RESUMEN
The main step in the pathogenesis of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) is the conformational change of the normal cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) into the abnormal isoform, named prion (PrP(Sc)). Since PrP is a highly conserved protein, the production of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of high specificity and affinity to PrP is a difficult task. In the present study we show that it is possible to overcome the unresponsiveness of the immune system by immunizing wild-type BALB/c mice with a 13 amino acid PrP peptide from the C-terminal part of PrP, bound to the keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Immunization induced predominantly anti-PrP(Sc) humoral immune response. Furthermore, we were able to obtain a panel of mAbs of IgG class specific for different non-self-conformations of PrP, with anti-PrP(Sc)-specific mAbs being the most abundant.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/biosíntesis , Péptidos/genética , Péptidos/inmunología , Priones/genética , Priones/inmunología , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Western Blotting , Encéfalo/inmunología , Dicroismo Circular , Humanos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Péptidos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Weak D red cell phenotype (formerly Du) exhibits weaker serological reaction with anti-D antibodies. Weak D occurs in 0.2% to 1% of whites and is caused by qualitatively altered RhD proteins called partial D or normal, only weakly expressed RhD proteins that are called weak D. Partial D genes are hybrid alleles between RHD an RHCE genes. 23 partial RHD alleles are described. Weak D phenotypes with reduced expression are likely to posses the normal RHD gene, but the latest findings indicate that weak D alleles carry at least one point mutation. The aim of the present work was to answer an important question how to approach partial and weak D identification in diagnostic use and if it is possible to distinguish between partial D and weak D using commercially available anti-D reagents for routine use. We also wanted to evaluate D-screen kit for partial D identification. We compared phenotypes identified by serological testing and genotypes identified by RHD Multiplex PCR and DVII specific ASPA PCR. Our results showed that it is not possible to distinguish between partial and weak D using commercially available anti-D reagents for routine use. D-screen proved to be useful for DVI and DVII identification, whereas for partial DDFR identification we must look for another set of monoclonal antibodies or simply use genotyping methods. In 44 samples with not interpretable serological results out of 80 we found all RHD specific exons present and we classified the samples as weak D. Fourteen types of weak D with at least one point mutation were recently proposed. Designing of allele specific PCRs for identification of proposed types of weak D is in progress.
RESUMEN
Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and its receptors (TNFRI and TNFRII) which exist in soluble form as a product of cleavage of the extracellular domain of membrane integrated receptors, still rise debate about their importance. It was reported that TNF-α has numerous actions in diseases such as inflammation, autoimmunity, infectious diseases, septic shock and many types of cancer [1, 2]. Several authors have reported the significance of sTNFRI level in serum of cancer patients [3, 4]. This study was performed in collaboration with the Institute of Oncology of Slovenia.At least two different mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against human sTNFRI have been prepared to obtain a sensitive and reliable sandwich ELISA. It was compared with commercially available R&D and Endogen ELISAs for the determination of sTNFRI. Groups of patients with different stages of melanoma and epithelial ovarian carcinoma were tested and their clinical records were reexamined. Levels of sTNFRI were measured and compared with the normal serum levels of sTNFRI.