Management of resistant hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure above patient goal despite three different antihypertensive agents at optimal dose including a diuretic. Resistant hypertension is increasingly common issue in clinical practice and it is a major risk factor of cardiovascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS: All patients with resistant hypertension should be evaluated for possible correctable factors associated with pseudoresistance, such as poor adherence, white coat hypertension and suboptimal measurement of blood pressure. In patients with resistant hypertension, thiazide diuretics should be considered as one of the first agents, in addition to mineralocorticoids receptor antagonist. SUMMARY: Resistant hypertension can be associated with secondary cause that is why treatment can be challenging and should always include lifestyle modification and evaluation for possible secondary causes, in addition to adding a fourth agent or considering newer interventional therapies, such as renal denervation or other device-based options.

Internal mammary artery-to-pulmonary vasculature fistula: Systematic review of case reports.

The formation of a fistula between the internal mammary artery and the pulmonary vasculature (IMA-to-PV) is a rare anomaly. The etiology can be congenital; however, most recent cases have been associated with coronary artery bypass grafting, trauma, inflammatory conditions, chronic infections, or neoplasia. The knowledge base on the formation of these fistulas is derived primarily from case reports. To our knowledge, no systematic reviews or guidelines are available that provide information on how to manage these cases, and the treatment of an IMA-to-PV fistula is controversial. To our knowledge, this report is the first to review 80 cases of IMA-to-PV fistulas reported in the literature. We describe the etiologies, clinical presentation, and management of these fistulas.

A high-value cost conscious approach to minimize heparin induced thrombocytopenia antibody (HITAb) testing using the 4T score.

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication from administration of heparin products. The 4T score is a validated pre-test probability tool to screen for HIT in hospitalized patients. As the negative predictive value (NPV) is very high further testing for HIT in patients with a low score can be avoided. Our objective was to determine trends at our hospital with respect to utilization of HIT antibody (HITAb) testing and evaluate economic burden from unnecessary HIT testing. A retrospective cohort review was performed on patients age 18 and above admitted to a tertiary care center from February 2013 to December 2014 who underwent HITAb testing. Surgical ICU patients were excluded. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate, and high risk for HIT based on the 4T model. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi square and regression models. Of 150 patients that underwent HITAb testing, 134 met inclusion criteria. 73 were male (54.47 %) and mean age was 55.50 ± 17.27 years. 81 patients had a low 4T score 0-3. Analysis of testing trends showed 60.44 % of patients were tested for HITAb despite being low risk using the 4T model. Only three patients with low 4T score were positive on confirmatory SRA testing (NPV 96.29 % CI 95 = 89.56-99.23 %). Expenditure due to inappropriate testing and treatment was estimated at $103,348.13. The majority of HITAb testing was found unnecessary based on the investigator calculated 4T score. We propose implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) based calculator in order to reduce unneeded tests and reduce use of costlier alternative anticoagulants.

Systematic review of multiple versus single device closure of Secundum atrial septal defects in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple device closure (MDC) strategy has been used in treating of complex Atrial septal defects (ASDs) in adults. The safety profile of MDC compared to conventional single device closure (SDC) is unknown in this population. This report represents the first review examining the outcomes of single versus multiple device ASD closure in adults with ostium secundum defects. METHODS: Literature databases and manual search from their inception until June 30th, 2017 followed the Preferred Reporting Items of Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Main outcomes are 1) overall complication incidence, 2) arrhythmia incidence, 3) residual shunt rate. Each outcome profile was pooled by MDC and SDC, respectively and chi-square analysis was applied to examine statistical significance between MDC and SDC strategies (two-sided and p < .050). RESULTS: A total of 1806 + studies were initially screened, and 20 studies were finally selected (MDC group, 147 patients; SDC group, 1706 patients). There was no difference in overall complication incidence (χ2 = 1.269; p = .259) and arrhythmia incidence (χ2 = 0.325; p = .568) between MDC and SDC. There was no difference in residual shunt rate between the SDC (4.10 %; 70/1706) and MDC groups (6.80 %; 10/147; χ2 = 2.387; p = .122). CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of percutaneous multiple ASD closure (MDC) seem to be safe and effective as compared to conventional single ASD (SDC) closure in terms of device - related complications and technical success of the procedure. Prospective registry data and randomized trials are needed to determine the long-term outcomes of percutaneous ASD closure using MDC.

Feasibility and Safety of Coronary Angiography via Radial Approach in Cardiac Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Experience.

Coronary angiography remains the gold standard post-transplant screening test for cardiac allograft vasculopathy. This procedure has traditionally been performed via femoral approach. Data on safety and efficacy of radial approach in cardiac transplant patients remains scarce. Single center retrospective study including all cardiac transplant patients who underwent coronary angiography via transradial approach (TRA) or transfemoral approach (TFA). Safety and efficacy outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Primary end points included major bleeding, vascular complications, crossover to femoral approach, contrast use and radiation exposure. A total of 201 patients were included. 96 patients (47.8%) underwent angiography via TRA. At baseline, no significant differences with regards to age, gender, or traditional risk factors such as HTN, DM, hyperlipidemia were noted between the 2 groups. Most patients underwent intravascular ultrasound (n = 179, 89%) with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (TRA: 90.6% vs TFA: 87.6%, P = 0.5). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in radiation exposure, amount of contrast use and fluoroscopy time between the 2 groups. Although there were trends toward increased bleeding among TFA group, these were not statistically significant and were mostly driven by access site hematomas. Use of TRA increased over time and Conversion from TRA to TFA was low (n = 4, 4.2%). Coronary angiography via the radial approach in cardiac transplant recipients is feasible, safe and is associated with low a risk of bleeding with no significant increase in radiation exposure when compared to the traditional femoral approach.

Clinical Outcomes of the Self-Expandable Evolut R Valve Versus the Balloon-Expandable SAPIEN 3 Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now indicated in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and low, moderate, and high surgical risk. There are multiple types of valves available in TAVR. SAPIEN 3, and Evolut R are two of the most commonly used valves. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies that compared SAPIEN 3 vs Evolut R in patients undergoing TAVR. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included major of life-threatening bleeding, risk of stroke, need of permanent pacemaker implantation, and risk of moderate to severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR). RESULTS: We included a total of 9 studies. One study was a randomized clinical trial, five were prospective observational studies and three were retrospective. 30-day mortality rate was similar between SAPIEN 3 and Evolut R (odds ratio (OR) 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.93; p = 0.47). The risk of major or life-threatening bleeding (OR of 0.83, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.39; p = 0.48), and the risk of stroke (OR of 0.82, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.78; p = 0.62) were also similar between the two types of valves. Compared to SAPIEN 3, Evolut R was associated with statistically significant risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR of 1.40, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.70; p = 0.0007), and moderate to severe PVR (OR of 2.56, 95% CI 1.14 to 5.74; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: At 30 day follow up, both Evolut R and SAPIEN 3 shared similar risks of 30-day mortality, major or life-threatening bleeding, and stroke; however greater odds of pacemaker placement implantation and moderate to severe PVR were associated with Evolut R.

Elective Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Closure Under Conscious Sedation: Procedural Techniques and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Paravalvular leaks (PVLs) are a well-recognized complication of prosthetic valves that are detected up to 18% of all implanted surgical valves. Perioperative morbidity is thought to be lower in percutaneous compared to surgical PVL repair. However, a direct comparison of PVL closure techniques has never been performed. Our study is the first to demonstrate that elective PVL closure with monitored anesthesia care can be achieved with high success and low complications rates resulting in short hospital stays. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort of patients admitted electively for catheter-based treatment of symptomatic prosthetic paravalvular regurgitation from Jan 2013 to April 2018. Both mitral and aortic PVLs were included. Patients' demographics, risk factors, procedural outcomes, In-hospital and thirty-day mortality were all reported. We followed the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) criteria to define device and procedural technical success. In-hospital and 30- day outcomes were assessed by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: A total of 54 PVLs in thirty-seven patients were repaired (65% aortic & 35% mitral). The mean-age in the mitral cohort was lower than the aortic cohort (61 vs 72years, P<0.0001) but the two groups shared similar clinical risk factors (P>0.05). Average hospital stay was 1-2days (<1.5days overall cohort) which was significantly lower in the aortic compared to the mitral cohort (P=0.009). All procedures were guided by TEE under conscious sedation with monitored anesthesia care. Procedural technical success defined as any significant residual shunt was 81% in the overall cohort and 88% in the aortic group. No procedural deaths were reported. Short-term mortality during the first 30days was 5.4% (two patients). CONCLUSION: Elective catheter-based repair of symptomatic prosthetic paravalvular regurgitation appears to be safe and effective. The use of conscious sedation with monitored anesthesia care resulted in short hospital stay.

Beta-blockers do not provide survival benefit in a population with angiographic coronary artery disease without myocardial infarction or reduced ejection fraction: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: While beta-blockers have been widely used for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), some concerns have been raised that beta blockers do not have survival benefit in this population. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effects of beta blockers on all-cause and cardiac mortality in adults with CAD without previous myocardial infarction (MI) or reduced ejection fraction. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Medline/Ovid and Google Scholar through March 2016 identified 4 studies that reported angiographic CAD without previous myocardial infarction or reduced ejection fraction. Fixed-effects pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of all-cause and cardiac mortality were estimated. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to assess overall quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 17,397 patients were analyzed. In both all-cause and cardiac mortality analysis, no serious limitation was identified. Beta-blockers were not associated with reductions in all-cause mortality (odds ratios=0.910, 95% confidence intervals 0.797-1.039, p=.163) or cardiac mortality (odds ratio=0.926, 95% confidence interval 0.773-1.110, p=.407). CONCLUSION: Beta-blockers do not provide any survival benefit in patients with angiographic CAD without history of MI or reduced ejection fraction.