How Does Job Insecurity and Workplace Activity Limitations Relate to Rheumatic Disease Symptom Trajectories in Young Adulthood? A Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVE: Workplace and labor market conditions are associated with the health of the working population. A longitudinal study was conducted among young adults with rheumatic disease to examine workplace activity limitations and job insecurity and their relationship with disease symptom trajectories. METHODS: Three online surveys were administered to young adults with rheumatic disease over 27 months. Self-reported data on pain, fatigue, and disease activity were collected. Workplace activity limitations and job insecurity were measured. Group-based discrete mixture models determined pain, fatigue, and disease activity trajectory groups. Robust Poisson regression models were fitted to examine the relationship among workplace activity limitations, job insecurity, and trajectory group membership. RESULTS: In total, 124 participants (mean ± SD age 29 ± 4.5 years) with rheumatic disease were recruited. At baseline, participants reported considerable workplace activity limitations (10.35 ± 5.8), and 36% of participants indicated experiencing job insecurity. We identified 2 latent rheumatic disease symptom trajectory groups. The first group had high persistent pain, fatigue, or disease activity; the second group had low persistent disease symptoms over time. Greater workplace activity limitations were associated with an increased relative risk (RR) of being in the high persistent severe pain (RR 1.02 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01, 1.03]), fatigue (RR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01, 1.03]), and disease activity trajectory groups (RR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01, 1.03]). Job insecurity was associated with an increased RR of membership in the high persistent pain (RR 1.14 [95% CI 1.04, 1.25]) and disease activity trajectory groups (RR 1.11 [95% CI 1.00, 1.22]). CONCLUSION: Workplace activity limitations and job insecurity represent working conditions that are associated with the health of young adults with rheumatic disease and should be examined as potential targets for intervention.

Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy and Its Determinants Among Rheumatology Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatic disease (RD) have an increased risk of influenza and its complications. Despite inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) recommendations, IIV uptake in patients with RD is suboptimal, a problem of increasing importance in the COVID-19 era. We estimated the frequency of IIV hesitancy and associated factors among Canadian patients with RD. METHODS: A cross-sectional vaccine hesitancy survey was completed by rheumatology clinic patients (November 2019 to January 2020). Patients rated their likelihood of receiving the influenza vaccine (scale of 0-10). We categorized these as follows: likely to refuse (scale of 0-2), uncertain (scale of 3-7), or likely to accept (scale of 8-10). Multivariate logistical regression was used to evaluate factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients (63.5% of those approached) completed the survey, with 165 (58.5%) being likely to accept, 67 (23.8%) being likely to refuse, and 50 (17.7%) uncertain. Uncertain patients were younger and more likely to be employed than those in the other two groups. No previous influenza vaccination (odds ratio [OR] 36.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-252.9), belief that vaccination should not be mandatory (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0-0.7), unwillingness to take time off work to be vaccinated (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.5-30.6), and distrust in pharmaceutical companies (OR 41.0, 95% CI 5.6-301.5) predicted likeliness to refuse. Reluctance to pay for vaccination (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.5) and no previous influenza vaccination (OR 18.9, 95% CI 3.3-109.7) predicted uncertainty. CONCLUSION: More than 40% of rheumatology patients are either likely to refuse or uncertain about receiving IIV. This contributes to suboptimal vaccine coverage in this population. Interventions addressing these concerns are needed, particularly in the COVID-19 era.

Inter-segmental coordination amplitude and variability differences during gait in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: There is limited research examining gait and inter-segmental coordination in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. The objective was to compare lower extremity inter-segmental coordination amplitude and variability during gait between patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and healthy adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included participants with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (n = 13) and healthy adults (n = 14). Gait data were acquired using a motion capture system and force plates. Participants ambulated at self-selected speeds for five trials. Inter-segmental coordination was quantified using continuous relative phase, which examined the dynamic interaction between the thigh-shank and shank-foot paired segments (i.e. phase space relation). A 2-way mixed analysis of variance examined the effects of groups (Ehlers-Danlos and healthy) and gait phases (stance and swing phase) on inter-segmental coordination amplitude and between-trial variability. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. FINDINGS: The Ehlers-Danlos group had greater inter-segmental coordination variability compared to the healthy group for foot-shank and shank-thigh segment pairs in the sagittal plane over stance and swing phases (P = 0.04; small to large effect sizes). The Ehlers-Danlos group also had greater variability in the frontal plane at the foot-shank segment pair during stance phase (P = 0.03; large effect). There were no differences in inter-segmental coordination amplitude between groups (P = 0.06 to 0.85). INTERPRETATION: Patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome have more variability between gait trials in lower limb motor coordination than healthy adults. This may be related to the impaired proprioception, reduced strength, pain, or slower gait speed seen in this population.

Training Physicians in Motivational Communication to Address Influenza Vaccine Hesitation: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to support health care professionals on how to address vaccine hesitancy are needed. METHODS: We developed a 4-h Motivational Communication (MC) training program tailored to help physicians address hesitancy related to influenza vaccination among patients living with rheumatoid arthritis. Five MC competencies were evaluated at baseline and post-training with a standardized patient using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity [MITI] scale. Adherence to MC during clinical consultations and changes in vaccine intentions was measured as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Seven rheumatology physicians participated in the training. MITI scores increased in all participants, and 71% (n = 5) achieved thresholds of clinical competency (i.e., ≥3.5/5 at MITI global score and ≥3/5 on at least 3 individual competency score) post-training. Autonomy/support and empathy competencies reached competency thresholds (+2.4 ± 1.3 to +4.1 ± 0.7 and +2.1 ± 0.7 to +4.1 ± 0.7, respectively). Evocation and collaboration competencies improved but without reaching competency thresholds (+1.4 ± 0.8 to +3.1 ± 1.1; +1.4 ± 0.8 to +2.9 ± 1.1, respectively). Direction did not improve. Among 21 patient consultations post-training, 15 (71%) were MC-consistent. Of the 15 patients, 67% (10/15) intended to receive the influenza vaccine and 33% (5/15) received it. CONCLUSION: A brief MC training program targeting vaccine hesitancy increased MC competency among rheumatology physicians and promoted behavioral change among patients.

Rheumatic Disease Disclosure at the Early Career Phase and Its Impact on the Relationship Between Workplace Supports and Presenteeism.

OBJECTIVE: Young adults with rheumatic disease face challenges communicating health needs, accessing workplace support, and sustaining productivity. Our objective was to examine whether disclosure modifies the relationship between workplace support and presenteeism. METHODS: An online survey was administered to Canadian young adults with rheumatic disease and asked about presenteeism (0 = health had no effect on work; 10 = health completely prevented working), workplace support need, availability, and use and whether health details were disclosed to an immediate supervisor. A multivariable robust linear regression model was conducted and stratified by those who did and did not disclose the details of their health to their supervisor. RESULTS: A total of 306 participants completed the survey with a mean ± SD presenteeism score of 4.89 ± 2.65. More than 70% disclosed health details to their supervisor; those who disclosed reported greater presenteeism (mean ± SD 5.2 ± 2.5) when compared to those who did not disclose (mean ± SD 4.2 ± 2.61). Greater disease severity was associated with disclosure. Half of the participants reported unmet workplace support needs (53%), 32% reported that their workplace support needs were met, and 15% reported exceeded workplace support needs. The relationship between presenteeism and workplace support needs was modified by disclosure. For participants who disclosed, workplace support needs that were unmet (ß = 1.59 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.75, 2.43]) and that were met (ß = 1.25 [95% CI 0.39, 2.11]) were associated with greater presenteeism when compared to those with exceeded workplace support needs. CONCLUSION: To address presenteeism, strategies should be developed for young adults with rheumatic disease to foster access to available workplace supports and to navigate disclosure decisions.

A multimodal intervention increases influenza vaccine uptake in rheumatoid arthritis.

Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but coverage is suboptimal. We assessed the impact of an implementation strategy in enhancing vaccination uptake in RA. We evaluated a multimodal implementation strategy at rheumatology clinics that included 3 approaches: patient recalls, a nurse providing vaccines, and physician reminders. We compared patient-reported vaccination rates after implementation with those reported before the implementation strategy in a nonequivalent control group. In multivariate analyses, we assessed factors potentially associated with influenza vaccine uptake. One hundred and sixteen RA patients were vaccinated during the intervention. The influenza vaccination rate in RA increased from 48.5% (65/136) before implementation to 62.6% (67/107) after implementation (difference of 14.1, 95% CI 1.5, 26.1). In multivariate analyses, older age, biologics use, and physician recommendation for vaccination were associated with influenza vaccine uptake. A multimodal intervention was associated with increased influenza vaccine coverage among RA patients. Older patients and those on biologics were more likely to be immunized against influenza. Physician's recommendations are important to promote vaccine coverage. Key Points • Despite current recommendations, influenza vaccine uptake among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is suboptimal. • A multimodal implementation strategy facilitating access to influenza vaccine and raising awareness through vaccination reminders improved immunization uptake in RA. • Physicians play a key role in promoting annual seasonal influenza vaccination. • The reasons for vaccine hesitancy in RA should be addressed to reach a vaccination target of 80% required to reduce the burden of this preventable infection.

Neuromuscular Activation Differences During Gait in Patients With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Healthy Adults.

OBJECTIVE: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a group of genetic disorders affecting connective tissue. Symptoms include joint and ligament laxity. The objectives of this study were to compare muscle activation, joint angles, and spatiotemporal parameters during gait, and to compare isometric strength between participants with EDS (hypermobility and classical subtypes) and healthy adults. METHODS: Participants with EDS (n = 14) and healthy adults (n = 14) were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Lower extremity muscle activation, sagittal joint angles, and spatiotemporal parameters during gait were measured using surface electromyography (EMG), motion capture, and force plates. Isometric strength of the lower extremity joints was measured with an isokinetic dynamometer. Important characteristics (principal components [PCs]) were determined from EMG and angle waveforms using PC analysis; relationships between PC scores and groups were examined using multilevel linear models after accounting for gait speed. Spatiotemporal parameters and strength were compared using independent t-tests and effect sizes (Cohen's d coefficient). RESULTS: The EDS group was associated with delayed vastus lateralis (b = 16.69) and medialis activation (b = 11.33), higher rectus femoris (b = 28.34) and tensor fascia latae activation (b = -11.06), prolonged gluteus medius activation (b = -32.78), and lower medial gastrocnemius activation (b = -27.18). Joint angles were similar between the EDS and healthy groups. The EDS group had slower gait speeds, shorter stride lengths, and a greater percentage of time in stance (d = -1.05 to 0.96). The EDS group had weaker hip and ankle muscles (d = -0.83 to -0.97). CONCLUSION: Alterations in muscle activation and spatiotemporal parameters during gait in patients with EDS may be a result of impaired proprioception and balance and muscle weakness. Interventions should target these deficits.