RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preoperative goals of care (GOC) and code status (CS) discussions are important in achieving an in-depth understanding of the patient's care goals in the setting of a serious illness, enabling the clinician to ensure patient autonomy and shared decision making. Past studies have shown that anesthesiologists are not formally trained in leading these discussions and may lack the necessary skill set. We created an innovative online video curriculum designed to teach these skills. This curriculum was compared to a traditional method of learning from reading the medical literature. METHODS: In this bi-institutional randomized controlled trial at 2 major academic medical centers, 60 anesthesiology trainees were randomized to receive the educational content in 1 of 2 formats: (1) the novel video curriculum (video group) or (2) journal articles (reading group). Thirty residents were assigned to the experimental video curriculum group, and 30 were assigned to the reading group. The content incorporated into the 2 formats focused on general preoperative evaluation of patients and communication strategies pertaining to GOC and CS discussions. Residents in both groups underwent a pre- and postintervention objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with standardized patients. Both OSCEs were scored using the same 24-point rubric. Score changes between the 2 OSCEs were examined using linear regression, and interrater reliability was assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Residents receiving the video curriculum performed significantly better overall on the OSCE encounter, with a mean score of 4.19 compared to 3.79 in the reading group. The video curriculum group also demonstrated statistically significant increased scores on 8 of 24 rubric categories when compared to the reading group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel video curriculum led to significant increases in resident performance during simulated GOC discussions and modest increases during CS discussions. Further development and refinement of this curriculum are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum/tendencias , Toma de Decisiones Asistida por Computador , Educación a Distancia/tendencias , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/tendencias , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Atención Perioperativa/tendencias , Anestesiología/educación , Anestesiología/métodos , Anestesiología/tendencias , Competencia Clínica , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/tendencias , Masculino , Atención Perioperativa/educación , Atención Perioperativa/métodosRESUMEN
Simulation-based education is often highlighted as a method to prepare health personnel to handle clinical emergencies through repeated training and the design of supports. As one of the most common clinical emergencies in anaesthesia, anaphylaxis is often included in simulation scenarios at both graduate and postgraduate levels. Case reviews of anaphylaxis management continue to identify deficiencies in clinical responses. We evaluated the evidence to support the use of simulation to address these deficiencies. We undertook a comprehensive review of the MEDLINE and Embase databases with MESH terms 'Anaphylaxis', 'Anaesthesia', 'Simulation training', and variations of these terms. Articles were also searched from reference lists in the identified papers. A total of 39 articles on perioperative anaphylaxis simulation were identified, with most focusing on the clinical skills of individuals. However, anaphylaxis scenarios are also being used in assessment of teams and in the evaluation of broader system performance. Many countries mandate simulation training and competency assessment at graduate and postgraduate levels: despite this, none of the articles linked simulation training or assessment with improved patient management or outcomes. We found evidence that in situ simulation and use of cognitive aids lead to improved teamwork and task performace. Quantitative and qualitative evidence for simulation-based perioperative training is limited. Future studies should investigate whether simulation training in perioperative anaphylaxis, particularly in situ simulation, translates into improved patient management and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/terapia , Anestesiología/educación , Competencia Clínica , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Simulación de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Educación en Enfermería , HumanosRESUMEN
Suspected perioperative allergic reactions are often severe. To avoid potentially life-threatening re-exposure to the culprit drug, establishing a firm diagnosis and identifying the culprit is crucial. Drug provocation tests are considered the gold standard in drug allergy investigation but have not been recommended in the investigation of perioperative allergy, mainly because of the pharmacological effects of drugs such as induction agents and neuromuscular blocking agents. Some specialised centres have reported benefits of provocation testing in perioperative allergy investigation, but the literature on the subject is limited. Here we provide a status update on the use of drug provocation testing in perioperative allergy, including its use in specific drug groups. This review is based on a literature search and experiences of the authors comprising anaesthesiologists and allergists with experience in perioperative allergy investigation. In addition, 19 participating centres in the International Suspected Perioperative Allergic Reaction Group were surveyed on the use of provocation testing in perioperative allergy investigation. A response was received from 13 centres in eight European countries, New Zealand, and the USA. Also, 21 centres from the Australian and New Zealand Anaesthetic Allergy Group were surveyed. Two centres performed provocation routinely and seven centres performed no provocations at all. Nearly half of the centres reported performing provocations with induction agents and neuromuscular blocking agents. Drug provocation testing is being used in perioperative allergy investigation in specialised centres, but collaborations between relevant specialties and multicentre studies are necessary to determine indications and establish common testing protocols.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Técnicas In Vitro/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , HumanosRESUMEN
Suspected perioperative allergic reactions are rare but can be life-threatening. The diagnosis is difficult to make in the perioperative setting, but prompt recognition and correct treatment is necessary to ensure a good outcome. A group of 26 international experts in perioperative allergy (anaesthesiologists, allergists, and immunologists) contributed to a modified Delphi consensus process, which covered areas such as differential diagnosis, management during and after anaphylaxis, allergy investigations, and plans for a subsequent anaesthetic. They were asked to rank the appropriateness of statements related to the immediate management of suspected perioperative allergic reactions. Statements were selected to represent areas where there is a lack of consensus in existing guidelines, such as dosing of epinephrine and fluids, the management of impending cardiac arrest, and reactions refractory to standard treatment. The results of the modified Delphi consensus process have been included in the recommendations on the management of suspected perioperative allergic reactions. This paper provides anaesthetists with an overview of relevant knowledge on the immediate and postoperative management of suspected perioperative allergic reactions based on current literature and expert opinion. In addition, it provides practical advice and recommendations in areas where consensus has been lacking in existing guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/terapia , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Internacionalidad , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions are rare but contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of surgical procedures. Recent publications have highlighted the differences between countries concerning the respective risk of different drugs, and changes in patterns of causal agents and the emergence of new allergens. This review summarises recent information on the epidemiology of perioperative hypersensitivity reactions, with specific consideration of differences between geographic areas for the most frequently involved offending agents.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , HumanosAsunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Endoscopía , Sedación Consciente , Humanos , Hipnóticos y SedantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Operating-room crises (e.g., cardiac arrest and massive hemorrhage) are common events in large hospitals but can be rare for individual clinicians. Successful management is difficult and complex. We sought to evaluate a tool to improve adherence to evidence-based best practices during such events. METHODS: Operating-room teams from three institutions (one academic medical center and two community hospitals) participated in a series of surgical-crisis scenarios in a simulated operating room. Each team was randomly assigned to manage half the scenarios with a set of crisis checklists and the remaining scenarios from memory alone. The primary outcome measure was failure to adhere to critical processes of care. Participants were also surveyed regarding their perceptions of the usefulness and clinical relevance of the checklists. RESULTS: A total of 17 operating-room teams participated in 106 simulated surgical-crisis scenarios. Failure to adhere to lifesaving processes of care was less common during simulations when checklists were available (6% of steps missed when checklists were available vs. 23% when they were unavailable, P<0.001). The results were similar in a multivariate model that accounted for clustering within teams, with adjustment for institution, scenario, and learning and fatigue effects (adjusted relative risk, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.42; P<0.001). Every team performed better when the crisis checklists were available than when they were not. A total of 97% of the participants reported that if one of these crises occurred while they were undergoing an operation, they would want the checklist used. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-fidelity simulation study, checklist use was associated with significant improvement in the management of operating-room crises. These findings suggest that checklists for use during operating-room crises have the potential to improve surgical care. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.).
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Análisis Multivariante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
Fragmented and variable perioperative care exposes patients to unnecessary risks and handoff errors. The perioperative surgical home aims to optimize quality, value-based care. We performed a retrospective evaluation of how a preoperative assessment center could coordinate care through e-mails sent to a patient's healthcare team that initiate discussion on critical clinical information. During 100 clinic days on which 8122 patients were evaluated, 606 triggered e-mails, with a potential impact on 19 elements across the perioperative care spectrum. Four cases were canceled, and 42 cases were rescheduled. By fostering information exchange, these communications could advance patient-centered, value-enhanced quality and safety outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Correo Electrónico/organización & administración , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Anciano , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Evaluación Preoperatoria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Perioperative anaphylaxis is a unique condition as a result of the additive cardiovascular effects of anesthetics on the cardiovascular disturbances of anaphylaxis. It occurs mainly in adulthood, primarily follows anesthetic induction, and for the most part, is an IgE-mediated pathomechanism. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) and antibiotics are the main culprit drugs, while latex is now infrequently involved. The Ring and Messmer scale is a useful tool for demonstrating the clinical severity of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity and guiding its management. Grades III and IV are life-threatening and are referred to as anaphylaxis. Three different clinical patterns of grade III may be observed, where cardiovascular collapse is the cardinal sign. Grade IV presents as cardiac arrest. The initial diagnosis is presumptive, whereas the etiological assessment is linked to the clinical presentation, tryptase levels, and skin test results. Since anaphylaxis presents with significant hypovolemia and vasoplegia, aggressive fluid therapy and epinephrine are the cornerstones of management. Whenever possible, anesthetic discontinuation is also recommended. Scientific evidence in favor of preemptive therapeutic strategies to prevent anaphylaxis in the operative setting is lacking.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Látex , Bloqueantes Neuromusculares/efectos adversos , Atención Perioperativa , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Scheduling systems that consider volume and patient acuity are crucial to maximize the use of resources during preoperative assessments. Identifying patients with specific needs and developing resource-efficient pathways to address these needs is essential to achieve a high-value framework. At our facility, we triage patients for assessment by phone or in-person visit. Significant variation in lengths of visits results in longer waiting times and inefficient scheduling of clinical and space resources. Developing a schedule that included appointments of shorter and longer lengths based on patient triage factors could optimize resource use. METHODOLOGY: We utilized a survey methodology to determine clinical and non-clinical factors that clinicians identified as important determinants of visit length. RESULTS: Within the system-based issues, incomplete information given to the patient during the surgical office visit and the need for additional phone calls to outside medical facilities for information gathering afforded the longest mean appointment time lengths. Within patient-based issues, new clinical findings discovered during the visit and patients who lacked social support demonstrated the longest mean appointment times. CONCLUSIONS: Both clinical and non-clinical issues contribute to visit length; a proper understanding of both can assist in developing evidence-based scheduling that maximizes value for both the patient and the system, as well as optimizing patient experience and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Triaje/métodos , Eficiencia Organizacional , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
Anemia is the most common modifiable risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. Early identification and optimal management are key to restore iron stores and ensure its resolution before surgery. Several therapies have been proposed to treat anemia in the perioperative period, such as iron supplementation and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, though it remains unclear which is the most optimal to improve clinical outcomes. This article summarizes the most updated evidence on perioperative management of anemia and denotes differences among the international guidelines to reflect the conflicting evidence in this field and the need for further research in specific areas.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Hematínicos , Humanos , Anemia/terapia , Hierro/uso terapéutico , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More than a quarter of medical costs for Medicare beneficiaries are incurred in the last year of life; surgical intensity during this time is significant. This study was performed to determine types of operations patients undergo in their terminal year, and compare characteristics of decedents with those of survivors. METHODS: Population of 747 consecutive all-payer patients seen at the preoperative assessment center of a tertiary care hospital. Patient characteristics were obtained from the electronic medical record. Surgical indication (palliative, curative, diagnostic, elective) was assessed based on procedure performed and underlying diagnosis. Vital status was determined using the electronic medical record with confirmation via social security national death master file. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare patient characteristics and procedures performed on those who died within 1 yr of procedure with those of survivors. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (5%) were confirmed dead at 1 yr. Ten (27%) of these had palliative procedures, 11 (30%) diagnostic, 14 (38%) curative, and 2 (5%) elective. Decedents were more likely to have undergone a palliative (27 vs. 3%) or diagnostic (30 vs. 14%) procedure and less likely to have undergone an elective procedure (5 vs. 42%) than survivors (P < 0.0001). Nearly half of decedents did not have an advanced directive by the date of surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1 in 20 patients seen at the preoperative assessment clinic of a tertiary care hospital died within 1 yr of their procedure. Patient characteristics and procedure indication for decedents differed from those of survivors. Similar analyses based on institution and region may provide methodologies to compare variation in surgical intensity and assist preoperative care providers in evaluating appropriateness of resource allocation.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Directivas Anticipadas/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The prevalence of anaphylaxis occurring during pregnancy is approximately 3 cases per 100,000 deliveries. The management of anaphylaxis occurring during the third trimester of pregnancy may be challenging because of the additive effects of aortocaval compression and cardiovascular disturbances of anaphylaxis. In this review, we identify the clinical signs of anaphylaxis occurring during labor and cesarean delivery, discuss the more common allergens that cause anaphylaxis during this clinical setting, and develop a rational approach to the identification of the offending allergen. We also suggest strategies for the management of anaphylaxis occurring during the third trimester of pregnancy, including the prompt administration of epinephrine and emergency cesarean delivery in cases of severe reactions. Evidence is limited to case reports and extrapolation from nonfatal and fatal cases, interpretation of pathophysiology, and consensus opinion.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Anestesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/mortalidad , Anafilaxia/fisiopatología , Anafilaxia/terapia , Anestesia Obstétrica/mortalidad , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/mortalidad , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Discussion of perioperative code status is an important element of preoperative care and a component of the American College of Surgeons' Geriatric Surgery Verification (GSV) program. Evidence suggests code status discussions (CSDs) are not routinely performed and are inconsistently documented. OBJECTIVES: Because preoperative decision making is a complex process spanning multiple providers, this study aims to utilize process mapping to highlight challenges associated with CSDs and inform efforts to improve workflows and implement elements of the GSV program. METHODS: Using process mapping, we detailed workflows relating to (CSDs) for patients undergoing thoracic surgery and a possible workflow for implementing GSV standards for goals and decision-making. RESULTS: We generated process maps for outpatient and day-of-surgery workflows relating to CSDs. In addition, we generated a process map for a potential workflow to address limitations and integrate GSV Standards for Goals and Decision Making. CONCLUSION: Process mapping highlighted challenges associated with the implementation of multidisciplinary care pathways and indicated a need for centralization and consolidation of perioperative code status documentation.
Asunto(s)
Documentación , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Humanos , Anciano , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
Perioperative medical management is challenging because of the rising complexity of patients presenting for surgical procedures. A key part of preoperative optimization is appropriate management of long-term medications, yet guidelines and consensus statements for perioperative medication management are lacking. Available resources use recommendations derived from individual studies and do not include a multidisciplinary focus on formal consensus. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement identified a lack of authoritative clinical guidance as an opportunity to use its multidisciplinary membership to improve evidence-based perioperative care. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement seeks to provide guidance on perioperative medication management that synthesizes available literature with expert consensus. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide practical guidance on the preoperative management of immunosuppressive, biologic, antiretroviral, and anti-inflammatory medications. A panel of experts including hospitalists, anesthesiologists, internal medicine physicians, infectious disease specialists, and rheumatologists was appointed to identify the common medications in each of these categories. The authors then used a modified Delphi process to critically review the literature and to generate consensus recommendations.