011-2018) were queried for posterior cervical fusions (PCFs), cervical laminoplasties, posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs), lumbar laminectomies, and deformity surgeries. Patients aged >89 and procedures for tumors, fractures, infections, and nonelective indications were excluded. Patients were divided into warm (admitted April-September) and cold (admitted October-March) seasonal groups. End points were SSIs and reoperations for wound débridement/drainage. Stratified analyses were performed by surgery type and pre-versus postdischarge infections. RESULTS: Overall (N = 208,291), SSIs were more likely in the warm season (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.23, P < 0.0001) and for PCFs (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.80, P = 0.011), PLFs (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.28, P = 0.006), and lumbar laminectomies (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.014). Postdischarge infections were also more likely in the warm season overall (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23, P < 0.0001) and for PCFs (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.73, P = 0.041), PLFs (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27, P = 0.014), and lumbar laminectomies (OR 1.15, CI 1.04-1.27, P = 0.007). In-hospital infections were more likely during the warm season only for PCFs (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.06-6.10, P = 0.037). Reoperations for infection were more likely during the warm season for PLFs (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.54, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: PCF, PLF, and lumbar laminectomy performed during the warm season had significantly higher odds of SSI, especially postdischarge SSIs. Reoperation rates for wound management were significantly increased during the warm season for PLFs. Identifying seasonal causes merits further investigation and may influence surgeon scheduling and expectations.
Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Cuidados Posteriores , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Estaciones del Año , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previously studied risk factors for sports-related concussion in soccer players include sex, age, and player position. However, prior studies were limited in number, they reported conflicting results, and most did not assess initial concussion severity. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to conduct an in-depth analysis of soccer players across key demographic groups (sex, age, position) for both concussion incidence and severity. It was hypothesized that concussion incidence and severity would be higher among male players, players aged ≥17 years, and goalkeepers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The authors analyzed baseline and postinjury ImPACT (Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) scores for athletes aged 12 to 22 years between July 2009 and June 2019. Players were assigned to an age group based on when they had their most recent baseline test. Concussion incidence and concussion severity index were compared using t tests and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: For 1189 individuals who reported soccer as their primary sport, 1032 contributed 1754 baseline ImPACT tests (some individuals had multiple baseline tests), whereas 445 individuals were suspected of sustaining a concussion and then referred for a postinjury 1 test. Of these players, 254 (24.6%) had both a baseline and a postinjury test and were analyzed for concussion severity. Linear regression showed that forwards had a lower incidence of ImPACT-proxied concussions than goalkeepers had (P = .008). Female players had a significantly higher incidence of ImPACT concussions compared with male players (mean, 0.07 [female] vs 0.04 [male] concussions per person-year; P = .05). Players in the ≥17-year age group had a higher incidence of ImPACT concussions than players in the 15- to 16-year age group (P = .04), although the 15- to 16-year age group had more severe concussions than the ≥17-year age group (mean severity index, 2.91 [age 15-16 years] vs 1.73 [age ≥17 years]; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Female soccer players experienced a higher incidence of concussion than did male players, and goalkeepers experienced a greater incidence of ImPACT concussions than did forwards. Players of both sexes and all positions in the 15- to 16-year age group showed increased initial concussion severity compared with the ≥17-year age group, despite a lower comparative incidence of ImPACT concussions. Further study is needed to understand whether sex and player position affect concussion severity.
RESUMEN
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) continues to have high morbidity and mortality. Improving ICH outcomes likely requires rapid removal of blood from the parenchyma and restraining edema formation while also limiting further neuronal damage due to the surgical intervention. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approaches promise to provide these benefits and have become alluring options for management of ICH. This review describes six MIS techniques for ICH evacuation including craniopuncture, stereotactic aspiration with thrombolysis, endoport-mediated evacuation, endoscope-assisted evacuation, adjunctive aspiration devices, and the surgiscope. The efficacy of each modality is discussed based on current literature. The largest clinical trials have yet to demonstrate definitive effects of MIS intervention on mortality and functional outcomes for ICH. Thus, there is a significant need for further innovation for ICH treatment. Multiple ongoing trials promise to better clarify the potential of the newer, non-thrombolytic MIS techniques.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The sex of an athlete is thought to modulate concussion incidence; however, the effects of sex on concussion severity and recovery are less clear. PURPOSE: To evaluate sex differences in concussion severity and recovery using a large, heterogeneous sample of young student-athletes with the goal of understanding how sex affects concussion outcomes in young athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing results of 11,563 baseline and 5216 postinjury tests were used to calculate the incidence of concussion of adolescent male and female student-athletes ages 12 to 22 years (median, 15 years). The postinjury tests of 3465 male and 1751 female student-athletes evaluated for concussion or head trauma were used to assess differences in the Severity Index (SI) and recovery. Chi-square tests and t tests were used to compare differences in demographic characteristics, incidence, and SI between the 2 cohorts. Multivariable linear, logistic, and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to control for differences between cohorts in analyses of incidence, SI, and recovery. RESULTS: When we controlled for demographic differences, female participants had higher odds of concussion (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.40-1.86; P < .0001) and higher SI after concussion (ß = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.02-1.32; P = .04). This discrepancy in SI was a result of differences in Symptom (2.40 vs 2.94; P < .0001) and Processing Speed (0.91 vs 1.06; P = .01) composite scores between male and female participants, respectively. We found no effect of sex on time to recovery when controlling for initial concussion SI (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.12; P = .48). CONCLUSION: Using large, multisport cohorts, this study provides evidence that female athletes are at higher risk for more concussions and these concussions are more severe, but male and female athletes have similar recovery times when the analysis controls for initial concussion SI.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Adolescente , Adulto , Atletas , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Conmoción Encefálica/epidemiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Caracteres Sexuales , Estudiantes , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous research in neurosurgery has examined academic productivity for U.S. medical graduates and residents. However, associations between scholarly output and international medical education, residency training, and fellowship training are scarcely documented. METHODS: We identified 1671 U.S. academic neurosurgeons in 2020 using publicly available data along with their countries of medical school, residency, and fellowship training. Using Scopus, h-index, number of publications, and number of times publications were cited were compiled. Demographic, subspeciality, and academic productivity variables were compared between training locations using univariate analysis and multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Of the current neurosurgery faculty workforce, 16% completed at least 1 component of their training abroad. Canada was the most represented international country in the cohort. Academic productivity for neurosurgeons with international medical school and/or international residency did not significantly differ from that of neurosurgeons trained in the United States. Neurosurgeons with ≥1 U.S. fellowships or ≥1 international fellowships did not have higher academic productivity than neurosurgeons without a fellowship. However, dual fellowship training in both domestic and international programs was associated with higher mean h-index (ß = 6.00, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 10.98, P = 0.02), higher citations (ß = 2092.0, 95% confidence interval 460.1 to 3724.0, P = 0.01), and a trend toward higher publications (ß = 36.82, 95% confidence interval -0.21 to 73.85, P = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgeon scholarly output was not significantly affected by international training in medical school or residency. Dual fellowship training in both a domestic and an international program was associated with higher academic productivity.