Using pulsatility responses to breath-hold maneuvers to predict readmission rates in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic respiratory maneuvers induce heterogenous changes to flow-pulsatility in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients. We evaluated the association of these pulsatility responses with patient hemodynamics and outcomes. METHODS: Responses obtained from HVAD (Medtronic) outpatients during successive weekly clinics were categorized into three ordinal groups according to the percentage reduction in flow-waveform pulsatility (peak-trough flow) upon inspiratory-breath-hold, (%∆P): (1) minimal change (%∆P ≤ 50), (2) reduced pulsatility (%∆P > 50 but <100), (3) flatline (%∆P = 100). Same-day echocardiography and right-heart-catheterization were performed. Readmissions were compared between patients with ≥1 flatline response (F-group) and those without (NF-group). RESULTS: Overall, 712 responses were obtained from 55 patients (82% male, age 56.4 ± 11.5). When compared to minimal change, reduced pulsatility and flatline responses were associated with lower central venous pressure (14.2 vs. 11.4 vs. 9.0 mm Hg, p = 0.08) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (19.8 vs. 14.3 vs. 13.0 mm Hg, p = 0.03), lower rates of ≥moderate mitral regurgitation (48% vs. 13% vs. 10%, p = 0.01), lower rates of ≥moderate right ventricular impairment (62% vs. 25% vs. 27%, p = 0.03), and increased rates of aortic valve opening (32% vs. 50% vs. 75%, p = 0.03). The F-group (n = 28) experienced numerically lower all-cause readmissions (1.51 vs. 2.79 events-per-patient-year [EPPY], hazard-ratio [HR] = 0.67, p = 0.12), reduced heart failure readmissions (0.07 vs. 0.57 EPPY, HR = 0.15, p = 0.008), and superior readmission-free survival (HR = 0.47, log-rank p = 0.04). Syncopal readmissions occurred exclusively in the F-group (0.20 vs. 0 EPPY, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Responses to inspiratory-breath-hold predicted hemodynamics and readmission risk. The impact of inspiratory-breath-hold on pulsatility can non-invasively guide hemodynamic management decisions, patient optimization, and readmission risk stratification.

Comparing left ventricular assist device inflow cannula angle between median sternotomy and thoracotomy using 3D reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation via thoracotomy has many potential advantages compared to conventional sternotomy, including improved inflow cannula (IFC) positioning. We compared the difference in IFC angles, postoperative, and long-term outcomes for patients with LVADs implanted via thoracotomy and sternotomy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis of 14 patients who underwent thoracotomy implantation was performed and matched with 28 patients who underwent sternotomy LVAD implantations for a total of 42 patients. Inclusion required a minimum LVAD support duration of 30 days and excluded concomitant procedures. A postoperative CT-chest was used to measure the angle the between the IFC and mitral valve in two-dimensions and results were compared with three-dimensional reconstruction using the same CT chest. Outcome data were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in gender, INTERMACS score, BMI, or age between the two groups. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the thoracotomy group compared to the sternotomy group, 107 min (86-122) versus 76 min (56-93), p < 0.01. 3D reconstructions revealed less deviation of the IFC away from the mitral valve in devices implanted via thoracotomy compared to sternotomy, median (IQR) angle 16.3° (13.9°-21.0°) versus 23.2° (17.9°-26.4°), p < 0.01. Rates of pump thrombosis, stroke, and gastrointestinal bleeding were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Devices implanted via thoracotomy demonstrated less deviation away from mitral valve. However, there was no difference in morbidity between the two approaches. 3D reconstruction of the heart is an innovative technique to measure angulation and is clinically advantageous when compared to 2D imaging.

Vasoplegia in patients following ventricular assist device explant and heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Vasoplegia has been shown to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It has been previously stated that low pulsatile states as seen with current left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) may contribute to vasoplegia post LVAD-explant and heart transplant. We sought to examine the literature regarding vasoplegia in the post-operative setting for patients undergoing LVAD explant and heart transplant. METHOD: A literature review was conducted to firstly define vasoplegia in the setting of LVAD patients, and secondly to better understand the relationship between vasoplegia and LVAD explantation in the postoperative heart transplant patient cohort. A keyword search of 'vasoplegia' OR 'vasoplegic' AND 'transplant' was used. Search engines used were PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Ovid, Scopus and grey literature. RESULTS: 17 studies met the selection criteria for review. Three key themes emerged from the literature. Firstly, there is limited consensus regarding the definition of vasoplegia. Secondly, patients with LVADs experienced higher rates of vasoplegia following heart transplant than their counterparts and thirdly, increased cardiopulmonary bypass time was associated with a higher rate of vasoplegia. CONCLUSION: Vasoplegia is not clearly defined in the literature as it pertains to the LVAD patient cohort. Patients bridged with LVADs appear to have higher rates of vasoplegia, however the aetiology of this is unclear and may be associated with continuous flow physiology or prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time. A universal definition will aid in risk stratification, early recognition and management.

Characteristic changes to pulsatile and steady-state load according to pulmonary hypertension classification.

