Chronic pain in children and young people with cerebral palsy: a narrative review of challenges, advances, and future directions.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral palsy (CP), the most common physical disability of childhood, is often accompanied by a range of comorbidities including pain. Pain is highly prevalent in children and young people with CP, yet has been poorly understood, inaccurately assessed, and inadequately managed in this vulnerable population. This narrative review presents recent research advances for understanding and managing pain in children and young people with CP, focusing on chronic pain, and highlights future research directions. MAIN BODY: Pain prevalence rates in CP vary due to different methodologies of studies. Recent systematic reviews report up to 85% of children experience pain; higher in older children, females, and those with dyskinesia and greater motor impairment. Research examining the lived experience perspectives of children and their families demonstrate that even those with mild motor impairments have pain, children want to self-report pain where possible to feel heard and believed, and management approaches should be individualized. Notably, many children with cognitive and communication impairments can self-report their pain if adjustments are provided and they are given a chance. Past inadequacies of pain assessment in CP relate to a focus on pain intensity and frequency with little focus on pain interference and coping, a lack of tools appropriate for the CP population, and an assumption that many children with cognitive and/or communication limitations are unable to self-report. Recent systematic reviews have identified the most reliable and valid assessment tools for assessing chronic pain. Many were not developed for people with CP and, in their current form, are not appropriate for the spectrum of physical, communication, and cognitive limitations seen. Recently, consensus and co-design in partnership with people with lived experience and clinicians have identified tools appropriate for use in CP considering the biopsychosocial framework. Modifications to tools are underway to ensure feasibility and applicability for the spectrum of abilities seen. CONCLUSION: Recent research advances have improved our understanding of the prevalence, characteristics and lived experience of chronic pain, and refined assessment methods in children and young people with CP. However, the very limited evidence for effective and novel management of chronic pain in this population is where research should now focus.

Pharmacological and neurosurgical management of cerebral palsy and dystonia: Clinical practice guideline update.

Dystonia, typically characterized by slow repetitive involuntary movements, stiff abnormal postures, and hypertonia, is common among individuals with cerebral palsy (CP). Dystonia can interfere with activities and have considerable impact on motor function, pain/comfort, and ease of caregiving. Although pharmacological and neurosurgical approaches are used clinically in individuals with CP and dystonia that is causing interference, evidence to support these options is limited. This clinical practice guideline update comprises 10 evidence-based recommendations on the use of pharmacological and neurosurgical interventions for individuals with CP and dystonia causing interference, developed by an international expert panel following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. The recommendations are intended to help inform clinicians in their use of these management options for individuals with CP and dystonia, and to guide a shared decision-making process in selecting a management approach that is aligned with the individual's and the family's values and preferences.

Examining tools for assessing the impact of chronic pain on emotional functioning in children and young people with cerebral palsy: stakeholder preference and recommendations for modification.

PURPOSE: To firstly identify tools for assessing the impact of chronic pain on emotional functioning in children and young people with cerebral palsy (CP), and secondly identify suggestions to improve their relevance, comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and feasibility for the CP population. Improving assessment of the impact of pain on emotional functioning can enhance quality of life by improving access to interventions for pain-related physical disability, anxiety and depression. METHODS: Ethics approval was granted through the Women's and Children's Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/HRE00154). A mixed methods study with people with lived experience and clinicians, and guided by the Consensus-based Standards for Measurement Instruments (COSMIN), was undertaken. An online survey identified the highest rated tools for validation and/or modification for young people with CP and chronic pain. Focus groups and interviews investigated content validity and feasibility of the tools identified as highest rated. RESULTS: The Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children-SF (FOPQ-C-SF) and Modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI) were the highest rated for pain coping and multidimensional assessment (respectively) from the online survey (n = 61) of eight tools presented. Focus group and interview data (n = 30), including 58 unique modification suggestions, were coded to six categories: accessibility, comprehensibility, feasibility, relevance, presentation and comprehensiveness. CONCLUSION: Potential modifications have been identified to improve the appropriateness and feasibility of the FOPQ-C-SF and mBPI for children and young people with CP. Future research should implement and test these modifications, prioritising the involvement of people with lived experience to ensure their needs are met alongside clinicians.

