Hybrid immunity protection against SARS-CoV-2 and severe COVID-19 in kidney transplantation: A retrospective, comparative cohort study.

Hybrid immunity, resulting from a combination of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, offers robust protection against COVID-19 in the general population. However, its impact on immunocompromised patients remains unexplored. We investigated the effect of hybrid immunity against the Omicron variant in a population of kidney transplant recipients receiving the fourth dose mRNA monovalent vaccination. By extracting data from the clinical records and performing individual interviews, participants were categorized into the hybrid cohort (previously infected and vaccinated individuals) and the vaccine cohort (vaccinated-only individuals). The study comprised 1114 participants, 442 in the hybrid and 672 in the vaccine cohorts. From April 2022 to August 2023, 286 infections, 38 hospitalizations and 9 deaths were reported. The cumulative incidence of infection was 12.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.03-16.03) for the hybrid cohort and 36.54% (95% CI, 32.81-40.54) for the vaccine cohort after 300 days of follow-up. Hybrid immunity was associated to a 72% lower risk of infection (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.21-0.38) and a 96% lower risk of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.32). No deaths occurred in the hybrid cohort. Hybrid immunity was associated with a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19, underscoring its importance for risk stratification in this vulnerable patient population.

Multicenter clinical evaluation of a novel transcription-mediated amplification assay for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing.

INTRODUCTION: The onset and spread of COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinical laboratories to rapidly expand testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluates the clinical performance of the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison to the RT-PCR assay AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. METHODS: Between November 2020 and February 2021, 610 upper-respiratory specimens received for routine SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing were prospectively collected and selected at the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron and the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain. All samples were processed in parallel with the TMA and the RT-PCR assays, and results were compared. Discrepancies were retested by an additional RT-PCR method and the clinical history of these patients was reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, the level of concordance between both assays was 92.0% (κ, 0.772). Most discordant results (36/38, 94.7%) corresponded to samples testing positive with the TMA assay and negative with the RT-PCR method. Of these discrepant cases, most (28/36, 77.8%) were finally classified as confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 cases according to the discrepant analysis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay performed well for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a multisite clinical setting. This novel TMA assay demonstrated a greater sensitivity in comparison to RT-PCR methods for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2. This higher sensitivity but also the qualitative feature of this detection of SARS-CoV-2 should be considered when making testing algorithm decisions.

Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing (RAST) of blood cultures in enterobacteria with inducible chromosomal AmpC-type ß-lactamase.

INTRODUCTION: Early and adequate treatment of bloodstream infections decreases patient morbidity and mortality. The objective is to develop a preliminary method for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing (RAST) in enterobacteria with inducible chromosomal AmpC. METHODS: RAST was performed directly on spiked blood cultures of 49 enterobacteria with inducible chromosomal AmpC. Results were read at 4, 6 and 8h of incubation. Commercial broth microdilution was considered the reference method. Disks of 10 antibiotics were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of readable tests at 4h was 85%. All RAST could be read at 6 and 8h. For most antibiotics, the S or R result at 4, 6 and 8h was greater than 80% after tentative breakpoints were established and Area of Technical Uncertainty was defined. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary method seems to be of practical use, although it should be extended to adjust the breakpoints and differentiate them by species.

A simple double differential centrifugation-wash procedure to rapidly obtain bacterial identification and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing from positive blood cultures.

INTRODUCTION: This study proposes a simple and rapid method for both bacterial identification and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by using MALDI-TOF and a double differential centrifugation-wash procedure from positive blood cultures. METHODS: Fifty-two positive blood cultures (37 gramnegative bacilli and 15 grampositive cocci) were studied by two methods for identification and AST: a reference method, and the rapid MALDI-TOF method obtaining a purified pellet by using a double differential centrifugation procedure. RESULTS: A total of 1101 MIC values (mg/l) were interpreted according to EUCAST clinical breakpoints and compared using the two methods simultaneously. Discrepancies in 81 MIC values (7.35%) were detected. By analyzing standard parameters, we obtained 98.28% essential agreement and 92.65% categorical agreement considering all isolates tested. CONCLUSION: This method provides rapid bacterial identification and AST, offering definitive results 24-48h earlier than the conventional method (p<0.001) and improving the turnaround time in blood culture diagnostics, especially in laboratories without 24-h on-call.

Multicenter clinical evaluation of a novel transcription-mediated amplification assay for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing.

INTRODUCTION: The onset and spread of COVID-19 pandemic has forced clinical laboratories to rapidly expand testing capacity for SARS-CoV-2. This study evaluates the clinical performance of the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison to the RT-PCR assay Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. METHODS: Between November 2020 and February 2021, 610 upper-respiratory specimens received for routine SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing were prospectively collected and selected at the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron and the Hospital Universitari Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain. All samples were processed in parallel with the TMA and the RT-PCR assays, and results were compared. Discrepancies were retested by an additional RT-PCR method and the clinical history of these patients was reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, the level of concordance between both assays was 92.0% (κ, 0.772). Most discordant results (36/38, 94.7%) corresponded to samples testing positive with the TMA assay and negative with the RT-PCR method. Of these discrepant cases, most (28/36, 77.8%) were finally classified as confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 cases according to the discrepant analysis. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the TMA Procleix SARS-CoV-2 assay performed well for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a multisite clinical setting. This novel TMA assay demonstrated a greater sensitivity in comparison to RT-PCR methods for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2. This higher sensitivity but also the qualitative feature of this detection of SARS-CoV-2 should be considered when making testing algorithm decisions.