Favorable Parental Perception of Proactive Nutrition Intervention in High-risk Pediatric Brain Tumor Population and Impact on Nutrition Outcomes.

Children with certain brain tumors often present with malnutrition and experience a decline in nutritional status throughout treatment. This can negatively affect outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that proactive enteral feeding can be beneficial to childhood cancer patients in helping to maintain or improve their nutritional status. To date, no classification parameters exist for pediatric brain tumor diagnoses and their corresponding nutritional risk. Our neuro-oncology team set out to develop a nutrition risk classification for pediatric brain tumors with a corresponding decision aid for nutrition intervention. We report the use of this decision aid in 15 pediatric brain tumor patients at high risk for nutritional deficits. Despite being high risk, weight loss did not exceed 5% in 93% (14/15) and 87% (13/15) of our patients from diagnosis to start of cycle 2 of chemotherapy and from diagnosis to end of therapy, respectively. Patients underweight at diagnosis (5/15) experienced improvements in nutritional status, and only 1 patient had a negative change in body mass index z-score ≥1 SD from diagnosis to end of therapy. This strategy was well-accepted by parents who reported satisfaction with the approach, their child's nutritional status throughout treatment, and the psychosocial aspects of feeding.

State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019: Systematic Review of Interventions for Preventing and Treating Children with Cerebral Palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cerebral palsy is the most common physical disability of childhood, but the rate is falling, and severity is lessening. We conducted a systematic overview of best available evidence (2012-2019), appraising evidence using GRADE and the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System and then aggregated the new findings with our previous 2013 findings. This article summarizes the best available evidence interventions for preventing and managing cerebral palsy in 2019. RECENT FINDINGS: Effective prevention strategies include antenatal corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, caffeine, and neonatal hypothermia. Effective allied health interventions include acceptance and commitment therapy, action observations, bimanual training, casting, constraint-induced movement therapy, environmental enrichment, fitness training, goal-directed training, hippotherapy, home programs, literacy interventions, mobility training, oral sensorimotor, oral sensorimotor plus electrical stimulation, pressure care, stepping stones triple P, strength training, task-specific training, treadmill training, partial body weight support treadmill training, and weight-bearing. Effective medical and surgical interventions include anti-convulsants, bisphosphonates, botulinum toxin, botulinum toxin plus occupational therapy, botulinum toxin plus casting, diazepam, dentistry, hip surveillance, intrathecal baclofen, scoliosis correction, selective dorsal rhizotomy, and umbilical cord blood cell therapy. We have provided guidance about what works and what does not to inform decision-making, and highlighted areas for more research.

Predicting driving ability using DriveSafe and DriveAware in people with cognitive impairments: a replication study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Previously developed cut-off scores for off-road assessments, DriveSafe and DriveAware, were applied to data from a new sample. Our aim was to determine whether results from previous research are replicable in a different population, to further investigate the psychometric properties of the tools. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we analysed data from DriveSafe and DriveAware gathered in three driving centres in Sydney (N = 90). We calculated sensitivity and specificity of DriveSafe and DriveAware data for predicting results of on-road testing. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for this study were very similar to those documented previously. The lower cut-off produced specificity of 96%, identical to previous calculations. The upper cut-off score yielded sensitivity of 91% compared with 93% previously. When scores from DriveSafe and DriveAware were trichotomised (i.e. 'pass,' 'fail,' and 'requires on-road testing'), they predicted on-road performance of about half of drivers with ≥ 90% accuracy. CONCLUSION: Findings will add to the body of evidence suggesting that not all drivers referred to occupational therapy driving assessors require expensive, time-consuming and potentially high risk on-road assessments.

School readiness of children at high risk of cerebral palsy randomised to early neuroprotection and neurorehabilitation: protocol for a follow-up study of participants from four randomised clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: School readiness includes cognitive, socio-emotional, language and physical growth and development domains which share strong associations with life-course opportunities. Children with cerebral palsy (CP) are at increased risk of poor school readiness compared with their typically developing peers. Recently, earlier diagnosis of CP has allowed interventions to commence sooner, harnessing neuroplasticity. First, we hypothesise that early referral to intervention for children at-risk of CP will lead to improved school readiness at 4-6 years relative to placebo or care as usual. Second, we hypothesise that receipt of early diagnosis and early intervention will lead to cost-savings in the form of reduced healthcare utilisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Infants identified as at-risk of CP ≤6 months corrected age (n=425) recruited to four randomised trials of neuroprotectants (n=1), early neurorehabilitation (n=2) or early parenting support (n=1) will be re-recruited to one overarching follow-up study at age 4-6 years 3 months. A comprehensive battery of standardised assessments and questionnaires will be administered to assess all domains of school readiness and associated risk factors. Participants will be compared with a historical control group of children (n=245) who were diagnosed with CP in their second year of life. Mixed-effects regression models will be used to compare school readiness outcomes between those referred for early intervention versus placebo/care-as-usual. We will also compare health-resource use associated with early diagnosis and intervention versus later diagnosis and intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, The University of Queensland, University of Sydney, Monash University and Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committees have approved this study. Informed consent will be sought from the parent or legal guardian of every child invited to participate. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and professional organisations, and to people with lived experience of CP and their families. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621001253897.

Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Decision-Making: The READ Model.

Evidence-based practice is the foundation of rehabilitation for maximizing client outcomes. However, an unacceptably high number of ineffective or outdated interventions are still implemented, leading to sub-optimal outcomes for clients. This paper proposes the Rehabilitation Evidence bAsed Decision-Making (READ) Model, a decision-making algorithm for evidence-based decision-making in rehabilitation settings. The READ Model outlines a step-by-step layered process for healthcare professionals to collaboratively set goals, and to select appropriate interventions. The READ Model acknowledges the important multi-layered contributions of client's preferences and values, family supports available, and external environmental factors such as funding, availability of services and access. Healthcare professionals can apply the READ Model to choose interventions that are evidence-based, with an appropriate mode, dose, and with regular review, in order to achieve client's goals. Two case studies are used to demonstrate application of the READ Model: cerebral palsy and autism spectrum disorder. The READ Model applies the four central principles of evidence-based practice and can be applied across multiple rehabilitation settings.