Predictors of Treatment Failure Following De-escalation to a Fluoroquinolone in Culture-Negative Nosocomial Pneumonia.

Background: Little evidence exists for de-escalation of nosocomial pneumonia therapy without positive cultures. Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of treatment failure following de-escalation to a fluoroquinolone in culture-negative nosocomial pneumonia. Methods: The study involved a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients admitted with diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia and positive chest radiography who received at least 24 hours of fluoroquinolone monotherapy following at least 24 hours of appropriate empirical antibiotics. Treatment failure was defined using a composite of all-cause death within 30 days of discharge, treatment re-escalation, or readmission for pneumonia within 30 days of discharge. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze predictors of treatment failure. Duration of empirical antibiotics and significant univariable exploratory predictors were included in multivariable analysis. Results: Of 164 patients, 23 (14%) failed de-escalation. Duration of empirical antibiotics (68.5 ± 32.1 vs 65.8 ± 35 hours) was not associated with treatment failure in univariable (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.002 [95% CI = 0.991-1.013]) or multivariable analyses (HR = 1.003 [95% CI = 0.991-1.015]). Significant exploratory predictors on univariable analysis included active cancer, intensive care unit (ICU) admission at empirical initiation, APACHE II score, and steroid use ≥20-mg prednisone equivalent. ICU admission at empirical initiation (HR = 2.439 [95% CI = 1.048-5.676]) and steroid use ≥20-mg prednisone equivalent (HR = 2.946 [95% CI = 1.281-6.772]) were associated with treatment failure on multivariable analysis. Conclusion and Relevance: Duration of empirical antibiotics does not appear to influence failure of de-escalation to fluoroquinolone monotherapy in culture-negative nosocomial pneumonia.

Comparison of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Regimens for Hospitalized, Non-severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Consensus guidelines for hospitalized, non-severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend empiric macrolide + ß-lactam or respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy in patients with no risk factors for resistant organisms. In patients with allergies or contraindications, doxycycline + ß-lactam is a recommended alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare differences in outcomes among guideline-recommended regimens in this population. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included patients ≥18 years of age with CAP who received respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy, empiric macrolide + ß-lactam, or doxycycline + ß-lactam. Major exclusion criteria included patients with immunocompromising conditions, requiring vasopressors or invasive mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of admission, and receiving less than 2 days of total antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical failure, 14- and 30-day hospital readmission, and hospital length of stay. Safety outcomes included incidence of new Clostridioides difficile infection and aortic aneurysm ruptures. FINDINGS: Of 4685 included patients, 1722 patients received empiric respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy, 159 received empiric doxycycline + ß-lactam, and 2804 received empiric macrolide + ß-lactam. Incidence of in-hospital mortality was not observed to be significantly different among empiric regimens (doxycycline + ß-lactam group: 1.9% vs macrolide + ß-lactam: 1.9% vs respiratory fluoroquinolone monotherapy: 1.5%, P = 0.588). No secondary outcomes were observed to differ significantly among groups. IMPLICATIONS: We observed no differences in clinical or safety outcomes among three guideline-recommended empiric CAP regimens. Empiric doxycycline + ß-lactam may be a safe empiric regimen for hospitalized CAP patients with non-severe CAP, although additional research is needed to corroborate these observations with larger samples.

Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A review focusing on exacerbations.

PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Exacerbations- acute worsening of COPD symptoms-can be mild to severe in nature. Increased healthcare resource use is common among patients with frequent exacerbations, and exacerbations are a major cause of the high 30-day hospital readmission rates associated with COPD. SUMMARY: This review provides a concise overview of the literature regarding the impact of COPD exacerbations on both the patient and the healthcare system, the recommendations for pharmacologic management of COPD, and the strategies employed to improve patient care and reduce hospitalizations and readmissions. COPD exacerbations significantly impact patients' health-related quality of life and disease progression; healthcare costs associated with severe exacerbation-related hospitalization range from $7,000 to $39,200. Timely and appropriate maintenance pharmacotherapy, particularly dual bronchodilators for maximizing bronchodilation, can significantly reduce exacerbations in patients with COPD. Additionally, multidisciplinary disease-management programs include pulmonary rehabilitation, follow-up appointments, aftercare, inhaler training, and patient education that can reduce hospitalizations and readmissions for patients with COPD. CONCLUSION: Maximizing bronchodilation by the appropriate use of maintenance therapy, together with multidisciplinary disease-management and patient education programs, offers opportunities to reduce exacerbations, hospitalizations, and readmissions for patients with COPD.

Edoxaban: A Comprehensive Review of the Pharmacology and Clinical Data for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism.

Historically, vitamin K antagonists have been the only class of oral anticoagulants available. Despite our experience with warfarin over the past 60 years, its use is associated with several pharmacokinetic and clinical disadvantages including unpredictable dosing, frequent monitoring, and delayed onset and offset. Edoxaban, an oral direct Xa inhibitor, may provide clinicians with an additional option in patients requiring chronic anticoagulation. This review examines the pharmacology and clinical data of edoxaban as a therapeutic alternative.