Up to 75% of children and young people with cerebral palsy report chronic pain, which is much higher than those without cerebral palsy. Assessing how pain impacts emotional functioning, and how each individual copes with pain, is of particular importance due to known links between emotional functioning and long term pain outcomes. Reliable assessment of how pain impacts emotional functioning may also help to identify those who would benefit from psychological treatments. Although pain questionnaires are available, many are not suitable for children and young people with cerebral palsy with different communication, cognitive and movement abilities. This study had two aims: (1) to work out which of the currently available tools that assess how pain impacts emotional functioning are considered best for people with cerebral palsy, and (2) to identify potential modifications to these tools. The two most relevant and easy to understand questionnaires selected for modification were the Fear of Pain Questionnaire for Children and the modified Brief Pain Inventory. A number of modifications were identified, including improving how relevant the questions were to people with cerebral palsy, improving accessibility for people with complex communication needs or cognitive impairment and improving how easy to understand the questions and answer options are. These modifications can now be implemented to make it easier for people with cerebral palsy to use the pain assessments. They should then be tested in people with cerebral palsy with different communication, cognitive and movement abilities.

Comprehensive care programmes for children with medical complexity.

BACKGROUND: Children with medical complexity (CMC) represent a small, but growing, proportion of all children. Regardless of their underlying diagnosis, by definition, all CMC have similar functional limitations and high healthcare needs. It has been suggested that improving aspects of healthcare delivery for CMC improves health- and quality of life-related outcomes for children and their families and reduces healthcare-related expenditure. As a result, dedicated comprehensive care programmes have been established at many hospitals to meet the needs of CMC; however, it is unclear if such programmes are effective. OBJECTIVES: Our main objective was to assess the effectiveness of comprehensive care programmes that aim to improve care coordination and other aspects of health care for CMC and to assess whether the effectiveness of such programmes differs according to the programme setting and structure. We aimed to assess their effectiveness in relation to child and parent health, functioning, and quality of life, quality of care, number of healthcare encounters, unmet healthcare needs, and total healthcare-related costs. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL in May 2023. We also searched reference lists, trial registries, and the grey literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series studies were included. Studies that compared enrolment in a comprehensive care programme with non-enrolment in such a programme/treatment as usual were included. Participants were children that met the criteria for the definition of CMC, which is: having (i) a chronic condition, (ii) functional limitations, (iii) increased health and other service needs, and (iv) increased healthcare costs. Studies that included the following types of outcomes were included: health; quality of care; utilisation, coverage and access; resource use and costs; equity; and adverse outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias in each included study, and evaluated the certainty of evidence according to GRADE criteria. Where possible, data were represented in forest plots and pooled. We were unable to undertake a meta-analysis for comparisons and outcomes, so we used a structured synthesis approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included four studies with a total of 912 CMC as participants. All included studies were randomised controlled trials conducted in hospitals in the USA or Canada. Participants varied across the included studies; however, all four studies included children with complex and chronic illness and high healthcare needs. While the primary aim of the intervention was similar across all four studies, the components of the interventions differed: in the four studies, the intervention involved some element of care coordination; in two of the studies, it involved the child receiving care from a multidisciplinary team, while in one study, the intervention was primarily centred on access to an advanced practice nurse care coordinator and another study involved nurse a practitioner-paediatrician dyad partnering with families. The risk of bias in the four studies varied across domains, with issues primarily relating to the lack of blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessors, inadequate allocation concealment, and incomplete outcome data. Comprehensive care for CMC compared to usual care may make little to no difference to child health, functioning, and quality of life at 12 or 24 months (three studies with 404 participants) and we assessed the evidence for the outcomes in this category (child health-related quality of life and functional status) as being of low certainty. For CMC, comprehensive care probably makes little or no difference to parent health, functioning, and quality of life compared to usual care at 12 months (one study with 117 participants) and we assessed the evidence for this outcome as being of moderate certainty. Comprehensive care for CMC compared to usual care may slightly improve child and family satisfaction with, and perceptions of, care and service delivery at 12 months (three studies with 453 participants); however, we assessed the evidence for these outcomes as being of low certainty. For CMC, comprehensive care probably makes little or no difference to the number of healthcare encounters (emergency department visits) and the number of hospitalised days (hospital admissions) compared to usual care at 12 months (three studies with 668 participants), and we assessed the evidence for these outcomes as being of moderate certainty. Three of the included studies (668 participants) reported cost outcomes and had conflicting results, with one study reporting significantly lower healthcare costs at 12 months in the intervention group compared to the control group, one reporting no differences between groups, and the other study reporting a greater increase in total healthcare costs in the intervention group compared to the control group. Overall, comprehensive care may make little or no difference to overall healthcare costs in CMC; however, the methods used to measure total healthcare costs varied across studies and the certainty of the evidence relating to this outcome is low. No studies assessed the costs to the family. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review should be treated with caution due to the limited amount and quality of the published research that was available to be included. Overall, the certainty of the evidence for the effectiveness of comprehensive care for CMC ranged from low to moderate across outcomes and there is currently insufficient evidence on which to draw strong conclusions. There is a need for more high-quality randomised trials with consistency of the target population and intervention components, methods of reporting outcomes, and follow-up periods, as well as full cost analyses, taking into account both costs to the family and costs to the healthcare system.

Chronic pain interference assessment tools for children and adults who are unable to self-report: A systematic review of psychometric properties.

AIM: To identify and evaluate psychometric properties of assessment tools for assessing pain interference in children, adolescents, and adults with chronic pain and the inability to self-report. METHOD: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022310102). A search was run in MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo (29th March 2022) to identify articles reporting psychometric properties of pain interference assessment tools for children, adolescents, and adults with chronic pain and the inability to objectively self-report pain. Retrieved studies were reviewed by two authors (MGS, LCF) and study quality was assessed using COSMIN. RESULTS: Psychometric properties of 10 pain interference tools were assessed from 33 studies. The Paediatric Pain Profile (PPP) had low-quality evidence for content validity and internal consistency with children and adolescents who are unable to self-report. No tools for adults had evidence for content validity and internal consistency. No tool had evidence for all nine psychometric properties. INTERPRETATION: The PPP is recommended for pain interference assessment in children and adolescents with chronic pain and the inability to self-report. Few tools are available for adults. Three tools for children (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pediatric Proxy Pain Interference Scale; Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire for Parents; modified Brief Pain Inventory-Proxy [mBPI]) and three tools for adults (Doloplus-2; Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference Scale-proxy; Brief Pain Inventory-proxy) are promising but require further investigation.

Pain coping tools for children and young adults with a neurodevelopmental disability: A systematic review of measurement properties.

AIM: To systematically identify and evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and observer-reported outcome measures (parent proxy report) of pain coping tools that have been used with children and young adults (aged 0-24 years) with a neurodevelopmental disability. METHOD: A two-stage search using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycInfo was conducted. Search 1 in August 2021 identified pain coping tools used in neurodevelopmental disability and search 2 in September 2021 located additional studies evaluating the measurement properties of these tools. Methodological quality was assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines (PROSPERO protocol registration no. CRD42021273031). RESULTS: Sixteen studies identified seven pain coping tools, all PROMs and observer-reported outcome measures (parent proxy report) versions. The measurement properties of the seven tools were appraised in 44 studies. No tool had high-quality evidence for any measurement property or evidence for all nine measurement properties as outlined by COSMIN. Only one tool had content validity for individuals with neurodevelopmental disability: the Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life tool. INTERPRETATION: Pain coping assessment tools with self-report and parent proxy versions are available; however, measurement invariance has not been tested in young adults with a neurodevelopmental disability. This is an area for future research.

Development of a Clinical Framework for the Assessment of Dyskinesia and Function in the Upper Limb in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

OBJECTIVE: Dyskinesia in cerebral palsy (CP) is a complex movement disorder that can significantly impact upper limb function. Despite a range of available tools, there is no consensus on best practice assessment of upper limb function in children with CP and dyskinesia. This study aimed to develop a clinical framework for the assessment of the impact of dyskinesia on upper limb function in children with CP. DESIGN: Modified Delphi study using expert consensus. METHODS: An expert panel of six highly experienced Australian therapists ranked assessment tools sourced from existing evidence-based literature using a five-point Likert scale. Tools rated as important for use "most" or "all" of the time, by 80% of respondents were accepted into the framework following two survey rounds and a third stage discussion. RESULTS: Of 21 tools, 12 were included in the framework under five categories: (i) screening for dyskinesia; (ii) measuring the severity of dyskinesia; (iii) Classifying upper limb functional ability; (iv) measuring upper limb functional ability; and (v) measuring upper limb movement. CONCLUSIONS: The framework for assessing the impact of dyskinesia on upper limb function in CP aims to guide clinicians to improve assessment consistency and facilitate individualized goal-directed management. Further studies with a larger number of expert clinicians and researchers will further strengthen the utility of the framework.

