Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Perit Dial Int ; 29(3): 330-9, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19458307

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated infections markedly contribute to treatment failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. There is much controversy surrounding prophylactic strategies to prevent these infections. METHODS: In this nationwide multicenter study we analyzed strategies to prevent catheter-associated infections as performed in Austrian PD centers in 2006. A questionnaire was sent to all 23 PD centers in Austria. RESULTS: Ten different catheter models were used in the 332 patients being treated in the 23 Austrian PD centers. Systemic antibiotics prior to catheter placement were given by 17 of the 23 PD centers (glycopeptides, n = 7; cephalosporins, n = 10). Nasal swabs were taken preoperatively by 17 PD centers; nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriers were treated prophylactically with mupirocin cream in 15 of these centers. Dressing change was routinely performed in 318 of 332 chronic PD patients (nonocclusive film dressing, n = 58; gauze dressing, n = 260). Disinfectants for chronic exit-site care included povidone iodine (n = 155), sodium hypochlorite (n = 31), povidone iodine + sodium hypochlorite together (n = 102), and octenidine dihydrochloride/phenoxyethanol (n = 17). Water + non-disinfectant soap or 0.9% sodium chloride was administered as a cleansing agent to the exit site by 27 patients. Routine S. aureus screening (nasal and/or exit-site swabs) in chronic PD patients was performed in 12 PD centers; carriers were treated with mupirocin cream in 11 of these centers. Dialysis staff members were screened for S. aureus in 8 PD centers and spouses were screened for S. aureus in 5 PD centers. The overall exit-site infection rate was 1 episode/43.9 patient-months, tunnel infection rate was 1 episode/88.9 patient-months, and peritonitis rate was 1 episode/51.0 patient-months. Patients of centers that have installed a prophylaxis protocol for treating S. aureus carriers had lower mean infection rates compared with those not using such a protocol. CONCLUSION: Various individual prophylactic strategies are used to prevent catheter-associated infections in Austrian PD centers. Infection rates are within the range reported in the literature. There is still scope for improvement in some centers (e.g., by establishing a prophylaxis protocol).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/prevención & control , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Austria , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA