Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 452, 2022 07 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35799144

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bumetanide is a selective NKCC1 chloride importer antagonist which is being repurposed as a mechanism-based treatment for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Due to their specific actions, these kinds of interventions will only be effective in particular subsets of patients. To anticipate stratified application, we recently completed three bumetanide trials each focusing on different stratification strategies with the additional objective of deriving the most optimal endpoints. Here we publish the protocol of the post-trial access combined cohort study to confirm previous effects and stratification strategies in the trial cohorts and in new participants. METHOD/DESIGN: Participants of the three previous cohorts and a new cohort will be subjected to 6 months bumetanide treatment using multiple baseline Single Case Experimental Designs. The primary outcome is the change, relative to baseline, in a set of patient reported outcome measures focused on direct and indirect effects of sensory processing difficulties. Secondary outcome measures include the conventional questionnaires 'social responsiveness scale', 'repetitive behavior scale', 'sensory profile' and 'aberrant behavior scale'. Resting-state EEG measurements will be performed at several time-points including at Tmax after the first administration. Assessment of cognitive endpoints will be conducted using the novel Emma Tool box, an in-house designed battery of computerized tests to measure neurocognitive functions in children. DISCUSSION: This study aims to replicate previously shown effects of bumetanide in NDD subpopulations, validate a recently proposed treatment prediction effect methodology and refine endpoint measurements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2020-002196-35, registered 16 November 2020, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-002196-35/NL.


Asunto(s)
Bumetanida , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo , Bumetanida/farmacología , Bumetanida/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/tratamiento farmacológico , Proyectos de Investigación , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 63(5): 584-591, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33368181

RESUMEN

AIM: To explore relationships between category classifications for children's rehabilitation goals, outcomes, and participant characteristics. METHOD: Children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy due to perinatal stroke rated self-selected goals with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and completed the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) and Box and Block Test (BBT), at baseline and 6 months, in a randomized, controlled 10-day neuromodulation rehabilitation trial using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Goals were classified with the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Analysis included standard linear regression. RESULTS: Data for 45 participants (mean age 11y 7mo, SD 3y 10mo, range 6-19y, 29 males, 16 females) on 186 goals were included. Self-care goal percentage corresponded with baseline BBT by age (standardized ß=-0.561, p=0.004). Leisure goal percentage corresponded with baseline BBT (standardized ß=0.419, p=0.010). AHA change corresponded with productivity goals (standardized ß=0.327, p=0.029) and age (standardized ß=0.481, p=0.002). COPM change corresponded with baseline COPM and age by AHA change (p<0.05). INTERPRETATION: Younger children with lower motor function were more likely to select self-care goals while those with better function tended to select leisure goals. Functional improvement corresponded with older age and productivity goals. COPM change scores reflected functional improvement among older children. Children chose functionally and developmentally appropriate goals. Consequently, children should be free to set goals that matter to them. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Children in a brain stimulation trial chose divergent upper extremity functional goals. Younger children with lower ability chose more self-care goals. Children with higher ability chose more leisure goals. Older children's goal ratings reflected objective functional motor gains. Children chose goals appropriate to their function and level of development.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Brazo/fisiopatología , Parálisis Cerebral/rehabilitación , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Objetivos , Rehabilitación Neurológica/métodos , Adolescente , Parálisis Cerebral/fisiopatología , Niño , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA