Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 59(2): 411-419, 2020 11 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33554506

RESUMEN

Objectives: Development and implementation of SARS-CoV-2 serologic assays gained momentum. Laboratories keep on investigating the performance of these assays. In this study, we compared three fully automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays. Methods: A total of 186 samples from 84 PCR-positive COVID-19 patients and 120 control samples taken before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic were analyzed using commercial serologic assays from Roche, Siemens and DiaSorin. Time after the positive COVID-19 PCR result and onset of symptoms was retrieved from the medical record. An extended golden standard, using the result of all three assays was defined, judging if antibodies are present or absent in a sample. Diagnostic and screening sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative predictive value were calculated. Results: Diagnostic sensitivity (ability to detect a COVID-19 positive patient) ≥14 days after positive PCR testing was 96.7% (95% CI 88.5-99.6%) for DiaSorin, 93.3% (95% CI 83.8-98.2%) for Roche and 100% (95% CI 94.0-100%) for Siemens. Lower diagnostic sensitivities were observed <14 days after onset of symptoms for all three assay. Diagnostic specificity (ability to detect a COVID-19 negative patient) was 95.0% (95% CI 89.4-98.1%) for DiaSorin, 99.2% (95% CI 95.4-99.9%) for Roche and 100% (95% CI 97.0-100%) for Siemens. The sensitivity/specificity for detecting antibodies (ability of detecting absence (specificity) or presence (sensitivity) of COVID-19 antibodies) was 92.4% (95% CI 86.4-96.3%)/94.9% (95% CI 90.5-97.6%) for DiaSorin, 97.7% (95% CI 93.5-99.5%)/97.1% (95% CI 93.5-99.1%) for Roche and 98.5% (95% CI 94.6-99.8)/97.1 (95% CI 93.5-99.1%) for Siemens. Conclusions: This study revealed acceptable performance for all three assays. An orthogonal testing algorithm using the Siemens and Roche assay achieved the highest positive predictive values for antibody detection in low seroprevalence settings.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Automatización de Laboratorios , COVID-19/inmunología , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto Joven
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 101(2): 115486, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332306

RESUMEN

Spike (S)- and nucleocapsid (N)-specific serological assay responses were determined before and/or after first dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in 22 individuals. S-specific assays quantified antibodies after vaccination with significant higher levels in participants with a previous infection. Be cautious combining N-/S-specific assay results, potentially differentiating post-infection/vaccination immunization as assay-specific N-antibody waning was observed.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside de Coronavirus/inmunología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Fosfoproteínas/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA