Mental Health Trends in Patients With Symptomatic Macromastia After Reduction Mammoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic macromastia can significantly affect both physical and mental health. Although previous studies suggested that breast reduction (BR) improves quality of life and mental health conditions, they were limited to smaller sample sizes and largely based on survey feedback. This study aims to further assess the impact of BR on mental health outcomes, specifically looking at prescribing patterns for common antidepressants. METHODS: A national insurance-based database was utilized for data collection. Patients with a diagnosis of macromastia (ICD-10 N62) between the years 2010 and 2021 that either underwent bilateral BR (CPT 19318) or did not undergo BR were included in the study. Demographics and medical comorbidities were compared. Among those who underwent BR, preoperative and postoperative rates of mental health diagnoses and antidepressant use were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine variables associated with surgery. RESULTS: Patients with a history of macromastia with a history of BR were compared with those with a history of macromastia without BR. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the BR group reported a history of depression (48.5%), obesity (55.7%), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use (55.3%) when compared with that of the no-reduction group (46.3%, 50.8%, and 52.6%). Patients with history of depression and obesity were more likely to undergo BR (odds ratio of 1.11 and 1.31). Patients who underwent BR had significantly reduced rates of mental health outcomes including depression (38.6% to 27.4%), anxiety (4.3% to 3.1%), and SSRI or SNRI prescriptions (46.3% to 29.5%) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent BR for symptomatic macromastia showed significantly reduced rates of depression, anxiety, and most importantly, rates of SSRI/SNRI prescriptions postoperatively when compared to those who did not undergo BR for symptomatic macromastia.

One-Stage Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Salvage of Infected Tissue Expanders.

BACKGROUND: Tissue expander-based breast reconstruction is associated with high rates of infectious complications, often leading to tissue expander explants and delays in receipt of definitive breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy. In this study, we describe a single-stage technique where deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are used to salvage actively infected tissue expanders among patients originally planning for free flap reconstruction. METHODS: In this technique, patients with tissue expander infections without systemic illness are maintained on oral antibiotics until the day of their DIEP flap surgery, at which time tissue expander explant is performed in conjunction with aggressive attempt at total capsulectomy and immediate DIEP flap reconstruction. Patients are maintained on 1-2 weeks of oral antibiotics tailored to culture data. Patients undergoing this immediate salvage protocol were retrospectively reviewed, and complications and length of stay were assessed. RESULTS: In a retrospective series, a total of six consecutive patients with culture-proven tissue expander infections underwent tissue expander removal and DIEP flap reconstruction in a single stage and were maintained on 7-14 days of oral antibiotics postoperatively. Within this cohort, no surgical site infections, microvascular complications, partial flap losses, reoperations, or returns to the operating room were noted within a 90-day period. CONCLUSIONS: Among a select cohort of patients, actively infected tissue expanders may be salvaged with free flap breast reconstruction in a single surgery with a low incidence of postoperative complications. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the influence of this treatment strategy on costs, number of surgeries, and dissatisfaction after staged breast reconstruction complicated by tissue expander infections.

Perceptions of Surgical Drains among Breast Reconstruction Patients and Health Care Staff: A Qualitative Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical drains are a key component for recovery in breast reconstruction procedures. However, they are often cumbersome and carry a risk of infection with prolonged use. We aimed to develop a more thorough understanding of patient and health care provider perspectives on surgical drains, to inform future efforts in improving the breast reconstruction patient experience. METHODS: Twenty-nine breast reconstruction patients and eight plastic surgery providers were recruited to complete surveys focused on surgical drains. Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 were developed to gauge how bothersome drains felt, as well as concern for infection. Ordinal variable and categorical multiple-choice analyses were applied as appropriate. RESULTS: Fifteen (51.7%) patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and 14 (48.3%) patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. The most common duration of drain placement was 2 weeks (N = 13). The surgical site infection (SSI) rate requiring antibiotics was 28% (N = 8). On a scale of 1 to 5, both patients (median = 3) and providers (median = 2.5) viewed drains as bothersome. Patients were "frequently" concerned about infection risk (median = 3). Other high-frequency patient concerns included general pain and discomfort. CONCLUSION: Surgical drains are a common component of breast reconstruction procedures and are viewed as cumbersome by both patients and providers. Patients expressed concerns about drain site pain, discomfort, and tugging on clothing. Patients and providers both believed that drains could contribute to SSI. Overall, these data provide insight to drive future improvements in the patient drain experience.

Complications, Costs, and Healthcare Resource Utilization After Staged, Delayed, and Immediate Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Longitudinal, Claims-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus detailing the optimal approach to free-flap breast reconstruction when considering immediate, delayed, or staged techniques. This study compared costs, complications, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) across staged, delayed, and immediate free-flap breast reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study using MarketScan databases to identify women who underwent mastectomies and free-flap reconstructions between 2014 and 2018. Complications, costs, and HCRU [readmission, reoperation, emergency department (ED) visits] occurring 90 days after mastectomy and 90 days after free flap were compared across immediate, delayed, and staged reconstruction. RESULTS: Of 3310 women identified, 69.8% underwent immediate, 11.7% underwent delayed, and 18.5% underwent staged free-flap reconstruction. Staged reconstruction was associated with the highest rate (57.8% staged, 42.3% delayed, 32.0% immediate; p < 0.001) and adjusted relative risk [67% higher than immediate (95% CI: 49-87%; p < 0.001)] of surgical complications. Staged displayed the highest HCRU (staged 47.9%, delayed, 38.4%, immediate 25.2%; p < 0.001), with 16.5%, 30.7%, and 26.5% of staged patients experiencing readmission, reoperation, or ED visit, respectively. The adjusted probability of HCRU was 206% higher (95% CI: 156-266%; p < 0.001) for staged compared with immediate. Staged had the highest mean total cost (staged $106,443, delayed $80,667, immediate $76,756; p < 0.001) with regression demonstrating the adjusted mean cost for staged is 31% higher (95% CI: 23-39%; p < 0.001) when compared with immediate. CONCLUSIONS: Staged free-flap reconstruction is associated with increased complications, costs, and HCRU, while immediate demonstrated the lowest. The potential esthetic benefits of a staged approach should be balanced with the increased risk for adverse events after surgery.

Mapping Patient Encounters in Breast Cancer Care: An Analysis of 8800 Clinical Encounters Among Patients Undergoing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transitions toward value-based systems require a comprehensive definition of the complexity and duration of provider effort required for a given diagnosis. This study modeled the numbers of clinical encounters involved in various treatment pathways among breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS: Clinical encounters with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, breast surgeons, or plastic surgeons ≤4 years after diagnosis among all patients undergoing mastectomy from 2017 to 2018 were reviewed. Relative encounter volumes were modeled each 90-day period after diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 8807 breast cancer-related encounters from 221 patients were analyzed, with mean (SD) encounter volume 39.9 (27.2) encounters per patient. Most encounters occurred in the first year after diagnosis (70.0%), with years 2, 3, and 4 representing 15.8%, 9.1%, and 3.5% of encounters, respectively. Overall stage was associated with encounter volume, with higher encounter volume with increasing stage (stages 0: 27.4 vs I: 28.5 vs II: 48.4 vs III: 61.1 vs IV: 80.8 mean encounters). Body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 0.22), adjuvant radiation (OR, 6.8), and receipt of breast reconstruction (OR, 3.5) were also associated with higher encounter volume (all P 's < 0.01). Duration of encounter volume varied by treatment phases, with medical oncology and plastic surgery sustaining high clinical encounter volume 3 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Encounter utilization in breast cancer care persists 3 years after index diagnosis and is influenced by overall stage and treatment characteristics, including receipt of breast reconstruction. These results may inform the design of episode durations within value-based models and institutional resource allocation for breast cancer care.

