Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 198
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 105(2): 268-279, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541355

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the prevalence of unmet rehabilitation needs among a sample of Canadians living with long-term conditions or disabilities during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Individuals residing in Canada during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible participants were Canadians living with long-term conditions or disabilities, 15 years or older living in 1 of the 10 provinces or 3 territories (n=13,487). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We defined unmet rehabilitation needs as those who reported needing rehabilitation (ie, physiotherapy/massage therapy/chiropractic, speech, or occupational therapy, counseling services, support groups) but did not receive it because of the COVID-19 pandemic. We calculated the national, age, gender, and province/territory-specific prevalence and 95% confidence interval of unmet rehabilitation needs. RESULTS: During the first wave of the pandemic, the prevalence of unmet rehabilitation needs among Canadians with long-term conditions or disabilities was 49.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 48.3, 50.3]). The age-specific prevalence was higher among individuals 15-49 years old (55.6%; 95% CI [54.2, 57.1]) than those 50 years and older (46.0%; 95% CI [44.5, 47.4]). Females (53.7%; 95% CI [52.6, 54.9]) had higher unmet needs than males (44.1%; 95% CI [42.3, 45.9]). Unmet rehabilitation needs varied across provinces and territories. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, almost 50% of Canadians living with long-term conditions or disabilities had unmet rehabilitation needs during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. This suggests that a significant gap between the needs for and delivery of rehabilitation care existed during the early phase of the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Pandemias , Rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Canadá/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Pueblos de América del Norte , Prevalencia
2.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(2): 99-109, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982343

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic health conditions impact worker outcomes but are challenging to measure using administrative workers' compensation (WC) data. The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) was developed to predict functional outcomes in community-based adult populations, but has not been validated for WC settings. We assessed a WC-based FCI (additive index of 18 conditions) for identifying chronic conditions and predicting work outcomes. METHODS: WC data were linked to a prospective survey in Ohio (N = 512) and Washington (N = 2,839). Workers were interviewed 6 weeks and 6 months after work-related injury. Observed prevalence and concordance were calculated; survey data provided the reference standard for WC data. Predictive validity and utility for control of confounding were assessed using 6-month work-related outcomes. RESULTS: The WC-based FCI had high specificity but low sensitivity and was weakly associated with work-related outcomes. The survey-based FCI suggested more comorbidity in the Ohio sample (Ohio mean = 1.38; Washington mean = 1.14), whereas the WC-based FCI suggested more comorbidity in the Washington sample (Ohio mean = 0.10; Washington mean = 0.33). In the confounding assessment, adding the survey-based FCI to the base model moved the state effect estimates slightly toward null (<1% change). However, substituting the WC-based FCI moved the estimate away from null (8.95% change). CONCLUSIONS: The WC-based FCI may be useful for identifying specific subsets of workers with chronic conditions, but less useful for chronic condition prevalence. Using the WC-based FCI cross-state appeared to introduce substantial confounding. We strongly advise caution-including state-specific analyses with a reliable reference standard-before using a WC-based FCI in studies involving multiple states.


Asunto(s)
Indemnización para Trabajadores , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Washingtón/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad
3.
J Appl Biomech ; 40(1): 40-49, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793656

RESUMEN

Driving posture can lead to musculoskeletal pain. Most work focuses on the lower back; therefore, we know little about automobile seat design and neck posture. This study evaluated an automobile driver seat that individualized upper back support to improve head and neck posture. Specifically, we examined the system's impact on anterior head translation with secondary outcomes of spine posture and perceptions of comfort/well-being compared with a control. Forty participants were block randomized to experience either the activated or deactivated version of the same seating system first. Participants completed two 30-minute simulated driving trials, separated by washout, with continuous measures of anterior head translation, spine posture, and pelvis orientation. Perceptions of comfort/well-being were assessed by survey and open-ended questions immediately following each condition. Small, but statistically significant decreases in anterior head translation and posterior pelvic tilt occurred with the activated seat system. Participants reported lower satisfaction with the activated seat system. Order of the 2 seat conditions affected differences in pelvis orientation and participant perceptions of comfort/well-being. An anthropometric-based seat system targeting upper back support can significantly affect head and pelvic posture but not satisfaction during simulated driving. Future work should examine long-term impacts of these posture changes on health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Cuello , Postura , Sedestación , Estudios Cruzados
4.
Healthc Manage Forum ; 37(1_suppl): 55S-61S, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39194274

RESUMEN

Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are the leading cause of disability, resulting in up to 40% of visits to family physicians. Current primary care workforce shortages in Canada require other providers to maximize scopes of practice. Few MSK providers have been trained in team-based primary care settings. Study objectives included: (1) educating participating primary care teams through synchronous education, (2) educating Canadian primary care providers through asynchronous education, and (3) integrating chiropractors into primary care teams, whilst evaluating team MSK care knowledge/attitudes and integration experience. Results indicated improvements in collaborative competency, improved understanding and attitudes to chiropractic, and the importance of providing MSK care within funded primary care. Teams employed unique approaches to integrating chiropractors and indicated high demand for their services by patients and providers. Provision of MSK care without economic barrier is desirable and highly valued by teams. Chiropractors are well suited to participate in funded primary care teams in Canada.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Competencia Clínica , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Quiropráctica/educación , Canadá , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Atención Integral de Salud/organización & administración , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Persona de Mediana Edad
5.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 65(1): 24-37, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35871758

RESUMEN

AIM: To describe the clinical course of pain intensity in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) resulting from usual care or specific interventions. METHOD: We conducted an exploratory prognostic systematic review searching electronic databases from inception to 31st December 2021. Evidence from low and moderate risk-of-bias studies was synthesized. RESULTS: We retrieved 2275 citations; 18 studies met the inclusion criteria and 10 were synthesized. The course of pain intensity in children with CP receiving usual care was stable over 15 weeks (χ2 [2]  = 1.8, p = 0.5). Children who received continuous intrathecal baclofen (CITB) reported significant pain intensity reduction (visual analogue scale [VAS] = -4.2 out of 10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -6.3 to -2.1]) 6 months postinsertion but similar children receiving usual care had no significant change over 6 months (VAS = 1.3 out of 10, 95% CI = -1.3 to 3.6). Children receiving botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injections had significant decreases in pain after 1 month (numeric rating scale = -6.5, 95% CI = -8.0 to -5.0). Adults with chronic pain receiving usual care reported stable pain intensity over time; pain intensity improved in ambulatory adults exercising and those treated surgically for cervical myelopathy. INTERPRETATION: The course of pain intensity in individuals with CP is unclear. Evidence suggests that children and adults receiving usual care had stable pain intensity over the short or long term. Interventions (CITB and BoNT-A in children and exercise and surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy in adults) had pain intensity reduction. Larger study samples are needed to confirm these results. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Pain intensity was stable in children with cerebral palsy (CP) receiving usual care. Adults with CP and chronic pain receiving usual care had stable, persistent pain intensity. Children receiving continuous intrathecal baclofen via pump and botulinum neurotoxin A reported significantly lower pain intensities. Adults with chronic pain and dyskinetic CP and cervical myelopathy reported significantly lower pain intensity with exercise or cervical decompression. Limited high-quality evidence exists describing non-procedural pain changes in individuals with CP.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Parálisis Cerebral , Dolor Crónico , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Parálisis Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor , Pronóstico
6.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 104(2): 287-301, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35798195

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the measurement properties and minimal important change (MIC) of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) short (12 questions) and full (36 questions) versions in persons with nonspecific low back pain (LBP). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, APA PsycInfo, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to May 2021). STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies assessed measurement properties or MIC of WHODAS 2.0 in persons with LBP. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using Consensus-Based Standards for Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) and COSMIN-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology checklists. DATA SYNTHESIS: We descriptively synthesized results stratified by measurement property and LBP duration (subacute: 6 weeks to 3 months; chronic: ≥3 months). RESULTS: We screened 297 citations and included 14 studies (reported in 15 articles). Methodological quality of studies was very good for internal consistency and varied between very good and doubtful for construct validity, doubtful for responsiveness, and adequate for all other properties assessed. Evidence suggests that WHODAS 2.0 full version has adequate content validity (2 studies); WHODAS 2.0 short and full versions have adequate structural validity (3 studies), but construct validity is indeterminate (9 studies). WHODAS 2.0 short and full versions have adequate internal consistency (10 studies), and the full version has adequate test-retest and interrater reliability (3 studies) in persons with LBP. Minimal detectable change (MDC) was 10.45-13.99 of 100 for the full version and 8.6 of 48 for the short version in persons with LBP (4 studies). WHODAS 2.0 full version has no floor or ceiling effects, but the short version has potential floor effects in persons with chronic LBP (3 studies). One study estimated MIC for the full version as 4.87 of 100 or 9.74 of 100 (corresponding to 1- and 2-point change on 0- to 10-cm visual analog scale for pain, respectively), and 1 study estimated 3.09-4.68 of 48 for the short version. CONCLUSIONS: In persons with LBP, WHODAS 2.0 full version has adequate content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability. WHODAS 2.0 short version has adequate structural validity and internal consistency. Construct validity of the short and full versions is indeterminate. Since MDC is estimated to be larger than MIC, users may consider both MIC and MDC thresholds to measure change in functioning for LBP.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Psicometría , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 64(11): 1416-1424, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35489074

RESUMEN

AIM: To identify 5-week pain intensity trajectories and their association with physical and psychological well-being in children/young people with cerebral palsy (CP). METHOD: A cohort study was conducted with 101 Canadian children/young people with CP, of whom 49 were female, with an overall mean age of 12 years 11 months (SD 3 years 1 month), range of 8 to 18 years, and classified in any Gross Motor Function Classification System level. Self-reported pain intensity (Faces Pain Scale - Revised) was collected weekly for 5 weeks and physical and psychological well-being (KIDSCREEN-27) at baseline and 5 weeks. Statistical analyses included latent class growth and general linear models. RESULTS: All Gross Motor Function Classification System levels were represented (I = 40.6%; II = 15.8%; III = 20.8%; IV = 13.9%; V = 8.9%). Five pain intensity trajectories were identified. Three trajectories had very low (35.4%), low (32.4%), or high (4.9%) mean stable pain. Two trajectories had moderate changing pain (16.8%) and high pain decreasing to moderate levels (10.5%) respectively. Trajectory participants with stable high pain had the lowest physical well-being (adjusted ß = -10.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -19.37 to -0.66). Those in the three trajectories with the highest mean baseline pain intensity (>3 out of 10) had the lowest psychological well-being (adjusted ß = -8.27, 95% CI = -14.84 to -1.70; ß = -6.74, 95% CI = -12.43 to -1.05; ß = -5.82, 95% CI = -15.34 to 3.71). INTERPRETATION: Almost one-third of participants had moderate-to-high pain intensity trajectories. Membership in the higher pain intensity trajectories was associated with lower physical and psychological well-being. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Five distinct 5-week pain intensity trajectories were identified in children/young people with cerebral palsy. Thirty-two per cent of participants had moderate-to-high pain intensity trajectories. Participants in the trajectories with higher pain intensity reported lower physical and psychological well-being.


OBJETIVO: Identificar trajetórias de intensidade de dor de 5 semanas e sua associação com o bem-estar físico e psicológico em crianças/jovens com paralisia cerebral (PC). MÉTODO: Foi realizado um estudo de coorte com 101 crianças/jovens canadenses com PC, sendo 49 do sexo feminino, com média de idade geral de 12 anos e 11 meses (DP 3 anos 1 mês), faixa de 8 a 18 anos, e classificados em qualquer nível do Sistema de Classificação da Função Motora Grossa. A intensidade da dor autorreferida (Faces Pain Scale - Revised) foi coletada semanalmente por 5 semanas e o bem-estar físico e psicológico (KIDSCREEN-27) no início e 5 semanas. As análises estatísticas incluíram crescimento de classe latente e modelos lineares gerais. RESULTADOS: Todos os níveis do Sistema de Classificação da Função Motora Grossa (GMFCS) foram representados (I = 40,6%; II = 15,8%; III = 20,8%; IV = 13,9%; V = 8,9%). Cinco trajetórias de intensidade de dor foram identificadas. Três trajetórias tiveram muito baixa (35,4%), baixa (32,4%) ou alta (4,9%) média de dor estável. Duas trajetórias apresentaram dor moderada em mudança (16,8%) e dor alta diminuindo para níveis moderados (10,5%), respectivamente. Os participantes com trajetória com dor alta estável tiveram o menor bem-estar físico (ß ajustado = -10,01; intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC] = -19,37 a -0,66). Aqueles nas três trajetórias com a maior intensidade média de dor na linha de base (> 3 em 10) tiveram o menor bem-estar psicológico (ß ajustado = -8,27, IC 95% = -14,84 a -1,70; ß = -6,74, 95% IC = -12,43 a -1,05; ß = -5,82, IC 95% = -15,34 a 3,71). INTERPRETAÇÃO: Quase um terço dos participantes tiveram trajetórias de intensidade de dor moderada a alta. A participação nas trajetórias de maior intensidade de dor foi associada a menor bem-estar físico e psicológico.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Adolescente , Canadá , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor/complicaciones , Dimensión del Dolor
8.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(8): 627-643, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35665525

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Older workers are increasingly represented in the U.S. workforce, but frequently work part-timeor intermittently, hindering accurate injury rate estimates. To reduce the impact of reporting barriers on rate comparisons, we focused on reinjury (both injury recurrence and new injury) among workers with a workers' compensation claim, assessing: (1) reinjury risk for workers age 65+ versus <65; (2) importance of work-time at-risk measurement for rate estimates and comparisons; and (3) age distribution of potential risk factors. METHODS: Washington State workers' compensation claims for a retrospective cohort of workers with work-related permanent impairments were linked to state wage files. Reinjury rates were calculated for the cohort (N = 11,184) and a survey sample (N = 582), using both calendar time and full-time equivalent (FTE)-adjusted time. Risk differentials were assessed using rate ratios and adjusted survival models. RESULTS: The rate ratio for workers age 65+ (vs. <65) was 0.45 (p < 0.001) using calendar time, but 0.70 (p = 0.07) using FTE-adjusted time. Survey-based rates were 35.7 per 100 worker-years for workers age 65+, versus 14.8 for <65. Workers age 65+ (vs. <65) were more likely to work <100% FTE, but were similar regarding job strain, their ability to handle physical job demands, and their comfort reporting unsafe conditions or injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Accounting for work-time at risk substantially improves age-based reinjury comparisons. Although the marked elevation in self-reported reinjury risk for older workers might be a small-sample artifact (n = 34), workers age 65+ are likely at higher risk than previously appreciated. Ongoing workforce trends demand increased attention to injury surveillance and prevention for older workers.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Ocupacionales , Lesiones de Repetición , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Indemnización para Trabajadores
9.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 23(1): 283, 2022 Mar 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331201

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While pain is often the focus of clinical interventions, other clinical outcomes (e.g., discomfort, stiffness) might also contribute to patients' functionality and well-being. Although researchers and clinicians may view discomfort, pain and stiffness as different constructs, it remains unclear how patients perceive and differentiate between these constructs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore patients' perceptions of pain, discomfort, and stiffness. METHODS: Chiropractic patients were invited to complete an online cross-sectional survey and describe what 'discomfort', 'pain' and 'stiffness' meant to them using their own words. Lexical and inductive qualitative content analyses were conducted independently and then triangulated. RESULTS: Fifty-three chiropractic patients (47.2% female, mean age: 39.1 ± 15.1 years) responded. The most common combinations of words to describe discomfort were "can be ignored" and "less severe than". "Cannot be ignored" and "sharp shooting" were used to describe pain. "Limited range of motion" was used to describe stiffness. Qualitatively, five themes were developed: impact, character, feeling, intensity and temporality. Stiffness was described as limited movement/mobility. Although discomfort and stiffness impacted patients' activities, patients remained functional; pain was described as stopping/limiting activities. Discomfort was described as dull and tingling, pain as sharp and shooting, and stiffness as tight and restricted. Patients felt displeased and annoyed when experiencing discomfort and stiffness but hurt and in danger of harm when experiencing pain. Discomfort and stiffness were described as less intense than pain, with shorter/intermittent duration; however, all constructs could be experienced constantly. CONCLUSION: Patients perceived discomfort, pain and stiffness as different, yet overlapping constructs. This preliminary work advances our knowledge of how patients conceptualize these constructs, contributing to better understanding of what patients mean when reporting these experiences, potentially improving the clinician-patient communication.


Asunto(s)
Dolor , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Adulto Joven
10.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 271, 2021 04 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33892643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal conditions are the primary reason older adults seek general medical care, resulting in older adults as the highest consumers of health care services. While there is high use of chiropractic care by older adults, there is no recent, specific data on why older adults seek chiropractic care and how chiropractors manage conditions. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe the demographic characteristics of older adults seeking chiropractic care, and to report problems diagnosed by chiropractors and the treatment provided to older adults who seek chiropractic care. METHODS: A secondary data analysis from two, large cross-sectional observational studies conducted in Australia (COAST) and Canada (O-COAST). Patient encounter and diagnoses were classified using the International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition (ICPC-2), using the Australian ICPC-2 PLUS general practice terminology and the ICPC-2 PLUS Chiro terminology. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize chiropractor, patient and encounter characteristics. Encounter and patient characteristics were compared between younger (< 65 years old) and older (≥65 years old) adults using χ2 tests or t-tests, accounting for the clustering of patients and encounters within chiropractors. RESULTS: A total of 6781 chiropractor-adult patient encounters were recorded. Of these, 1067 encounters were for persons aged > 65 years (16%), from 897 unique older patients. The most common diagnosis within older adult encounters was a back problem (56%), followed by neck problems (10%). Soft tissue techniques were most frequently used for older patients (85 in every 100 encounters) and in 29 of every 100 encounters, chiropractors recommended exercise to older patients as a part of their treatment. CONCLUSIONS: From 6781 chiropractor-adult patient encounters across two countries, one in seven adult chiropractic patients were > 65 years. Of these, nearly 60% presented with a back problem, with neck pain and lower limb problems the next most common presentation to chiropractors. Musculoskeletal conditions have a significant burden in terms of disability in older adults and are the most commonly treated conditions in chiropractic practice. Future research should explore the clinical course of back pain in older patients seeking chiropractic care and compare the provision of care to older adults across healthcare professions.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Scand J Public Health ; 49(7): 750-754, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304621

RESUMEN

AIMS: This study aims to describe the mean trajectories of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms among Swedish university students before and during the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We recruited 1835 participants in September 2020, of whom 81% provided follow-ups in December 2020-January 2021 and 77% provided follow-ups in March-April 2021. The short-form Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale was used to measure mental health symptoms. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the mean differences in symptom levels over the three time periods. RESULTS: Compared with September, mean depression was 0.91 points of 21 higher (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.13) in December 2020-January 2021 and 0.66 points higher (95% CI 0.43-.88) in March-April 2021. Anxiety levels were 0.20 points higher (95% CI 0.05-0.34) in December 2020-January 2021 and 0.17 points higher (95% CI 0.02-0.33) in March-April 2021. Stress levels were 0.21 points higher (95% CI 0.00-0.41) in December 2020-January 2021 and 0.16 points lower (95% CI -0.38 to 0.05) in March-April 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate relatively stable levels of mental health among Swedish university students during the second and third waves of COVID-19 compared with before the second wave. Mean depression symptom scores increased slightly, but the importance of this small increase is uncertain.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes , Suecia/epidemiología , Universidades
12.
Scand J Public Health ; 49(7): 741-749, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034577

RESUMEN

AIMS: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound effect on societies and citizens worldwide, raising concerns about potential mental health impacts. We aimed to describe trajectories of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak compared to before the outbreak, and to determine if trajectories were modified by pre-pandemic loneliness, poor sleep quality and mental health problems. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study with 1836 Swedish university students entering the study before 13 March 2020, the onset of the pandemic, with follow-ups within three (FU1) and six months (FU2) of the outbreak. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate mean differences in symptom levels over time-periods, and to estimate potential effect modifications. RESULTS: We found small differences in mean levels of the depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) over time. Compared to before the pandemic, depression increased by 0.25 points of 21 (95% CI: 0.04 to 0.45) at FU1 and decreased by 0.75/21 (95% CI:-0.97 to -0.53) at FU2. Anxiety decreased from baseline to FU1 by 0.09/21 (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.07) and by 0.77/21 (95% CI: -0.93 to -0.61) to FU2. Stress decreased from baseline to FU1 by 0.30/21 (95% CI: -0.52 to -0.09) and by 1.32/21 (95% CI: -1.55 to -1.09) to FU2. Students with pre-pandemic loneliness, poor sleep quality or pre-pandemic mental health problems did not have worse trajectories of mean mental health symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom levels were relatively stable during the first three months of the pandemic, while there was a slight decrease during the summer months, probably due to seasonality effects.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estudiantes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia/epidemiología , Universidades
13.
BMC Pediatr ; 21(1): 428, 2021 09 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although chronic pain is common in children with cerebral palsy (CP), little is known about short-term pain fluctuations and their impact on children's well-being. High-quality cohort studies are needed to understand the clinical course of pain in this population. We aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a multicentre cohort study. In this pilot study we assessed: 1) study processes, 2) resource and 3) management indicators including recruitment and follow-up rates, data completeness, participant characteristics, and successes and barriers in the study conduct. METHODS: A multi-centre pilot cohort study was conducted with 10 Canadian children/youth with CP attending one of two children's rehabilitation centers. We collected self-reported pain intensity (Faces Pain Scale-Revised [FPS-R], Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]); pain interference (PROMIS PI); pain location (pain diagram); physical and psychological well-being (KIDSCREEN-27), sleep characteristics, preceding months' interventions, and some clinical characteristics at baseline. Average pain intensity was reported weekly for five weeks. Well-being, sleep and interventions were measured at baseline and again at five weeks. We used feasibility indicators to evaluate:1) study processes (e.g. recruitment, attrition rates); 2) resources (e.g. data completion, budgetary challenges); and 3) management (e.g. data optimization, variability of participants and pain scores). RESULTS: Between March and May 2019, 24 children and their parents/guardians were contacted and 20 met eligibility criteria. Of those, 10 agreed to in-person screening (50%) and were subsequently enrolled. The follow-up rate was 90% and self-reported missing data was minimal. Ninety percent of participants chose e-questionnaire follow-ups versus mailed paper questionnaires. Sixty percent required reminders to complete e-follow-ups. Participants were aged 8-17 years, five were female, GMFCS levels I-IV (none with level V), 90% had spastic CP and 80% reported having pain in the preceding week. Pain intensity (FPS-R) between participants ranged from 0-8/10 at baseline and 0-6/10 across all four weekly follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a multicentre cohort study to identify short-term pain trajectories and measure their association with well-being in children and youth with CP. Additional strategies to improve recruitment and accessibility for those with GMFCS levels V should be implemented in future studies.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Dolor Crónico , Adolescente , Canadá , Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Parálisis Cerebral/diagnóstico , Niño , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 750, 2021 Jul 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34320964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of information about health education clinical file audits in the context of completeness of records and demonstrating program-wide competency achievement. We report on the reliability of an audit instrument used for electronic health record (EHR) audits in the clinics of a chiropractic college in Canada. METHODS: The instrument is a checklist built within an electronic software application designed to pull data automatically from the EHR. It consists of a combination of 61 objective (n = 20) and subjective (n = 41) elements, representing domains of standards of practice, accreditation and in-house educational standards. Trained auditors provide responses to the elements and the software yields scores indicating the quality of clinical record per file. A convenience sample of 24 files, drawn randomly from the roster of 22 clinicians, were divided into three groups of eight to be completed by one of three auditors in the span of 1 week, at the end of which they were transferred to another auditor. There were four audit cycles; audits from cycles 1 and 4 were used to assess intra-rater (test-retest) reliability and audits from cycles 1, 2 and 3 were used to assess inter-rater reliability. Percent agreement (PA) and Kappa statistics (K) were used as outcomes. Scatter plots and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients were used to assess standards of practice, accreditation, and overall audit scores. RESULTS: Across all 3 auditors test-retest reliability for objective items was PA 89% and K 0.75, and for subjective items PA 82% and K 0.63. In contrast, inter-rater reliability was moderate at PA 82% and K 0.59, and PA 70% and K 0.44 for objective and subjective items, respectively. Element analysis indicated a wide range of PA and K values inter-rater reliability of many elements being rated as poor. ICC coefficient calculations indicated moderate reliability for the domains of standards of practice, accreditation, and overall file scores. CONCLUSION: The file audit process has substantial test-retest reliability and moderate inter-rater reliability. Recommendations are made to improve reliability outcomes. These include modifying the audit checklist with a view of improving clarity of elements, and enhancing uniformity of auditor responses by increased training aided by preparation of an audit guidebook.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Canadá , Lista de Verificación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
15.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(5): 323-337, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33616241

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Roughly 10% of injured workers experience work injuries that result in permanent impairment and a permanent partial disability (PPD) award. This study aimed to characterize and quantify long-term employment outcomes for injured workers, by the degree of whole body impairment (WBI) and by participation in several workers' compensation (WC)-based return-to-work (RTW) programs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 43,968 Washington State workers were followed for up to 10 years after WC claim closure (2009-2017). Degree of impairment was classified as: (1) no PPD award, (2) PPD award with WBI < 10%, or (3) PPD award with WBI ≥ 10%. State wage files were used to construct employment outcomes for regression, modeling: (1) time to first RTW, (2) time to first RTW interruption, (3) RTW volatility, and (4) employment gaps. RESULTS: Wage patterns and employment outcomes differed significantly by the degree of impairment. Compared to other workers, workers with WBI ≥ 10% had delayed RTW, shorter average times to first RTW interruption, and higher rates of both RTW interruptions and quarters without wages. Time to first RTW averaged over a year, increasing with the degree of impairment. About 9% overall-and 27% of workers with ≥10% WBI-had no observed wages after claim closure. In adjusted models, workers with WBI ≥ 10% had significantly poorer employment outcomes, compared to workers with no PPD award (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: State wage files provide an efficient approach to identifying RTW patterns. Workers with permanent impairment were at substantially higher risk of poor employment outcomes. WC-based RTW programs may promote better employment outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral/economía , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/economía , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Washingtón/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(1): 13-25, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33210293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many injured workers are reinjured, but reinjury risk is challenging to quantify. Because many injured workers face delayed return-to-work, or return to part-time or intermittent jobs, a calendar timescale may overestimate actual work-time at risk, yielding underestimated reinjury rates. Objectives included determining: (1) reinjury risk by degree of permanent impairment and other factors, and (2) how choice of timescale affects reinjury estimates. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Washington State workers' compensation (WC) claims for 43,114 injured workers, linked to state wage files (2003-2018). Three timescales were used to define at-risk denominators: (1) calendar quarters; (2) quarters with any wages; and (3) full-time equivalent (FTE) quarters, defined as cumulative work hours ÷ 520. Associations between reinjury outcomes and worker, injury, job, and WC vocational rehabilitation program participation characteristics were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Overall reinjury rates were 5.9 per 100 worker-years using a calendar timescale (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8-6.0), 10.0 using any-wage quarters (95% CI: 9.9-10.2), and 12.5 using FTE quarters (95% CI: 12.3-12.7). Reinjury rates were highest in the first two quarters after initial injury, remaining elevated for about 4 years. Using FTE quarters, workers with ≥10% whole body impairment had a 34% higher risk of reinjury relative to workers with no permanent partial disability award (95% CI: 1.25-1.44); no difference was detected using calendar time. CONCLUSIONS: Timescale substantially affects reinjury estimates and comparisons between groups with differential return-to-work patterns. Linking wage data to WC claims facilitates measurement of long-term employment, yielding more accurate reinjury estimates.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Lesiones de Repetición/epidemiología , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadística como Asunto/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rehabilitación Vocacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Washingtón/epidemiología , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
17.
J Occup Rehabil ; 31(1): 219-231, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32651725

RESUMEN

Purpose The purpose of this study was to descriptively quantify experiences of injured workers with permanent impairment during their first year of work reintegration. Methods A representative survey was conducted to characterize health, disability, pain, employment, reinjury, and economic outcomes for 598 workers with permanent impairment who had returned to work during the year after workers' compensation claim closure. Survey responses were summarized by degree of whole body impairment (< 10% vs. ≥ 10%). Results Injured workers who had returned to work reported that permanent impairment made it difficult to get a job (47%) and to keep their job (58%). A year after claim closure, 66% reported moderate to very severe pain; 40% reported pain interference with work. About 13% reported new work injuries; over half thought permanent impairment increased their reinjury risk. Asked to compare current to pre-injury work status, workers with a higher degree of impairment more frequently reported working fewer hours (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.06, 2.42), earning less (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.04, 2.36), and being at higher risk of losing their current job due to their impairment (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.01, 2.71). Conclusions Injured workers with permanent impairment face long-term challenges related to health limitations, chronic pain, work reintegration, and economic impacts. Workers with a higher degree of impairment more frequently reported several economic and job security challenges. Developing workplace and workers' compensation-based interventions that reduce return-to-work interruption and reinjury for workers with permanent impairment should be prioritized as an important public health and societal goal.