It is of increasing importance to understand and predict changes to the systemic and pulmonary circulations in pulmonary hypertension (PH). To do so, it is necessary to describe the circulation in complete quantitative terms. Characteristic impedance (Zc) expresses opposition of the circulation to pulsatile blood flow. Evaluation of systemic and pulmonary Zc relationships according to PH classification has not previously been described. Prospective study of 40 clinically indicated patients referred for CMR and RHC (56 ± 18 years; 70% females, eight mPAP ≤ 25 mmHg, 16 pre-capillary [Pre-cPH], eight combined pre- and post-capillary [Cpc-PH] and eight isolated left-heart disease [Ipc-PH]). CMR provided assessment of ascending aortic (Ao) and pulmonary arterial (PA) flow, and RHC, central Ao and PA pressure. Systemic and pulmonary Zc were expressed as the relationship of pressure to flow in the frequency domain. Baseline demographic characteristics were well-matched across PH subclasses. In those with a mPAP ≤25mHg, systemic Zc and SVR were >2 times higher than pulmonary Zc and PVR. Only Pre-cPH was associated with inverse pulsatile (systemic Zc 58 [45-69] vs pulmonary Zc 70 [58-85]), but not steady-state (SVR 1101 [986-1752] vs. PVR 483 [409-557]) relationships. Patients with CpcPH and IpcPH had concordant pulsatile and steady-state relationships (Graphical Abstract). Measurement of, and the relationship between, systemic and pulmonary Zc in patients according to PH sub-classification has not previously been described. Systemic Zc was routinely higher than pulmonary Zc, except in patients with newly diagnosed Pre-cPH, where inverse pulsatile but not steady-state relationships were observed.

Prognostic role of pulmonary impedance estimation to predict right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The effect of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on right ventricular (RV) afterload is commonly defined by elevation of pulmonary artery (PA) pressure or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). In humans however, one-third to half of the hydraulic power in the PA is contained in pulsatile components of flow. Pulmonary impedance (Zc) expresses opposition of the PA to pulsatile blood flow. We evaluate pulmonary Zc relationships according to PH classification using a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)/right heart catheterization (RHC) method. METHODS: Prospective study of 70 clinically indicated patients referred for same-day CMR and RHC [60 ± 16 years; 77% females, 16 mPAP <25 mmHg (PVR <240 dynes.s.cm-5 /mPCWP <15 mmHg), 24 pre-capillary (PrecPH), 15 isolated post-capillary (IpcPH), 15 combined pre-capillary/post-capillary (CpcPH)]. CMR provided assessment of PA flow, and RHC, central PA pressure. Pulmonary Zc was expressed as the relationship of PA pressure to flow in the frequency domain (dynes.s.cm-5 ). RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were well matched. There was a significant difference in mPAP (P < 0.001), PVR (P = 0.001), and pulmonary Zc between mPAP<25 mmHg patients and those with PH (mPAP <25 mmHg: 47 ± 19 dynes.s.cm-5 ; PrecPH 86 ± 20 dynes.s.cm-5 ; IpcPH 66 ± 30 dynes.s.cm-5 ; CpcPH 86 ± 39 dynes.s.cm-5 ; P = 0.05). For all patients with PH, elevated mPAP was found to be associated with raised PVR (P < 0.001) but not with pulmonary Zc (P = 0.87), except for those with PrecPH (P < 0.001). Elevated pulmonary Zc was associated with reduced RVSWI, RVEF, and CO (all P < 0.05), whereas PVR and mPAP were not. CONCLUSIONS: Raised pulmonary Zc was independent of elevated mPAP in patients with PH and more strongly predictive of maladaptive RV remodelling than PVR and mPAP. Use of this straightforward method to determine pulmonary Zc may help to better characterize pulsatile components of RV afterload in patients with PH than mPAP or PVR alone.

Reviewing the clinical utility of ventricular assist device log files.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have provided a temporising solution to many individuals with refractory heart failure (HF) while awaiting a suitable donor for heart transplantation which remains the gold standard in treatment. Many of the discussions around VADs involve ongoing morbidity; however, one aspect of VADs that is often overlooked is the utility of their log files. We decided to review the literature for mentions of the clinical utility of VAD log files. METHODS: A keyword search was utilised on PUBMED using the terms 'Ventricular Assist Device' and 'Log files'. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this search only yielded 4 results with further articles being discovered through the bibliography of these publications. RESULTS: The 4 identified articles provided basic information on log files, particularly with reference to the HVAD. Logs can be categorised into three types-data (pump parameters), events (changes in parameters) and alarms (abnormal function). Using a combination of these logs, we can readily identify abnormal pump operation such as the development and progression of pump thrombosis, suction events and gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the research potential of log files was not discussed in these publications, particularly as it pertains to areas such as studying speed modulation and pulsatility in VADs. CONCLUSIONS: VADs are an important staple in the treatment of patients with refractory HF. Log files provide a treasure-trove of information and knowledge that can be utilised for clinical benefit. Furthermore, log files provide an excellent tool for conducting research into device functionality. Current literature on the clinical utility of log files is sparse with much untapped potential.