Evaluating Disparities in Pathways to Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Rates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction have been shown to vary by racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors. In this study, we evaluated disparities across pathways toward breast reconstruction. METHODS: All women who underwent mastectomy for breast cancer at a single institution from 2017 to 2018 were reviewed. Rates of discussions about reconstruction with breast surgeons, plastic surgery referrals, plastic surgery consultations, and ultimate decisions to pursue reconstruction were compared by race/ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included, with the racial/ethnic demographic of 56% white, 28% Black, 1% American Indian/Native Alaskan, 4% Asian, and 4% Hispanic/Latina. The overall incidence of postmastectomy breast reconstruction was 48%, which varied by race (white: 58% vs. Black: 34%; p < 0.001). Plastic surgery was discussed by the breast surgeon with 68% of patients, and referrals were made in 62% of patients. While older age (p < 0.001) and nonprivate insurance (p < 0.05) were associated with lower rates of plastic surgery discussion and referral, it did not vary by race/ethnicity. The need for an interpreter was associated with lower rates of discussion (p < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, a lower reconstruction rate was associated with the Black race (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; p = 0.014) and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 (OR = 0.14; p < 0.001). Elevated BMI did not disproportionately lower breast reconstruction rates in Black versus white women (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Despite statistically equivalent rates of plastic surgery discussions and referrals, black women had lower breast reconstruction rates versus white women. Lower rates of breast reconstruction in Black women likely represent an amalgamation of barriers to care; further exploration within our community is warranted to better understand the racial disparity observed.

Dissatisfaction After Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is associated with improved patient well-being after mastectomy; however, factors that contribute to post-surgical dissatisfaction remain poorly characterized. METHODS: Adult women who underwent post-mastectomy implant-based or autologous breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding their lived experiences with reconstructive care. Participants completed the BREAST-Q, and tabulated scores were used to dichotomize patient-reported outcomes as satisfied or dissatisfied (high or low) for each BREAST-Q domain. A convergent mixed-methods analysis was used to evaluate interviews for content related to satisfaction or dissatisfaction with breast reconstruction. RESULTS: Overall, we interviewed 21 women and identified 17 subcodes that corresponded with the five BREAST-Q domains. Sources of dissatisfaction were found to be related to the following domains: (a) low breast satisfaction due to asymmetry, cup size, and lack of sensation and physical feeling (n = 8, 38%); (b) poor sexual well-being due to shape, look and feel (n = 7, 78% [of 9 who discussed sexual well-being]); (c) reduced physical well-being of the chest due to persistent pain and weakness (n = 11, 52%); (d) reduced abdominal well-being due to changes in abdominal strength, numbness, and posture (n = 6, 38% [of 16 who underwent abdominally based reconstruction]); and (e) low psychosocial well-being impacted by an unexpected appearance that negatively influenced self-confidence and self-identity (n = 13, 62%). CONCLUSION: Patients may be unprepared for the physical, sexual, and psychosocial outcomes of breast reconstruction. Targeted strategies to improve preoperative education and shared decision making are needed to mitigate unexpectedness associated with breast reconstruction and related outcomes.

The Association Between Metabolic Derangement and Wound Complications in Elective Plastic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of metabolically unhealthy obesity is rising nationally. In this study, we compare wound and overall complications between metabolically unhealthy obese and healthy patients undergoing elective plastic surgery and model how operative time influences a complication risk. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective breast and body plastic surgery procedures in the 2009-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) dataset were identified. Complications were compared between metabolically unhealthy obese (body mass index [BMI] > 30 with diabetes and/or hypertension) versus metabolically healthy obese patients (BMI > 30 without diabetes or hypertension). Logistic regression was used to model the probability of wound complications across operative times stratified by metabolic status. RESULTS: Of 139,352 patients, 13.4% (n = 18,663) had metabolically unhealthy obesity and 23.8% (n = 33,135) had metabolically healthy obesity. Compared to metabolically healthy patients, metabolically unhealthy patients had higher incidence of wound complications (6.9% versus 5.6%; P < 0.001) and adverse events (12.4% versus 9.6%; P < 0.001), in addition to higher 30-d readmission, returns to the operating room, and length of stay (all P < 0.001). After adjustment, BMI (Odds ratio [OR] 7.86), hypertension (OR 1.15), and diabetes (OR 1.25) were independent risk factors for wound complications (all P < 0.001). Among metabolically unhealthy patients, the operative time was log-linear with a wound complication risk (OR 1.21; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and hypertension are additive risk factors with obesity for wound complications in elective plastic surgery. Among patients with metabolically unhealthy obesity, a risk of wound complications increases logarithmically with operative time. This distinction with regard to metabolic state might explain the unclear impact of obesity on surgical outcomes within existing surgical literature.

Assessing the Influence of Failed Implant Reconstruction on Patient Satisfaction and Decision Regret after Salvage Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Free-flap breast reconstruction after failed implant reconstruction is associated with improved patient outcomes. How the level of satisfaction achieved compares between patients with and without previously failed implant reconstruction remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of prior failed implant-based reconstruction on long-term patient-reported outcomes after free-flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: All patients undergoing free-flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Patient satisfaction using the BREAST-Q and decisional regret using the Decision Regret Scale were compared between patients with and without a history of implant breast reconstruction. RESULTS: Overall, 207 patients were contacted and 131 completed the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale. A total of 23 patients had a history of failed implant-based reconstruction requiring free-flap-flap salvage, most commonly due to infection (39.1%), chronic pain (34.8%), capsular contracture (26%), and implant malposition (26.1%). Following definitive free-flap reconstruction, patients with prior failed implant reconstruction had significantly lower BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with breast (61.2 ± 16.7 vs. 70.4 ± 18.7; p = 0.04) and sexual well-being (38.5 ± 18.2 vs. 52.8 ± 24.7; p = 0.01) and reported higher decision regret (19.1 ± 18.6 vs. 9.6 ± 15.6, respectively). There were no significant differences for psychosocial well-being (p = 0.67), physical well-being (chest; p = 0.27), and physical well-being (abdomen; p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: A history of failed implant-based reconstruction is associated with reduced satisfaction and increased decision regret with the final reconstructive outcome. This data underscores the importance of appropriate patient selection at the initial consultation, and informed preoperative counseling regarding long-term outcomes in patients presenting for free-flap reconstruction after a failed implant-based reconstruction.

An Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Decisional Regret in Patients Undergoing Staged Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: In the setting of radiation therapy or significant medical comorbidities, free-flap breast reconstruction may be intentionally delayed or staged with tissue expander placement ("delayed-immediate" approach). The effect of a staged approach on patient satisfaction and decisional regret remains unclear. METHODS: All patients undergoing free-flap breast reconstruction (n = 334) between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Complication rates, patient satisfaction using the BREAST-Q, and decisional regret using the Decision Regret Scale were compared between patients undergoing immediate, delayed, and staged approaches. RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients completed the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale. BREAST-Q scores for psychosocial well-being (P = 0.19), sexual well-being (P = 0.26), satisfaction with breast (P = 0.28), physical well-being (chest, P = 0.49), and physical well-being (abdomen, P = 0.42) did not significantly vary between patients undergoing delayed, staged, or immediate reconstruction. Overall, patients experienced low regret after reconstruction (mean score, 11.5 ± 17.1), and there was no significant difference in regret scores by reconstruction timing (P = 0.09). Compared with normative BREAST-Q data, unlike immediate and delayed approaches, staged reconstruction was associated with lower sexual well-being (P = 0.006). Furthermore, a significantly higher infection rate was seen among staged patients (immediate 0%, delayed 5%, staged 20%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Staged free-flap breast reconstruction confers similar long-term satisfaction and decisional regret as immediate and delayed reconstruction but may be associated with worsened sexual well-being, when compared with normative data, and an increased risk of surgical site infection. When counseling patients regarding the timing of reconstruction, it is important to weigh these risks in the context of equivalent long-term satisfaction and decisional regret between immediate, delayed, and staged approaches.

The Essential Local Muscle Flaps for Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity reconstruction is often a challenging prospect with major implications on a patient's quality of life. For complex defects of the lower extremity, special consideration must be given to ensure suitable and durable coverage. In the following article, we present the essential local muscle flaps for lower extremity reconstruction and discuss guiding principles for the reconstructive surgeon to consider. METHODS: A thorough literature review was performed using PubMed to identify commonly used local muscle flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Common considerations for each identified flap were noted. RESULTS: The essential local muscle flaps for lower extremity reconstruction were identified and classified based on anatomical region of the defect to be reconstructed. General considerations and postoperative management were discussed to aid in operative decision making. CONCLUSION: While many factors must be taken into account when performing lower extremity reconstruction, there are numerous reliable local muscle flaps which can be used to successfully provide durable coverage for a variety of soft tissue defects of the lower extremity.

A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Bipedicled Total Abdominal versus Unipedicled Hemiabdominal Free Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: While bipedicled free flaps enable increased soft tissue volume and potential for contralateral symmetry in unilateral breast reconstruction, the influence of bipedicled flap reconstruction on patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: Patients undergoing unilateral free flap breast reconstruction at a single institution from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and sent the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale. Complication rates and the BREAST-Q and Decisional Regret Scale scores (0-100) were compared between patients receiving bipedicled total abdominal and unipedicled hemiabdominal free flaps. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients undergoing unilateral breast reconstruction completed the BREAST-Q and Decision Regret Scale with median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time of 32 [22-55] months. Compared with bipedicled flaps, patients receiving unipedicled hemiabdominal flaps had higher mean body mass index (BMI; p = 0.009) and higher incidence of fat grafting (p = 0.03) and contralateral reduction mammaplasties (p = 0.03). There was no difference in incidence of major or minor complications, abdominal hernias or bulges, or total operative time between bipedicled and unipedicled flaps (p > 0.05). Overall, BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with breast, sexual wellbeing, psychosocial wellbeing, physical wellbeing (chest), and physical wellbeing (abdomen) and the Decision Regret Scale scores did not significantly vary between bipedicled and unipedicled reconstructions (all p > 0.05). However, among large-breasted patients (≥C cup), mean (standard deviation [SD]) sexual wellbeing was significantly higher after bipedicled total abdominal free flap reconstruction ([60.2 (23.3) vs. 46.2 (22.0)]; p = 0.04), though this difference did not reach significance after multivariate adjustment. CONCLUSION: Unilateral breast reconstruction with bipedicled total abdominal free flaps results in similar complication risk, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret without the need for as many contralateral reduction procedures.

The Effect of Lavender Oil on Perioperative Pain, Anxiety, Depression, and Sleep after Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial distress, depression, or anxiety can occur in up to 50% of women after a breast cancer diagnosis and mastectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential benefit of lavender oil as a perioperative adjunct to improve anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep in women undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of 49 patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. Patients were randomized to receive lavender oil or placebo (coconut oil) throughout their hospitalization. The effect of lavender oil on perioperative stress, anxiety, depression, sleep, and pain was measured using the hospital anxiety and depression scale, Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, and the visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were assigned to the lavender group and 22 patients were assigned to the control group. No significant differences were seen in the perioperative setting between the groups with regard to anxiety (p = 0.82), depression (p = 0.21), sleep (p = 0.86), or pain (p = 0.30) scores. No adverse events (i.e., allergic reaction) were captured, and no significant differences in surgery-related complications were observed. When evaluating the entire cohort, postoperative anxiety scores were significantly lower than preoperative scores (p < 0.001), while depression scores were significantly higher postoperatively as compared with preoperatively (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: In the setting of microvascular breast reconstruction, lavender oil and aromatherapy had no significant adverse events or complications; however, there were no measurable advantages pertaining to metrics of depression, anxiety, sleep, or pain as compared with the control group.

Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Symptoms and Ergonomics Among Plastic Surgery Residents: Results of a National Survey and Analysis of Contributing Factors.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal symptoms and injuries among surgeons are underestimated but are increasingly recognized to constitute a major problem. However, it has not been established when symptoms start and what factors contribute to the development of symptoms. METHODS: A 19-question survey approved by our institution's review board, and American Council of Academic Plastic Surgery was sent to all plastic surgery residents enrolled in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited plastic surgery training programs in the United States. The presence of various musculoskeletal symptoms was calculated, and predictors of these symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS: We received 104 total responses. Ninety-four percent of residents had experienced musculoskeletal pain in the operating room. The neck was the most commonly affected area (54%) followed by the back (32%) and extremities (12%). Interestingly, 52% of responders developed these symptoms during the first 2 years of their residency. Furthermore, increasing postgraduate year level (P = 0.3) and independent versus integrated status (P = 0.6) had no correlation with pain, suggesting that symptoms began early in training.Pain symptoms were frequent for 47%, whereas 5% reported experiencing symptoms during every case. The use of a headlight correlated with frequent pain (odds ratio, 2.5; P = 0.027). The use of microscope and loupes did not correlate with frequent pain. Eighty-nine percent of responders were aware of having bad surgical posture, but only 22% had received some form of ergonomics training at their institution. Sixty-four percent of responders believe that the operating room culture does not allow them to report the onset of symptoms and ask for adjustments. This was more common among residents reporting frequent pain (odds ratio, 3.12; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic surgeons are at high risk for occupational symptoms and injuries. Surprisingly, symptoms start early during residency. Because residents are aware of the problem and looking for solutions, this suggests an opportunity for educational intervention to improve the health and career longevity of the next generation of surgeons.

Assessing the Influence of Attending Surgeon Continuity on Free Flap Outcomes Following Unplanned Returns to the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned returns to the operating room (OR) may be necessary at times to salvage a compromised free flap. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of attending surgeon continuity on free flap outcomes following a return to the OR. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent free flap reconstruction and experienced an unplanned return to the OR within 30 days from 2002 to 2017. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors that predict unplanned returns to the OR. RESULTS: Of the 1,177 patients were identified, 267 (22.5%) had an unplanned return to the OR. Of these, 69 (5.9%) patients experienced total flap loss. Overall, 216 take-back procedures were performed by the primary surgeons (80.2%), while 50 were performed by covering surgeons (18.8%). Flap loss occurred more frequently during a weekend procedure (p = 0.013). Additionally, when the take-back procedure was performed within 5 days of the original surgery by the primary as opposed to a covering surgeon, patients experienced lower estimated blood loss (75 vs. 150 cc, p = 0.04). Overall, there was a significantly lower incidence of flap loss when the take-back procedure was performed by the primary, as opposed to the covering, surgeon (20 vs. 47%, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Higher rates of flap loss occur when a covering surgeon performs a take-back procedure in comparison to the primary surgeon. It is important to ensure the availability of the primary surgeon in the first few postoperative days following free flap reconstruction. When transfer of care is necessary, photographic or video documentation of the microvascular anastomosis may be helpful in addition to a verbal sign out.

Content Validity of the LIMB-Q: A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Lower Extremity Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Limb-threatening lower extremity traumatic injuries can be devastating events with a multifaceted impact on patients. Therefore, evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in addition to traditional surgical outcomes is important. However, currently available instruments are limited as they were not developed specific to lower extremity trauma patients and lack content validity. The LIMB-Q is being developed as a novel PRO instrument to meet this need, with the goal to measure all relevant concepts and issues impacting amputation and limb-salvage patients after limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. METHODS: This is a qualitative interview-based study evaluating content validity for the LIMB-Q. Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent amputation, reconstruction, or amputation after failed reconstruction were recruited using purposeful sampling to maximize variability of participant experiences. Expert opinion was solicited from a variety of clinical providers and qualitative researchers internationally. Preliminary items and scales were modified, added, or removed based on participant and expert feedback after each round of participant interviews and expert opinion. RESULTS: Twelve patients and 43 experts provided feedback in a total of three rounds, with changes to the preliminary instrument made between each round. One scale was dropped after round one, one scale was added after round two, and only minor changes were needed after round three. Modifications, additions and removal of items, instructions, and response options were made after each round using feedback gathered. CONCLUSION: The LIMB-Q was refined and modified to reflect feedback from patients and experts in the field. Content validity for the LIMB-Q was established. Following a large-scale field test, the LIMB-Q will be ready for use in research and clinical care.

Adipose stem cell crosstalk with chemo-residual breast cancer cells: implications for tumor recurrence.

PURPOSE: Most triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients exhibit an incomplete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, resulting in chemo-residual tumor cells that drive tumor recurrence and patient mortality. Accordingly, strategies for eliminating chemo-residual tumor cells are urgently needed. Although stromal cells contribute to tumor cell invasion, to date, their ability to influence chemo-residual tumor cell behavior has not been examined. Our study is the first to investigate cross-talk between adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and chemo-residual TNBC cells. We examine if ASCs promote chemo-residual tumor cell proliferation, having implications for tumor recurrence. METHODS: ASC migration toward chemo-residual TNBC cells was tested in a transwell migration assay. Importance of the SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis was determined using neutralizing antibodies and a small molecule inhibitor. The ability of ASCs to drive tumor cell proliferation was analyzed by culturing tumor cells ± ASC conditioned media (CM) and determining cell counts. Downstream signaling pathways activated in chemo-residual tumor cells following their exposure to ASC CM were studied by immunoblotting. Importance of FGF2 in promoting proliferation was assessed using an FGF2-neutralizing antibody. RESULTS: ASCs migrated toward chemo-residual TNBC cells in a CXCR4/SDF-1α-dependent manner. Moreover, ASC CM increased chemo-residual tumor cell proliferation and activity of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). An FGF2-neutralizing antibody inhibited ASC-induced chemo-residual tumor cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: ASCs migrate toward chemo-residual TNBC cells via SDF-1α/CXCR4 signaling, and drive chemo-residual tumor cell proliferation in a paracrine manner by secreting FGF2 and activating ERK. This paracrine signaling can potentially be targeted to prevent tumor recurrence.

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway Implementation on Abdominal-Based Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways are becoming the standard of care in microvascular breast reconstruction, evidence supporting their use is limited or based on small sample sizes. We hypothesized that improvements in postoperative outcomes would persist when examining the largest cohort of patients undergoing abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstruction, to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed for 276 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction before and after ERAS implementation (pre-ERAS, n = 138 patients; post-ERAS, n = 138 patients). Primary outcomes were postoperative opioid use measured in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), median hospital length of stay (LOS) in days, and incidence of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Postoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower in the post-ERAS cohort compared with the pre-ERAS cohort (57.3 OME, [interquartile range 20.0-115.5] versus 297.3 OME [interquartile range 138.6-437.7], P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in hospital LOS when controlling for variables that differed between the groups. In addition, there were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications, return to operating room, or readmission after ERAS pathway implementation. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS improves specific aspects of recovery for patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction, most notably postoperative opioid use. Patient selection and a shift toward less invasive procedures may explain a nonsignificant impact on hospital LOS.

The Impact of Ergonomics on Recruitment to Surgical Fields: A Multi-Institutional Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Awareness of ergonomics in surgery is growing, but whether musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries in surgery influence trainee career choices remains unknown. This study aimed to characterize medical students' MSK pain during surgical rotations and determine whether ergonomics influence student interest in surgical fields. METHODS: An online survey was administered to medical students in North Carolina. Students were asked about specialty interest, MSK pain on surgical rotations, and deterrents from surgical fields. Students were exposed to literature about ergonomics in surgery then queried again about relative specialty interest (medical versus surgical). Differences in specialty interest before and after the exposure were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Of 243 participants, 44.0% were interested in pursuing a surgical specialty. Overall, 75.3% reported MSK pain during their surgical rotation, with the average daily pain score highest during surgery rotations compared to all other clinical rotations. The worst pain was reported in the feet and low back while "standing in the operating room" (81.2%) or "retracting" (59.4%). Among students initially interested in surgery but whose interest changed to a medical specialty during medical school, "physical demands of the field" was a common deterrent (36.4%). After exposure to literature regarding the incidence of MSK injuries in surgery, student interest in surgical fields on a 10-point scale significantly decreased (average -0.5 points; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: High incidence of MSK injury among surgeons may be one factor deterring medical students from surgical careers. Ergonomic interventions may be important both to improve surgeon longevity and maintain the surgical workforce.

Modeling Particle Emissions from Three-Dimensional Printing with Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene Polymer Filament.

An eddy diffusion model using data from a desktop three-dimensioanl (3D) printer was developed under laboratory conditions and then coupled with Monte Carlo analysis to estimate the potential range of particulate concentrations in and around various industrial-size 3D printers, in this case large additive manufacturing processes using acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymer feedstock. The model employed mass emission estimates determined from thermal gravimetric analysis and printer enclosure particle loss rates. Other model inputs included ranging terms for extrusion rate, temperature, print time, source-to-receiver distance, printer positions, particle size fraction, and environmental diffusivity estimates based on air changes per hour. Monte Carlo analysis bracketed measured environmental particulate concentrations associated with large-scale additive manufacturing processes (3D printing). Statistically, there was no difference between the average near-field particle concentrations measured and that of the model-derived average. However, the model began to vary more statistically, if not practically, from air-monitoring results in the far field. Diffusivity and extrusion rate emerged as the two most important variables in predicting environmental concentrations. This model can be used to estimate air concentrations over a range of varying conditions, such as one might employ in a "what if" type of evaluation to estimate employee exposure, for example, as a compliance effort with OSHA standard 29 CFR Part 1910.132, requiring a formal hazard assessment for work environments as a "before exposure" effort to determine if respiratory protection is needed.