RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Minimally invasive single position lateral ALIF at L5-S1 with simultaneous robot-assisted posterior fixation has technical and anatomic considerations that need further description. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of single position lateral ALIF at L5-S1 with robotic assisted fixation. End points included radiographic parameters, lordosis distribution index (LDI), complications, pedicle screw accuracy, and inpatient metrics. RESULTS: There were 17 patients with mean age of 60.5 years. Eight patients underwent interbody fusion at L5-S1, five patients at L4-S1, two patients at L3-S1, and one patient at L2-S1 in single lateral position. Operative times for 1-level and 2-level cases were 193 min and 278 min, respectively. Mean EBL was 71 cc. Mean improvements in L5-S1 segmental lordosis were 11.7 ± 4.0°, L1-S1 lordosis of 4.8 ± 6.4°, sagittal vertical axis of - 0.1 ± 1.7 cm°, pelvic tilt of - 3.1 ± 5.9°, and pelvic incidence lumbar-lordosis mismatch of - 4.6 ± 6.4°. Six patients corrected into a normal LDI (50-80%) and no patients became imbalanced over a mean follow-up period of 14.4 months. Of 100 screws placed in lateral position with robotic assistance, there were three total breaches (two lateral grade 3, one medial grade 2) for a screw accuracy of 97.0%. There were no neurologic, vascular, bowel, or ureteral injuries, and no implant failure or reoperation. CONCLUSION: Single position lateral ALIF at L5-S1 with simultaneous robotic placement of pedicle screws by a second surgeon is a safe and effective technique that improves global alignment and lordosis distribution index.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is a devastating complication. Demographic risk factors for ICH in LVAD patients are defined, however anatomic predispositions to ICH are unknown. We sought to interrogate intracranial radiographic risk factors for ICH in LVAD patients. METHODS: We reviewed 440 patients who received an LVAD from 2008-2021. We selected patients with CT scans of the head either before or after LVAD placement, but typically within 5 years. 288 patients (21 ICH, 267 Control) with imaging were included. A detailed chart review was performed on demographics, radiographic features, and management. RESULTS: The incidence of ICH in our total cohort was 8.6% (38/440). The presence of pump thrombosis (p=0.001), driveline infection (p=0.034), other hemorrhage (p=0.001), or previous placement of a cardio-defibrillator (p=.003) was associated with increased risk for ICH. An analysis of imaging revealed that the presence of a mass (p=0.006), vascular pathology (p=0.001), and microangiopathy (p=0.04) was significantly associated with ICH in LVAD patients. These radiographic features were validated with a multivariate logistic regression which confirmed presence of a mass (aOR 332.1, 95% CI: 14.7-7485.1, p<0.001), vascular pathology (aOR 69.7, 95% CI: 1.8-2658.8, p=0.022), and microangiopathy (aOR 6.5, 95% CI: 1.1-37.6, p=0.035) were independently associated with ICH. CONCLUSION: Radiographic evidence of microangiopathy, intracranial mass, and vascular pathology are independent risk factors for ICH which are readily identified by imaging. We advocate that CT imaging be used to further stratify patients at highest risk of ICH during treatment with an LVAD.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragias Intracraneales/epidemiología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Hemorragia/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapiaRESUMEN
We present here a 58-year-old female patient with L4-5 spondylolisthesis, who underwent a minimally invasive L4-5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with robot-assisted bilateral posterior instrumented fixation in a single lateral position (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic). There has been interest in detailed video-based descriptions of single-position surgery with lateral approach interbody fusions, either in the prone or lateral decubitus position.1-6 Particularly, the addition of robotics has been shown to help increase overall operating efficiency in the lateral position with reduced case times even with the increased up-front robot setup time.7,8 The OLIF, also known as an anterior-to-psoas approach, allows for single-position posterior fixation and can be very effective at L4-5 where the anatomy of the iliac crest or lumbar plexus does not preclude this surgical corridor the way it could in the transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical outcomes between these 2 lateral approaches have been shown to be very good,9 and OLIF has reduced blood loss while still restoring alignment parameters compared with anterior lumbar interbody fusion, with better fusion and reduced subsidence compared with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.10,11 To our knowledge, this is the first video demonstrating a view of the OLIF approach through a high-definition retractor-based camera (MaxView Camera, Viseon Inc). There is no identifying patient information in this video. The participants and any identifiable individuals consented to publication of his/her image, and the patient consented to the procedure.
RESUMEN
(1) Background: The correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) can require long, complex constructs with multiple rods which traverse important biomechanical levels to achieve multi-pelvic fixation. Minimally invasive (MIS) placement of these constructs has historically been difficult. Advanced technologies such as spinal robotics platforms can facilitate the design and placement of these constructs and further enable these surgical approaches in MIS deformity surgery. (2) Methods: A retrospective study was performed on a series of ASD patients undergoing MIS deformity correction with ≥eight fusion levels to the lower thoracic spine with preoperative robotic construct planning and robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. (3) Results: There were 12 patients (10 female, mean age 68.6 years) with a diagnosis of either degenerative scoliosis (8 patients) or sagittal imbalance (4 patients). All underwent preoperative robotic planning to assist in MIS robot-assisted percutaneous or transfascial placement of pedicle and iliac screws with multiple-rod constructs. Mean operative values per patient were 9.9 levels instrumented (range 8-11), 3.9 interbody cages (range 2-6), 3.3 iliac fixation points (range 2-4), 3.3 rods (range 2-4), 18.7 screws (range 13-24), estimated blood loss 254 cc (range 150-350 cc), and operative time 347 min (range 242-442 min). All patients showed improvement in radiographic sagittal, and, if applicable, coronal parameters. Mean length of stay was 5.8 days with no ICU admissions. Ten patients ambulated on POD 1 or 2. Of 224 screws placed minimally invasively, four breaches were identified on intraoperative CT and repositioned (three lateral, one medial) for a robot-assisted screw accuracy of 98.2%. (4) Conclusions: Minimally invasive long-segment fixation for adult spinal deformity surgery has historically been considered laborious and technically intensive. Preoperative robotics planning facilitates the design and placement of even complex multi-rod multi-pelvic fixation for MIS deformity surgery.
RESUMEN
The ventricular migration of vitreous silicone oil (SiO) is rare and can easily be mistaken for intraventricular hemorrhage or a ruptured colloid cyst. We report here the case of an adult male who was misdiagnosed with a ruptured colloid cyst and was subsequently found to have ventricular migration of vitreous SiO. A 57-year-old male presented unresponsive following a respiratory arrest and underwent a head computed tomography (CT) scan that demonstrated multiple ovoid hyperdensities in the ventricular system, which was concerning for a ruptured colloid cyst. He was transferred to our institution for neurosurgical evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed and demonstrated widespread abnormal diffusion restriction throughout the cortex and basal ganglia, consistent with anoxic brain injury secondary to hypoxic respiratory arrest. The MRI also demonstrated an abnormal signal in areas corresponding with the previously identified intraventricular lesions, which did not layer posteriorly. Given that the MRI sequence signals of the lesions in the ventricular system matched perfectly with the signals of the somewhat deflated SiO within the globe, these multiple ovoid lesions on imaging were most consistent with the migration of SiO from the vitreous body of the right globe into the ventricular system. This case demonstrates a diagnostic error that can occur in emergent settings because of the broad differential diagnosis for cerebral ventricular hyperdensities. A ruptured colloid cyst was considered the reason for transfer, with the anticipation of neurosurgical intervention, but further imaging demonstrated that this was an incidental finding in this patient who presented in extremis. Awareness of this rare clinical condition can prevent overutilization of resources and unnecessary interventions.
