Comparative study of Tat vaccine regimens in Mauritian cynomolgus and Indian rhesus macaques: influence of Mauritian MHC haplotypes on susceptibility/resistance to SHIV(89.6P) infection.

Protection afforded by HIV Tat-based vaccines has differed in Indian rhesus and Mauritian cynomolgus macaques. We evaluated native Tat and Ad-HIVtat priming/Tat-boosting regimens in both species. Both vaccines were immunogenic. Only the Ad-tat regimen modestly reduced acute viremia in rhesus macaques after SHIV(89.6P) challenge. Confounding variables uncovered in Mauritian macaques included significant associations of susceptibility to infection with MHC class IB and class II H2 and H5 haplotypes, and resistance to infection with class IB haplotypes H3 and H6. Although protection here was limited, Tat-based vaccines incorporating other HIV components have shown greater efficacy. Combination strategies should be further explored.

A replication-competent adenovirus-human immunodeficiency virus (Ad-HIV) tat and Ad-HIV env priming/Tat and envelope protein boosting regimen elicits enhanced protective efficacy against simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P challenge in rhesus macaques.

We previously demonstrated that replication-competent adenovirus (Ad)-simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) recombinant prime/protein boost regimens elicit potent immunogenicity and strong, durable protection of rhesus macaques against SIV(mac251). Additionally, native Tat vaccines have conferred strong protection against simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIV(89.6P) challenge of cynomolgus monkeys, while native, inactivated, or vectored Tat vaccines have failed to elicit similar protective efficacy in rhesus macaques. Here we asked if priming rhesus macaques with replicating Ad-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tat and boosting with the Tat protein would elicit protection against SHIV(89.6P). We also evaluated a Tat/Env regimen, adding an Ad-HIV env recombinant and envelope protein boost to test whether envelope antibodies would augment acute-phase protection. Further, expecting cellular immunity to enhance chronic viremia control, we tested a multigenic group: Ad-HIV tat, -HIV env, -SIV gag, and -SIV nef recombinants and Tat, Env, and Nef proteins. All regimens were immunogenic. A hierarchy was observed in enzyme-linked immunospot responses (with the strongest response for Env, followed by Gag, followed by Nef, followed by Tat) and antibody titers (with the highest titer for Env, followed by Tat, followed by Nef, followed by Gag). Following intravenous SHIV(89.6P) challenge, all macaques became infected. Compared to controls, no protection was seen in the Tat-only group, confirming previous reports for rhesus macaques. However, the multigenic group blunted acute viremia by approximately 1 log (P = 0.017), and both the multigenic and Tat/Env groups reduced chronic viremia by 3 and 4 logs, respectively, compared to controls (multigenic, P = 0.0003; Tat/Env, P < 0.0001). The strikingly greater reduction in the Tat/Env group than in the multigenic group (P = 0.014) was correlated with Tat and Env binding antibodies. Since prechallenge anti-Env antibodies lacked SHIV(89.6P)-neutralizing activity, other functional anti-Env and anti-Tat activities are under investigation, as is a possible synergy between the Tat and Env immunogens.

A complementary single-stranded docking site is required for enhancement of strand exchange by human immunodeficiency virus nucleocapsid protein on substrates that model viral recombination.

Enhancement of strand exchange by nucleocapsid protein (NC) is proposed to occur during retroviral recombination. The mechanism was examined using an RNA (donor)-DNA hybrid that mimicked a retrovirus replication intermediate. This consisted of a 25 base pair hybrid region flanked on each side by single-stranded RNA or DNA. A second set of acceptor RNAs that could bind to the 25-base hybrid region and to various lengths of additional bases on the DNA was used to displace the donor by hybridizing with the DNA. Displacement required a complementary single-stranded DNA region outside the donor-DNA 25-nucleotide hybrid region. NC enhanced displacement slightly when the acceptor could bind 10 nucleotides and significantly when binding 22 or more nucleotides in the single-stranded region. Two mutated acceptors that bound over 47 total nucleotides on the DNA (22 in the single-stranded region plus 25 in the hybrid region) were constructed. One had three mismatches in the hybrid region; the other, three in the single-stranded region and one in the hybrid region. Each acceptor bound the DNA with approximately equal thermodynamic stability, yet NC stimulated exchange with the former and actually inhibited with the latter. This emphasized the importance of the single-stranded region in NC stimulation. The results support a mechanism where NC enhances the docking of the acceptor to the single-stranded region and then the acceptor "zippers" through the hybrid and displaces the donor. Results with the mutated acceptors indicate that NC may actually inhibit strand exchange between genomes in nonhomologous regions.

Evidence for the differential effects of nucleocapsid protein on strand transfer in various regions of the HIV genome.

An in vitro strand transfer assay that mimicked recombinational events occurring during reverse transcription in HIV-1 was used to assess the role of nucleocapsid protein (NC) in strand transfer. Strand transfer in highly structured nucleic acid species from the U3 3' long terminal repeats, gag-pol frameshift region, and Rev response element were strongly enhanced by NC. In contrast, weakly structured templates from the env and pol-vif regions transferred well without NC and showed lower enhancement. The lack of strong polymerase pause sites in the latter regions demonstrated that non-pause driven mechanisms could also promote transfer. Assays conducted using NC zinc finger mutants supported a differential role for the two fingers in strand transfer with finger 1 (N-terminal) being more important on highly structured RNAs. Overall this report suggests a role for structural intricacies of RNA templates in determining the extent of influence of NC on recombination and illustrates that strand transfer may occur by several different mechanisms depending on the structural nature of the RNA.

Differing roles of the N- and C-terminal zinc fingers in human immunodeficiency virus nucleocapsid protein-enhanced nucleic acid annealing.

The replication process of human immunodeficiency virus requires a number of nucleic acid annealing steps facilitated by the hybridization and helix-destabilizing activities of human immunodeficiency virus nucleocapsid (NC) protein. NC contains two CCHC zinc finger motifs numbered 1 and 2 from the N terminus. The amino acids surrounding the CCHC residues differ between the two zinc fingers. Assays were preformed to investigate the activities of the fingers by determining the effect of mutant and wild-type proteins on annealing of 42-nucleotide RNA and DNA complements. The mutants 1.1 NC and 2.2 NC had duplications of the N- and C-terminal zinc fingers in positions 1 and 2. The mutant 2.1 NC had the native zinc fingers with their positions switched. Annealing assays were completed with unstructured and highly structured oligonucleotide complements. 2.2 NC had a near wild-type level of annealing of unstructured nucleic acids, whereas it was completely unable to stimulate annealing of highly structured nucleic acids. In contrast, 1.1 NC was able to stimulate annealing of both unstructured and structured substrates, but to a lesser degree than the wild-type protein. Results suggest that finger 1 has a greater role in unfolding of strong secondary structures, whereas finger 2 serves an accessory role that leads to a further increase in the rate of annealing.