Prolonged complete response to adjuvant tepotinib in a patient with newly diagnosed disseminated glioblastoma harboring mesenchymal-epithelial transition fusion.

The prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor despite current treatments. Targeted therapy in GBM has been the subject of intense investigation but has not been successful in clinical trials. The reasons for the failure of targeted therapy in GBM are multifold and include a lack of patient selection in trials, the failure to identify driver mutations, and poor blood-brain barrier penetration of investigational drugs. Here, we describe a case of a durable complete response in a newly diagnosed patient with GBM with leptomeningeal dissemination and PTPRZ1-MET fusion who was treated with tepotinib, a brain-penetrant MET inhibitor. This case of successful targeted therapy in a patient with GBM demonstrates that early molecular testing, identification of driver molecular alterations, and treatment with brain-penetrant small molecule inhibitors have the potential to change the outcome in select patients with GBM.

Pharmacologic management of myelofibrosis.

Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by abnormal hematopoiesis. Alterations to the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway result in dysregulation of gene transcription and cell proliferation. Patients with symptomatic myelofibrosis present with a variety of signs and symptoms including, but not limited to myelosuppression, marked splenomegaly, abdominal discomfort, fatigue, and blood transfusion-dependence. Traditional myelosuppressive therapies including hydroxyurea, azacitidine, and cladribine aim to reduce constitutional symptoms and control the burden of disease. Immunomodulators can potentially reverse anemia associated with myelofibrosis, but are poorly tolerated by most patients. The novel Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor, ruxolitinib, has demonstrated marked improvements to constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly. While survival benefit has not yet been demonstrated, continued research into pharmacologic management of myelofibrosis offers the promise of altering the course of disease progression.

Accelerated tumor progression after COVID-19 infection in patients with glioblastoma: A retrospective case-control study.

Background: We observed rapid tumor progression following COVID-19 infection among patients with glioblastoma and sought to systematically characterize their disease course in a retrospective case-control study. Methods: Using an institutional database, we retrospectively identified a series of COVID-19-positive glioblastoma cases and matched them by age and sex 1:2 to glioblastoma controls who had a negative COVID-19 test during their disease course. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. Hyperprogression was defined using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. Time to progression and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Thirty-two glioblastoma cases with positive COVID-19 testing were matched to 64 glioblastoma controls with negative testing; age, sex, and molecular profiles did not differ between groups. Progression events occurred in 27 cases (84%) and 46 controls (72%). Of these, 14 cases (52%) presented with multifocal disease or leptomeningeal disease at progression compared with 10 controls (22%; P = .0082). Hyperprogression was identified in 13 cases (48%) but only 4 controls (9%; P = .0001). Cases had disease progression at a median of 35 days following COVID-19 testing, compared with 164 days for controls (P = .0001). Median survival from COVID-19 testing until death was 8.3 months for cases but 17 months for controls (P = .0016). Median overall survival from glioblastoma diagnosis was 20.7 months for cases and 24.6 months for controls (P = .672). Conclusions: Patients with glioblastoma may have accelerated disease progression in the first 2 months after COVID-19 infection. Infected patients should be monitored vigilantly. Future investigations should explore tumor-immune microenvironment changes linking tumor progression and COVID-19.

Carfilzomib and pomalidomide: recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma is a hematologic malignancy characterized by plasma cell clonal expansion as well as end-organ damage due to increased levels of monoclonal proteins in both the plasma and urine. The clinical syndrome is characterized by hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone involvement that leads to pathologic fractures. This progressive disease can result in significant patient morbidity and mortality. Despite advances with treatment options and autologous stem cell transplantation, multiple myeloma remains incurable. Current front-line therapies include proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, anthracyclines, and steroids. Due to the advent of the immunomodulatory agents thalidomide and lenalidomide, as well as the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma has improved greatly. However, once patients progress through front-line therapy and have relapsed or refractory disease, treatment options have historically been very limited. Carfilzomib, a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, has shown impressive response rates as a single agent in the relapsed and refractory patient setting; this includes patients who are refractory to previous bortezomib therapy. In addition, a third-generation immunomodulator, pomalidomide, has also shown promising results in a similar patient population, including those patients who have been shown to be refractory to lenalidomide and bortezomib. Adverse effects of both of these medications have been considered tolerable in the relapsed or refractory population, especially considering the benefits that have been shown. Continuing clinical research will reveal the utility of these agents in combination regimens or in a front-line setting for patients with multiple myeloma.