RESUMEN
Brachioradial pruritis (BRP) is a rare form of dermatomal pruritis that appears to be caused both by cervical radiculopathy and exposure to ultraviolet-light, although the exact pathophysiology for the manifestation of these symptoms remains to be determined. A diagnosis of BRP is typically confirmed with the "ice-pack" test and evidence of cervical spine pathology using magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment options consist of application of ice, reduction in sun exposure, and topical capsaicin, antiepileptics, or tricyclic antidepressants. Patients with refractory symptoms and cervical spine pathology may be candidates for surgical decompression, particularly at the C5 and C6 levels. However, there are currently no established guidelines to treat BRP, or surgical procedures that have shown to be superior. Here, we report two cases of cervical disc herniations after traumatic events that presented as BRP. Both cases were successfully treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with complete resolution of symptoms.
RESUMEN
Anterior column realignment via anterior, oblique, or lateral lumbar interbody fusion is increasingly recognized as a powerful mechanism for indirect decompression and sagittal realignment in flexible deformity. Single-position lateral surgery is a popular variation that places patients in the lateral decubitus position, allowing concomitant placement of lateral interbodies and posterior segmental instrumentation without the need for repositioning the patient. The addition of robotics to this technique can help to overcome ergonomic limitations of the placement of pedicle screws in the lateral decubitus position; however, its description in the literature is relatively lacking. In this review we aim to discuss the indications, advantages, and pitfalls of this approach.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Greater thecal sac volumes are associated with an increased risk of spinal anesthesia (SA) failure. The thecal sac cross-sectional area accurately predicts thecal sac volume. The thecal sac area may be used to adjust the dose and prevent anesthetic failure. We aim to assess the rate of SA failure in a prospective cohort of lumbar surgery patients who receive an individualized dose of bupivacaine based on preoperative measurement of their thecal sac area. METHODS: A total of 80 patients prospectively received lumbar spine surgery under SA at a single academic center (2022-2023). Before surgery, the cross-sectional area of the thecal sac was measured at the planned level of SA injection using T2-weighted MRI. Patients with an area <175 mm2, equal to or between 175 and 225 mm2, and >225 mm2 received an SA injection of 15, 20, or 25 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine, respectively. Instances of anesthetic failure and adverse outcomes were noted. Incidence of SA failure was compared with a retrospectively obtained control cohort of 250 patients (2019-2022) who received the standard 15 mg of bupivacaine. RESULTS: No patients in the individualized dose cohort experienced failure of SA compared with 14 patients (5.6%) who experienced failure in the control cohort (P = .0259). The average thecal sac area was 187.49 mm2, and a total 28 patients received 15 mg of bupivacaine, 42 patients received 20 mg of bupivacaine, and 10 patients received 25 mg of bupivacaine. None of the patients experienced any adverse outcomes associated with SA. Patients in the individualized dose cohort and control cohort were comparable and had a similar distribution of lumbar procedures and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Adjusting the dose of SA according to thecal sac area significantly reduces the rate of SA failure in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is used in lumbar surgery, but initial adequate analgesia fails in some patients. In these cases, spinal redosing or conversion to general endotracheal anesthesia is required, both of which are detrimental to the patient experience and surgical workflow. METHODS: We reviewed cases of lumbar surgery performed under SA from 2017-2021. We identified 12 cases of inadequate first dose and then selected 36 random patients as controls. We used a measurement tool to approximate the volume of the dural sac for each patient using T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging sequences. RESULTS: Patients who had an inadequate first dose of anesthesia had a significantly larger dural sac volume, 22.8 ± 7.9 cm3 in the inadequate dose group and 17.4 ± 4.7 cm3 in controls (P = 0.043). The inadequate dose group was significantly younger, 54.2 ± 8.8 years in failed first dose and 66.4 ± 11.9 years in controls (P = 0.001). The groups did not differ by surgical procedure (P = 0.238), level (P = 0.353), American Society of Anesthesia score (P = 0.546), or comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: We found that age, larger height, and dural sac volume are risk factors for an inadequate first dose of SA. The availability of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing spine surgery allows the preoperative measurement of their thecal sac size. In the future, these data may be used to personalize spinal anesthesia dosing on the basis of individual anatomic variables and potentially reduce the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia in spine surgery.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Vértebras Lumbares , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Duramadre/cirugía , Duramadre/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy and opioid administration are thought to increase the risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium in elderly patients. Spinal anesthesia (SA) holds potential to reduce perioperative polypharmacy in spine surgery. As more geriatric patients undergo spine surgery, understanding how SA can reduce polypharmacy and opioid administration is warranted. We aim to compare the perioperative polypharmacy and dose of administered opioids in patients ≥65 years who undergo transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) under SA versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 200 patients receiving a single-surgeon TLIF procedure at a single academic center (2014-2021) was performed. Patients underwent the procedure with SA (n = 120) or GA (n = 80). Demographic, procedural, and medication data were extracted from the medical record. Opioid consumption was quantified as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Statistical analyses included χ2 or Student's t-test. RESULTS: Patients receiving SA were administered 7.45 medications on average versus 12.7 for GA patients (P < 0.001). Average perioperative opioid consumption was 5.17 MME and 20.2 MME in SA and GA patients, respectively (P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving antiemetics and opioids remained comparable postoperatively, with a mean of 32.2 MME in the GA group versus 27.5 MME in the SA group (P = 0.14). Antiemetics were administered less often as a prophylactic in the SA group (32%) versus 86% in the GA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SA reduces perioperative polypharmacy in patients ≥65 years undergoing TLIF procedures. Further research is necessary to determine if this reduction correlates to a decrease the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Anestesia Raquidea , Vértebras Lumbares , Polifarmacia , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia General/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a safe and effective alternative to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) for lumbar surgery. Foremost among the reasons to avoid GEA is the desire to minimize postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Although POCD is a complex and multifactorial entity, the risk of its development has been associated with anesthetic modality and perioperative polypharmacy, among others. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SA reduced polypharmacy compared with GEA in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: Demographic and procedural data of 424 consecutive TLIF patients were extracted retrospectively. Patients undergoing single-level TLIF through GEA (n = 186) or SA (n = 238) were enrolled into our database. Perioperative medications, excluding antibiotic prophylaxis and local anesthetics, were classified into various categories. RESULTS: Patients in the SA cohort received a mean of 4.5 medications vs a mean of 10.5 medications in the GEA cohort ( P < .0001). This reduction in perioperative medications remained significant after a multivariate analysis to control for confounders ( P < .001 for all variables). The use of vasopressors was significantly reduced in the SA cohort ( P < .001), which coincided with a significant reduction in hypotensive episodes ( P < .001). Patients undergoing TLIF through GEA had 3.6 times greater odds of experiencing a hypotensive episode intraoperatively (odds ratio = 3.62, 95% CI [2.38-5.49]). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is associated with a significant decrease in perioperative medications and may confer superior intraoperative hemodynamic stability, which lowers pressor requirements. The decrease of perioperative medications may be an important contribution in reducing the incidence of POCD in patients undergoing TLIFs, although this requires further study.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Polifarmacia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Triggered electromyography (tEMG) is an intraoperative neuromonitoring technique used to assess pedicle screw placement during instrumented fusion procedures. Although spinal anesthesia is a safe alternative to general anesthesia in patients undergoing lumbar fusion, its use may potentially block conduction of triggered action potentials or may require higher threshold currents to elicit myotomal responses when using tEMG. Given the broad utilization of tEMG for confirmation of pedicle screw placement, adoption of spinal anesthesia may be hindered by limited studies of its use alongside tEMG. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether spinal anesthesia affects the efficacy of tEMG, we compare the baseline spinal nerve thresholds during lumbar fusion procedures under general vs spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients (12 general and 11 spinal) undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were included in the study. Baseline nerve threshold was determined through direct stimulation of the spinal nerve using tEMG. RESULTS: Baseline spinal nerve threshold did not differ between the general and spinal anesthesia cohorts (3.25 ± 1.14 vs 3.64 ± 2.16 mA, respectively; P = .949). General and spinal anesthesia cohorts did not differ by age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score status, or surgical indication. CONCLUSION: We report that tEMG for pedicle screw placement can be safely and effectively used in procedures under spinal anesthesia. The baseline nerve threshold required to illicit a myotomal response did not differ between patients under general or spinal anesthesia. This preliminary finding suggests that spinal anesthetic blockade does not contraindicate the use of tEMG for neuromonitoring during pedicle screw placement.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Tornillos Pediculares , Humanos , Electromiografía/métodosRESUMEN
Spinal anesthesia (SA) is gaining recognition as a safe and efficacious regional alternative to general anesthesia for elective lumbar surgery. However, unfamiliarity with management issues related to its use has limited the adoption of awake spine surgery, despite its benefits. Few centers in the United States routinely offer SA for elective lumbar surgery, and a comprehensive workflow to standardize SA for lumbar surgery is lacking. In this article, we examine recent literature on the use of SA in lumbar surgery, review the experience of our institution with SA in lumbar surgery, and provide a cohesive outline to streamline the implementation of SA from the perspective of the anesthesiologist. We review the critical features of SA in contemporary lumbar surgery, including selection of patients, methods of SA, intraoperative sedation, and management of several important technical considerations. We aimed to flatten the learning curve to improve the availability and accessibility of the technique for eligible patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Post-operative quadriparesis following posterior cervical decompression and fusion is a rare but devastating complication. Unless rapidly identified and treated, it can cause permanent injury and disability. Given the sparse literature on this topic we intend to report on its incidence, to identify potential predisposing risk factors, and to discuss management considerations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 301 patients who underwent posterior cervical decompressive laminectomies and instrumented fusion performed by the senior author between 2006 and 2020. We describe the clinical courses and interventions for the seven of these 301 patients who developed post-operative quadriparesis. RESULTS: The incidence of post-operative quadriparesis following cervical spine decompressive laminectomies and instrumented fusion was 2.3% (7/301) in our study. The mean time-to-onset was 2 days, and the most common pathology was post-operative hematoma. We did not identify any statistically significant risk factors that predispose patients to post-operative quadriparesis. In our series, the patients with post-operative quadriparesis without profound hypotension who underwent emergent surgical decompression demonstrated improved neurologic outcomes compared to those who underwent interval imaging prior to decompression. CONCLUSION: Post-operative quadriparesis following cervical spine surgery is a catastrophic complication that is poorly reported and under-studied in current literature. In this study, we found a 2.3% incidence of post-operative quadriparesis with no obvious risk factors predisposing patients to this adverse outcome. We advocate that post-operative quadriparesis following cervical spine surgery, in the absence of profound hypotension, warrants emergent surgical site exploration without delay for interval imaging.
Asunto(s)
Laminectomía , Fusión Vertebral , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Laminectomía/efectos adversos , Laminectomía/métodos , Cuadriplejía/epidemiología , Cuadriplejía/etiología , Cuadriplejía/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common and vexing complication in elective spine surgery. Efficacious prevention strategies are still lacking, and existing studies focus primarily on identifying risk factors. Spinal anesthesia has become an attractive alternative to general anesthesia in elective lumbar surgery, with the potential of having a differential impact on POUR. METHODS: 422 spinal anesthesia procedures were prospectively collected between 2017 and 2021 and compared to 416 general anesthesia procedures retrospectively collected between 2014 and 2017, at a single academic center by the same senior neurosurgeon. The main outcome was POUR, defined as the need for straight bladder catheterization or indwelling bladder catheter placement after surgery due to failure to void. A power calculation was performed prior to data collection. RESULTS: The general anesthesia group had a higher rate of POUR (9.1 %) compared with the spinal anesthesia group (4.3 %), p = 0.005. At baseline, the spinal anesthesia cohort had an older average age and fewer patients with a history of previous spine surgery. Other comorbid conditions were comparable between the groups. For perioperative characteristics, spinal anesthesia patients had higher ASA scores, shorter operative times, shorter lengths of hospital stay, less operative levels, and zero use of intraoperative bladder catheterization. Acute pain service consult was similar between the groups. A multivariable logistic regression revealed that spinal anesthesia was associated with a significantly lower rate of urinary retention in the spinal anesthesia group (p = 0.0130), after adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Other statistically significant risk factors for POUR included diabetes, (p = 0.003), BPH (p = 0.014), operative time (p = 4.94e-06), and ASA score (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We collect and analyze one of the largest available cohorts of patients undergoing simple and complex surgeries under spinal and general anesthesia, finding that spinal anesthesia is independently associated with a lower incidence of POUR compared to general anesthesia, even when adjusted for potentially confounding risk factors. Further prospective trials are needed to explore this finding.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Retención Urinaria , Humanos , Retención Urinaria/epidemiología , Retención Urinaria/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Wild-type transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloid deposition has been found in the ligamentum flavum (LF) of patients undergoing spinal stenosis surgery. Our group previously reported that ATTRwt amyloid is associated with an increased lumbar ligamentum flavum thickness at symptomatic levels that required surgery. A comprehensive evaluation of LF thickness at asymptomatic levels in addition to symptomatic, treated levels has never been performed in ATTRwt patients. In this study, we compare the total LF thickness of all lumbar levels (lumbar LF burden) in ATTRwt and non-ATTRwt patients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 177 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. Ligamentum flavum thickness of 885 lumbar levels was measured on T2-weighted axial MRI. Amyloid presence was confirmed through Congo red staining of specimens, and subtype of ATTRwt was confirmed using mass-spectrometry and gene sequencing. RESULTS: Of the 177 patients, 30 (16.9%) were found to have ATTRwt in the ligamentum flavum. One hundred and fifty ATTRwt levels and 735 non-ATTRwt levels were measured by four different reviewers, with an intraclass coefficient (ICC) of 0.79. Mean ligamentum flavum thickness was 4.64 (±1.31) mm in the ATTRwt group and 3.99 (±1.45) mm in the non-ATTRwt group (p < 0.001). The lumbar LF burden (sum of ligamentum flavum thickness at all lumbar levels) for ATTRwt patients was 23.22 (±4.48) mm, and for non-ATTRwt patients was 19.96 (±5.49) mm (p = 0.003) CONCLUSION: The lumbar LF burden is greater in patients with ATTRwt amyloid compared to non-ATTRwt patients. This supports prior evidence that ATTRwt amyloid deposition might be associated with increased LF thickness and lumbar stenosis. This potential association requires more research and could be an important finding, as medications have recently become available that can treat patients with ATTRwt amyloid deposition.
Asunto(s)
Neuropatías Amiloides Familiares/patología , Ligamento Amarillo/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Región Lumbosacra , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prealbúmina , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Wild-type transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloid deposits have been found in the ligamentum flavum of patients undergoing surgery for spinal stenosis. The relationship between ATTRwt and ligamentum flavum thickness is unclear. We used pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to analyze ligamentum flavum thickness in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with and without ATTRwt amyloid. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 178 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. Ligamentum flavum thickness of 253 specimens was measured on T2-weighted axial MRI. Amyloid presence was confirmed through Congo red staining of specimens, and ATTRwt was confirmed using mass-spectrometry and gene sequencing. RESULTS: Twenty four of the 178 patients (13.5%) were found to have ATTRwt in the ligamentum flavum. Forty ATTRwt specimens and 213 non-ATTRwt specimens were measured. Mean ligamentum flavum thickness was 4.92 (±1.27) mm in the ATTRwt group and 4.00 (±1.21) mm in the non-ATTRwt group (p < 0.01). The ligamentum flavum was thickest at L4-L5, with a thickness of 5.15 (±1.27) mm and 4.23 (±1.29) mm in the ATTRwt and non-ATTRwt group, respectively (p = 0.007). There was a significant difference in ligamentum flavum thickness between ATTRwt and non-ATTRwt case for both patients younger than 70 years (p = 0.016) and those older than 70 years (p = 0.004). ATTRwt patients had greater ligamentum flavum thickness by 0.83 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-1.25 mm, p < 0.001) when controlled for age and lumbar level. CONCLUSION: Patients with ATTRwt had thicker ligamentum flavum compared to patients without ATTRwt. Further studies are needed to investigate the pathophysiology of ATTRwt in ligamentum flavum thickening.