RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More and more women are studying medicine these days. They often face a conflict between having children and pursuing a career. Thus, a challenging question arises for a new generation of young doctors: How can children and career be reconciled? Also, the right time to start a family plays an important role. At the University Witten/Herdecke, students with and without children were asked to what extent their time when they were students of medicine proved to be a convenient time to start a family. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was carried out in which a total of 423 medical students took part. A further 12 medical students with children were also interviewed about their situation using a guided interview. Results were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Medical students with children saw that there were advantages in terms of family and career to starting a family during their studies, but noted the disadvantages in terms of studies and the financial situation. The majority of medical students without children were undecided about the ideal time to start a family, but only 18% considered the student years to be the ideal time for this. Among medical students with children, on the other hand, 50% considered the student years as the ideal time to start a family and only five percent perceived the time after their studies as ideal. CONCLUSION: In order to facilitate combining children and career across the entire career path as a medical doctor, political and university policy concepts should be developed that take into consideration financial relief and flexible study organization.
Asunto(s)
Facultades de Medicina , Estudiantes de Medicina , Selección de Profesión , Niño , Familia , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Professional competence is important in delivering high quality patient care, and it can be enhanced by reflection and reflective discourse e.g. in mentoring groups. However, students are often reluctant though to engage in this discourse. A group mentoring program involving all preclinical students as well as faculty members and co-mentoring clinical students was initiated at Witten-Herdecke University. This study explores both the attitudes of those students towards such a program and factors that might hinder or enhance how students engage in reflective discourse. METHODS: A qualitative design was applied using semi-structured focus group interviews with preclinical students and semi-structured individual interviews with mentors and co-mentors. The interview data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Students' attitudes towards reflective discourse on professional challenges were diverse. Some students valued the new program and named positive outcomes regarding several features of professional development. Enriching experiences were described. Others expressed aversive attitudes. Three reasons for these were given: unclear goals and benefits, interpersonal problems within the groups hindering development and intrapersonal issues such as insecurity and traditional views of medical education. Participants mentioned several program setup factors that could enhance how students engage in such groups: explaining the program thoroughly, setting expectations and integrating the reflective discourse in a meaningful way into the curriculum, obliging participation without coercion, developing a sense of security, trust and interest in each other within the groups, randomizing group composition and facilitating group moderators as positive peer and faculty role models and as learning group members. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed and empathetic setup of group mentoring programs can help raise openness towards engaging in meaningful reflective discourse. Reflection on and communication of professional challenges can, in turn, improve professional development, which is essential for high quality patient care.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/normas , Tutoría , Competencia Profesional/normas , Desarrollo de Personal/métodos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Curriculum , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Alemania , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Rol Profesional , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Autoimagen , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Not least the much-invoked shortage of physicians in the current and the next generation has resulted in a wide range of efforts to improve postgraduate medical training. This is also in the focus of the current healthcare policy debate. Furthermore, quality and scope of available postgraduate training are important locational advantages in the competition for medical doctors. This study investigates the preferences and concerns that German house officers (HOs) have about their current postgraduate training. It also highlights how HOs evaluate the quality of their current postgraduate training and the learning environment. METHODS: HOs were asked to answer the question: "Which things are of capital importance to you personally in your medical training?", using a free text format. The survey was conducted web based (Lime survey) and all data was anonymized. Summarizing qualitative analyses were performed using the software tool MaxQDA. RESULTS: A total of 255 HOs participated in this study (female: n = 129/50.6 %; male: n = 126/49.4 %; age: 32 + 6 years) associated with 17 different German hospitals and from four medical specialties. Ten categories were generated from a total of 366 free text answers: 1. methodology of learning (n = 66), 2. supervision (n = 66), 3. learning structure (n = 61), 4. teaching competence (n = 37), 5. dedication (n = 34), 6. work climate (n = 29), 7. feedback/communication (n = 22), 8. challenge/patient safety (n = 21), 9. time/resources (n = 17), 10. personal security/safety (n = 13). CONCLUSIONS: HOs want a reliable and curriculum-guided learning structure. Different studying techniques should be used with sufficient (time) resources available in a trusting and communicative learning environment. Competent and dedicated instructors are expected to give individual and specific feedback to the HOs on individual strengths and deficits. Instructors should develop educational concepts in cooperation with the HOs and at the same time avoid excessive demands on HOs or hazards to patients.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Motivación , Médicos/psicología , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enseñanza/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accidents are the leading cause of death in adults prior to middle age. The care of severely injured patients is an interdisciplinary challenge. Limited evidence is available concerning pre-hospital trauma care training programs and the advantage of such programs for trauma patients. The effect on trauma care procedures or on the safety of emergency crews on the scene is limited; however, there is a high level of experience and expert opinion. METHODS: I - Video-recorded case studies are the basis of an assessment tool and checklist being developed to verify the results of programs to train participants in the care of seriously injured patients, also known as "objective structured clinical examination" (OSCE). The timing, completeness and quality of the individual measures are assessed using appropriate scales. The evaluation of team communication and interaction will be analyzed with qualitative methods and quantified and verified by existing instruments (e.g. the Clinical Team Scale). The developed assessment tool is validated by several experts in the fields of trauma care, trauma research and medical education. II a) In a German emergency medical service, the subjective assessment of paramedics of their pre-hospital care of trauma patients is evaluated at three time points, namely before, immediately after and one year after training. b) The effect of a standardized course concept on the quality of documentation in actual field operations is determined based on three items relevant to patient safety before and after the course. c) The assessment tool will be used to assess the effect of a standardized course concept on procedures and team communication in pre-hospital trauma care using scenario-based case studies. DISCUSSION: This study explores the effect of training on paramedics. After successful study completion, further multicenter studies are conceivable, which would evaluate emergency-physician staffed teams. The influence on the patients and prehospital measures should be assessed based on a retrospective analysis of the emergency room data. TRIALS REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00004713.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Accidentes , Adulto , Evaluación Educacional , Alemania , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Investigación Cualitativa , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of medical education on students' attitudes toward psychiatry and psychiatric patients, and examined the usefulness of a new evaluation tool: the 6-item Psychiatric Experience, Attitudes, and Knowledge (PEAK-6). METHOD: Authors studied the attitudes of 116 medical students toward psychiatry and individuals with mental disorders, using two questionnaires before and after a 12-week module of "psychosocial medicine." Results of the 30-item questionnaire Attitudes Toward Psychiatry (ATP-30) were compared with the results of PEAK-6. RESULTS: With the ATP-30, no change in attitudes toward psychiatry was observed at the end of the module. With the PEAK-6, the item "attitude toward psychiatry" significantly improved. Knowledge of and experience with psychiatry as well as knowledge of and experience with individuals with mental disorders improved significantly; however, attitudes toward individuals with mental disorders did not improve. CONCLUSION: PEAK-6 seems to be a promising tool with regard to nuanced information about psychiatric learning experiences. Participation in a psychiatric module may be associated with a positive effect on students' knowledge about, experience with, and attitudes toward psychiatry, but not attitudes toward psychiatric patients.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Psiquiatría , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Curriculum , Humanos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency training is designed to improve medical care teams' knowledge, practical skills, and treatment procedures in patient care to increase patient safety. This requires effective training, but the multifactorial effects of training are difficult to measure. METHODS: We assessed the impact of emergency team training on treatment procedures and quality, processes, technical skills, and nontechnical skills in simulated trauma emergencies in a longitudinal analysis, using videos that were recorded before (t0), immediately after (t1), and 1 year after the training (t2). The training was evaluated with the validated PERFECT checklist, which includes 7 scales: primary assessment, secondary assessment, procedures, technical skills, trauma communication, nontechnical skills, and a global performance scale.The primary end point was the change from before a training intervention (t0) to 1 year after training (t2), measured by a metric point score. The second end point was the impact of the intervention from before training to after and from immediately after training to 1 year later. RESULTS: A total of 146 trainings were evaluated. In simulated traumatological emergencies, training participants showed significantly better treatment capacity after 1 year (t0: 28.8 ± 5.6 points versus t2: 59.6 ± 6.6 points, P < 0.001), with greater improvement from t0 to t1 (28.8 ± 5.6 points versus 65.1 ± 7.9 points, P < 0.001). The most significant change from t0 to t2 was seen in the primary assessment, with a mean change of 11.1 ± 5.1, followed by the scale of the procedure (6.1 ± 3.0) and nontechnical skills (6.0 ± 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: Team trainings with intensive scenario training and short theoretical inputs lead to a significant improvement in simulated care of severely injured patients, especially in identifying and intervening in life-threatening symptoms, processes, and nontechnical skills, even 1 year after the course. Positive, longitudinally positive effects were also in communication and subjective safety of prehospital health care personnel.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Entrenamiento Simulado , Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodosRESUMEN
Introduction: For the selection of students for the winter semester 2020/21, the established selection procedure of the University of Witten/Herdecke (UW/H) was adapted to the virtual space in view of the current contact ban and recommended keeping of distance. The three stations in the second step of the procedure, the biographical one-on-one interview, presentation and discussion on a subject-specific topic as well as multiple mini interviews (MMI) on the social skills of the applicants were audiovisual and in real time in zoom meetings. Project description: The medical, psychological and student reviewers were prepared for the virtual selection procedure in training sessions. Three weeks before the selection days, the applicants received information on the technical requirements for the interviews and on data protection for the persons affected by the collection of personal data. The evaluation of the virtual selection procedure was carried out by the reviewers using an online questionnaire with 8 socio-demographic, 5 organizational, 8 content and 3 open questions. Results: The 108 reviewers conducted selection interviews in tandems (medical/psychological and student reviewers) with 178 applicants for human medicine and 105 applicants for psychology. The online evaluation by 58 reviewers (response rate 53.7%) showed a positive agreement with the virtual selection procedure, with a more favorable assessment of organization and content by the medical and psychological reviewers compared to the student reviewers. Discussion: The adequate adaptation of the selection procedure of the UW/H to the virtual zoom room as well as its acceptance are confirmed by the successful execution of the selection days for the students for the winter semester 2020/21 and the evaluation of the reviewers. Conclusion: The results and analysis of this exceptional situation will be used to also conduct the upcoming selection procedure for the summer semester 2021 in the virtual space. A valid assessment for the future use of a virtual selection procedure as a possible supplement to the personal selection interviews at the University of Witten/Herdecke remains to be made.
Asunto(s)
Educación a Distancia , Educación Médica , Psicología , Realidad Virtual , Educación Médica/métodos , Alemania , Humanos , Psicología/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , EnseñanzaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mass-casualty terrorist incidents are a medical and organisational challenge for every hospital. The Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course was developed because such incidents are associated with special injury patterns, escalating situations, and surges of casualties and haemodynamically unstable patients requiring treatment and can overwhelm the resources of hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The course currently lasts two-and-a -half days and is designed for 18-21 experienced surgeons, anaesthetists and clinical emergency physicians (who form groups of three for the tabletop simulation game). From 2017 to 2019, a total of 20 courses with 437 participants were conducted. The data in this study were collected from these 437 participants. RESULTS: Most of the participants were male (82%); 64% of participants specialised in a major field of surgery (general surgery, visceral surgery, vascular surgery, trauma surgery and orthopaedics). At the time of the course, most participants (86%) were department heads, senior physicians or specialists. The tabletop simulation game, which was specifically developed for the course, as well as the presentations were rated good to very good. The result of the overall course evaluation, which included aspects such as organisation, professionalism, content and teaching, was on average 1.34 and thus very good. DISCUSSION: The TDSC course complements already established courses and provides training in tactical surgical care after hospital admission. The TDSC course integrates and builds on elements of individualised trauma care such as the primary survey and the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST). This underlines again that it complements and does not replace other course formats. We can conclude that the presentations and the tabletop simulation game were well suited to the target group and that the participants were able to increase their knowledge of this complex subject.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica Continua , Cirugía General/educación , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Terrorismo , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Alemania , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , TriajeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mass-casualty incidents, especially in connection with a terrorist attack, can quickly overwhelm the capacities of receiving hospitals. After a mass-casualty terrorist incident, patients often arrive at hospitals in an uncoordinated manner on account of the chaotic situation. Many patients leave the incident site and refer themselves to hospitals independently. Hospital decision makers must, therefore, be able to make quick decisions on diagnostic procedures and treatment for every individual patient and, at the same time, take into consideration available resources. They require decision criteria and aids to properly manage such scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of the preparation of the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course, we developed a tabletop simulation game based on a comprehensive and structured review of the literature, the opinions of renowned experts, and the results of specialised conferences. This tabletop simulation game is played four times during each TDSC® course. RESULTS: Our analysis involved 264 of 465 course-participants from 2017 to 2019 and showed that the overall evaluation was very good and that participants grew more positive about the tabletop simulation game during the course. The tabletop simulation game received an average rating of 1.53 (1 = very good, 6 = insufficient). This rating remained consistently high over 19 courses. DISCUSSION: Hospital decision makers must respond to mass-casualty terrorist situations in a defined tactical and strategic approach. Rapid decisions must be made that take into account the special situation and available capacities and resources to maximise the number of survivors even though individual patients may have a poorer functional outcome. As part of the TDSC® course, the tabletop simulation game teaches high-level decision-making algorithms and prepares key hospital personnel for such situations.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Educación Médica Continua , Cirugía General/educación , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Entrenamiento Simulado , Terrorismo , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Planificación en Desastres , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Alemania , Humanos , TriajeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examines whether students in the clinical phase show reduced well-being and lower empathy scores compared to preclinical students. Furthermore, it explores students' most stressful experiences. METHODS: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted among medical students of the revised patient- and student-centred curriculum at Witten/Herdecke University (Germany). An online survey included questions regarding empathy (JSPE-S), well-being (WHO-5), distressing factors in the learning and clinical environments, mistreatment and thoughts of dropping out. RESULTS: 176 (34 %) of 517 medical students completed the questionnaire, 73 being preclinical and 103 clinical students. Despite lower well-being, clinical student did not demonstrate lower empathy levels. Main stressors during the clinical phase were negative physician role models and financially focussed care rather than challenging patient encounters. Compared to preclinical students, clinical students showed more mistreatment experiences and higher ratings towards thoughts of dropping out. CONCLUSION: Our results illustrate contemporary challenges to establishing a learner-centred clinical environment that nurtures well-being and empathy of medical students. The sustainment of empathy despite more stressful experiences and lower well-being may be due to protective factors. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The paper suggests activities to support clinical students to find ways to adapt the clinical learning environment to students' needs.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Empatía , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Atención al Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Comunicación , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Distrés Psicológico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Introduction: The University of Witten/Herdecke (UW/H) was founded in 1982 as the first privately run German university. In addition to economics, dentistry, a center for life sciences and the institute for general studies, the main focus from the inception of the University was the development of a model course in medical studies. Methodology: A description of the history of the development of medical studies in relation to the reasons for its founding, its founding ideals and their implementation; phases of development, transformations and influencing factors are presented in detail. External assessments are also used for this purpose. Result: The "Herdecke Model" was first implemented with the initial group of medical students in 1983. In the past 36 years the curriculum for medical education in Witten/Herdecke has evolved to meet internal and external requirements. The goals of the founders for a reform of medical studies and the founding ideals of the UW/H have continued to lead the University through a continuous reform process of medical training. From the first model of a reform degree course at UW/H 1983 to the current Model Study Course/Modellstudiengang (MSG 2018plus), these reforms have manifested themselves in four major phases spanning a 15 year period. Landmarks of the reforms include the first systematic introduction of problem-oriented learning in Germany, and clinical and practical training with real patients in both clinical and general medical elective blocks that far surpass the Medical Licensure Act's requirements. Additionally noteworthy are the introduction of PY training wards and the active participation and co-design role students may hold. Discussion: Due to the small size of UW/H, reforms can be tested quickly and implemented with ease and flexibility. This facilitates a "laboratory setting" for the testing of future-oriented innovations. The small size has allowed various concepts to be able to be used as models, thus serving as stimuli for larger change in medical studies in Germany.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum/normas , Modelos Educacionales , Curriculum/tendencias , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Docentes Médicos/educación , Docentes Médicos/tendencias , Alemania , Humanos , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendenciasRESUMEN
Objective: The individualized two-stage selection procedure for medical studies at Witten/Herdecke University (UW/H) has been in use for more than 30 years and comprises explicit and implicit selection criteria. This analysis aims at identifying the implicit criteria and answering the question whether an internal consistency of these implicit criteria may be verified for the different phases of the selection procedure (when evaluating the statements of purpose, during the selection weekend and during the concluding discussions of assessors). Methodology: Three qualitative studies on all phases of the selection procedure at UW/H have been conducted for determining the implicit assessment criteria of assessors: statements of purpose in extreme group comparison (12 admissions versus 18 rejections); semi-structured expert interviews (N=25) on the selection weekend; focus group analysis of the concluding discussions on two selection weekends (N=16). Results: The content analysis of the statements of purpose yielded 14 main categories with significant deviations between extreme groups in the categories school career, reasons for application and reflections as well as regarding the higher education entrance qualification grade. Based on the expert interviews, three main categories could be identified: intellectual ability, motivation and social competence, and the ability to reflect as a cross-content category. The focus group analysis yielded four main categories: performance, personality, personal growth potential and ability to reflect. Most frequently, the ability to reflect was mentioned as an assessment criterion. Conclusion: The main assessment categories are: motivation for the medical profession and starting studies at UW/H; performance and scholastic aptitude; personality, personal growth potential and social competence, as well as the ability to reflect as the most important basic competence and general category. Assessors consider the ability to reflect as a predictor of lifelong professional development as a physician.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Personal/normas , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Grupos Focales/métodos , Humanos , Selección de Personal/métodos , Selección de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Criterios de Admisión Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Universidades/organización & administración , Universidades/normas , Universidades/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trainings in emergency medicine are well structured, but examinations are rarely validated. We are evaluating the impact of pre-hospital emergency trainings on participants and patient care and developed and validated a checklist to assess emergency trainings. METHODS: We used videos recorded at the time points directly before (t0), directly after (t1), and one year after (t2) training to develop the PERFECT checklist (Performance Assessment of Emergency Teams and Communication in Trauma Care). The videos were assessed using semi-qualitative/linguistic analysis as well as expert panel appraisal and recommendations using the Delphi method. The checklist was tested for validity and reliability. RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.99) and internal consistency (α = 0.99) were high. Concurrent validity was moderate to high (r = 0.65 -r = 0.93 (p<0.001)). We included scales for procedures, non-technical skills, technical skills and global performance. The procedures were done faster in the mean over the timeline (t0: 2:29, 95%CI 1:54-3:03 min., t1: 1:11, 95%C 0:53-1:30 min, t2: 1:14, 95%CI 0:56-1:31 min.). All experts rated the recorded scenarios at t0 with the lowest sum score (mean 31±8), with a significantly better performance of the teams at t1 (mean 69±7). The performance at t2 (mean 66 ± 13) was slightly lower than at t1, but still better than at t0. At t1 and t2, linguistic analysis showed a change in the team leaders communication behaviour, which can be interpreted as a surrogate parameter for reduced stress. CONCLUSION: The PERFECT checklist has a good validity and high reliability for assessing trauma procedures and teamwork.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Medicina de Emergencia , Lista de Verificación , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Atención al Paciente/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Grabación de Cinta de VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prehospital trauma care is stressful and requires multi-professional teamwork. A decrease in the number of accident victims ultimately affects the routine and skills and underlines the importance of effective training. Standardized courses, like PHTLS, are established for health care professionals to improve the prehospital care of trauma patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the subjective safety in prehospital trauma care and learning progress by paramedics in a longitudinal analysis. METHODS: This was a prospective intervention trial and part of the mixed-method longitudinal EPPTC-trial, evaluating subjective and objective changes among participants and real patient care as a result of PHTLS courses. Participants were evaluated with pre/post questionnaires as well as one year after the course. RESULTS: We included 236 datasets. In the pre/post comparison, an increased performance could be observed in nearly all cases. The result shows that the expectations of the participants of the course were fully met even after one year (p = 0.002). The subjective safety in trauma care is significantly better even one year after the course (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that (ABCDE)-structure is decisive (p = 0.036) as well as safety in rare and common skills (both p < 0.001). Most skills are also rated better after one year. Knowledge and specific safety are assessed as worse after one year. CONCLUSION: The courses meet the expectations of the participants and increase the subjective safety in the prehospital care of trauma patients. ABCDE-structure and safety in skills are crucial. In the short term, both safety in skills and knowledge can be increased, but the courses do not have the power to maintain knowledge and specific subjective safety issues over a year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00004713 , registered 14. February 2014.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Auxiliares de Urgencia/psicología , Seguridad del Paciente , Autoimagen , Traumatología/educación , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Controlados Antes y Después , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Care for severely injured patients requires multidisciplinary teamwork. A decrease in the number of accident victims ultimately affects the routine and skills. PHTLS ("Pre-Hospital Trauma Life Support") courses are established two-day courses for medical and non-medical rescue service personnel, aimed at improving the pre-hospital care of trauma patients worldwide. The study aims the examination of the quality of documentation before and after PHTLS courses as a surrogate endpoint of training effectiveness and awareness. METHODS: This was a prospective pre-post intervention trial and was part of the mixed-method longitudinal EPPTC (Effect of Paramedic Training on Pre-Hospital Trauma Care) study, evaluating subjective and objective changes among participants and real patient care, as a result of PHTLS courses. The courses provide an overview of the SAMPLE approach for interrogation of anamnestic information, which is believed to be responsible for patient safety as relevant, among others, "Allergies," "Medication," and "Patient History" (AMP). The focus of the course is not the documentation. RESULTS: In total, 320 protocols were analyzed before and after the training. The PHTLS course led to a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the "AMP" information in the documentation. The subgroups analysis of "allergies" (+47.2%), "drugs" (+38.1%), and "medical history" (+27.8%) before and after the PHTLS course showed a significant increase in the information content. CONCLUSION: In summary, we showed that PHTLS training improves documentation quality, which we used as a surrogate endpoint for learning effectiveness and awareness. In this regard, we demonstrated that participants use certain parts of training in real life, thereby suggesting that the learning methods of PHTLS training are effective. These results, however, do not indicate whether patient care has changed.
Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Documentación/normas , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida , Alemania , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS©) courses, multiple choice question (MCQ) tests are used to assess student's post course knowledge. As part of the ninth Edition Revision Process, existing MCQ tests were reviewed and revised by an International MCQ Revision group. The aim of this study was to evaluate the revision procedure and its effects. METHODS: Based on psychometric data and evidence based guidelines for adequate MCQ item and test development, a detailed stepwise approach was determined and followed to evaluate the existing MCQs, and to guide test item revision or replacement. RESULTS: The MCQ Revision group composed three new draft test versions comprising of 40 MCQs each. These were beta-tested among ATLS Instructors in various countries involved in ATLS. Psychometric analysis demonstrated that a minority of MCQ items required revision to create three equally balanced tests. After these final adjustments, a new set of three validated MCQ tests was available for use in 9th edition ATLS provider courses. Beta testing was performed using instructors but not students. The failure rate amongst students of ATLS provider courses increased significantly after introduction of the new MCQ tests. CONCLUSION: ATLS tests were revised and updated using current evidence based guidelines and psychometric analysis. Difficulty of the tests was not initially beta-tested on students. Increasing test item discrimination and quality resulted in lower test scores by students.
Asunto(s)
Atención de Apoyo Vital Avanzado en Trauma , Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación Médica Continua/normas , Traumatología/educación , Atención de Apoyo Vital Avanzado en Trauma/normas , Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludRESUMEN
The current challenges of educational policy seem to be associated to changes of the health care system, to counteract concerns regarding the lack of physicians, supply shortage and migration of specialists. Therefore, expectations, wishes and concerns relevant to the anticipated everyday life as a physician of medical students at the Witten/Herdecke University (UWH) were acquired with an online questionnaire. Useful for a direct comparison the results of the online survey 'Medical Study and Future' throughout Germany have been used. Findings from this survey are common characteristics regarding the choice of the profession and planning of an establishment as a general practitioner and clear differences in reflecting on future issues in the occupational field.