Task-specific training for bicycle-riding goals in ambulant children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To determine whether a task-specific physiotherapist-led training approach is more effective than a non-specific parent-led home programme for attaining bicycle-riding goals in ambulant children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: Sixty-two ambulant children with CP aged 6 to 15 years (33 males, 29 females, mean age 9y 6mo) with bicycle-riding goals participated in this multi-centre, assessor-blind, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial. Children in the task-specific group participated in a physiotherapist-led, group-based, intensive training programme. Children in the parent-led home group were provided with a practice schedule, generic written information, and telephone support. Both programmes involved a 1-week training period. The primary outcome was goal attainment at 1 week after training measured using the Goal Attainment Scale. Secondary outcomes included bicycle skills, participation in bicycle riding, functional skills, self-perception, physical activity, and health-related quality of life at 1 week and 3 months after training. RESULTS: Children in the task-specific training group had greater odds of goal attainment than those in the parent-led home programme at 1 week after intervention (odds ratio [OR] 10.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-38.6), with evidence for superiority retained at 3 months (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.3-12.5). INTERPRETATION: The task-specific physiotherapist-led training approach was more effective for attaining bicycle-riding goals than a non-specific parent-led home programme in ambulant children with CP.

The Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy Functional Impact Scale: development and validation of a new tool.

AIM: To outline the development and examine the content and construct validity of a new tool, the Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy Functional Impact Scale (D-FIS), which measures the impact of dyskinesia on everyday activities in children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: D-FIS content was informed by a systematic review of dyskinesia outcome measures, in collaboration with children with dyskinetic CP, parents, caregivers, and expert clinicians. The D-FIS uses parent proxy to rate impact of dyskinesia on everyday activities. Construct validity was determined by examining internal consistency; known groups validity with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), Communication Function Classification System (CFCS), and Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS); and convergent validity with the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS). RESULTS: Fifty-seven parents of children (29 males, 28 females, mean [SD] age 11y 8mo [4y 4mo], range 2y 6mo-18y) completed the D-FIS. Correlation between D-FIS and GMFCS was r=0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.91, p<0.001); MACS r=0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.90, p<0.001); CFCS r=0.80 (95% CI: 0.67-0.88, p<0.001); and EDACS r=0.78 (95% CI: 0.66-0.87). Correlation between D-FIS and BADS was r=0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.86, p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.96. INTERPRETATION: The D-FIS demonstrates good construct validity and high internal consistency. The D-FIS will be useful for identifying priorities for intervention. It adds to the measurement tool kit for children with dyskinetic CP by addressing functional impact of dyskinetic movements and postures. What this paper adds The Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy Functional Impact Scale (D-FIS) assesses the perceived impact of dyskinesia on daily activities in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The D-FIS demonstrates good construct validity and high internal consistency. The D-FIS is a clinically feasible, family-centred tool that fills a current gap in the dyskinetic CP assessment toolkit.

A pilot feasibility study of gabapentin for managing pain in children with dystonic cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentin is often used to manage pain in children with dystonic cerebral palsy, however the evidence for its effectiveness in this population is limited. The primary objective of this feasibility pilot study was to assess the factors which might impact on a future randomised controlled trial including the ability to recruit and retain participants, assess adherence/compliance to the prescribed intervention, and ability to complete all outcome assessments. The secondary objective was to gather preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of gabapentin at reducing pain, improving comfort and reducing dystonia in children with dystonic cerebral palsy. METHODS: This open label pilot study recruited children aged 5-18 years with dystonic cerebral palsy and accompanying pain affecting daily activities from four centres around Australia. Children were prescribed gabapentin for 12 weeks and were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility of the protocol. Secondary outcomes were pain behaviour, pain intensity, care and comfort, individualised goal setting and dystonia severity. RESULTS: Thirteen children (mean age 10.4 years (SD 2.4yrs), 9 females) were recruited from 71 screened over 15 months. Two children withdrew while eight children experienced side effects. There were issues with adherence to medication dosage regimens and data collection. Improvements were seen in pain behaviour, comfort and pain related goals at 12 weeks. Dystonia was not significantly changed. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst gabapentin has potential to improve pain and comfort in children with dystonic CP, the feasibility of implementing a definitive randomised controlled trial is low. Alternative trials designs are required to further examine the effectiveness of gabapentin in this heterogeneous population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the Australian Clinical Trial Registry ( ACTRN12616000366459 ) on 22/03/2016 and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (CT-2016-CTN-00500-1) on 22/06/2016.

National surveillance of oral medication prescription for children with dystonic cerebral palsy.

AIM: Oral medications are often first-line medical management for children with cerebral palsy who have generalised dystonia; however, evidence for their effectiveness is limited and dosing practices are inconsistent. As a first step to improve consistency, this study aimed to examine current clinical practice of expert doctors for prescribing medications for children with dystonic cerebral palsy including prescribing patterns and combinations of medications used. METHODS: This was a prospective surveillance study of medical doctors working in major Australian centres who manage children with cerebral palsy. Each week over a continuous 6-month period, doctors completed a custom developed online survey for children seen that week with dystonic cerebral palsy for whom they prescribed a new medication to treat dystonia. RESULTS: Twenty-five doctors consented to participate, 16 of whom prescribed new medications for dystonia in children with cerebral palsy over the study period. There were 77 children who were prescribed new medications. Baclofen and gabapentin were prescribed most, followed by levodopa, trihexyphenidyl and diazepam. The most common combinations of medications were baclofen and diazepam or baclofen and gabapentin. Dosage regimens were variable, particularly for trihexyphenidyl and diazepam. CONCLUSION: Inconsistencies in dosing regimens remain for oral medication prescription by Australian doctors when managing dystonia in cerebral palsy. Future studies using the consensus of expert clinicians will be conducted to develop guidelines in an area where the evidence for individual medications is extremely limited.

Clinician Perspectives of Chronic Pain Management in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy and Dyskinesia.

AIMS: To explore perspectives of clinicians from interdisciplinary teams on the barriers and facilitators to chronic pain management for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and dyskinesia. METHODS: Interdisciplinary focus groups (n = 2) were conducted at two Australian tertiary pediatric hospitals. Twenty-five experienced clinicians took part, including ten physiotherapists, six pediatricians, four rehabilitation physicians, four occupational therapists, and one speech and language therapist. An external moderator conducted the focus groups and data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four key themes emerged: "balancing the intersection of pain and dyskinesia," "difficulty communicating between so many providers," "uncertainty surrounding chronic pain education," and "differing priorities." Key barriers were identified including a lack of access to some interdisciplinary team members and formalized guidance for health professionals regarding chronic pain education. CONCLUSION: Key issues were reported to impact the delivery of coordinated inter-disciplinary chronic pain management at the tertiary level for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and dyskinesia. In the absence of strong evidence, a strategy for implementing effective chronic pain management for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and dyskinesia and gaining clinician consensus regarding the best practice management are recommended.

Pain in children with dyskinetic and mixed dyskinetic/spastic cerebral palsy.

AIM: To evaluate pain prevalence and characteristics in children and adolescents with predominant dyskinetic and mixed (dyskinetic/spastic) cerebral palsy (CP) motor types. METHOD: Seventy-five participants with a diagnosis of CP and confirmed dyskinetic or mixed (dyskinetic/spastic) motor type took part in a multisite cross-sectional study. The primary outcome was carer-reported pain prevalence (preceding 2wks) measured using the Health Utilities Index-3. Secondary outcomes were chronicity, intensity, body locations, quality of life, and activity impact. RESULTS: Mean participant age was 10 years 11 months (SD 4y 2mo, range 5-18y). There were 44 males and 31 females and 37 (49%) had predominant dyskinetic CP. Pain was prevalent in 85% and it was chronic in 77% of participants. Fifty-two per cent experienced moderate-to-high carer-reported pain intensity, which was significantly associated with predominant dyskinetic motor types (p=0.008). Pain occurred at multiple body locations (5 out of 21), with significantly increased numbers of locations at higher Gross Motor Function Classification System levels (p=0.02). Face, jaw, and temple pain was significantly associated with predominant dyskinetic motor types (p=0.005). Poorer carer proxy-reported quality of life was detected in those with chronic pain compared to those without (p=0.03); however, chronic pain did not affect quality of life for self-reporting participants. INTERPRETATION: Pain was highly prevalent in children and adolescents with predominant dyskinetic and mixed (dyskinetic/spastic) motor types, highlighting a population in need of lifespan pain management. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Chronic pain prevalence in children and adolescents with predominant dyskinetic and mixed (dyskinetic/spastic) motor types is high. Pain occurs across multiple body locations in predominant dyskinetic and mixed (dyskinetic/spastic) motor types. Less recognized locations of pain include the face, jaw, and temple for predominant dyskinetic motor types.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging is a predictor of bimanual performance and executive function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.

AIM: To examine the association between brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and executive function and bimanual performance in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: Clinical MRI brain scans were classified as: (1) predominant pathological pattern (normal, white matter injury [WMI]; grey matter injury; focal vascular insults [FVI]; malformations; or miscellaneous); and (2) focal lesions (frontal, basal ganglia, and/or thalamus). Assessments included: (1) bimanual performance; (2) unimanual dexterity; and (3) executive function tasks (information processing, attention control, cognitive flexibility, and goal setting) and behavioural ratings (parent). RESULTS: From 131 recruited children, 60 were ineligible for analysis, leaving 71 children (47 males, 24 females) in the final sample (mean age 9y [SD 2y], 6y-12y 8mo). Brain MRIs were WMI (69%) and FVI (31%); and frontal (59%), thalamic (45%), basal ganglia (37%), and basal ganglia plus thalamic (21%). Bimanual performance was lower in FVI versus WMI (p<0.003), and with frontal (p=0.36), basal ganglia (p=0.032), and thalamic/basal ganglia lesions (p=0.013). Other than information processing, executive function tasks were not associated with predominant pattern. Frontal lesions predicted attention control (p=0.049) and cognitive flexibility (p=0.009) but not goal setting, information processing, or behavioural ratings. INTERPRETATION: Clinical brain MRI predicts cognitive and motor outcomes when focal lesions and predominate lesion patterns are considered. What this paper adds Early brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts bimanual performance and cognitive outcomes. Brain MRI may identify children requiring targeted interventions. Basal ganglia with/without thalamic lesions predicted bimanual performance. Frontal lesions were associated with attention control and cognitive flexibility. Brain MRI predominant patterns predicted motor, not cognitive outcomes, other than information processing.

La resonancia magnética cerebral es un predictor del rendimiento bimanual y la función ejecutiva en niños con parálisis cerebral unilateral OBJETIVO: Examinar la asociación entre las características de la resonancia magnética cerebral (RMN) y la función ejecutiva y el rendimiento bimanual en niños con parálisis cerebral unilateral (PC). MÉTODO: Los escáneres cerebrales de resonancia magnética clínica se clasificaron como: (1) patrón patológico predominante (normal, lesión de la sustancia blanca [WMI]; lesión de la materia gris; lesiones vasculares focales [FVI]; malformaciones; o varios); y (2) lesiones focales (ganglios frontales, basales y / o tálamo). Las evaluaciones incluyeron: (1) desempeño bimanual; (2) destreza unimanual; y (3) tareas de funciones ejecutivas (procesamiento de información, control de atención, flexibilidad cognitiva y fijación de objetivos) y calificaciones de comportamiento (padres). RESULTADOS: De 131 niños reclutados, 60 no fueron elegibles para el análisis, dejando 71 niños (47 varones, 24 mujeres) en la muestra final (edad media 9 años [DE 2 años], 6 años - 12 años 8 meses). Las RMN cerebrales fueron WMI (69%) y FVI (31%); y frontal (59%), talámico (45%), ganglios basales (37%) y ganglios basales más talámico (21%). El rendimiento bimanual fue menor en FVI versus WMI (p <0,003), y con lesiones frontales (p = 0,36), ganglios basales (p = 0,032) y talámicas / ganglios basales (p = 0,013). Aparte del procesamiento de la información, las tareas de la función ejecutiva no se asociaron con el patrón predominante. Las lesiones frontales predijeron el control de la atención (p = 0,049) y la flexibilidad cognitiva (p = 0,009) pero no el establecimiento de objetivos, el procesamiento de la información o las clasificaciones de comportamiento. INTERPRETACIÓN: La resonancia magnética cerebral clínica predice los resultados cognitivos y motores cuando se consideran las lesiones focales y los patrones de lesiones predominantes.

Imagem por ressonância magnética do cérebro como preditora do desempenho bimanual e função executiva de crianças com paralisia cerebral unilateral OBJETIVO: Examinar a associação entre as características do exame de imagem por ressonância magnética (IRM) e a função executiva e desempenho bimanual em crianças com paralisia cerebral (PC) unilateral. MÉTODO: Escaneamentos clínicos de IRM cerebrais foram classificados como: 1) padrão patológico predominante (normal, lesão da substância branca [LSB]; lesão da substância cinzenta; insultos vasculares focais [IVF]; malformações; ou outro); e (2) lesões focais (frontal, gânglios basais, e/ou tálamo). As avaliações incluíram: (1) desempenho bimanual; (2) destreza unimanual; e (3) tarefas de função executiva (processamento de informações, controle da atenção, flexibilidade cognitiva, e estabelecimento de metas) e pontuações comportamentais (pais). RESULTADOS: De 131 crianças recrutadas, 60 eram inelegíveis para análise, restando 71 crianças (47 do sexo masculino, 24 do sexo feminino) na amostra final (média de idade 9a [DP 2a], 6a-12a 8m). IRMs cerebrais eram do tipo LSB (69%) e IVFs (31%); e frontais (59%), talâmicas (45%), de gânglios da base (37%), e de gânglios da base mais talâmicas (21%). O desempenho bimanual foi menor em IVF versus LSB (p<0,003), e com lesões frontais (p=0,36), gânglios da base (p=0,032), e talâmicas/gânglios da base (p=0,013). Com exceção do processamento de informações, as tarefas da função executiva não foram associadas com o padrão predominante. Lesões frontais foram preditivas do controle da atenção (p=0,049) e flexibilidade cognitiva (p=,.009) mas não do estabelecimento de metas, processamento de informações, e pontuações comportamentais. INTERPRETAÇÃO: A IRM cerebral clínica prediz resultados cognitivos e motores quando lesões focais e padrões predominantes de lesão são considerados.

The lived experience of chronic pain and dyskinesia in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: To explore the lived experience of chronic pain and dyskinesia in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. METHODS: A convergent parallel mixed methods design was undertaken. First, a quantitative cross-sectional study of participants able to self-report their quality of life was undertaken. This study characterised pain chronicity, intensity, body locations, and quality of life. Second, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a subset of children and adolescents experiencing chronic pain. RESULTS: Twenty-five children and adolescents took part in the cross-sectional study, 23 of whom experienced chronic pain and 13 of moderate intensity. Pain was often located in multiple bodily regions (6/21), with no trends in quality of life outcomes detected. Eight participated in semi-structured interviews, which identified three key themes including 'lives embedded with dyskinesia', 'real world challenges of chronic pain', and 'still learning strategies to manage their pain and dyskinesia'. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and dyskinesia who were able to self-report experienced chronic pain. The physical and emotional impacts of living with chronic pain and dyskinesia existed along a spectrum, from those with lesser to greater extent of their impacts. Children and adolescents may benefit from targeted chronic pain education and management within bio-psychosocial models.

Anxiety in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

AIMS: To describe the prevalence of, and factors associated with, anxiety in 6-18-year-old children with cerebral palsy (CP) and determine how often clinicians screen for and manage anxiety in this group. METHODS: Using a population CP register as the sampling pool, 569 families were approached by email, and 172 (mean age of children 12 years 7 months [SD 3 years 5 months]; 96 males) participated. Parents and, where able, children completed the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Parents also completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Children's medical records were searched for previous anxiety diagnoses and treatments. RESULTS: Clinically significant anxiety was identified in 38% of children on parent reports and 46% on child reports. Girls were twice as likely to have anxiety (p = 0.02). Parent- and child-reported scores were strongly correlated (r = 0.853). Fewer parents of children with intellectual and communication impairments completed the survey. Based on the SCARED parent reports, anxiety was not identified by a clinician in 16 children (43%) with clinically significant anxiety. CONCLUSION: Anxiety symptoms are prominent among children with CP, indicating a need for routine screening. Available screening tools are unsuitable for children with more severe limitations in cognition and communication; further research is needed to address this gap.

Sleep problems and solution seeking for children with cerebral palsy and their parents.

AIM: Sleep problems are common in school-aged children with cerebral palsy (CP). Despite the significant impact of sleep disturbance and deprivation, there is a paucity of research in the area. The aims of this study were to (i) investigate the frequency of sleep problems in children with CP and their parents and (ii) understand what happens when parents ask for help with sleep problems from their health-care professionals. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study using an online survey sent to parents/primary care givers of children with CP aged 6-12 years recruited through the Victorian Cerebral Palsy Register. The following sleep assessment tools: The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Gross Motor Function Classification System Parent Rating Tool were administered along with custom-designed questions that were informed by a preceding qualitative scoping study. RESULTS: Complete data sets were received from 126 parents/care givers. Almost half (46%) of the parents reported their child had sleep problems. Of the 64 parents who reported seeking help for a child's sleep problem, only 21 indicated that their attempt was successful. If a child had poor sleep, the parent was more likely to have a sleep problem than parents who did not report poor child sleeping. CONCLUSION: Sleep problems are common in children with CP and their parents. Parents do not always seek help, and those who do may not find an effective solution. Future research should explore how sleep problems can be effectively prioritised for children with CP and their parents/care givers.

Prevalence and characteristics of pain in children and young adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

AIM: The primary aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence for pain prevalence in children and young adults with cerebral palsy. Secondary aims are to identify pain characteristics and types of pain measurement used in this population. METHOD: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and PubMed were searched in October 2016 and updated in November 2017. Two authors independently screened studies according to Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pain outcomes were categorized within a biopsychosocial pain framework, with pain prevalence extracted for all recall periods and measurement types. RESULTS: One hundred and six publications from 57 studies met inclusion criteria. Pain prevalence varied widely from 14 per cent to 76 per cent and was higher in females, older age groups, and those classified within Gross Motor Function Classification System level V. Pain was most frequent in the lower limbs, back, and abdomen and associated with reduced quality of life or health status. The influence of pain on psychological functioning, interference, and participation was inconclusive. INTERPRETATION: Variation exists in reported pain prevalence because of sampling bias, inconsistent measurement, varying recall periods, and use of different participant age ranges. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Pain prevalence varies from 14 per cent to 76 per cent in children and young adults with cerebral palsy. Pain is more prevalent in females, older age groups, and children in Gross Motor Function Classification System level V.

Implementing accurate identification and measurement of dyskinesia in cerebral palsy into clinical practice: A knowledge translation study.

AIM: The application of current, best evidence into clinical practice is problematic. This article describes a knowledge translation (KT) project aimed at improving clinician identification, classification and measurement of dyskinesia in children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: A 2-year KT fellowship investigated clinicians' understanding of dyskinetic CP, identified knowledge gaps, determined educational needs and implemented a multifaceted KT strategy and dissemination framework to address those needs. RESULTS: Australian and New Zealand medical and allied health clinicians identified significant gaps in their clinical knowledge regarding dyskinetic CP, particularly confidence in identifying and measuring dyskinesia and poor knowledge of available identification and measurement tools. Following a targeted implementation strategy, there was a definite shift towards increased awareness of dyskinetic CP, a significant improvement in identification and measurement confidence (mean change from 47 to 66% confidence, P < 0.0001), and the embedding of the knowledge and skills into everyday clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This targeted and well-resourced KT project in dyskinetic CP improved clinician knowledge and led to meaningful change in clinical practice. The strategy utilised would be appropriate across a range of health-care settings.

Training Two-Wheel Bike Skills in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Practice Survey of Therapists in Australia.

Aim: To describe current practices of physiotherapists and occupational therapists when training two-wheel bike skills in children with cerebral palsy (CP) within an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Methods: Ninety-five physiotherapists and occupational therapists working with children with CP in Australia completed a customized online survey. Survey questions related to: eligibility, initial assessment, intervention characteristics, and evaluation of effectiveness. Open-ended responses were analyzed using deductive content analysis. Close-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The ICF was used as a framework for coding and reporting. Results: Body structure and function factors were most frequently considered in eligibility (56% of observations) and assessment (47%). Activity and participation-related factors were considered more in intervention (42%) and evaluation (75%). While functional training approaches were predominant, intervention characteristics varied markedly. Excepting goal-related tools, few measures were identified for assessment or evaluation of effectiveness. Environmental and personal factors were seldom considered across practice areas. Conclusions: Current two-wheel bike skills training for children with CP in Australia appears highly variable. Development and testing of bike skills-specific outcome measures and interventions and guidance for therapists on consideration of environmental and personal factors are warranted.