[Low-intensity Psychiatric Expert Monitoring and Counseling of Unemployed: Presentation of the Gütersloh Pilot Project]. / Gesundheitscoach ­ Niedrigschwellige Begleitung von psychisch belasteten Arbeitslosengeld II Empfängern: Darstellung des Gütersloher Pilotprojekts.

OBJECTIVE: Psychological problems are highly prevalent in unemployed people and can lead to impairments in several areas of life. Programs to support and assist those affected, especially the long-term unemployed, are scarce. Reservations by those affected present an additional barrier with respect to health care utilisation. The authors designed a collaborative care cooperation project between a local job center and a psychiatric clinic with the aims of counselling unemployed people with psychological distress as well as offering continuing psychosocial care if required. METHOD: This paper presents the methodological design, clinical procedure as well as a preliminary evaluation of the pilot phase. RESULTS: Within the first 12 months of the pilot phase, 57 long-term unemployed were enrolled in the project. Subjective psychological distress in the sample was comparable with other studies reporting high rates of psychological problems in the unemployed. The psychosocial intervention was well accepted not only by the unemployed but also by case managers and led to high re-assignment rates (n=37) to complementary services within the psychosocial health care system. CONCLUSION: Unemployment and psychological distress should be addressed together within collaborative care projects that can positively affect the negative interaction between unemployment and psychological distress. Low-intensity psychological interventions are well suited to address barriers that hinder health care utilization and to offer person-centered, psychological assistance.

[Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (LI-CBT) - An Introduction in Concepts and Framework]. / Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (LI-CBT) ­ Eine Einführung in Konzepte und Rahmenbedingungen.

Low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (LI-CBT) depicts interventions that aim at increasing access to evidence-based psychological therapies. This is achieved by (1) reducing the amount of time in which the practitioner is in contact with individual patients, (2) using practitioners that have been specifically trained to deliver low intensity interventions and without any prior formal health professional qualifications and (3) use of interventions with varying intensity. Stepped care and collaborative care constitute the organizational frame to deliver low-intensity interventions. Whereas large-scale research and health service projects abroad are focussing on LI-CBT, research in German is lagging far behind. Particularly in the light of the growing demands and utilization of mental health care as well as governmental claims to develop and evaluate new forms of providing mental health services, LI-CBT represents a promising approach.

[German translation of Suicidal Patient Observation Chart (SPOC) - an instrument for practice]. / Deutsche Übersetzung des Suicidal Patient Observation Charts (SPOC) - ein Instrument für die Praxis.

Nursing of suicidal in-patients is a complex and responsible task. A direct and immediate intensive caring and therapeutic supervision, also known as special observation is still recommended in guidelines (DGPPN, 2012) and maybe one of the most used interventions in the caring of suicidal patients in inpatient settings. It involves many kinds to develop the relationship between the observer and the patient. The original SPOC was developed in Sweden with the aim to increase the quality of a systematically documentation during the supervision of suicidal patients. It is an instrument to ensure systematic documentation of observational behavior or noticeable mood during acute suicidal crisis, for example feelings like "worried, anxious" or other possible influencing factors like "sudden mood variation". By this means the SPOC can ensure the process of systematic documentation of special observation and increase its quality, i. e. who documented what at what time. Furthermore SPOC can facilitate a better communication of the observation process to the multidisciplinary team and to the patient as well. The SPOC includes the 28 items and covers 24 separate observation periods. The aim of this paper is to constitute the translation process from the English to the German SPOC version. The translation process followed a five step model. In the first step the English version was translated from two German native speakers. In the second step, the first two translation results where discussed by the Expert group (authors) and a new version was developed. In the third step the first german version was translated back (two English native Speakers) into English. The fourth step was taken, to review the results by the expert groups (authors) and set up the so called "pre version". The last step includes the proof of content validity by 52 nurses. The proof was able to identify a few misunderstandings and helped to enhance the tool in its final version. With the translation, the German-speaking nursing practice in psychiatry has a tool that can be used by psychiatric nurses regarding their complex interventions to be undertaken in this special group of patients.

[Special observation in inpatient treatment of people with mental illness]. / Die intensive Überwachung von Patienten in der stationären psychiatrischen Akutversorgung.

OBJECTIVE: To report the state of research about special observation and to develop implications for the German-speaking countries. METHODS: Systematic literature search. RESULTS: The literature consists mainly of descriptive studies. There are no standardized approaches. Use of assistants can have a negative impact on quality of the intervention and may result in an accumulation and change of measures. Nurses play a responsible role in special observation. There are different experiences and perceptions of patients and nurses. Special observation includes both therapeutic and non-therapeutic components. CONCLUSIONS: The focus should be on therapeutic aspects of observation; particularly involvement and development of hope. Observation might restrict personal freedom and should be used as rarely as possible. Strengthening nurses in decision-making is associated with increased quality. More research is needed regarding the effectiveness, the frequency of utilization and opportunities for prevention. The importance of observation is in contrast to the lack of relevant data.