Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 39(1): 50-4, 1999 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10099750

RESUMEN

This study was performed to improve our knowledge and understanding of the needs of women affected by female genital mutilation. We looked at the types of complications of these practices which present to a large metropolitan women's hospital in order to determine how we can appropriately treat and support affected women. This was an observational study of women from countries with a high prevalence of female genital mutilation who presented to the Royal Women's Hospital between October, 1995 and January, 1997. Fifty-one patients with a past history of female genital mutilation who were attending the hospital for antenatal or gynaecological care consented to participate in the study. We found that 77.6% of women identified as having had female genital mutilation had undergone infibulation. More than 85% of the women in our study reported a complication of the procedure. The major complications were dyspareunia, apareunia and urinary tract infections; 29.4% of these women required surgery to facilitate intercourse. In our study group there was no difference in Caesarean section rates between the women who had previously delivered in Australia compared with those who had delivered in Africa. Women who have had a female genital mutilation procedure have specific needs for their care which present challenges to both their general practitioners and obstetrician/gynaecologists. These women have significant complications related to their procedure including social and psychosexual problems which require sympathetic management.


Asunto(s)
Circuncisión Femenina/efectos adversos , Emigración e Inmigración , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto , África Oriental/etnología , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Circuncisión Femenina/clasificación , Circuncisión Femenina/métodos , Circuncisión Femenina/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispareunia/etiología , Emigración e Inmigración/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Victoria
2.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 40(2): 180-4, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10925906

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to develop an accurate formula for the ultrasonic prediction of fetal weight for infants < 33 weeks gestational age and < or = 1500 g birthweight. The subjects comprised live births free of lethal malformations or chromosomal anomalies, < 33 weeks gestational age and with birthweights +/- 1500 g born in the Royal Women's Hospital between January 1990 and March 1996. All subjects had accurate gestational age confirmed by ultrasound prior to 20 weeks gestation and ultrasound measurements within 72 hours of birth of biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL) and abdominal circumference (AC). A formula with the highest explained variance was computed by linear regression analysis using the three fetal variables in various combinations from 54 infants born between January 1990 and December 1993. The optimal formula was: Log(10)birthweight = 0.714627 + 0.077362.AC + 0.058758.BPD + 0.287037.FL - 0.011274.AC.FL. The new formula was more accurate compared with existing formulae when tested in a separate cohort of 39 infants born between January 1994 and March 1996.


Asunto(s)
Peso Fetal , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Lineales , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA