ADAMDEC1 induces EMT and promotes colorectal cancer cells metastasis by enhancing Wnt/ß-catenin signaling via negative modulation of GSK-3ß.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly invasive malignant tumor with pronounced proliferation capacity and is prone to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and subsequent metastasis. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-like decysin 1 (ADAMDEC1) is a proteolytically active metzincin metalloprotease that is involved in extracellular matrix remodeling, cell adhesion, invasion, and migration. However, the effects of ADAMDEC1 on CRC are unclear. This study was conducted to investigate the expression and biological role of ADAMDEC1 in CRC. We found that ADAMDEC1 was differentially expressed in CRC. Further, ADAMDEC1 was found to enhance CRC proliferation, migration, and invasion while inhibiting apoptosis. Exogenous ADAMDEC1 overexpression elicited EMT in CRC cells, as evidenced by alterations in E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin expression. In ADAMDEC1 knockdown or ADAMDEC1 overexpressed CRC cells, the western blotting analysis revealed that Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway-related proteins were down-regulated or up-regulated. Furthermore, an inhibitor of the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway (FH535) partially negated the effect of ADAMDEC1 overexpression on EMT and CRC cell proliferation. Further mechanistic research suggested that ADAMDEC1 knockdown may upregulate GSK-3ß and inactivate the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway, accompanied by suppressing the expression of ß-catenin. Additionally, the blocker of GSK-3ß (CHIR-99021) markedly abolished the inhibitory effect of ADAMDEC1 knockdown on Wnt/ß-catenin signaling. Our results indicate that ADAMDEC1 promotes CRC metastasis by negatively regulating GSK-3ß, activating the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway, and inducing EMT, presenting its potential as a therapeutic target for the treatment of metastatic CRC.

Knockdown of NF-κB activating protein promotes pancreatic cancer growth and metastasis through mTOR signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: NF-κB activating protein (NKAP) acts as a transcriptional suppressor in the Notch signaling pathway, It plays a role in hematopoiesis maintenance, immune cell development, maturation, and functional competency acquisition. NKAP has been found to act as an oncogene in many tumors, but it has not been reported in PAAD.The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of NKAP on the growth and metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma(PAAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, western blot and qRT-PCR showed that highly expressed NKAP was found in PAAD cell lines, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) was employed to reduce the expression of NKAP in PAAD cell lines. The results of CCK-8, clony formation, Transwell and flow cytometry showed that knockdown of NKAP significantly inhibited biological function of PAAD cells, and increased cell apoptosis. Study also observed that knockdown of NKAP inhibited the expression levels of apoptosis proteins and cyclin in PAAD cells. In addition, mTOR's degree of phosphorylation and the expression of its downstream target p70S6K can both be activated by NKAP. This effect was also confirmed in salvage experiments performed with Rapamycin(RaPa), an inhibitor of mTOR. At the end of the experiment, It was investigated how NKAP affected the drug sensitivity of gemcitabine used to treat PAAD. The results showed that knocking down NKAP could increase the drug sensitivity of gemcitabine. CONCLUSIONS: NKAP as an oncogene regulates the development of PAAD cells. The research found that the mTOR signaling pathway is engaged in the oncogenic role of NKAP in PAAD for the first time.

Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations between primary tumors and lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer: a review and meta-analysis of published data.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can predict the clinical response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. However, EGFR mutations may be different in primary tumors (PT) and metastatic lymph nodes (MLN). The aim of this study was to compare EGFR mutations between PT and the corresponding MLN in NSCLC patients, and provide some guidelines for clinical treatment using TKI therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed with several research databases. Relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to investigate the EGFR mutation status between PT and the corresponding MLN. A random-effects model was used. RESULTS: 9 publications involving 707 patients were included in the analysis. It was found that activation of EGFR mutations identified in PT and the corresponding MLN was 26.4% (187/707) and 19.9% (141/707), respectively. The overall discordance rate in our meta-analysis was 12.2% (86/707). The relative risk (RR) for EGFR mutation in PT relative to MLN was 1.33 (95%CI: 1.10-1.60; random-effects model). There was no significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2=5%, p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: There exists a considerable degree of EGFR mutation discrepancy in NSCLC between PT and corresponding MLN, suggesting that tumor heterogeneity might arise at the molecular level during the process of metastasis.