Long-term health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors: A large multinational study.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients suffer from a range of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues, but little is known about their long-term HRQoL. This study explored associations between treatment group and HRQoL at least 5 years' post-diagnosis in HNC survivors. In an international cross-sectional study, HNC survivors completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and its HNC module (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35). Meaningful HRQoL differences were examined between five treatment groups: (a) surgery, (b) radiotherapy, (c) chemo-radiotherapy, (d) radiotherapy ± chemotherapy and neck dissection and (e) any other surgery (meaning any tumour surgery that is not a neck dissection) and radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Twenty-six sites in 11 countries enrolled 1105 survivors. They had a median time since diagnosis of 8 years, a mean age of 66 years and 71% were male. After adjusting for age, sex, tumour site and UICC stage, there was evidence for meaningful differences (10 points or more) in HRQoL between treatment groups in seven domains (Fatigue, Mouth Pain, Swallowing, Senses, Opening Mouth, Dry Mouth and Sticky Saliva). Survivors who had single-modality treatment had better or equal HRQoL in every domain compared to survivors with multimodal treatment, with the largest differences for Dry Mouth and Sticky Saliva. For Global Quality of Life, Physical and Social Functioning, Constipation, Dyspnoea and Financial Difficulties, at least some treatment groups had better outcomes compared to a general population. Our data suggest that multimodal treatment is associated with worse HRQoL in the long-term compared to single modality.

Targeting a therapeutically relevant concentration of alendronate for in vitro studies on osteoblasts.

OBJECTIVE: Bisphosphonates like alendronate mainly exert their effects on osteoclasts. However, osteoblasts are also affected, but exposed to a much lower concentration in vivo than the osteoclasts. Given that the effects are dose-dependent, the intention of the study was to identify a therapeutically relevant concentration of alendronate for in vitro studies on osteoblasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary human osteoblasts were incubated with alendronate (5, 20 and 100 µM) for 1, 3, 7 and 14 days. Proliferation and viability were assessed, and the effects on cellular growth and function were evaluated by multianalyte profiling of selected proteins in cell culture media using the Luminex 200TM. RESULTS: The viability was not affected by any of the dosages. Exposure to 5 µM alendronate had a neutral effect on osteoblast proliferation, and on secretion of osteogenic and inflammatory markers, while enhancing synthesis of a marker of angiogenesis. 20 µM alendronate induced a decline in proliferation and affected angiogenic and osteogenic biomarkers adversely. 100 µM alendronate reduced proliferation dramatically, and this dosage was excluded from further experiments. CONCLUSION: A concentration of 5 µM alendronate exerted effects on human osteoblasts that may translate to those observed in vivo and could therefore be relevant for in vitro studies.

Oral disorders, saliva secretion, and oral health-related quality of life in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Chemosensory function, burning sensations in the tongue (BST), halitosis, saliva secretion, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were investigated in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). In 31 patients with pSS and 33 controls, olfactory and gustatory functions were evaluated. Self-reported complaints of dysgeusia, BST, and halitosis were recorded. Saliva secretion rates were measured and OHRQoL was assessed using the short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Patients had significantly lower olfactory (8.8 ± 3.5 vs. 10.7 ± 1.2) and gustatory (18.9 ± 7.1 vs. 25.4 ± 4.3) scores than controls, and significantly more patients complained of dysgeusia (58.1% vs. 0%), BST (54.8% vs. 6.1%), and halitosis (41.9% vs. 0%). A significantly greater proportion of patients with pSS had ageusia (19% vs. 0%), hypogeusia (32% vs. 12%), anosmia (13% vs. 0%), or hyposmia (29% vs. 9%). Significantly lower saliva secretion rates (ml min-1 ) were observed in patients with pSS for stimulated (0.62 ± 0.40 vs. 1.57 ± 0.71) and unstimulated (0.08 ± 0.07 vs. 0.29 ± 0.17) saliva. The mean OHIP-14 score was significantly higher in patients with pSS (16.2 ± 10.8 vs. 2.7 ± 3.1) and was positively correlated with dysgeusia, BST, and halitosis. In conclusion, patients with pSS reported higher occurrence of dysgeusia, BST, and halitosis, and demonstrated relatively impaired chemosensory and salivary functions. The patients' poorer OHRQoL was associated with dysgeusia, BST, and halitosis.

International field testing of the psychometric properties of an EORTC quality of life module for oral health: the EORTC QLQ-OH15.

PURPOSE: This international EORTC validation study (phase IV) is aimed at testing the psychometric properties of a quality of life (QoL) module related to oral health problems in cancer patients. METHODS: The phase III module comprised 17 items with four hypothesized multi-item scales and three single items. In phase IV, patients with mixed cancers, in different treatment phases from 10 countries completed the EORTC QLQ-C30, the QLQ-OH module, and a debriefing interview. The hypothesized structure was tested using combinations of classical test theory and item response theory, following EORTC guidelines. Test-retest assessments and responsiveness to change analysis (RCA) were performed after 2 weeks. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-two patients (median age 60.3, 54 % females) were analyzed. Completion took <10 min for 84 %, 40 % expressed satisfaction that these issues were addressed. Analyses suggested a revision of the phase III hypothesized scale structure. Two items were deleted based on a high degree of item misfit, together with negative patient feedback. The remaining 15 items formed one eight-item scale named OH-QoL score, a two-item information scale, a two-item scale regarding dentures, and three single items (sticky saliva/mouth soreness/sensitivity to food/drink). Face and convergent validity and internal consistency were confirmed. Test-retest reliability (n = 60) was demonstrated as was RCA for patients undergoing chemotherapy (n = 117; p = 0.06). The resulting QLQ-OH15 discriminated between clinically distinct patient groups, e.g., low performance status vs. higher (p < 000.1), and head-and-neck cancer versus other cancers (p < 0.03). CONCLUSION: The EORTC module QLQ-OH15 is a short, well-accepted assessment tool focusing on oral problems and QoL to improve clinical management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01724333.

Alendronate alters osteoblast activities.

OBJECTIVE: Due to accumulation in the bone matrix and a half-life of at least 10 years, it is important to understand the cellular impact of bisphosphonates (BPs). This study assessed the effects of alendronate (ALN) on human primary osteoblasts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Osteoblasts were incubated with ALN (5, 20 and 100 µM), and both cells and cell culture media were harvested after d 1, 3, 7 or 14. Proliferation was evaluated by 3H-thymidine incorporation and tetrazolium dye (MTT) colorimetric assay, and viability by the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in the medium. Differentiation was evaluated using protein Luminex multiplex assays and RT-PCR. RESULTS: ALN had no significant effects on cell viability. The lower concentrations enhanced the proliferation, whereas 100 µM diminished the proliferation. mRNA expression of osteocalcin (OC), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and α-1 type 1 collagen were reduced, whereas ALN enhanced the expression of leptin mRNA and the secretion of interleukin-8 (IL-8) and regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES). CONCLUSIONS: ALN enhanced the secretion of immune factors from human osteoblasts. Combined with a lower rate of proliferation and a decline in differentiation, this indicates that higher dosages or accumulation may cause undesirable local changes in bone.

Serious Long-Term Effects of Head and Neck Cancer from the Survivors' Point of View.

The long-term problems of head and neck cancer survivors (HNCS) are not well known. In a cross-sectional international study aimed at exploring the long-term quality of life in this population, 1114 HNCS were asked to state their two most serious long-term effects. A clinician recorded the responses during face-to-face appointments. A list of 15 example problems was provided, but a free text field was also available. A total of 1033 survivors responded to the question. The most frequent problems were 'dry mouth' (DM) (n = 476; 46%), 'difficulty swallowing/eating' (DSE) (n = 408; 40%), 'hoarseness/difficulty speaking' (HDS) (n = 169; 16%), and 'pain in the head and neck' (PHN) (n = 142; 14%). A total of 5% reported no problems. Logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, treatment, and tumor stage and site showed increased odds of reporting DM and DSE for chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) alone compared to surgery alone (odds ratio (OR): 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-9.0; OR: 2.1, CI: 1.1-3.9), but decreased odds for HDS and PHN (OR: 0.3, CI: 0.1-0.6; OR: 0.2, CI: 0.1-0.5). Survivors with UICC stage IV at diagnosis compared to stage I had increased odds of reporting HDS (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.2-3.0). Laryngeal cancer survivors had reduced odds compared to oropharynx cancer survivors of reporting DM (OR: 0.4, CI: 0.3-0.6) but increased odds of HDS (OR: 7.2, CI: 4.3-12.3). This study provides evidence of the serious long-term problems among HNCS.

Oral health is an important issue in end-of-life cancer care.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the prevalence of oral morbidity in patients receiving palliative care for cancers outside the head and neck region and to investigate if information concerning oral problems was given. METHODS: Patients were recruited from two Norwegian palliative care inpatient units. All patients went through a face-to-face interview, completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) covering 10 frequent cancer-related symptoms, and went through an oral examination including a mouth swab to test for Candida carriage. RESULTS: Ninety-nine of 126 patients (79 %) agreed to participate. The examined patients had a mean age of 64 years (range, 36-90 years) and 47 % were male. Median Karnofsky score was 40 (range, 20-80) and 87 % had metastatic disease. Estimated life expectancy was <3 months in 73 %. Dry mouth was reported by 78 %. The highest mean scores on the modified 0-10 ESAS scale were 4.9 (fatigue), 4.7 (dry mouth), and 4.4 (poor appetite). Clinical oral candidiasis was seen in 34 % (86 % positive cultures). Mouth pain was reported by 67 % and problems with food intake were reported by 56 %. Moderate or rich amounts of dental plaque were seen in 24 %, and mean number of teeth with visible carious lesions was 1.9. One patient was diagnosed with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Overall, 78 % said they had received no information about oral adverse effects of cancer treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients in palliative care units need better mouth care. Increased awareness among staff about the presence and severity of oral problems is necessary. Systematic information about oral problems is important in all stages of cancer treatment.

Alendronate and omeprazole in combination reduce angiogenic and growth signals from osteoblasts.

OBJECTIVE: Due to gastrointestinal side effects of oral bisphosphonates (BPs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed. PPIs may enhance the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw, a rare side effect of BPs. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the oral BP alendronate (ALN) and the PPI omeprazole (OME) alone and in combination on primary human osteoblasts and gingival fibroblasts in vitro. METHODS: Human gingival fibroblasts and normal human osteoblasts were incubated with either 5 µM of ALN or 1 µM of OME, or ALN + OME for 1, 3, 7 or 14 days. Effect on viability was evaluated by the lactate dehydrogenase activity in the medium and on proliferation by quantifying 3H-thymidin incorporation. Multianalyte profiling of proteins in cell culture media was performed using the Luminex 200TM system to assess the effect on selected bone markers and cytokines. RESULTS: The proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts was reduced upon exposure to ALN + OME. ALN induced an early, temporary rise in markers of inflammation, and OME and ALN + OME promoted a transient decline. An initial increase in IL-13 occurred after exposure to all three options, whereas ALN + OME promoted IL-8 release after 7 days. OME and ALN + OME promoted a transient reduction in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) from osteoblasts, whereas ALN and ALN + OME induced a late rise in VEGF from fibroblasts. Osteoprotegerin release was enhanced by ALN and suppressed by OME and ALN + OME. CONCLUSIONS: ALN + OME seemed to exaggerate the negative effects of each drug alone on human osteoblasts and gingival fibroblasts. The anti-proliferative effects, modulation of inflammation and impairment of angiogenesis, may induce unfavorable conditions in periodontal tissue facilitating development of osteonecrosis.

Assessing the association between bisphosphonate exposure and delayed mucosal healing after tooth extraction.

BACKGROUND: Tooth extraction in patients exposed to bisphosphonates (BPs) is considered a risk factor for osteonecrosis. The authors evaluated the time to mucosal healing and frequency of osteonecrosis after tooth extraction in participants exposed to BPs. METHODS: The authors compared wound healing after tooth extraction in participants exposed to BPs with that in control participants who had not been exposed to BPs. Variables included age, sex, type of BP therapy (oral or intravenous), BP exposure time and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) test results. The authors followed up patients weekly or biweekly until healing was complete. They used multivariable analyses to model time to healing in the presence of covariates, and estimates provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for all variables in the model. RESULTS: The authors enrolled 53 participants with BP exposure and 39 control participants. Postextraction healing was significantly longer in participants exposed to BPs (P < .001) than it was in control participants. One patient (1.9 percent) developed osteonecrosis. A Cox proportional hazards model in which the authors controlled for age, sex and CTX values showed that BP exposure alone significantly (adjusted HR, 0.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.16-0.48) increased mucosal healing time [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: The study results showed that postextraction healing was impaired in patients exposed to BPs. CTX values were not associated with delayed healing after tooth extraction. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Postextraction healing was delayed in patients receiving BP therapy. However, the risk of developing osteonecrosis was low.

The EORTC QLQ-OH17: a supplementary module to the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessment of oral health and quality of life in cancer patients.

AIMS: Assessment of oral and dental problems is seldom routine in clinical oncology, despite the potential negative impact of these problems on nutritional status, social function and quality of life (QoL). The aim was to develop a supplementary module to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) focusing on oral health and related QoL issues in all cancer diagnoses. METHODS: The module development followed the EORTC guidelines. Phases 1&2 were conducted in France, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Norway and United Kingdom, while seven countries representing seven languages were included in Phase 3. RESULTS: Eighty-five QoL-items were identified from systematic literature searches. Semi-structured interviews with health-care professionals experienced in oncology and oral/dental care (n=18) and patients (n=133) resulted in a provisional module with 41 items. In phase 3 this was further tested in 178 European patients representing different phases of disease and treatment. Results from the interviews, clinical experiences and statistical analyses resulted in the EORTC QLQ-OH17. The module consists of 17 items conceptualised into four multi-item scales (pain/discomfort, xerostomia, eating, information) and three single items related to use of dentures and future worries. CONCLUSION: This study provides a useful tool intended for use in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 for assessment of oral and dental problems. The increased awareness may lead to proper interventions, thereby preventing more serious problems and negative impact on QoL. The reliability and validity, the cross-cultural applicability and the psychometric properties of the module will be tested in a larger international study.