RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is effective in metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of the docetaxel-based triplet FLOT (fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) as a perioperative therapy for patients with locally advanced, resectable tumours. METHODS: In this controlled, open-label, phase 2/3 trial, we randomly assigned 716 patients with histologically-confirmed advanced clinical stage cT2 or higher or nodal positive stage (cN+), or both, resectable tumours, with no evidence of distant metastases, via central interactive web-based-response system, to receive either three pre-operative and three postoperative 3-week cycles of 50 mg/m2 epirubicin and 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 plus either 200 mg/m2 fluorouracil as continuous intravenous infusion or 1250 mg/m2 capecitabine orally on days 1 to 21 (ECF/ECX; control group) or four preoperative and four postoperative 2-week cycles of 50 mg/m2 docetaxel, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m2 leucovorin and 2600 mg/m2 fluorouracil as 24-h infusion on day 1 (FLOT; experimental group). The primary outcome of the trial was overall survival (superiority) analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01216644. FINDINGS: Between Aug 8, 2010, and Feb 10, 2015, 716 patients were randomly assigned to treatment in 38 German hospitals or with practice-based oncologists. 360 patients were assigned to ECF/ECX and 356 patients to FLOT. Overall survival was increased in the FLOT group compared with the ECF/ECX group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·77; 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.63 to 0·94]; median overall survival, 50 months [38·33 to not reached] vs 35 months [27·35 to 46·26]). The number of patients with related serious adverse events (including those occurring during hospital stay for surgery) was similar in the two groups (96 [27%] in the ECF/ECX group vs 97 [27%] in the FLOT group), as was the number of toxic deaths (two [<1%] in both groups). Hospitalisation for toxicity occurred in 94 patients (26%) in the ECF/ECX group and 89 patients (25%) in the FLOT group. INTERPRETATION: In locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, perioperative FLOT improved overall survival compared with perioperative ECF/ECX. FUNDING: The German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe), Sanofi-Aventis, Chugai, and Stiftung Leben mit Krebs Foundation.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Effective targeted treatment is unavailable for most sarcomas and doxorubicin and ifosfamide-which have been used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma for more than 30 years-still have an important role. Whether doxorubicin alone or the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide should be used routinely is still controversial. We assessed whether dose intensification of doxorubicin with ifosfamide improves survival of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma compared with doxorubicin alone. METHODS: We did this phase 3 randomised controlled trial (EORTC 62012) at 38 hospitals in ten countries. We included patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma, age 18-60 years with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. They were randomly assigned (1:1) by the minimisation method to either doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2) by intravenous bolus on day 1 or 72 h continuous intravenous infusion) or intensified doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2); 25 mg/m(2) per day, days 1-3) plus ifosfamide (10 g/m(2) over 4 days with mesna and pegfilgrastim) as first-line treatment. Randomisation was stratified by centre, performance status (0 vs 1), age (<50 vs ≥50 years), presence of liver metastases, and histopathological grade (2 vs 3). Patients were treated every 3 weeks till progression or unacceptable toxic effects for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00061984. FINDINGS: Between April 30, 2003, and May 25, 2010, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin and 227 to receive doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Median follow-up was 56 months (IQR 31-77) in the doxorubicin only group and 59 months (36-72) in the combination group. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (median overall survival 12·8 months [95·5% CI 10·5-14·3] in the doxorubicin group vs 14·3 months [12·5-16·5] in the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·83 [95·5% CI 0·67-1·03]; stratified log-rank test p=0·076). Median progression-free survival was significantly higher for the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group (7·4 months [95% CI 6·6-8·3]) than for the doxorubicin group (4·6 months [2·9-5·6]; HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·60-0·90], stratified log-rank test p=0·003). More patients in the doxorubicin and ifosfamide group than in the doxorubicin group had an overall response (60 [26%] of 227 patients vs 31 [14%] of 228; p<0·0006). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxic effects-which were all more common with doxorubicin and ifosfamide than with doxorubicin alone-were leucopenia (97 [43%] of 224 patients vs 40 [18%] of 223 patients), neutropenia (93 [42%] vs 83 [37%]), febrile neutropenia (103 (46%) vs 30 [13%]), anaemia (78 [35%] vs 10 [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (75 [33%]) vs one [<1%]). INTERPRETATION: Our results do not support the use of intensified doxorubicin and ifosfamide for palliation of advanced soft-tissue sarcoma unless the specific goal is tumour shrinkage. These findings should help individualise the care of patients with this disease. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, EORTC Charitable Trust, UK NHS, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Amgen.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/secundario , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Ifosfamida/administración & dosificación , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos , Selección de Paciente , Factores de Riesgo , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the factors that predict for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. METHODS: Risk factors for GIST recurrence were identified, and 2 risk stratification scores were developed using the database of the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group (SSG) XVIII trial, where 358 patients with high-risk GIST with no overt metastases were randomly assigned to adjuvant imatinib 400 mg/day either for 12 or 36 months after surgery. The findings were validated in the imatinib arm of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z9001 trial, where 359 patients with GIST were randomized to receive imatinib and 354 were to receive placebo for 12 months. RESULTS: Five factors (high tumor mitotic count, nongastric location, large size, rupture, and adjuvant imatinib for 12 months) were independently associated with unfavorable recurrence-free survival (RFS) in a multivariable analysis in the SSGXVIII cohort. A risk score based on these 5 factors had a concordance index with GIST recurrence of 78.9%. When a simpler score consisting of the 2 strongest predictive factors (mitotic count and tumor site) was devised, the groups with the lowest, intermediate high, and the highest risk had 5-year RFS of 76.7%, 47.5%, and 8.4%, respectively. Both scores were strongly associated with RFS in the validation cohort (P < .001 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: The scores generated were effective in stratifying the risk of GIST recurrence in patient populations treated with adjuvant imatinib. Patients with nongastric GIST with a high mitotic count are at a particularly high risk for recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy is regarded as a standard perioperative treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer. We investigated the efficacy and safety of substituting fluorouracil with the oral prodrug capecitabine. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial began in March, 2002, as an adjuvant trial comparing capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy with fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy, in patients aged 18 years or older with pathological stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer from 35 German institutions. Patients in the capecitabine group were scheduled to receive two cycles of capecitabine (2500 mg/m(2) days 1-14, repeated day 22), followed by chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus capecitabine 1650 mg/m(2) days 1-38), then three cycles of capecitabine. Patients in the fluorouracil group received two cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2) days 1-5, repeated day 29), followed by chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) daily), then two cycles of bolus fluorouracil. The protocol was amended in March, 2005, to allow a neoadjuvant cohort in which patients in the capecitabine group received chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus capecitabine 1650 mg/m(2) daily) followed by radical surgery and five cycles of capecitabine (2500 mg/m(2) per day for 14 days) and patients in the fluorouracil group received chemoradiotherapy (50·4 Gy plus infusional fluorouracil 1000 mg/m(2) days 1-5 and 29-33) followed by radical surgery and four cycles of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2) for 5 days). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment group in a 1:1 ratio using permuted blocks, with stratification by centre and tumour stage. The primary endpoint was overall survival; analyses were done based on all patients with post-randomisation data. Non-inferiority of capecitabine in terms of 5-year overall survival was tested with a 12·5% margin. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01500993. FINDINGS: Between March, 2002, and December, 2007, 401 patients were randomly allocated; 392 patients were evaluable (197 in the capecitabine group, 195 in the fluorouracil group), with a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR 41-72). 5-year overall survival in the capecitabine group was non-inferior to that in the fluorouracil group (76% [95% CI 67-82] vs 67% [58-74]; p=0·0004; post-hoc test for superiority p=0·05). 3-year disease-free survival was 75% (95% CI 68-81) in the capecitabine group and 67% (59-73) in the fluorouracil group (p=0·07). Similar numbers of patients had local recurrences in each group (12 [6%] in the capecitabine group vs 14 [7%] in the fluorouracil group, p=0·67), but fewer patients developed distant metastases in the capecitabine group (37 [19%] vs 54 [28%]; p=0·04). Diarrhoea was the most common adverse event in both groups (any grade: 104 [53%] patients in the capecitabine group vs 85 [44%] in the fluorouracil group; grade 3-4: 17 [9%] vs four [2%]). Patients in the capecitabine group had more hand-foot skin reactions (62 [31%] any grade, four [2%] grade 3-4 vs three [2%] any grade, no grade 3-4), fatigue (55 [28%] any grade, no grade 3-4 vs 29 [15%], two [1%] grade 3-4), and proctitis (31 [16%] any grade, one [<1%] grade 3-4 vs ten [5%], one [<1%] grade 3-4) than did those in the fluorouracil group, whereas leucopenia was more frequent with fluorouracil than with capecitabine (68 [35%] any grade, 16 [8%] grade 3-4 vs 50 [25%] any grade, three [2%] grade 3-4). INTERPRETATION: Capecitabine could replace fluorouracil in adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. FUNDING: Roche Pharma AG (Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany).
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Capecitabina , Estudios Cruzados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Selección de Paciente , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Adjuvant imatinib administered for 12 months after surgery has improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) compared with placebo. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of imatinib administration duration as adjuvant treatment of patients who have a high estimated risk for GIST recurrence after surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Patients with KIT-positive GIST removed at surgery were entered between February 2004 and September 2008 to this randomized, open-label phase 3 study conducted in 24 hospitals in Finland, Germany, Norway, and Sweden. The risk of GIST recurrence was estimated using the modified National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. INTERVENTION: Imatinib, 400 mg per day, orally for either 12 months or 36 months, started within 12 weeks of surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was RFS; the secondary end points included overall survival and treatment safety. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were allocated to each group. The median follow-up time after randomization was 54 months in December 2010. Diagnosis of GIST was confirmed in 382 of 397 patients (96%) in the intention-to-treat population at a central pathology review. KIT or PDGFRA mutation was detected in 333 of 366 tumors (91%) available for testing. Patients assigned for 36 months of imatinib had longer RFS compared with those assigned for 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.65; P < .001; 5-year RFS, 65.6% vs 47.9%, respectively) and longer overall survival (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89; P = .02; 5-year survival, 92.0% vs 81.7%). Imatinib was generally well tolerated, but 12.6% and 25.8% of patients assigned to the 12- and 36-month groups, respectively, discontinued imatinib for a reason other than GIST recurrence. CONCLUSION: Compared with 12 months of adjuvant imatinib, 36 months of imatinib improved RFS and overall survival of GIST patients with a high risk of GIST recurrence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00116935.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Benzamidas , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/genética , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/genética , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/genética , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Receptor alfa de Factor de Crecimiento Derivado de Plaquetas/genética , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: ⢠To describe the histopathological types of late relapses of germ cell tumours and to search for molecular markers associated with chemotherapy resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ⢠Samples from 14 patients with late relapse from a non-seminoma were analysed. ⢠Archival tumour tissue was gathered at intial diagnosis (n= 9) and at relapse (n= 9), mostly after previous treatment with chemotherapy. ⢠In addition to routine histopathology, tumours were analysed for microsatellite instability and screened for mutations in the KRAS and BRAF genes. RESULTS: ⢠Relapse occurred after 76.5 months (median, range: 24-209 months). ⢠The histology in relapse was pure yolk sac tumour in four of the nine patients analysed. ⢠Three had a non-germ cell malignancy, one was a mixed non-seminoma and one was a pure mature teratoma. ⢠One sample with non-germ cell malignancy originated from a yolk sac tumour without any evidence of teratoma. ⢠In four of 12 evaluable patients, high-level microsatellite instability was observed. ⢠All patients were KRAS wild-type but four showed a BRAF mutation at V600E. CONCLUSIONS: ⢠Many late relapses of germ cell tumours show pure yolk sac histology. ⢠Non-germ cell malignancies do not necessarily develop from teratoma but can also arise from yolk sac histology. ⢠The biology underlying chemotherapy resistance in late relapse could be related to a high incidence of microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation V600E, which were found in half of the patients.
Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/genética , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/secundario , Orquiectomía/métodos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Neoplasias Testiculares/genética , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven , Proteínas ras/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases can downsize tumours for curative resection. We assessed the effectiveness of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in this setting. METHODS: Between Dec 2, 2004, and March 27, 2008, 114 patients were enrolled from 17 centres in Germany and Austria; three patients receiving FOLFOX6 alone were excluded from the analysis. Patients with non-resectable liver metastases (technically non-resectable or > or =5 metastases) were randomly assigned to receive cetuximab with either FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid; group A) or FOLFIRI (irinotecan, fluorouracil, and folinic acid; group B). Randomisation was not blinded, and was stratified by technical resectability and number of metastases, use of PET staging, and EGFR expression status. They were assessed for response every 8 weeks by CT or MRI. A local multidisciplinary team reassessed resectability after 16 weeks, and then every 2 months up to 2 years. Patients with resectable disease were offered liver surgery within 4-6 weeks of the last treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was tumour response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST), analysed by modified intention to treat. A retrospective, blinded surgical review of patients with radiological images at both baseline and during treatment was done to assess objectively any changes in resectability. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00153998. FINDINGS: 56 patients were randomly assigned to group A and 55 to group B. One patient in each group were excluded from the analysis of the primary endpoint because they discontinued treatment before first full dose, one patient in group B was excluded because of early pulmonary embolism. A confirmed partial or complete response was noted in 36 (68%) of 53 patients in group A, and 30 (57%) of 53 patients in group B (difference 11%, 95% CI -8 to 30; odds ratio [OR] 1.62, 0.74-3.59; p=0.23). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities were skin toxicity (15 of 54 patients in group A, and 22 of 55 patients in group B), and neutropenia (13 of 54 patients in group A and 12 of 55 patients in group B). R0 resection was done in 20 (38%) of 53 patients in group A and 16 (30%) of 53 of patients in group B. In a retrospective analysis of response by KRAS status, a partial or complete response was noted in 47 (70%) of 67 patients with KRAS wild-type tumours versus 11 (41%) of 27 patients with KRAS-mutated tumours (OR 3.42, 1.35-8.66; p=0.0080). According to the retrospective review, resectability rates increased from 32% (22 of 68 patients) at baseline to 60% (41 of 68) after chemotherapy (p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: Chemotherapy with cetuximab yields high response rates compared with historical controls, and leads to significantly increased resectability. FUNDING: Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Austria , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Receptores ErbB/análisis , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Alemania , Humanos , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Modelos Lineales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/química , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Oportunidad Relativa , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras) , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proteínas ras/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the pattern of relapse after chemotherapy in patients with high-risk germ cell tumor (GCT) to critically review common follow-up procedures including close monitoring of serum tumor markers and radiologic procedures. METHODS: 645 patients received first-line (434 patients) or salvage platinum-based (211 patients) high-dose chemotherapy in three multicenter trials. Retrospective analysis comprised 77 patients after first-line and 61 after salvage chemotherapy, who had achieved at least a partial remission but progressed afterwards. RESULTS: At relapse, 24% of the patients presented with an isolated elevation in serum tumor markers, 26% with pathologic radiologic confirmation with negative tumor markers, and 42% with elevated tumor markers and radiologically confirmed progression. Relapse was detected by clinical symptoms in 8%. 46% relapsed within 3 months and 97% within 2 years. Relapse pattern did not correlate with tumor marker status or metastasis location prior to chemotherapy, line of chemotherapy, response status after chemotherapy or time point of relapse. CONCLUSION: In high-risk GCT patients, relapse after chemotherapy is detected either by tumor marker elevation alone, radiologic imaging alone or both, in one third each. Close monitoring including serum tumor markers, radiologic imaging and clinical examination appears warranted within the first 2 years.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/secundario , Compuestos de Platino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Routine posttreatment surveillance is recommended after adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I seminoma. However, systematic studies on the value of follow-up in these patients are missing. This report addresses the efficiency of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma with particular reference to the mode of detection of relapse and the costs of posttreatment screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All follow-up investigations of a prospectively followed cohort of 675 patients with stage I seminoma treated with PA radiotherapy were analyzed with respect to the first indications of relapse, patterns of recurrence, risk factors of relapse, and cost-efficiency of the different technical examinations of the follow-up schedule over a 10-year period. RESULTS: With a median time to follow-up of 61 months, recurrence was diagnosed by symptoms or physical examination in 14 out of 26 relapsing patients. Among the technical follow-up investigations abdominopelvic imaging had the highest detection rate for relapse, while thoracic imaging and marker analysis were inefficient. Abdominal sonography had the highest cost-efficiency of all technical follow-up investigations, while computed tomography (CT) scans were responsible for approximately 60% of all costs. The authors failed to identify risk factors predictive of relapse after adjuvant irradiation. CONCLUSION: Routine technical investigations during follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma yield only a low detection rate of relapse from cancer. The data presented here provide no evidence for the value of technical follow-up beyond the 3rd year after treatment or routine screening of the chest. Thorough physical examination of the patients should be encouraged. Patients should be informed about potential symptoms indicative of recurrence. Restrictive use of abdominopelvic CT scans will reduce exposure to ionizing radiation and considerably increase the cost-efficiency of follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/economía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Seminoma/economía , Seminoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias Testiculares/economía , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Seminoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Morbid obesity is a recognized risk factor for gastrointestinal cancer. Little is known about pancreatic cancer developing after gastric bypass surgery or about surgery for this type of tumor following bariatric surgery. This report describes a case of pancreatic head cancer identified 3 months after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. During routine follow-up, mild abdominal pain and elevated pancreatic enzymes prompted computed tomography, which revealed mild edematous pancreatitis. Hyperbilirubinemia developed, and magnetic resonance imaging showed a pancreatic head tumor. CA19-9 was elevated. After a pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection, the postoperative course was uneventful. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. Unfortunately, at the time of writing (9 months postoperatively), a local recurrence and hepatic metastases were diagnosed. Patients treated with bariatric surgery who develop new symptoms or report constant mild symptoms should be evaluated using endoscopy and radiomorphological imaging. Interdisciplinary obesity treatment can then offer significant benefits for the patient, particularly in the case of pancreatic cancer, which is still difficult to diagnose. In addition, there is a need for epidemiological studies of patients who undergo bariatric surgery and subsequently develop cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Gastrectomía , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/etiología , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , PíloroRESUMEN
Changes in skin and its adnexa such as hair follicles and nails are among the most common side effects of antineoplastic treatments. They pose a challenge with regard to diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. This article reviews the various cutaneous reactions to chemotherapy and their most common causative agents, the adverse events of radiation therapy, as well as the characteristic skin changes under treatment with new molecular-driven targeted agents.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the announcement of the 8th edition of TNM classification, the 7th edition (2010) is still being used for prognostic assessment in gastric cancer patients. A proposed new staging system (termed as the Kiel proposal) claims to offer a better prognostic stratification. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate the Kiel proposal and compare it with the 6th and 7th TNM editions on a collected database. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed gastric cancer patients who had undergone surgical resection without any previous treatment from selected randomized trials and from a cohort of patients operated at the University Hospital of Mainz, Germany. All patients were restaged using the 3 staging systems and overall survival was estimated and compared. RESULTS: A study population of 491 patients was identified. Relevant changes in stage distribution between the 6th and 7th TNM and the Kiel staging systems were observed. The 6th classification appears to display the best discriminatory measures. The Kiel staging system is slightly less prognostic than the TNM editions, but provides clearly separated strata as with the 6th edition. CONCLUSIONS: The Kiel staging system for gastric cancer appears promising in terms of simplicity, predictability and applicability and should be taken into consideration in future TNM revisions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/clasificación , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidadRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Little is known about whether the duration of adjuvant imatinib influences the prognostic significance of KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) mutations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of KIT and PDGFRA mutations on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with surgery and adjuvant imatinib. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This exploratory study is based on the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group VIII/Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (SSGXVIII/AIO) multicenter clinical trial. Between February 4, 2004, and September 29, 2008, 400 patients who had undergone surgery for GISTs with a high risk of recurrence were randomized to receive adjuvant imatinib for 1 or 3 years. Of the 397 patients who provided consent, 341 (85.9%) had centrally confirmed, localized GISTs with mutation analysis for KIT and PDGFRA performed centrally using conventional sequencing. During a median follow-up of 88 months (completed December 31, 2013), 142 patients had GIST recurrence. Data of the evaluable population were analyzed February 4, 2004, through December 31, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was RFS. Mutations were grouped by the gene and exon. KIT exon 11 mutations were further grouped as deletion or insertion-deletion mutations, substitution mutations, insertion or duplication mutations, and mutations that involved codons 557 and/or 558. RESULTS: Of the 341 patients (175 men and 166 women; median age at study entry, 62 years) in the 1-year group and 60 years in the 3-year group), 274 (80.4%) had GISTs with a KIT mutation, 43 (12.6%) had GISTs that harbored a PDGFRA mutation, and 24 (7.0%) had GISTs that were wild type for these genes. PDGFRA mutations and KIT exon 11 insertion or duplication mutations were associated with favorable RFS, whereas KIT exon 9 mutations were associated with unfavorable outcome. Patients with KIT exon 11 deletion or insertion-deletion mutation had better RFS when allocated to the 3-year group compared with the 1-year group (5-year RFS, 71.0% vs 41.3%; P < .001), whereas no significant benefit from the 3-year treatment was found in the other mutational subgroups examined. KIT exon 11 deletion mutations, deletions that involved codons 557 and/or 558, and deletions that led to pTrp557_Lys558del were associated with poor RFS in the 1-year group but not in the 3-year group. Similarly, in the subset with KIT exon 11 deletion mutations, higher-than-the-median mitotic counts were associated with unfavorable RFS in the 1-year group but not in the 3-year group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with KIT exon 11 deletion mutations benefit most from the longer duration of adjuvant imatinib. The duration of adjuvant imatinib modifies the risk of GIST recurrence associated with some KIT mutations, including deletions that affect exon 11 codons 557 and/or 558. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00116935.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/genética , Mesilato de Imatinib/administración & dosificación , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/genética , Receptor alfa de Factor de Crecimiento Derivado de Plaquetas/genética , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Análisis Mutacional de ADN/métodos , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proto-Oncogenes MasRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Surgical resection has a potential benefit for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcome in patients with limited metastatic disease who receive chemotherapy first and proceed to surgical resection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The AIO-FLOT3 (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) trial is a prospective, phase 2 trial of 252 patients with resectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Patients were enrolled from 52 cancer care centers in Germany between February 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, and stratified to 1 of 3 groups: resectable (arm A), limited metastatic (arm B), or extensive metastatic (arm C). Data cutoff was January 2012, and the analysis was performed in March 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in arm A received 4 preoperative cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) followed by surgery and 4 postoperative cycles. Patients in arm B received at least 4 cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT and proceeded to surgical resection if restaging (using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) showed a chance of margin-free (R0) resection of the primary tumor and at least a macroscopic complete resection of the metastatic lesions. Patients in arm C were offered FLOT chemotherapy and surgery only if required for palliation. Patients received a median (range) of 8 (1-15) cycles of FLOT. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 238 of 252 patients (94.4%) were eligible to participate. The median (range) age of participants was 66 (36-79) years in arm A (n = 51), 63 (28-79) years in arm B (n = 60), and 65 (23-83) years in arm C (n = 127). Patients in arm B (n = 60) had only retroperitoneal lymph node involvement (27 patients [45%]), liver involvement (11 [18.3%]), lung involvement (10 [16.7%]), localized peritoneal involvement (4 [6.7%]), or other (8 [13.3%]) incurable sites. Median overall survival was 22.9 months (95% CI, 16.5 to upper level not achieved) for arm B, compared with 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.1-12.8) for arm C (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.25-0.55) (P < .001). The response rate for arm B was 60% (complete, 10%; partial, 50%), which is higher than the 43.3% for arm C. In arm B, 36 of 60 patients (60%) proceeded to surgery. The median overall survival was 31.3 months (95% CI, 18.9-upper level not achieved) for patients who proceeded to surgery and 15.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-22.9) for the other patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with limited metastatic disease who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and proceeded to surgery showed a favorable survival. The AIO-FLOT3 trial provides a rationale for further randomized clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00849615.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Unión Esofagogástrica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Docetaxel , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática , Metastasectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Human parvovirus B 19 is known as a virus causing erythema infectiosum, arthropathy, transient aplastic crisis and intrauterine fetal death. Healthy hosts are able to clear the virus within weeks after infection. There are a few reports available in the literature regarding immunocompromised renal transplant recipients with persistent infection without seroconversion. Herein, we describe a 56-year old woman with a relapse of grade II follicular lymphoma who received a combined immunochemotherapy of rituximab, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide and subsequently developed a persistent parvovirus B19 infection. In the absence of serum immunoglobulin antibodies, PCR analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate were positive for parvovirus B19. Treatment with IVIG treatment resulted in normalization of peripheral blood counts within 7 weeks.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/etiología , Leucopenia/etiología , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Parvoviridae/complicaciones , Parvovirus B19 Humano/patogenicidad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Médula Ósea/virología , Terapia Combinada , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Linfoma Folicular/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Parvoviridae/sangre , Infecciones por Parvoviridae/tratamiento farmacológico , Parvovirus B19 Humano/aislamiento & purificación , Prednisolona/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Rituximab , Vidarabina/administración & dosificación , Vidarabina/efectos adversos , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Viremia/sangre , Viremia/complicacionesRESUMEN
Camptothecins represent an established class of effective agents that selectively target topoisomerase I by trapping the catalytic intermediate of the topoisomerase I-DNA reaction, the cleavage complex. The water-soluble salt camptothecin-sodium - introduced in early trials in the 1960s - was highly toxic in animals, whereas the semisynthetic derivatives irinotecan and topotecan did not cause haemorrhagic cystitis because of their higher physicochemical stability and solubility at lower pH values. Myelosuppression, neutropenia and, to a lesser extent, thrombocytopenia are dose-limiting toxic effects of topotecan. In contrast to the structurally-related topotecan, irinotecan is a prodrug which has to be converted to SN-38, its active form. SN-38 is inactivated by conjugation, thus patients with Gilbert's syndrome and other forms of genetic glucuronidation deficiency are at an increased risk of irinotecan-induced adverse effects, such as neutropenia and diarrhoea. The cytotoxic mechanism of podophyllotoxin is the inhibition of topoisomerase II. Common adverse effects of etoposide include dose-limiting myelosuppression. Hypersensitivity reactions are more common with etoposide and teniposide than with etoposide phosphate because the formulations of the former contain sensitising solubilisers. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occur in 65% and 80%, respectively, of patients after administration of conventional doses of teniposide. Anorexia, vomiting and diarrhoea are generally of mild severity after administration of conventional doses of topoisomerase II inhibitors. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies have revealed substantial interindividual variabilities regarding the area under the concentration-time curve values and steady-state concentrations for all drugs reviewed in this article. Irinotecan, etoposide and teniposide are degraded via complex metabolic pathways. In contrast, topotecan primarily undergoes renal excretion. Regarding etoposide and teniposide, the extent of catechol formation over time during drug metabolism may be associated with a higher risk for secondary malignancies.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos , Camptotecina , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Podofilotoxina , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/farmacología , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias/enzimología , Podofilotoxina/efectos adversos , Podofilotoxina/farmacología , Podofilotoxina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa I , Inhibidores de Topoisomerasa IIAsunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Niño , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: New treatment options for patients with metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma are urgently needed. Preclinical studies suggested activity of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. METHODS: A multi-centre, open-label, non-randomised phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of vorinostat in patients with locally advanced or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma failing 1st-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy was initiated. Patients were treated with vorinostat 400 mg po qd for 28 d followed by a treatment-free period of 7 d, representing a treatment cycle of 5 weeks. Restaging was performed every three cycles or at clinical progression. RESULTS: Between 06/10 and 09/13, 40 Soft Tissue Sarcoma patients were treated with vorinostat at seven participating centres. Patients had received 1 (n=8, 20%), 2 (n=10, 25%) or ≥3 (n=22, 55%) previous lines of chemotherapy. Best response after three cycles of treatment was stable disease (n=9, 23%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.2 and 12.3 months, respectively. Six patients showed long-lasting disease stabilisation for up to ten cycles. Statistical analyses failed to identify baseline predictive markers in this subgroup. Major toxicities (grade ≥III) included haematological toxicity (n=6, 15%) gastrointestinal disorders (n=5, 13%), fatigue (n=4, 10%), musculoskeletal pain (n=4, 10%), and pneumonia (n=2, 5%). CONCLUSION: In a heavily pre-treated patient population, objective response to vorinostat was low. However, a small subgroup of patients had long-lasting disease stabilisation. Further studies aiming to identify predictive markers for treatment response as well as exploration of combination regimens are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00918489 (ClinicalTrials.gov) EudraCT-number: 2008-008513-19.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxámicos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/secundario , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vorinostat , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Three years of adjuvant imatinib therapy are recommended for patients with GI stromal tumor (GIST) with high-risk features, according to survival findings in the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XVIII/AIO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie) trial. To investigate whether the survival benefits have persisted, we performed the second planned analysis of the trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had macroscopically completely excised, KIT-positive GIST with a high risk of recurrence, as determined by using the modified National Institutes of Health criteria. After surgery, the patients were randomly assigned to receive imatinib for either 1 or 3 years. The primary objective was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the secondary objectives included survival. RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were entered onto this open-label study between February 4, 2004, and September 29, 2008. During a median follow-up of 90 months, 171 recurrences and 69 deaths were detected. Patients assigned to the 3-year group had longer RFS than those assigned to the 1- year group; 5-year RFS was 71.1% versus 52.3%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.81; P < .001), and survival was 91.9% versus 85.3% (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.97; P = .036). Patients in the 3-year group survived longer in the subset with centrally confirmed GIST and without macroscopic metastases at study entry (93.4% v 86.8%; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.93; P = .024). Similar numbers of cardiac events and second cancers were recorded in the groups. CONCLUSION: Three years of adjuvant imatinib therapy results in longer survival than 1 year of imatinib. High 5-year survival rates are achievable in patient populations with high-risk GIST.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Mesilato de Imatinib/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To characterize the clinical and biologic features of extragonadal germ cell tumor (EGCT) and to determine the overall outcome with currently available treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of an unselected population of 635 consecutive patients treated from 1975 through 1996 at 11 cancer centers, 341 patients (54%) had primary mediastinal EGCT, and 283 patients (45%) had retroperitoneal EGCT. Five hundred twenty-four patients (83%) had a nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (GCT), and 104 patients (16%) had a seminomatous histology. RESULTS: After platinum-based induction chemotherapy with or without secondary surgery, 141 patients (49%) with mediastinal nonseminomas (median follow-up, 19 months; range, 1 to 178 months) and 144 patients (63%) with retroperitoneal nonseminoma (median follow-up, 29 months; range, 1 to 203 months) are alive (P =.0006). In contrast, the overall survival rate for patients with a seminomatous EGCT is 88%, with no difference between patients with mediastinal or retroperitoneal tumor location (median follow-up, 49 months; range, 4 to 193 months; respective 70 months; range, 1 to 211 months). A significantly lower progression-free survival rate was found in seminoma patients treated with initial radiotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy. Nonseminomatous histology, presence of nonpulmonary visceral metastases, primary mediastinal GCT location, and elevated beta-human chorionic gonadotropin were independent prognostic factors for shorter survival. Hematologic malignancies (n = 17) occurred without exception in patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma. Sixteen patients developed a metachronous testicular cancer despite the use of platinum-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Whereas patients with pure seminomatous EGCT histology have a long-term chance of cure of almost 90% irrespective of the primary tumor site, 45% of patients with mediastinal nonseminomas are alive at 5 years. This outcome is clearly inferior compared with patients with nonseminomatous retroperitoneal primary tumors.