RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor roflumilast has been studied in several dermatologic conditions. OBJECTIVE: Roflumilast foam 0.3% is being investigated as a topical treatment for seborrheic dermatitis (SD). METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blinded trial, patients with SD were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to once-daily roflumilast foam 0.3% or vehicle foam for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at week 8, defined as IGA of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) plus ≥2-point improvement from baseline. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: 79.5% of roflumilast-treated and 58.0% of vehicle-treated patients met the primary endpoint (P < .001); statistically significant differences in IGA Success also favored roflumilast at week 2 (roflumilast: 43.0%; vehicle: 25.7%; P < .001) and week 4 (roflumilast: 73.1%; vehicle: 47.1%; P < .001). Roflumilast was well-tolerated with a low rate of treatment-emergent adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Study limitations include the 8-week treatment period for this chronic condition. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily roflumilast foam was superior to vehicle in leading to IGA of Clear or Almost Clear plus ≥2-point improvement from baseline at 8 weeks in patients with SD. Longer trials are needed to determine durability and safety of roflumilast foam in SD.
Asunto(s)
Benzamidas , Dermatitis Seborreica , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aminopiridinas/efectos adversos , Inmunoglobulina A , Método Doble Ciego , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , CiclopropanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD), a topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist, downregulates pro-inflammatory Th2 cytokines, upregulates skin-barrier components, and reduces oxidative stress. OBJECTIVE: To assess tapinarof efficacy and safety in adults and children down to 2 years of age with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: Eight hundred and thirteen patients were randomized to tapinarof or vehicle QD in two 8-week phase 3 trials. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint, Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis score of 0 or 1 and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 8, was met with statistical significance in both trials: 45.4% versus 13.9% and 46.4% versus 18.0% (tapinarof vs vehicle; both P < .0001). Significantly superior Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) responses were also observed with tapinarof versus vehicle at Week 8: 55.8% versus 22.9% and 59.1% versus 21.2% (both P < .0001). Rapid improvements in patient-reported pruritus were also significant with tapinarof versus vehicle. Common adverse events (≥5%) of folliculitis, headache, and nasopharyngitis were mostly mild or moderate, with lower discontinuations due to adverse events in the tapinarof groups than with vehicle. LIMITATIONS: Long-term efficacy was not assessed. CONCLUSION: Tapinarof demonstrated highly significant efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability in a diverse population of patients with AD down to 2 years of age.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Crema para la Piel , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Adolescente , Crema para la Piel/administración & dosificación , Crema para la Piel/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Lactante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Resorcinoles/administración & dosificación , Resorcinoles/efectos adversos , Prurito/etiología , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Preescolar , Anciano , EstilbenosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clascoterone cream 1% is a topical androgen receptor inhibitor approved to treat acne vulgaris in patients =>12 years of age. This report provides details of patients who developed laboratory signs of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression without clinical signs of adrenal suppression during the clascoterone development program. METHODS: Two open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 trials evaluated HPA axis suppression in patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris. Study 1 (NCT01831960) enrolled cohorts of adults =>18 years of age and adolescents =>12 to <18 years of age. Study 2 (NCT02720627) enrolled adolescents 9 to <12 years of age. Patients applied clascoterone twice daily at maximum-exposure dosages for 14 days. Adrenal suppression was evaluated via cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) at baseline and day 14. Patients with an abnormal CST result (serum cortisol level =<18 µg/dL) had a follow-up CST approximately 4 weeks later. Blood was collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Other safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examination/vital signs, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: Overall, 5/69 clascoterone-treated patients had an abnormal CST result on day 14, including 1/20 adults, 2/22 patients aged =>12 to <18 years, and 2/27 patients aged 9 to <12 years. All patients had normal cortisol levels at follow-up testing approximately 4 weeks later. No relationship was observed between abnormal CST results and clascoterone plasma concentrations or the amount of study drug applied. No clinically relevant AEs or clinically significant changes in safety measures were observed in patients with adrenal suppression. CONCLUSION: Clascoterone induced laboratory evidence of mild, reversible HPA axis suppression under maximum-use exposure. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):433-437. doi:10.36849/JDD.7997.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Hidrocortisona , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisario , Sistema Hipófiso-Suprarrenal , Humanos , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisario/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Hipófiso-Suprarrenal/efectos de los fármacos , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Niño , Adulto Joven , Hidrocortisona/sangre , Cortodoxona/administración & dosificación , Cortodoxona/análogos & derivados , Cortodoxona/sangre , Administración Cutánea , Crema para la Piel/administración & dosificación , Crema para la Piel/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cosintropina/administración & dosificación , PropionatosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clascoterone cream 1% is approved for the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients aged 12 years or older based on results from two identical pivotal Phase 3 trials. Integrated efficacy of clascoterone in patients aged 12 years or older with acne vulgaris from the pivotal trials (NCT02608450 and NCT02608476) and long-term extension (LTE) study (NCT02682264) is reported. METHODS: In the pivotal trials, patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris were randomized 1:1 to twice-daily application of clascoterone cream 1% or vehicle for 12 weeks; they could then enter the LTE study, where all patients applied clascoterone to the face and, if desired, trunk for up to 9 additional months. Efficacy was assessed from treatment success based on Investigator's Global Assessment scores (IGA 0/1) in patients aged 12 years or older in the intention-to-treat population; lesion counts were assessed through week 12. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation in the pivotal studies and were not imputed in the LTE study. RESULTS: Of 1421 patients enrolled, 1143 (clascoterone, 576; vehicle, 567) completed week 12; 600 entered and 343 completed the LTE study. The treatment success rate and most lesion count reductions following clascoterone vs placebo treatment reached statistical significance at week 12; the overall treatment success rate increased to 30.2% for facial acne after 12 months and 31.7% for truncal acne after 9 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of clascoterone cream 1% for the treatment of acne vulgaris continued to increase over time for up to 12 months in patients aged 12 years or older with acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1278-1283. doi:10.36849/JDD.7719.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Propionatos , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Cortodoxona , EmolientesRESUMEN
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing–remitting disease with a multifactorial etiology involving epidermal barrier and immunologic dysfunction. Topical therapies form the mainstay of AD treatment, but options are limited by adverse effects and restrictions on application site, duration, and extent of use. Tapinarof (VTAMA; Dermavant Sciences, Inc.) is a first-in-class, non-steroidal, topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. AhR is a ligand-dependent transcription factor with wide-ranging roles, including regulation of homeostasis and immune response in skin cells. AhR expression and signaling are altered in many inflammatory skin diseases, and clinical trials with tapinarof have validated AhR as a therapeutic target capable of delivering significant efficacy. Tapinarof cream 1% once daily demonstrated efficacy versus vehicle in adults and adolescents with AD and is being investigated in the ADORING trials for the treatment of AD in adults and children down to 2 years of age. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(2):23-28. doi:10.36849/JDD.8026.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Estilbenos , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Hidrocarburo de Aril/agonistas , Resorcinoles , PielRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A once-daily, three-pronged approach using an antibiotic, antibacterial, and retinoid may provide faster acne improvement versus monotherapy or dual-combination products. This post hoc analysis compared threshold acne lesion reductions with clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% (CAB) gel—the first FDA-approved triple-combination topical acne product—to its dyads and vehicle. METHODS: Phase 2 (N=741; NCT03170388) and phase 3 (N=183; N=180; NCT04214639; NCT04214652), double-blind, 12-week studies randomized participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne to once-daily CAB or vehicle gel; the phase 2 study included three additional dyad gel arms. The pooled percentage of participants achieving ≥33%, ≥50%, and ≥75% reduction in inflammatory and noninflammatory acne lesions was evaluated. RESULTS: As early as week 4 in the phase 2 study, ≥33% reduction in inflammatory lesions occurred in a significantly greater percentage of CAB gel-treated participants (82.7%) than with the 3 dyads and vehicle (61.1-69.8%; P<0.05, all). These early reductions were sustained throughout the study, with significantly (P<0.05) more CAB-treated participants achieving ≥50% reduction in inflammatory lesions versus dyads and vehicle from weeks 4-12. By week 12, CAB led to substantial reductions of ≥75% in significantly more participants than dyads and vehicle (65.8% vs 49.9-51.2% and 21.6%; P<0.05, all). Similar trends were observed for noninflammatory lesions in the phase 2 study and for inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions in the phase 3 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion count reductions were significantly greater with CAB versus its dyads and vehicle gel as early as week 4, with substantial reductions observed after 12 weeks of treatment. This faster-acting and sustained efficacy of CAB gel—coupled with its optimized formulation, once-daily dosing, and tolerability—may positively impact treatment adherence. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(3): doi:10.36849/JDD.7907.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Combinación Adapaleno y Peróxido de Benzoílo , Clindamicina , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , NiñoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concise patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments addressing the consequences of facial acne vulgaris (AV) on patients’ functioning and activities of daily living (ADL) are needed. METHODS: A 12-week, single-arm, prospective cohort study was conducted in patients ≥9 years old with moderate/severe non-nodular facial AV prescribed sarecycline as part of usual care. The primary endpoint included AV-specific patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes assessed with the expert panel questionnaire (EPQ, developed by 10 experts using a Delphi method) in patients (>12 years) and caregivers (for patients 9-11 years). Additional assessments included parental/caregiver perspectives on children’s AV. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients completed the study. Following 12-weeks of treatment, there were significant (P ≤.0001) changes from baseline in the proportion of patients responding that they never or rarely: felt angry (31.6%), worried about AV worsening (28.9%), had thoughts about AV (20.9%), had a certain level of worries about AV (38.7%), altered their social media/selfie activity (23.7%), had an impact on real-life plans due to AV (22.9%), made efforts to hide AV (21.3%), felt picked-on/judged due to AV (15.0%), were concerned about their ability to reach future goals due to AV (13.8%), or had sleep impacted due to AV (18.2%). No significant change from baseline was observed for parent/caregiver’s understanding of the child’s AV concerns, from both patient and parent/caregiver perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Over 12 weeks of AV management with oral sarecycline, patients reported significant reductions in AV-related effects on emotional/social functioning and ADL as measured by the EPQ, a simple PRO with potential for use in clinical practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:1(Suppl 1):s4-11.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Interacción Social , Tetraciclinas , Niño , Humanos , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are emerging as a fundamental component of disease impact assessment in acne vulgaris (AV), complementing clinician-reported outcomes. No data is available on PROs for patients with AV using sarecycline in real-world settings. METHODS: A single-arm, prospective cohort study that included patients ≥9 years old diagnosed with moderate or severe non-nodular AV was implemented as part of routine care in clinical practices (N=30). Patients received oral sarecycline (60 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg) for 12 weeks, as part of usual care. The primary endpoint was Acne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS) responses from patients (≥12 years) and caregivers (for patients 9-11 years) at week 12 and change from baseline (CFB). Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of AV severity and adverse events (AEs) were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients with AV completed the study (adults: 60.1%, females: 77.6%). ASIS mean scores significantly decreased (P <.0001) at week 12 for: signs (mean CFB ± standard deviation [SD]: –0.8 ± 0.7), impact (–1.0 ± 1.0), emotional impact (–1.2 ± 1.1), and social impact (0.6 ± 1.1). Significant reductions in AV severity (P <.0001) were reported by patients and caregivers. The IGA success rate was 58.9% and physician satisfaction with treatment outcomes was 88.1%. A total of 31 (10.3%) patients reported ≥1 AE during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate-to-severe AV receiving acne management with an oral antibiotic for 12 weeks experienced a significant improvement in AV-related symptoms and psychosocial burden. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:1(Suppl 1):s12-18.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Tetraciclinas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inmunoglobulina A/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Malaria, Zika virus, West Nile virus, Dengue fever, and Lyme disease are common causes of morbidity and mortality around the world. While arthropod bites may cause local inflammation and discomfort, a greater concern is the potential to develop deadly systemic infection. The use of insect repellents (IRs) to prevent systemic infections constitutes a fundamental public health effort. Cost effectiveness, availability, and high efficacy against arthropod vectors are key characteristics of an ideal IR. Currently, numerous IRs are available on the market, with N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) being the most widely used. DEET has an excellent safety profile and remarkable protection against mosquitoes and various other arthropods. Other Environmental Protection Agency-registered IR ingredients (eg, permethrin, picaridin, IR3535, oil of lemon eucalyptus, oil of citronella, catnip oil, and 2-undecanone) are alternative IRs of great interest because some of these ingredients have efficacies comparable to that of DEET. These alternative IRs possess low toxicity and favorable customer experiences in use (eg, cosmetically pleasant, naturally occurring). This review summarizes the currently available Environmental Protection Agency-registered IRs, including their origins, mechanisms of action, side effect profiles, and available formulations. This review will enable the clinician to select the best IR option to meet a patient's needs and provide the greatest protection from arthropod bites and their sequelae.
Asunto(s)
Culicidae , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos , Repelentes de Insectos , Infección por el Virus Zika , Virus Zika , Animales , Humanos , Repelentes de Insectos/efectos adversos , DEET/efectos adversos , Mosquitos Vectores , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Eczema (also called atopic dermatitis) is a chronic, relapsing skin disease characterized by erythema, scaling, and pruritus. METHODS: Study 1. A double-blind, uncontrolled study in patients with mild-moderate eczema, ≥2 flares in prior 2 months, and baseline Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score ≤15. Participants applied Eczema Flare-Up Relief Cream (EFRC) (N=65) BID for 56 days. Efficacy was assessed by SCORAD, patient-oriented SCORAD, skin sensitivity, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and digital photography. Standard safety assessments were performed. STUDY 2: A 21-day open study of EFRC (N=50) to evaluate tolerability as well as its effect on eczema. Results: Study 1. EFRC significantly reduced overall SCORAD scores from baseline to day 56 (11.6 to 4.9, or a 57% reduction). The patient-oriented SCORAD was reduced from 18.6 to 6.8 from baseline to day 56. At day 56, itch and pain improved in 70.4% of children and 62% of adults. DLQI scores were decreased by 75% in adults and 61% in children by day 56. Global skin sensitivity, assessed by the Sensiscale 10-item questionnaire, was 13.1 at baseline and 3.6 at day 56, an improvement of 72%. STUDY 2: EFRC improved eczema-prone skin after 7 and 21 days. Conclusions: Study 1 showed that EFRC had good efficacy with significant reductions in overall SCORAD scores and subscores for the extent and intensity of eczema and subjective symptoms. Skin sensitivity also improved along with quality of life. Studies 2-3 also had significantly positive results and good tolerability. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22:10(Suppl 2):s5-9.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Eccema , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Prurito/diagnóstico , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/etiología , Emolientes/uso terapéutico , Eccema/diagnóstico , Eccema/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Pediatric psoriasis (PsO) and its associated comorbidities carry physical and psychosocial burdens in children and adolescents, which can negatively impact quality of life. However, features distinguishing pediatric PsO from eczema and other common inflammatory skin diseases may not be obvious to primary care providers, which may contribute to underrecognition and misdiagnosis. Accurate diagnosis of pediatric PsO is critical for managing the physical and psychological burdens associated with this disease. This review aims to support pediatricians with enough information to confidently diagnose pediatric PsO, assess associated physical and mental health comorbidities, and recommend first-line treatment options for children with mild to moderate PsO. To accomplish this, we provide information that distinguishes the appearance and symptoms of pediatric PsO from other common pediatric skin conditions. In addition, comorbidities and some of the mental health challenges associated with pediatric PsO are reviewed to help pediatricians provide appropriate care for patients in their clinical practice. Hebert AA, Browning J, Kwong PC, et al. Diagnosis and management of pediatric psoriasis: an overview for pediatricians. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(8):742-752. doi:10.36849/JDD.7531.
Asunto(s)
Psoriasis , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , PediatrasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pediatric acne is a common, complex, multifactorial inflammatory skin disease with various expressions in childhood that can be categorized by age, severity, and pubertal status. METHODS: The Faces of Pediatric Acne Project (FoPAP) aims to improve patient outcomes. The FoPAP group developed an algorithm that follows a consensus paper and a clinical case series on pediatric acne by applying the selected literature and drawing from the clinical knowledge and experience of each group member. RESULTS: The algorithm addresses neonatal, infantile, mid-childhood, preadolescent, and adolescent acne and starts with education on acne, general measures for prevention, treatment, maintenance, and ongoing skin care. Evaluation of pediatric acne requires a directed medical history and physical examination. For mid-childhood acne patients, a workup is warranted, and endocrine-associated abnormalities necessitate referral to a pediatric dermatologist. The second section of the algorithm identifies the type of pediatric acne, followed by the third section on acne treatment using a prescription or nonprescription treatment and skincare options. After successfully controlling the disease, maintenance treatment with topical agents and skincare using gentle cleansers and moisturizers containing lipids such as ceramides is important. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric acne algorithm offers a comprehensive approach to treating and maintaining pediatric acne. In addition, it may support healthcare providers to bring more attention to pediatric acne patients and improve outcomes. Schachner LA, Andriessen A, Latanya Benjamin L, et al. The many faces of pediatric acne: a practical algorithm for treatment, maintenance therapy, and skincare recommendations for pediatric acne patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(6):539-545. doi:10.36849/JDD.7440 .
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Recién Nacido , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados de la Piel , Algoritmos , ConsensoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clascoterone cream 1% is approved for the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients aged ≥ 12 years based on results from two 12-week Phase 3 studies in patients with moderate-to-severe acne. Safety and efficacy of clascoterone in patients aged ≥ 12 years from an open-label, long-term extension study are presented. Methods: Enrolled patients applied clascoterone cream 1% twice daily to the entire face and, if desired by the patient and/or investigator, truncal acne, for up to 9 months. Patients achieving Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) could stop treatment and resume if/when acne worsened. Safety was assessed from treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and local skin reactions (LSRs [telangiectasia, skin atrophy, striae rubrae, erythema, edema, scaling/dryness, stinging/burning, and pruritus]) in all treated patients. Efficacy was assessed from IGA at each visit among those completing the study per-protocol (PP); face and trunk were evaluated individually. Results: Of 600 patients aged ≥ 12 years (original randomization: 311 clascoterone, 289 vehicle), 343 completed the extension study (177 clascoterone, 166 vehicle). There were 187 TEAEs in 108/598 clascoterone-treated patients (18.1%), including 56/311 (18.0%) and 52/287 (18.1%) patients originally randomized to clascoterone and vehicle, respectively; the most common LSRs (previous clascoterone/vehicle) were erythema (face, 8.0%/7.7%) and scaling/dryness (face, 10.0%/7.3%). The percentage of PP patients with facial and truncal IGA 0/1 increased to 48.9% (156/319) and 52.4% (65/124), respectively, at study end. CONCLUSIONS: Clascoterone cream 1% maintained a favorable safety and efficacy profile for up to 12 months in patients aged ≥ 12 years. Eichenfield LF, Hebert AA, Stein Gold L, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of twice-daily topical clascoterone cream 1% in patients ≥ 12 years of age with acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(8):810-816. doi:10.36849/JDD.7592.
Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Niño , Humanos , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Acné Vulgar/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Emolientes/efectos adversos , Eritema/inducido químicamente , Eritema/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Crema para la Piel/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , AdolescenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This subgroup analysis of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 trial (NCT03732807) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral, selective dual JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA) in patients aged 12-17 years. METHODS: In ALLEGRO-2b/3, patients aged ≥12 years with AA and ≥50% scalp hair loss received once-daily ritlecitinib 50 or 30 mg (±4-week 200-mg loading dose) or 10 mg or placebo for 24 weeks. In a subsequent 24-week extension period, ritlecitinib groups continued their doses, and patients initially assigned to placebo switched to 200/50 or 50 mg daily. Clinician- and patient-reported hair regrowth outcomes and safety were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 105 adolescents were randomized. At Week 24, 17%-28% of adolescents achieved a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20 (≤20% scalp without hair) in the ritlecitinib 30 mg and higher treatment groups versus 0% for placebo. At Week 48, 25%-50% of patients had a SALT score ≤20 across ritlecitinib treatment groups (30 mg and higher). Adolescents reporting that their AA "moderately" or "greatly" improved were 45%-61% in the ritlecitinib groups (30 mg and higher) (vs. 10%-22% for placebo) at Week 24 and 44%-80% at Week 48. The most common adverse events in adolescents were headache, acne, and nasopharyngitis. No deaths, major adverse cardiovascular events, malignancies, pulmonary embolisms, opportunistic infections, or herpes zoster infections were reported. CONCLUSION: Ritlecitinib treatment demonstrated clinician-reported efficacy, patient-reported improvement, and an acceptable safety profile through Week 48 in adolescents with AA with ≥50% scalp hair loss.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Adolescente , Humanos , Alopecia Areata/tratamiento farmacológico , Carbazoles/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Methotrexate (MTX) is a readily accessible drug, first used in 1948 and employed for a wide variety of indications since then. However, despite widespread off-label use, FDA labeling does not include approved indications for the use of MTX for many inflammatory skin diseases in pediatric patients, including morphea, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and alopecia areata, among others. Without published treatment guidelines, some clinicians may be hesitant to use MTX off-label, or uncomfortable prescribing MTX in this population. To address this unmet need, an expert consensus committee was convened to develop evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for use of MTX to treat pediatric inflammatory skin disease. Clinicians with experience and expertise in clinical research, drug development, and treating inflammatory skin disease in pediatric patients with MTX were recruited. Five committees were created based on major topic areas: (1) indications and contraindications, (2) dosing, (3) interactions with immunizations and medications, (4) adverse effects (potential for and management of), and (5) monitoring needs. Pertinent questions were generated and addressed by the relevant committee. The entire group participated in a modified Delphi process to establish agreement on recommendations for each question. The committee developed 46 evidence- and consensus-based recommendations, each with >70% agreement among members, across all five topics. These are presented in tables and text, along with a discussion of supporting literature, and level of evidence. These evidence- and consensus-based recommendations will support safe and effective use of MTX for the underserved population of pediatric patients who may benefit from this valuable, time-honored medication.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Psoriasis , Humanos , Niño , Metotrexato , Consenso , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Atópica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple non-invasive modalities have become popular alternatives to surgical procedures for body contouring. OBJECTIVE: To analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with non-invasive body contouring devices reported through the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The MAUDE database were queried for AEs associated with non-invasive body contouring devices between January 2011 and June 2021. An extensive list of keywords and brand and manufacturer names was used. RESULTS: A total of 1,325 reports with 1,590 AEs were identified among 6 modalities. More than 70% were reported in the past 5 years. Cryolipolysis made up 38.3% reports, which mostly pertained to paradoxical hyperplasia and hernias. Radiofrequency had the most reports (41.9%). Like laser devices, most of their reports described burns. Focused ultrasound was commonly associated with unintentional fat loss and surface irregularities. Focused electromagnetic field resulted in only 7 reports. CONCLUSION: The analysis of present study supports previous studies concerning common local symptoms caused by these devices, but it also reveals complications not reported in previous device studies. This study highlights the importance of proper technique and adherence to device guidelines. Practitioners should be knowledgeable of potential complications from each device to both prevent and manage them accordingly.
Asunto(s)
Contorneado Corporal , Contorneado Corporal/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Information is limited on the relationship between skin clearance, resolution of challenging body areas, and improvement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in pediatric psoriasis. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients aged 6 to <18 years. This study examines improvement in psoriasis clearance in challenging body areas in pediatric patients relative to health-related quality of life. METHODS: Data from the IXORA-PEDS trial (NCT03073200) were analyzed, and changes from baseline were measured for overall Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), static Physicians' Global Assessment of psoriasis (sPGA), Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI), Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PPASI), and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index. Rates of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), or Children's DLQI (CDLQI), scores of 0 or 1 were evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: Higher rates of DLQI/CDLQI (0,1) scores were significantly associated with greater PASI and PSSI responses at both Week 12 and Week 48 (p < .0001). A significant association was also observed between DLQI/CDLQI (0,1) and sPGA scores (p < .0001). Significantly higher rates of DLQI/CDLQI (0,1) scores were achieved in patients with greater levels of palmoplantar clearance as measured by PPASI at Week 12 (p = .0139), but significance was not sustained at Week 48 (p = .0896). CONCLUSIONS: Greater skin clearance and scalp resolution are associated with better PROs over a short-term (12-week) and long-term (48-week) period. This demonstrates that greater improvement of skin clearance and scalp resolution may benefit quality of life in pediatric patients with psoriasis.
Asunto(s)
Psoriasis , Calidad de Vida , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome is a superficial blistering disorder caused by exfoliative toxin-releasing strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Bacterial toxins are released hematogenously, and after a prodromal fever and exquisite tenderness of skin, patients present with tender erythroderma and flaccid bullae with subsequent superficial generalized exfoliation. The head-to-toe directed exfoliation lasts up to 10 to 14 days without scarring after proper treatment. Children younger than 6 years are predominantly affected because of their lack of toxin-neutralizing antibodies and the immature renal system's inability to excrete the causative exotoxins. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and essential primary skin lesions used to diagnose staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome are summarized for the pediatric emergency medicine physician.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Síndrome Estafilocócico de la Piel Escaldada , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Piel/patología , Síndrome Estafilocócico de la Piel Escaldada/diagnóstico , Síndrome Estafilocócico de la Piel Escaldada/patología , Síndrome Estafilocócico de la Piel Escaldada/terapia , Staphylococcus aureusRESUMEN
Importance: Once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.3%, a potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in a phase 2b trial of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of roflumilast cream, 0.3%, applied once daily for 8 weeks in 2 trials of patients with plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trials (DERMIS-1 [trial 1; n = 439] and DERMIS-2 [trial 2; n = 442]) were conducted at 40 centers (trial 1) and 39 centers (trial 2) in the US and Canada between December 9, 2019, and November 16, 2020, and between December 9, 2019, and November 23, 2020, respectively. Patients aged 2 years or older with plaque psoriasis involving 2% to 20% of body surface area were enrolled. The dates of final follow-up were November 20, 2020, and November 23, 2020, for trial 1 and trial 2, respectively. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive roflumilast cream, 0.3% (trial 1: n = 286; trial 2: n = 290), or vehicle cream (trial 1: n = 153; trial 2: n = 152) once daily for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success (clear or almost clear status plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline [score range, 0-4]) at week 8, analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by site, baseline IGA score, and intertriginous involvement. There were 9 secondary outcomes, including intertriginous IGA success, 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale score of 4 or higher at baseline achieving 4-point reduction (WI-NRS success) at week 8 (scale: 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst imaginable itch]; minimum clinically important difference, 4 points). Results: Among 881 participants (mean age, 47.5 years; 320 [36.3%] female), mean IGA scores in trial 1 were 2.9 [SD, 0.52] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.45] for vehicle and in trial 2 were 2.9 [SD, 0.48] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.47]) for vehicle. Statistically significantly greater percentages of roflumilast-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients had IGA success at week 8 (trial 1: 42.4% vs 6.1%; difference, 39.6% [95% CI, 32.3%-46.9%]; trial 2: 37.5% vs 6.9%; difference, 28.9% [95% CI, 20.8%-36.9%]; P < .001 for both). Of 9 secondary end points, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast vs vehicle were observed for 8 in trial 1 and 9 in trial 2, including intertriginous IGA success (71.2% vs 13.8%; difference, 66.5% [95% CI, 47.1%-85.8%] and 68.1% vs 18.5%; difference, 51.6% [95% CI, 29.3%-73.8%]; P < .001 for both), 75% reduction in PASI score (41.6% vs 7.6%; difference, 36.1% [95% CI, 28.5%-43.8%] and 39.0% vs 5.3%; difference, 32.4% [95% CI, 24.9%-39.8%]; P < .001 for both), WI-NRS success (67.5% vs 26.8%; difference, 42.6% [95% CI, 31.3%-53.8%] and 69.4% vs 35.6%; difference, 30.2% [95% CI, 18.2%-42.2%]; P < .001 for both). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 25.2% with roflumilast vs 23.5% with vehicle in trial 1 and 25.9% with roflumilast vs 18.4% with vehicle in trial 2. The incidence of serious adverse events was 0.7% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 1 and 0% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 2. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, treatment with roflumilast cream, 0.3%, compared with vehicle cream resulted in better clinical status at 8 weeks. Further research is needed to assess efficacy compared with other active treatments and to assess longer-term efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04211363, NCT04211389.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4 , Psoriasis , Aminopiridinas/administración & dosificación , Aminopiridinas/efectos adversos , Aminopiridinas/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Benzamidas/uso terapéutico , Ciclopropanos/administración & dosificación , Ciclopropanos/efectos adversos , Ciclopropanos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/uso terapéutico , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/etiología , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Crema para la Piel/administración & dosificación , Crema para la Piel/efectos adversos , Crema para la Piel/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Impetigo is a contagious bacterial infection that affects the superficial skin layers. Increasing worldwide antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to existing topical agents commonly prescribed to treat impetigo is central to treatment failure. The Worldwide Health Organization developed a global action plan on AMR, but omitted information about AMR stewardship programs for topical antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: The review aims to provide information to clinicians and stakeholders regarding AMR and antimicrobial stewardship on topical antimicrobial drugs for impetigo treatment. METHODS: The literature searches reviewed the status of AMR to current topical antibiotics in impetigo, current therapeutic behavior, and concordance with antimicrobial stewardship principles. Two international panels convened to discuss the output of the searches, and the results of the panel discussions were used in the development of the manuscript. RESULTS: The literature search included clinical trials, research studies, clinical guidelines, consensus papers, and reviews (if they provided original data), published between January 2008 and May 2019. The articles were selected based on clinical relevancy of impetigo management, clinical efficacy, and safety of the treatment and antimicrobial resistance. The searches resulted in one-hundred and ninety-eight articles. After applying the eligibility criteria, nineteen articles met inclusion criteria and were considered in the present review. CONCLUSIONS: While published antimicrobial stewardship guidelines have focused on systemic antibiotics, few studies have attempted to evaluate topical antibiotic prescribing practices for impetigo treatment. Many of the topical impetigo treatments currently in use have developed resistance. The appropriate use of topical ozenoxacin can help eradicate impetigo while minimizing AMR.J Drugs Dermatol. 20(4):366-372. doi:10.36849/JDD.5795.