"The least significant change on bone mineral density scan increased in patients with higher degrees of obesity".

BACKGROUND: The least significant change (LSC) threshold of 0.03 g/cm² is used to interpret bone mineral density (BMD) scans in the general population. Our working hypothesis was that the current LSC threshold would not be applicable in obese populations. AIMS: The aim of this study was to calculate the LSC in an obese population. METHODS: We performed an interventional study among 120 obesity patients, in whom two measurements of BMD were performed at 3 sites. Pairs of measures were used to calculate the LSC, using the Bland and Altman method. RESULTS: We calculated that the LSC was 0.046 g/cm² at the lumbar spine, 0.069 g/cm² at the femoral neck, and 0.06 g/cm² at the total hip. We also calculated the LSC for each class of obesity and observed an increase in LSC with increasing body mass index (BMI). We calculated a LSC of 0.05 g/cm² in patients with class 2 or class 3 obesity, whereas the LSC in patients with class 1 obesity is similar to the threshold used in the general population. DISCUSSION: In obese population, like BMD, LSC is higher than the threshold value of the general population, and increases with increasing BMI. CONCLUSION: LSC of 0.05 g/cm² could be used in clinical practice in patients with class 2 or 3 obesity. These findings should help to improve the interpretation of BMD scans in these patients and optimize their management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile-de France VII, France.

A new pharmacokinetic model of urinary methotrexate to assess adherence in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Methotrexate (MTX) is the first-line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While therapeutic adherence is essential to successful management, no objective MTX assay is currently available. Using population pharmacokinetic modelling (PopPK), our objective was to describe the urinary MTX (MTXu) kinetics in treated patients and to evaluate its abilities to assess the MTX-adherence. METHODS: The association between urinary methotrexate level and methotrexate administration was assessed using a generalized linear model. Then, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on data from 59 patients using with Monolix 2021. R2. Simulations were run to establish a reference kinetic profile and evaluate the proportion of samples predicted as true positives. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, multivariate analysis showed that MTXu was independently associated with methotrexate administration (p < 0.0001) with a sensitivity and specificity greater than 99%. The final PopPK model selected was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Internal and external validation of the model met all predefined criteria. When using an analytical assay with a LOQ equal to 1 nM, the proportion of samples predicted as true positives is over 90%, as a function of MTX dose (7.5-25 mg/week) and post-administration sampling days (1-7 days). CONCLUSION: We developed a pharmacokinetic model able to describe expected patterns of urinary methotrexate. This allowed us to propose a new objective test of MTX adherence, which could help in routine practice to differentiate patients who are truly unresponsive to methotrexate from those who are unresponsive because of non-adherence.