Asunto(s)
Reinserción al Trabajo , Indemnización para Trabajadores , Adulto , Anciano , Empleo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recursos Humanos , Lugar de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
18.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(9): 637-647, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32636331

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this historical cohort study was to determine the claimant and prescriber factors associated with receiving opioids at first postinjury dispense compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs) in a sample of workers' compensation claimants with low back pain (LBP) claims between 1998 and 2009 in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Administrative workers' compensation, prescription and healthcare data were linked. The association between claimant factors (sociodemographics, occupation, diagnosis, comorbidities, pre-injury prescriptions and healthcare) and prescriber factors (sex, birth year, specialty) with drug class(es) at first dispense (opioids vs NSAIDs/SMRs) was examined with multilevel multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Increasing days supplied with opioids in the previous year was associated with increased odds of receiving opioids only (1-14 days OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.75; ≥15 days OR 5.12, 95% CI 4.65 to 5.64) and opioids with NSAIDs/SMRs (1-14 days OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.60; ≥15 days OR 2.82, 95% CI 2.56 to 3.12). Other significant claimant factors included: pre-injury dispenses for NSAIDs, SMRs, antidepressants, anticonvulsants and sedative-hypnotics/anxiolytics; International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 9th Revision diagnosis; various pre-existing comorbidities; prior physician visits and hospitalisations; and year of injury, age, sex, health authority and occupation. Prescribers accounted for 25%-36% of the variability in the drug class(es) received, but prescriber sex, specialty and birth year did not explain observed between-prescriber variation. CONCLUSIONS: During this period in the opioid crisis, early postinjury dispensing was multifactorial, with several claimant factors associated with receiving opioids at first prescription. Prescriber variation in drug class choice appears particularly important, but was not explained by basic prescriber characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Traumatismos de la Espalda/tratamiento farmacológico , Colombia Británica , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Indemnización para Trabajadores
19.
Occup Environ Med ; 77(7): 439-445, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32276968

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: High-risk opioid prescribing practices in workers' compensation (WC) settings are associated with excess opioid-related morbidity, longer work disability and higher costs. This study characterises the burden of prescription opioid-related hospitalisations among injured workers. METHODS: Hospital discharge data for eight states (Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, South Carolina, Utah and Washington) were obtained from the State Inpatient Databases, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. We calculated 5-year (2010-2014) average annual rates of prescription opioid overdose/adverse effect (AE) hospitalisations. Injured workers were identified using payer (WC) and external cause codes. RESULTS: State-level average annual prescription opioid overdose/AE hospitalisation rates ranged from 0.3 to 1.2 per 100 000 employed workers. Rates for workers aged ≥65 years old were two to six times the overall rates. Among those hospitalised with prescription opioid overdose/AEs, injured workers were more likely than other inpatients to have a low back disorder diagnosis, and less likely to have an opioid dependence/abuse or cancer diagnosis, or a fatal outcome. Averaged across states, WC was the primary expected payer for <1% of prescription opioid overdose/AE hospitalisations vs 6% of injury hospitalisations. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based estimates of prescription opioid morbidity are almost nonexistent for injured workers; this study begins to fill that gap. Rates for injured workers increased markedly with age but were low relative to inpatients overall. Research is needed to assess whether WC as payer adequately identifies work-related opioid morbidity for surveillance purposes, and to further quantify the burden of prescription opioid-related morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Indemnización para Trabajadores , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
20.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 55(8): 1041-1051, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32047973

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine differences in the return to work (RTW) process for workers' compensation claimants with psychological injuries compared to those with musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries. METHODS: We collected data from 869 workers' compensation claimants in Victoria, Australia, at three time points over a 12-month period (21% with psychological injury claims). RTW was assessed through self-report. Potential mediators were identified at the personal, health-care provider, workplace and system levels. The relationships between injury type, mediating factors and RTW were assessed using path analysis, with adjustment for confounders through inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: We observed better RTW outcomes for claimants with MSK injuries (compared to those with psychological injuries) at T1 and T2, but not at T3. We also observed differences between psychological injuries and MSK injuries and all but two of the mediating factors examined. These differences, in particular related to supervisor response to injury, consultative RTW planning and offers of accommodation, as well as differences in mental health symptoms, explained approximately two-thirds of differences in RTW between injury types at T1. Differences in RTW at T2 were explained by mediating factors, and differences in RTW at T1. CONCLUSION: Claimants with work-related psychological injuries experience a variety of challenges in RTW compared to those with MSK injuries. While treating and preventing further exacerbation of psychological symptoms should remain an important part of the rehabilitation process, other modifiable factors, in particular supervisor response to injury and consultative RTW planning and modified duties, should be prioritised to reduce inequalities in RTW across injury types.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Traumatismos Ocupacionales , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Reinserción al Trabajo , Victoria/epidemiología , Indemnización para Trabajadores
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA